This is topic Mass Destruction in lefthand in forum Land Use Issues at Colorado4x4 Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.colorado4x4.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=000087

Posted by stuart (Member # 499) on September 30, 2003 07:08 PM :
 
I just got my colorado association paper today and in it was this letter.

Someone who trenched and bulldozed the road and destroyed over one hundred trees in the process destroyed the road out to Fairview peak in the lefthand network of roads. We are looking for anyone who has information or has seen any of this activity of damage that was done while 4-wheeling in the area.

If anyone has info email me at jjunkies1@comcast.com
 

Posted by BoulderBronco (Member # 1603) on September 30, 2003 07:25 PM :
 
Yeah, heard about that. What a &*$#@!* ^#*&@ $^@* *$& *%^hole.
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on September 30, 2003 07:25 PM :
 
Lefthand pics
 

Posted by coiledcj7 (Member # 1211) on September 30, 2003 07:31 PM :
 
Just a note I am apart of the colorado four wheel drive association and I have heard alot of times that boulder is going to close the area down and not let anyone 4-wheel in the lefthand canyon area or carnage canyon. All I can say is we realy need to be carefull at this time on what damage we do. The realy want to close the roads badly.
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on September 30, 2003 07:37 PM :
 
boulder would have a hard time since it is forest service land and they want it open
 

Posted by ahhjaws (Member # 1888) on September 30, 2003 09:35 PM :
 
Dang these people, thats just sick! Someone has to know something! I would think it would be obvious if something that big went up there.
 

Posted by Andy (Member # 1243) on September 30, 2003 09:40 PM :
 
Let me get this straight, they are looking for some who was four-wheeling and may have seen who did this right...

They're not trying to claim that this was done by four-wheeler's are they? That's insane! I think I can speak for all of us when I say I don't "wheel" a bulldozer and dynamite tree-trunks, this was somebody looking to block off a trail, not somebody blazing a one. [Roll Eyes]
 

Posted by Butt Head (Member # 2073) on September 30, 2003 10:05 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Andy:
Let me get this straight, they are looking for some who was four-wheeling and may have seen who did this right...

They're not trying to claim that this was done by four-wheeler's are they? That's insane! I think I can speak for all of us when I say I don't "wheel" a bulldozer and dynamite tree-trunks, this was somebody looking to block off a trail, not somebody blazing a one. [Roll Eyes]

Thats exactly what thier claiming.
http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html
 

Posted by Malamute (Member # 164) on September 30, 2003 10:17 PM :
 
These people actually start to believe their own lies.

Just because they may not view "rock crawling" as a "family" activity doesn't mean others do not.

I get sick of assholes(environmentalists or otherwise) who think they should define what I or others enjoy to do.

I don't like granola, Birkenstocks or hugging baby seals, but I don't really care if others enjoy those things and persue them. Why is it these people want OHV's out of these areas so much? I honestly don't believe it has as much to do with the environment as they would like us to believe.

After reading that page you'd think Vernon was the devil. BTW, Vernon, I don't know if you'd call it lible, slander or what, but the words they print about you should not be taken lightly if they don't have some kind of proof.

Man these people really frustrate me.
 

Posted by Jmyrigdfj (Member # 181) on September 30, 2003 10:26 PM :
 
quote:
It is too early to make accusations about who did this
quote:
On Sunday, June 25, 2000, Vernon and his vigilantes destroyed dozens of trees on the Balarat Creek Ranch, and then tried to blame it on the owners.
WTF how can a writer make the first statement, and then follow up with the second statement????????? That article is rediculouse no wonder people look at 4wheelers in such a bad light with these kind of articles being written
 

Posted by ahhjaws (Member # 1888) on September 30, 2003 10:28 PM :
 
Keep us all updated guys!
 

Posted by Mr Zed (Member # 1524) on September 30, 2003 10:28 PM :
 
Freaky bunch of misinformation in that page...
 

Posted by Mcstiff (Member # 160) on October 01, 2003 12:44 AM :
 
I hate it when I am affected by other peoples personal problems with each other. I hope this "feud" does not cause the loss of more trails.
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 01:40 AM :
 
Oh man. I was already to go to sleep until I skimmed through that page. What fricking morons.

I'm not too experienced in this kind of stuff, but its kinda like going after Capone on tax evasion just to get him on something. They are using many pictures on their site and it is quite obvious the owner of that site is not the owner of said pic. Wouldn't the owners of said pics be able to use copyright laws to have those pics removed from that site since they are more than likely being used without permission from the owner of the photograph?
 

Posted by Mcstiff (Member # 160) on October 01, 2003 02:22 AM :
 
thats a great idea
 

Posted by Mystikal (Member # 379) on October 01, 2003 08:20 AM :
 
can it be proved though the true owner of the pictures?
 

Posted by xjSLATE (Member # 2569) on October 01, 2003 08:38 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mystikal:
can it be proved though the true owner of the pictures?

BCC posted those pics a few weeks ago.
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 08:48 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mystikal:
can it be proved though the true owner of the pictures?

The owner of the pic is the one who took the picture. Obviously that person would have to get involved, but it shouldn't be too hard to prove. It may take a lot of effort for a little results though, I really have no clue what it would take.
 

Posted by Breck4x4-John McCallister (Member # 1207) on October 01, 2003 08:52 AM :
 
just got back from Boslough (sp?) site, if you right click on the pic and select properties the pic is just a link to http://www.back-countrycolorado.com/photo_album/Trail_block4.jpg . Mark is not even smart enough to save the pic then upload it to his server. Since wee all know that Mark/Knobbybobby [Flipoff] still lurks here the whole premise for the info on that site is stolen from here, just spun to refect badly on us.

edit- link corrected, still the same as right-clicking on pic @ Site and selecting properties.

[ October 01, 2003, 09:38 AM: Message edited by: Breck4x4-John McCallister ]
 

Posted by XJ-HIGHLANDER (Member # 1854) on October 01, 2003 09:21 AM :
 
Granolaville aka Boulder,

"Hmmmmmm, let's see here......to keep people out of this area we should DOZE down trees as to minimize enviromental impact."

Smart....


Bark Eatin Tree Hugger wannabe Hippies....
 

Posted by ImNotDave (Member # 2649) on October 01, 2003 09:23 AM :
 
If the pictures are copyrighted, yes, the owner can take legal action. If they're public domain (posted on the web without copyright), then the owner has no claim to them.
 

Posted by Mike Holmes (Member # 196) on October 01, 2003 09:25 AM :
 
vernon,

you are going to have one hell of a libel suit against knob bob when this is all over with. the fabrications he presents as facts will be his noose.

i PERSONALLY think knob bob did this. afterall " Sometimes eco-terrorism is o.k.," (according to the website). i am sure in his warped, crazier than a shithouse rat, mind he was justified.

MH
 

Posted by Murfman (Member # 441) on October 01, 2003 09:35 AM :
 
last link is not working!
 

Posted by Breck4x4-John McCallister (Member # 1207) on October 01, 2003 09:42 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Murfman:
last link is not working!

Link Corrected- [Flipoff2]
 

Posted by Yeeper (Member # 876) on October 01, 2003 09:45 AM :
 
Hey Vernon! This dude is totally slandering your name across the internet! Isn't that against the law!?
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 09:45 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ImNotDave:
If the pictures are copyrighted, yes, the owner can take legal action. If they're public domain (posted on the web without copyright), then the owner has no claim to them.

Good point. I don't see anything on his site saying all pics are copyrighted and property of XYZ on there. Maybe BCC could provide some info for us, or possibly just change the file names so the remote hosting wont work anymore.
 

Posted by rich (Member # 435) on October 01, 2003 10:22 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Yeeper:
Hey Vernon! This dude is totally slandering your name across the internet! Isn't that against the law!?

Yeah, and anyone who's a member of this site is a "vigilante" according to them. Many of their links lead to here.
 

Posted by jumpinNrollin (Member # 783) on October 01, 2003 11:11 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ImNotDave:
If the pictures are copyrighted, yes, the owner can take legal action. If they're public domain (posted on the web without copyright), then the owner has no claim to them.

Actually that is not quite true. Copyright law asumes that the copyright is granted at the time of creation. It does not actually take anything else unless you are going to try to prove the ownership. If you have an original and can prove it is an original and, is yours then that is all there is to it. Yes you can apply for a copyright but it does you no good as far as "proof". If another person can prove that it is their's they win copyright or not.
 

Posted by Trango (Member # 264) on October 01, 2003 11:15 AM :
 
This is libel, or written defamation, and is "actionable" under our legal system.

http://injury-law.freeadvice.com/libel_and_slander/defamatory_statements.htm

Also, I cannot believe the hypocrisy and pure pathological lying that this "side" is presenting. Weird. All we want to do is drive on trails that don't get paved, which is often less harmful and intrusive to areas than paved roads. Why don't these people go blow up a tunnel on Boulder Canyon or something? If their motive is to stop people from accessing forest lands, that would surely be the strongest and most effective action around. And are they not aware that WE, not THEM, clean up trails? When I read this sort of fanatacism, it just shouts irrationality to me.

I'm so sorry, Vernon. These people have no honor, and are clearly delusional. I'm sorry that your name is their firebrand.

Bob
 

Posted by jumpinNrollin (Member # 783) on October 01, 2003 11:23 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
quote:
Originally posted by ImNotDave:
If the pictures are copyrighted, yes, the owner can take legal action. If they're public domain (posted on the web without copyright), then the owner has no claim to them.

Good point. I don't see anything on his site saying all pics are copyrighted and property of XYZ on there. Maybe BCC could provide some info for us, or possibly just change the file names so the remote hosting wont work anymore.
Actually the "page" is copyrighted down at the bottom "Copyrighted 2001 Colorado 4X4.org". Changing the names would stop them for awhile until they noticed the names were changed and they get the new name. There are several things that can be done to limit the use of the pics but have to be done at the server level (hint: hsdata, cgi-bin files, name translation script and other means). Who ever took the pics can go after them and the CO4X4 site could also go after them for site content usage without permissions as it currently stands. Vernon, if it was me... this guy would get formally introduced to my attorney with a cease and disist order with a retraction and slander suit.
 

Posted by Mcstiff (Member # 160) on October 01, 2003 11:34 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ImNotDave:
If the pictures are copyrighted, yes, the owner can take legal action. If they're public domain (posted on the web without copyright), then the owner has no claim to them.

Art it automatically copyrighted to the creator untill it is sold. Photography is art.
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 01, 2003 11:35 AM :
 
The photo used on his site belongs to my company, BCC. I have written the email below asking him to remove it.....and then some.


quote:
I notice on your site, http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html , you utilize a photo which is property of my company, Backcountry Colorado... http://www.back-countrycolorado.com/photo_album/Trail_block4.jpg. I am requesting that you remove the photo from your website. If, in the future, you wish to use photos belonging to me or Backcountry Colorado, simply contact me at the address below.

Just so you are aware of the situation up in the Fairview Peak area, I hiked the trail and found the felled trees and excavated ditches and then photographed them. The ONLY, I repeat ONLY reason for someone to destroy OUR PUBLIC forest and block posted USFS roads/trails in this manner is to prevent access to these areas. The USFS is currently conducting an investigation into this matter. Information I have received, from the MOST credible source, indicates that it was, in fact, done by someone OUTSIDE OF the local OHV/4-wheel drive community. Also, as a proponent of both OHV use and forest conservation (yes, they can in-fact be pursued concurrently), I find the information contained in your website quite biased and mis-leading.


Respectfully,

Ray Greco, owner
Backcountry Colorado
www.Back-CountryColorado.com


 

Posted by hjeepxj (Member # 1270) on October 01, 2003 11:45 AM :
 
dang man! this site: http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html

makes us sound like we are a gorrilla warfare army

I bet some stupid wannabe hippies did this, trying to prevent us from wheeling there, when in reality, they have nothing to hug anymore! [Big Grin]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 11:56 AM :
 
Ray,
Well put in your email/letter. Strong enough to get your point across, but not antagonistic(sp??). Let us know if you hear back from them!
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 11:58 AM :
 
Checked the rest of the pics on the page and they're all hosted on HoboJeepers or MHJC sites. If someone from those organizations could send a similar notice as Ray to these dorks that might help too.

EDIT: only the pics involving four-wheeling are hosted on these sites, but without those pics that site loses its effect entirely.

[ October 01, 2003, 12:04 PM: Message edited by: Big Dave ]
 

Posted by Breck4x4-John McCallister (Member # 1207) on October 01, 2003 12:03 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Backcountry Colorado:
The photo used on his site belongs to my company, BCC. I have written the email below asking him to remove it.....and then some.


quote:
I notice on your site, http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html , you utilize a photo which is property of my company, Backcountry Colorado... http://www.back-countrycolorado.com/photo_album/Trail_block4.jpg. I am requesting that you remove the photo from your website. If, in the future, you wish to use photos belonging to me or Backcountry Colorado, simply contact me at the address below.

Just so you are aware of the situation up in the Fairview Peak area, I hiked the trail and found the felled trees and excavated ditches and then photographed them. The ONLY, I repeat ONLY reason for someone to destroy OUR PUBLIC forest and block posted USFS roads/trails in this manner is to prevent access to these areas. The USFS is currently conducting an investigation into this matter. Information I have received, from the MOST credible source, indicates that it was, in fact, done by someone OUTSIDE OF the local OHV/4-wheel drive community. Also, as a proponent of both OHV use and forest conservation (yes, they can in-fact be pursued concurrently), I find the information contained in your website quite biased and mis-leading.


Respectfully,

Ray Greco, owner
Backcountry Colorado
www.Back-CountryColorado.com


 -
Hopefully this will curtail the some of the assault on Vernon & MHJC.
The idea that anyone who uses this area for recreation was behind the destruction/blocking of the trail is asinine. [Mad]

Good Luck Ray [Thumbsup]
John
 

Posted by Trango (Member # 264) on October 01, 2003 01:33 PM :
 
I would also forward that email to the ISP, since they are providing a harbor for your stolen photographs.
 

Posted by hjeepxj (Member # 1270) on October 01, 2003 02:05 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trango:
I would also forward that email to the ISP, since they are providing a harbor for your stolen photographs.

good idea!

[Bounce]

Keep us updated boys!
 

Posted by SSII (Member # 29) on October 01, 2003 02:14 PM :
 
Well, it sure as hell looks like to me that Vern and the Mile High Jeep Club has a couple of legs to stand on for a Slander suit. Get them! That crap I read was nothing but B.S. [Mad]
 

Posted by SNOWMAN (Member # 1822) on October 01, 2003 02:23 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SSII:
Well, it sure as hell looks like to me that Vern and the Mile High Jeep Club has a couple of legs to stand on for a Slander suit. Get them! That crap I read was nothing but B.S. [Mad]

We wish it was that easy. Pursueing a suit like that costs alot of money. [Frown]

Trango has a good point about the pics though. I'm sure that would be a relatively free angle to grind. Good thing he's got his thinkin fro on. haha.
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 01, 2003 02:59 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SSII:
Well, it sure as hell looks like to me that Vern and the Mile High Jeep Club has a couple of legs to stand on for a Slander suit. Get them! That crap I read was nothing but B.S. [Mad]

This is by far the best option! This would be a class action suit considering it characterizes the entire 4-wheeling community! The Mile Hi Jeep Club would be intitled to the largest amount if any considering they are the most bashed in that article. They say that the wheeling community is just a bunch of high priced pricks in highly modified vehicles! I think that most of the members of this board would be offended by the comments stated on that web sight. But slander and depravation of character are the first that come to mind. As for chasing down ISP's over pictures is a waste of time IMHO. There is enough photos of 4X4's on the entire web to keep his sight going for years. If everyone that is or was offended or characterized in a fashion that is false and or causes harm (physical or emotional) would be part of a class action suit. If those people all got together and paid say $100 each that would be more than enough to pay for any suit! The owner of that site claims to be a native of more then 100 years and is a good ol boy with little money (at least that is the way I read it) and would not be able to finacialy handle a court battle and would be forced to close his site or re-write it with the truth! But it will come down to the first amendment "freedom of speech" but his comments are clearly slanderous and incorrect, we would just have to prove that. That wouldn't be that hard to prove!
 

Posted by honney (Member # 310) on October 01, 2003 03:33 PM :
 
I find it funny that they bash Vernon and others for encouraging "unstacking" rocks, saying this practice prevents access to the elderly and ranchers who own the land, but then they clearly want roads closed to OHV users.

So, which is it? Stack rocks so all can access, or close roads to the "evil" OHV recreationists? Maybe Knobby would stop fighting Barking Dog if we promised to stack lots of rocks [Laugh]

The pictures of the alleged oil spill crack me up, they're just pictures of Jeeps sitting on the trail. They prove nothing.

Also the pic at the bottom of Greg Mackey with his front end in the air proves nothing; I guess they're trying to convince soccer moms we're all reckless (not that that picture conveys anything reckless IMO, and certainly less dangerous than that same soccer mom talking on the cell phone while her kids roughhouse in the back of her Yukon on I-25).

As for the pics, you guys are nit-picking and showing the eco-freaks they can get a rise out of us/you. Just change the link to the pics, that'll throw 'em off and be more comical. Their nifty website can come up with a bunch of red X's (since they're not smart enough to save the pics to their own server).
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 03:36 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by honney:


As for the pics, you guys are nit-picking and showing the eco-freaks they can get a rise out of us/you. Just change the link to the pics, that'll throw 'em off and be more comical. Their nifty website can come up with a bunch of red X's (since they're not smart enough to save the pics to their own server).

Light Bulb!!

<edited to remove an idea that needs to be kept private/confidential>

[ October 01, 2003, 04:03 PM: Message edited by: Big Dave ]
 

Posted by Mike Holmes (Member # 196) on October 01, 2003 03:55 PM :
 
<editted to go along with big dave's idea>

[ October 01, 2003, 04:11 PM: Message edited by: Mike Holmes ]
 

Posted by gmule (Member # 1264) on October 01, 2003 04:00 PM :
 
Message deleted

[ October 01, 2003, 04:17 PM: Message edited by: gmule ]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 01, 2003 04:02 PM :
 
D'OH!!! I'll edit it out. BCC, I'm shooting you a PM regarding my post that I will soon be editing for content.
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 01, 2003 04:05 PM :
 
Mile hi needs to change the pics, Backcoutry Colorado needs to change the pics! If you guys change the pics he has no ammo!!
 

Posted by Mike Holmes (Member # 196) on October 01, 2003 04:12 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
D'OH!!! I'll edit it out. BCC, I'm shooting you a PM regarding my post that I will soon be editing for content.

i was hoping you would see my reply quickly and edit your message and send a PM instead. great idea. [Big Grin]
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 01, 2003 05:17 PM :
 
i think that some of you are closer to the truth then you might think
at this point i feel really bad for boshlough and his family. he obviously has a bad problem. as far as a suit. which cost less liable or the road is public. in this country and boulder in particular, it is not about whats right or just, it is about who has the most money. at more then 200/hour a lawyer to chase after either is outa my legue and boslough the lier knows it. doesnt bother me a whole lot since he and i both know that he is wrong.(just a reminder to all includeing mark. i sat in an office with this clown and his brother and their lawyer, by the end of the day they were all setin perty low in the saddle and not a one of them had any doubt that the road was public and that if i ended up in front of a judge with my information that the judge would rule that way also. in fact i told his lawyer to show me just one item that would show that the road was not public and his lawyer could not. from that point on they have made as many motions as they could to stay clear of a court hearing in the case that they are in right now,not to mention leaning on an elderly man that just wants access) it just gets to him so badly that he has gone off the deep end. the news paper articles are nothing more then his side and total bias from the news folks since none of em talk with me.(hes looking for public oppinion and lieing to get the sympathy he seeks.) and the ones that have have choosein not to even quote me correctly. it all too obvious to all that this is very personal and getting more so with him on a dayly bases. how much time do you spoze he devotes to this will being paid by taxpayer funds?


just a little heads up mark---- it was 6 months ago that i posted the equipment needed for the removal of your illegal obstructions not a couple days prior to the dammage up at fairview and from what i understand the damage acured musch earlier then my post reinterating that i was going to use a backhoe and not a bulldozer (your and idiot !!)
btw all i find it funny that sunday a friend asked me if i had been acused yet. i wont tell you the possition of the friend but the laughter is perty sweet.
the more time passes and this boslough clown keeps it up the less credable he is . he has totally ruined any believability he had with most of the folks that mean something up there.
if i could inlist the help of the group id like to continue to raise funds to get in front of a judge on the barking dog issue. paypal is set up under brandtv@wwdb.org
checks can be sent to po box 97 windsor co 80550 and made out to john henderson (the lawyer)
i would appreciate the help to the end that the road is again usable by us all.
mhjc btw has stuff in the works to take boslough to court for liable /slander/cry baby stuff
so sad that they wont put that money toward the rod case. all they care is that folks "think" that mile high is "good" they have left me high and dry- in fact i liken it to we walked up to a cliff with the agreement that we would both go over and then the said "jump" i jumped and they stayed safe on the top of the cliff.
btw mark dues were due in june and i have not even been a member since june. in other words i was asked by members of the club to join around sept/oct of last year and payed for a full year which was up in may. just looks like someone has not updated that page but i assue you that gregg/maxx/neil disconnected me from the club site as soon as they got the chance. i had offer to report on the state and cohvco meetings since at the time a had the time available to attend those. i have never been a rep of cohvco. i attend their meetings and support them where i can
so go back and re edit your site yet again. its amazeing how often mark has to go back and change the places that hes wrong. which of course sould further call his credability to question
as for my credability mark. the rangers and the sheriff and the folks at the county that i have dealt with know that i would never do the damage that was done up at fairview without first makeing sure that i had the legal right to do it. unlike the person that will spend time in federal prison for the work done on fairview
and just a reminder---- i am going to remove all of your obstructions and drive on the road knows as barking dog/balarat road/county road 87
ill post the pictures for you also
THE ROAD IS A PUBLIC ROAD

[ October 01, 2003, 05:26 PM: Message edited by: vb ]
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 01, 2003 05:43 PM :
 
btw mark
who in their right mind would even come up with the idea that on one side of a hill that i would go through so much for a public road and then on the other side of the same hill that i would do all that damage to close off a public road?
please reserface and conect those dots for us.
i have no doubt i my mind that you yourself had something to do with all the damage up on fairview. not sure if you drove the trachoe but i know that you are being looked at very hard for your involvement in this.
 

Posted by ahhjaws (Member # 1888) on October 01, 2003 06:11 PM :
 
I'd help out any way I could finacially or otherwise.
 

Posted by Hobo Willy (Member # 95) on October 01, 2003 08:17 PM :
 
FYI: [Mad]

I posted the Barking Dog trip report way back in June of 1999. It was actually my 1st report posted on our site (I have done over 200 since then,,,see our sitemap). All we (HoboJeepers) did--was attend the trip, and I did a report on it. I have been the webmaster since 99.

I dispise the fact that they are using our patrol logo from our site (this is our own site, not part of MHJC's website--even though we are Patrol 1 in the club). Also, the fact he is linking both photos off my site. [Mad2]

I once changed some text to reflect what we did in the field (what really happened at the trail fix----repair of oil plug and cleanup of <1/4 or less of oil & hauled away). Obviously, it's not conveved that way, or stated on his site. He ended up saying I was trying to 'cover up' by changing my story. He copied the original text.

I could change my photos, but I would have to change alot of pages too. He would just come back and say 'see, they are hiding something'. As he does copies the pages. I have always had a copyright--see at bottom of main page: web page --on the website since it started.

BC, if he removes your photo--tell me, I will send him an email too, to remove mine (which are copy righted.

PS: watch what you say here--Knobby is listening (and uses this site on his webpage (as you have seen).
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 01, 2003 09:32 PM :
 
bill
welcome to my world!!!!! ive been chastized before for mentioning that we are watched. these folks here for the most part have no idea how many others watch this place. i certainly would not worry too much about it though.
these types like boslough care nothing for the truth and no matter what is said they will make up what they want.boslough has shown that in every thing hes ever done.
your site is just fine.
 

Posted by Malamute (Member # 164) on October 01, 2003 09:36 PM :
 
Vernon,

Times are tight for everyone, I know that, but some more $$$ is headed your way soon from me. Hopefully everyone on this board can find at least 5 bucks to send(we all should be able to pull that off). Simply miss one M & G, or don't buy that 12 pack after work tomorrow, whatever, it's worth the sacrifice to keep this fight funded. Think with the number of members on this board if everyone would just throw in $5, that would go a long way towards funding this.

I hope whoever did this realizes not only the damage they have caused, but how they may have re-vitalize our efforts to support Vernon's fight(all our fight really). This may have been very counter-productive for these people.

Again Vernon, how do the people responsible for this site get away with saying the things they say?
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 01, 2003 09:36 PM :
 
btw mark his brother nor his wife carw anything for the law either. they think they are above it and dictate it for us small folks. and unless there is money behind the threats id bet he'll continue to do what he wants -copywrite or none
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 01, 2003 09:41 PM :
 
malamute
i would bet that the boslough would try to cry first amendment rights. their intire deal is predacted on the idea that noone has the funds to prove them wrong. unfortunatly these folks can say all the lies they want and its up to the ones lied about to fix it.

thanks for the support

[ October 01, 2003, 10:17 PM: Message edited by: vb ]
 

Posted by Rhyas (Member # 433) on October 01, 2003 09:57 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hobo Willy:
FYI: [Mad]

I could change my photos, but I would have to change alot of pages too. He would just come back and say 'see, they are hiding something'. As he does copies the pages. I have always had a copyright--see at bottom of main page: web page --on the website since it started.

BC, if he removes your photo--tell me, I will send him an email too, to remove mine (which are copy righted.

There's not really a large leg to stand on there legally, because he's not copying the image, he's mearly linking to it. Best bet is to change the name if the actual image file, or restrict it based on HTTP_REFERER.

By far the best thing to do though, would be to put some sort of script in there, that plugged one image when referenced from his sites, and the normal one when referenced from anywhere else. [Big Grin]

-= Jay =-
 

Posted by Ingvae (Member # 459) on October 02, 2003 03:04 AM :
 
Just change the pics to something else. Something completely inappropriate to his website. Make his website look like $h!t.
 

Posted by Ingvae (Member # 459) on October 02, 2003 03:06 AM :
 
BTW

Click on the barking dog link in my profile to make a PayPal donation on Vernon's behalf.

Come on what's $5 and what could be easier than clicking below.
 

Posted by flexychevy (Member # 5) on October 02, 2003 05:33 AM :
 
Where is the article of him bashing Vernon and the rest of us?
This guy sounds like another waste of oxygen.Some people feel better tearing the world a part.They like to stir things up,because they have no life.I hope you are reading this you [Barf] they will catch you [Flipoff] I hope it is soon. [Mad2]
 

Posted by Eric Cheezer (Member # 926) on October 02, 2003 06:30 AM :
 
http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html
 

Posted by jeepinaround (Member # 102) on October 02, 2003 06:52 AM :
 
Well he isn't using one photo from Backcountry Colorado he has it scrolling through all of the photos and they now have Backcountry Colorado on the photo. It also has been updated with more links here since yesterday.
 

Posted by Eric Cheezer (Member # 926) on October 02, 2003 08:18 AM :
 
FYI, He's linking directly to this thread.
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 08:52 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ingvae:
Just change the pics to something else. Something completely inappropriate to his website. Make his website look like $h!t.

We had already discussed that, thats what me and Mike's posts that were edited talked about. Obviously it's a little too late, but BCC did change the pic to include his company name that is now being used on the site. Shouldn't be too hard to prove that one's his.

It's been said already, but I think it's time for Hobo's, BCC, and MHJC to contact Comcrap about their server being used to illegally host pics.
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 02, 2003 08:54 AM :
 
Just pull the pics and put up that pic of Critters rear diff [Laugh2] Or just rewrite the address, so he can't use them! Hey Vernon I didn't know you were into mudboggin [Roll Eyes]

[ October 02, 2003, 09:10 AM: Message edited by: Pioneer ]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 09:09 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pioneer:
Just pull the pics and put up that pic of Critters rear diff [Laugh2] Or just rewrite the address, so he can't use them!

He's already saved at least BCC's to his own server.
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 02, 2003 09:11 AM :
 
When the hell did he do that? Yesterday they were on Backcountrys site!
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 09:18 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pioneer:
When the hell did he do that? Yesterday they were on Backcountrys site!

Sometime between last night and now they were switched. He reads this board pretty frequently and like Cheezer said this thread is now linked from the site.

Mr. Jackass, if you're reading this thread, [Flipoff] [Flipoff] [Flipoff]
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 02, 2003 09:42 AM :
 
OK, not only did he fail to reply to my email, he went and did a bad, bad thing. I don't think he realizes that I am serious here. Latest email below.

quote:
Not only did you fail to respond to my first email, but you blatantly and inappropriately modified photos which are property of my company, Backcountry Colorado. You did not so much as give photo credit. You now have until Monday, Oct. 6th, 2003 to remove the photos from you website. If these photos are not removed, I will submit my dated prints of these pilfered photos to my lawyer and have a cease and desist order drawn up against you, Balarat Ranch and Comcast. I do not appreciate nor condone the fact that you are using Backcountry Colorado's property to slander and accuse my associates. You are not dealing with a 'renegade-mud-boggin-yahoo' here. I am an educated, well-versed, well-connected, well-to-do member of the OHV/4-wheel drive community. I will not allow you to continue to target me, my company nor my fellow OHV users in the manner you are, with my own property. Again, you have until Monday Oct. 6th, 2003 to comply with my request. If the images are not removed, you WILL face legal action.



Ray Greco, owner
Backcountry Colorado
www.Back-CountryColorado.com


 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 09:44 AM :
 
[Thumbsup]

Way to be Ray!
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 02, 2003 09:50 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
[Thumbsup]

Way to be Ray!

Yee-haw [Flipoff] [Flipoff]


I LOVE IT!!!!!!! [Big Grin]


Now you just need to get MHJC and HOBO to do the same!!! [Bounce] [Bounce]
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 02, 2003 09:56 AM :
 
I just finished contacting Comcast indicating my intentions and recent actions. Since it is hosted on their servers, they may take action against him. Especially since I mentioned adding them to the cease and desist order.
 

Posted by Camp (Member # 496) on October 02, 2003 10:09 AM :
 
VB,

I am going to paypal after this is posted to make my contribution to the Barking Dog issue. I would like to help in anyway I can on this but, my capacity will be limited for the next 5 or 6 months as I will be out of the country. I have sat back and watched this issue long enough. The lack of morals by the accusing party absolutely baffle me. How does a person who tells such blatent lies sleep at night.
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 10:20 AM :
 
Just sent some $ via paypal as well. I can't afford much right now, but I know every little bit helps.
 

Posted by jeepinaround (Member # 102) on October 02, 2003 10:29 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pioneer:
When the hell did he do that? Yesterday they were on Backcountrys site!

Sometime between last night and now they were switched. He reads this board pretty frequently and like Cheezer said this thread is now linked from the site.

Mr. Jackass, if you're reading this thread, [Flipoff] [Flipoff] [Flipoff]
[/QUOTE]
It was this morning, he had been scrolling through all the pictures on Backcountry's site now they are on his server. Also the link to this thread has been blocked! [Flipoff] [Bounce]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 10:35 AM :
 
All the links I could find from that site to threads over here have been blocked. If you had a hand in that Eric, way to be!! [Beer]
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 02, 2003 10:37 AM :
 
Awww...., his remote links no longer workie [Laugh2] [Flipoff2]

Backcountry, you might want to consider blocking remote-linking of your images (also referred to as bandwidth stealing). I've been thinking of doing that here as well.
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 02, 2003 10:38 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
All the links I could find from that site to threads over here have been blocked. If you had a hand in that Eric, way to be!! [Beer]

Aren't I a stinker [Big Grin] [Laugh]
 

Posted by Yeeper (Member # 876) on October 02, 2003 10:39 AM :
 
Taken from Mark Boslough's article:

Just a few days before the recent vandalism on Fairview Peak, Vernon publicly threatened to take a backhoe to another local landowner's property. Vernon Brandt solicited help from other vigilantes.
He even specified the kind of heavy equipment he planned to use. We urge the U.S Forest Service to investigate Vernon Brandt.

Quote from Vernon Brandt on Colorado 4x4:

for all those that would like to help remove the obstructions and run the road please send me a personal email
*e-mail add. edited*
include your phone number

call your reps
call the boulder rangers


Am I missing something? VB's statement was taken from a link on Mr. Boslough's article. Where does it say ANYTHING about bulldozing someone elses property? If you read closely, VB was trying to enlist help to remove obstructions from a trail, so that it was passable! After "someone" had torn down trees and moved boulders to prevent passage! Gee, I wonder who was involved in that destruction.

Lies beget lies! And destroying the forest so that OHV enthusiasts cannot enter is EXTREMELY selfish, and narrow minded, and totally against what this fool is aguing about!

DUH! Let's save the forest by destroying it!? What kind of plan is that!?

To me, this makes about as much sense as burning your own house down to prevent burglury
 

Posted by Yeeper (Member # 876) on October 02, 2003 10:42 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
All the links I could find from that site to threads over here have been blocked. If you had a hand in that Eric, way to be!! [Beer]

Aren't I a stinker [Big Grin] [Laugh]
Right on!! [Big Grin] [Thumbsup] [Beer]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 11:28 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
Awww...., his remote links no longer workie [Laugh2] [Flipoff2]


Hey Eric, a couple of us are having problems accessing the site now since you disabled those links. Any advice on how to avoid that?
 

Posted by Pioneer (Member # 2365) on October 02, 2003 11:30 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
Awww...., his remote links no longer workie [Laugh2] [Flipoff2]


Hey Eric, a couple of us are having problems accessing the site now since you disabled those links. Any advice on how to avoid that?
Ya what he said!! I had to go and delete all temp internet files and cookies before I got permission to come back!
 

Posted by Breck4x4-John McCallister (Member # 1207) on October 02, 2003 11:31 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
quote:
Originally posted by Big Dave:
All the links I could find from that site to threads over here have been blocked. If you had a hand in that Eric, way to be!! [Beer]

Aren't I a stinker [Big Grin] [Laugh]
yes you are! way to go [Thumbsup]
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 02, 2003 11:39 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pioneer:
Hey Eric, a couple of us are having problems accessing the site now since you disabled those links. Any advice on how to avoid that?
Ya what he said!! I had to go and delete all temp internet files and cookies before I got permission to come back!

Sounds like you were viewing a cached version of the link/page. If you're using IE go to Tools / Internet Options and click Settings under the Temporary Internet Files section. Under "Check for newer versions of stored pages:" select "Every visit to the page" and click OK (see pic).

 -

If using a different browser you'll need to look at your settings for similar cache settings that govern how often the cache is updated.

[ October 02, 2003, 11:47 AM: Message edited by: Eric ]
 

Posted by COGrand (Member # 2803) on October 02, 2003 11:46 AM :
 
My 2 cents......Does anyone have info on the a$$ hat that used Ray's photos on the site? It wouldn't be far fetched that these people are the ones who tore up the Lefthand trails and are attempting steer the investigation in "our" direction. ???
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 02, 2003 11:47 AM :
 
Mark Boslough owns that website. I don't know if he is responsible for the Lefthand Canyon vandalism or not, but he is clearly trying to use it to his advantage.
 

Posted by COGrand (Member # 2803) on October 02, 2003 12:05 PM :
 
I did some looking around and found out what you just posted. He obviously has the means of doing the damage that was done in Lefthand.

"Mark Boslough, a physicist who lives in New Mexico, owns some of the land bisected by what the Jeepers call the Barking Dog Road. In 1999, Boslough erected no-trespassing signs to keep the ORVs out. (He allows hikers on the trail.) The signs were torn down. SO BOSLOUGH DROPPED LARGE BOULDERS AND TREES OVER THE TRAIL"
--This is from the Boulder Daily Camera article about the situation on Barking Dog.
 

Posted by Camp (Member # 496) on October 02, 2003 12:12 PM :
 
Pony up fella's. Let's get VB the funds to fight this problem legally and respectably.
 

Posted by 79CJLongmont (Member # 446) on October 02, 2003 12:19 PM :
 
hmmm... It ain't legal, so I'd never do it, but my background is in computers. I am quite sure I could hack some systems if I tried. Wanna see this guy disappear!?

I'D NEVER DO ANYTHING LIKE THAT, IT IS ILLEGAL AND I DON'T CONDONE IT!

[Wink]
 

Posted by Grandpa Jeep (Member # 47) on October 02, 2003 12:21 PM :
 
Boslough certainly sounds like the prime candidate to me. Think about it, his court case isn't going too well, so he blocks off a trail and then publicly blames Vernon Brandt for it. He knows Vernon is having trouble raising funds to continue the fight. Perhaps he's hoping he can land VB in some legal trouble.

Does Boslough own equipment that can do this? How far is this from Boslough's property? According to what CO_Grand found, he either used his own equipment or rented some to block barking dog Rd. Has anyone checked equipment rental places to see if anyone rented anything capable of doing this damage? Is the Forest Service the only agency investigating this crime? Perhaps someone needs to steer them towards Mark Boslough.
 

Posted by COGrand (Member # 2803) on October 02, 2003 12:30 PM :
 
In the event anyone would like to contact Mark:

Sandia National Laboratories
http://www.sandia.gov
BOSLOUGH,MARK B. E.
(505)845-8851
MBBOSLO@sandia.gov
Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB), in southeastern Albuquerque mailstop: 0318

This is asumming that this is the same Mark Boslough. As stated in the article, Mark is a "physicist" in New Mexico. So, this is most likely him.

This info is posted as free information on the web.

I do find it interesting that a guy who's career centers on developing Nuclear weapons to incinerate people and destroy massive amounts land is fighting a small group of four-wheelers over some trails in Colorado. Go figure. I guess that's why he doesn't live in Boulder. :-)
 

Posted by bsaunder (Member # 14) on October 02, 2003 01:10 PM :
 
I doubt he develops nuclear weapons - the information above points to the wrong group and wrong laboratory to be doing that - very few of the national laboratory employees have anything to do with nuclear weapons research, even if they are physicists.

Sorry about the rant - but after growing up in Los Alamos and having to put up with the disinformation about the labs and ignorance of all the rest that they do and accomplish for us on a daily basis, I get set off sometimes.

This in no way stands up for Mark, or anything he has done, I don't think I could stand to be in the same room with him, I would be torn between vomiting and laughing hysterically.

edit - after doing some research and checking out several published studies and works that Mark helped with, it appears he is probably a Geo physicist. All this is really too bad, actually, as it looks like he is quite intelligent and would have been very interesting to have a conversation with. His tactics and lack of morals around the Barking dog issue and OHV enthusiast in general make the thought of an "intelligent" conversation with this man quite revolting.

[ October 02, 2003, 01:40 PM: Message edited by: bsaunder ]
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 02, 2003 01:21 PM :
 
I just emailed his Sandia email addy, in case he 'did not get' my emails to the Balarat site......
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 02, 2003 01:23 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bsaunder:
Sorry about the rant - but after growing up in Los Alamos and having to put up with the disinformation about the labs and ignorance of all the rest that they do and accomplish for us on a daily basis, I get set off sometimes.

I'll bet they have aliens there though, probably a flying saucer or two as well. Nuthin' but top-secret conspiracy going on in those think tanks. Hey, maybe they zapped these trees with one of the ray guns they recovered from aliens. Come awn Ben, you know they gotta have aliens! [Big Grin] [Flipoff2] [Beer]

 -

[ October 02, 2003, 01:30 PM: Message edited by: Eric ]
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 02, 2003 01:24 PM :
 
For those having problems accessing the site, simply open the page, right click on it, then hold the shift button and hit refresh at the same time, clears the cache and refreshes page.
 

Posted by bsaunder (Member # 14) on October 02, 2003 01:32 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:

I'll bet they have aliens there though, probably a flying saucer or two as well. Nuthin' but top-secret conspiracy going on in those think tanks. Hey, maybe they zapped these trees with one of the ray guns they recovered from aliens. Come awn Ben, you know they gotta have aliens! [Big Grin] [Flipoff2] [Beer]

 -

I...um...err... can not confirm nor deny any reference to said aliens or the existance of said ray guns or flying apparati.....


[Flipoff2]
 

Posted by Big Dave (Member # 20) on October 02, 2003 01:35 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bsaunder:
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:

I'll bet they have aliens there though, probably a flying saucer or two as well. Nuthin' but top-secret conspiracy going on in those think tanks. Hey, maybe they zapped these trees with one of the ray guns they recovered from aliens. Come awn Ben, you know they gotta have aliens! [Big Grin] [Flipoff2] [Beer]

 -

I...um...err... can not confirm nor deny any reference to said aliens or the existance of said ray guns.....


[Flipoff2]

[independance day] well, thats not EXACTLY correct sir [/independance day]

Always loved that line!!


Anyways, I wheeled with a guy who worked for Sandia a few years ago. I'm gonna see if I can dig up his email to see if maybe he knows this guy.
 

Posted by bsaunder (Member # 14) on October 02, 2003 01:57 PM :
 
BTW - let’s not waste too much energy finding out about Mark. We most definitely do not need to start making up stuff about him or trying to slander him in anyway. We do not need to stoop to that level, even if others do.
Lets rather focus on helping the FS anyway we can to help find the vandals that destroyed Federal land and pursuing all legal means of keeping public land open to the public.
 

Posted by Phazertwo A.K.A Brenden (Member # 2793) on October 02, 2003 04:50 PM :
 
What about clearing the trail, what is the latest one that? What can we do, or does the FS not want us to clear it (investigation thing). But I would like to clear it, it would be fun... Get to meet all you guys, now is a good time of year, before the snow flies and it gets cold...

My auto tec class has a 4x4 kinda club of there own, including the instructor, and it sounds like they wanna go help clear
 

Posted by ColoradoGrand (Member # 2950) on October 02, 2003 05:45 PM :
 
How is it a waste of energy to find out a little about this guy? He could very well be behind bulldozing Lefthand Canyon. He's already admitted to moving boulders, etc. into the middle of the trail at Barking Dog. He's obviously got the means and motive to do it. Why not redirect the focus onto "us" and claim "we" are responsible? I don't think investigating the guy is wasteful in the least bit.
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 02, 2003 08:53 PM :
 
bosloughs property is on county road 87. the damage to lefthand is on county road 87j. there is one hill between the areas and all dirt roads. boslough is known by the nieghbors up there and several of them have the exact equipment that did the damage. like i said he is being looked at for this damage and im thinkin he is involved. to what extent i guess we just have to wait and see.
mark does meteors (sp). and bashes God an a regular basis as part of his job.
you are correct his actions show that he has no internal govner to control him so of course is unable to tell any diferance between a lie and the truth. im sure that the only thing that keeps him from sleeping at night is that hes wrong and cant lie well enough to make others think that hes right.
can you emagine being married to this guy or even working with him?? youd never ever know if you could trust a thing he says.
as for his site:
there are so many things in it that contridict each other and are just plain redicules to all but the most gulable. the proof is in the fact that he needs us to help him with his constent rewrites. what a clown
btw if any of you have a printer please make a copy of his site every once in awhile so that we have a way to document all of the facts that change there
as for the mud boggin: i think he says that to conjur up images in folks minds of the kbpi thing up by caribu. i wonder why he stoped claiming to also be a four wheeler him self as he used to claim

[ October 02, 2003, 09:29 PM: Message edited by: vb ]
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 02, 2003 09:00 PM :
 
btw the stuff on left hand is still a crime scene so lets let the fs do their job. there is an area of the damage that i would like to remove and believe that it can be done under the same laws that alow for the removel of bosloughs obsticles. im going to wait for alittle more info and for the fs to do their thing if youd like to help with that let me know back chanel.
as for barking dog : the obsticles can be remove by the public at any time . the only thing is that the public needs to stay on the road at all times . the property on either side for 2.5 miles is private property for the most part. noone wants to see a tresspass deal. even if the sheriff is called all he will do is take pictures and names for his report
 

Posted by flexychevy (Member # 5) on October 03, 2003 05:24 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
Awww...., his remote links no longer workie [Laugh2] [Flipoff2]

Backcountry, you might want to consider blocking remote-linking of your images (also referred to as bandwidth stealing). I've been thinking of doing that here as well.

I just went to his site to read his mumbo jumbo and his links are still working.You might want to take another look at it.Also has anyone thought about going to the News or paper to put this B.S> out there.It good in two ways,one it shows how are so lovely tree huggers are and put a message out that we are trying that we do care.We just want to enjoy are time here with what we have in a decent matter.
 

Posted by Hobo Willy (Member # 95) on October 03, 2003 09:02 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Backcountry Colorado:
I just finished contacting Comcast indicating my intentions and recent actions. Since it is hosted on their servers, they may take action against him. Especially since I mentioned adding them to the cease and desist order.

Can you get my stuff removed too??
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 03, 2003 10:57 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by flexychevy:
I just went to his site to read his mumbo jumbo and his links are still working.You might want to take another look at it.

[Laugh] This is great, did anyone notice the links that he provided to get around the block?

http://home.comcast.net/~roadripper/colo1.html
http://home.comcast.net/~roadripper/colo2.html
etc. etc.

Roadripper. ROAD RIPPER!!!!! Doh! Nothing like incriminating yourself [Big Grin] Nice one Mark. [Laugh2]

Here's the text he posted on his page, this is great [Big Grin] :

quote:
What the off-roaders don't want you to see!


Off-roaders have attempted to block and deny access from this site to their discussion groups, in order to keep people from seeing their self-incriminating statements. If you get a FORBIDDEN notice on some of the links to their site, cut and paste the following URLS into another browser to see what they are attempting to cover up

[Laugh2] That's beautiful! [Big Grin] If anything I ENCOURAGE people to visit this site so they can participate in discussions and get the real skinney. The blatantly biased and lie-infested web page that he presents, without any means for discussion, is nothing less than a sad grasp for attention from a desperate soul. The more exaggerated and extreme the better is his motto, and if it includes wild accusations and pure speculation that all works for him. The poor guy doesn't even realize that sending people here HURTS his position [Big Grin] The key to persuasive speech is not to allow your audience to hear the other side of the story. [Laugh2]

So keep sending your audience here Mark, WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE IT! Your site was banned from linking directly to Colorado4x4.org simply because you did so without asking permission. According to the above testamony you've also stolen images and presented them on your site as your own (and currently continue to do so) so apparantly you feel you can do whatever you like. You can link to websites without permission, you can use property (images) without permission (theft), and you have previously demonstrated that you feel you can close public roads without permission (remember the trees that you cut down across CR87 and the deep ruts that you carved into that public road? No speculation there, YOU SAID IT YOURSELF!). If ANYONE looks suspicious in the recent Lefthand Canyon vandalism it is you Mark. You have prior history of this exact same behavior and your webpage is a living demonstration of your contempt for law. So please, Mark, please DO continue to direct your audience to Colorado4x4.org. The more educated the public becomes, the less dangerous you become. [Big Grin]

[Beer]

[ October 03, 2003, 11:23 AM: Message edited by: Eric ]
 

Posted by Camp (Member # 496) on October 03, 2003 11:05 AM :
 
Ouch! That's going to leave a mark [Thumbsup]

Truth is wonderful thing.
 

Posted by Chuck Henry - GollyGwagen (Member # 266) on October 03, 2003 11:33 AM :
 
Gave some money to the Barking Dog fund.

I just don't get the whole idea that we would block trails we are trying to use. I see how he accuses us of unstacking rocks to make it so only WE can go there... but NO ONE could drive down a trail full of trees. I just don't get it.

Good luck with this monkey. I doubt he'll ever pay, but that doesn't mean we should stop fighting.
 

Posted by jumpinNrollin (Member # 783) on October 03, 2003 12:04 PM :
 
This guy is not real smart. This wasn't (unfortunately) on my radar screen till he decided to illegally use pics from this and other sites. BTW, I have never used or even been close to that trail so this is in no way self serving (although it may become that way now, if you get my point, someone give me directions [Razz] ).

Sent donation to Barking Dog. If you can, you should also to help defeat people like this, if not for the preservation of use of public lands.

I mean...he is his worst enemy and what seems like a great fund raising source! Good luck VB, let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks
 

Posted by xjSLATE (Member # 2569) on October 03, 2003 12:14 PM :
 
this kind of reminds me of the whole 9/11 thing (sorry to bring that subject up) but whoever did this pretty much woke a sleeping giant. i am going to send money for this right now.
 

Posted by bronca aka Ryan (Member # 2430) on October 03, 2003 12:22 PM :
 
right on i went up there last night with colledge girls and counted 120 trees what a tragedy
 

Posted by Grandpa Jeep (Member # 47) on October 03, 2003 01:18 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by vb:
bosloughs property is on county road 87. the damage to lefthand is on county road 87j. there is one hill between the areas and all dirt roads. boslough is known by the nieghbors up there and several of them have the exact equipment that did the damage.

So what you're saying is Boslough lives just over the hill from the damage, and could have "borrowed" the equipment nearby? Furthermore, he has blocked a public road before and gotten away with it (so far). He also seems to think eco-terrorism is OK as evidenced by his letter to the Alburquerque Journal posted on his page. Then he tries to blame VB (who has worked to clear roads, not block them). I hope the sheriff and th FS are investigating him seriously.
 

Posted by XJ-HIGHLANDER (Member # 1854) on October 03, 2003 01:36 PM :
 
"CAUSING MASS DESTRUCTION!!"

--Public Enemy
 

Posted by vb (Member # 1196) on October 03, 2003 02:40 PM :
 
paypal or check is fine. and yes mark lives in nm . his brother lives around the brighten area and works for the railroad. yes they would have access to machinery. in fact back when boslough first started to block barking dog he "borrowed" mr rameys backhoe without permission (if i remember this correctly) something along those lines anyway.
the damage was done sometime around laborday are slightly before so he might have been back here. even if he wasnt driveing the rig the guess is that he was involved somehow.
and a good point to make would be that the more the authorities let this stuff go on unchecked the bolder these folks become. it time to take a stand and set a legal presidence that can be used to stop this type of thing. it goes on all the time here in the west and it is illegal for these surrounding land oners to block public roads . without funds for the fight esspecially in boulder county the autorities will continue to let these folks break the law
given the prank that was linked to the darwin award we see that boslough likes to place "code" in his stories. i think it was said well that roadripper is a huge giveaway to his position .
 

Posted by bsaunder (Member # 14) on October 06, 2003 06:26 PM :
 
FYI - the FBI are helping the FS to find the vandals. Sounds like this is being taken seriously by the FS [Big Grin] for which I am glad, maybe the people that think eco-terrorism is "ok" sometimes will think twice, especially after one of their own gets thrown into Federal prison.
 

Posted by Backcountry Colorado (Member # 1364) on October 06, 2003 10:42 PM :
 
My lawyer is drawing up the cease and desist papers this week. They will hopefully be signed and on their way when I return from Moab next week. Mark needs to realize that he is not the only intelligent and resourceful person envolved in this matter. All he had to do was remove the photos, give photo credit, or ask permission to use them. [Wink]
 

Posted by Hobo Willy (Member # 95) on October 08, 2003 12:16 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Backcountry Colorado:
My lawyer is drawing up the cease and desist papers this week. They will hopefully be signed and on their way when I return from Moab next week. Mark needs to realize that he is not the only intelligent and resourceful person envolved in this matter. All he had to do was remove the photos, give photo credit, or ask permission to use them. [Wink]

Ray,

He is using a photo I created (and is copyrighted--see our website) back in 99. He used to link it off my site, now he has saved it and renamed it to his (http://home.comcast.net/%7Ebalarat/trailidiots.jpg).

I have no $$, can you help??

Bill
 -
 

Posted by Hobo Willy (Member # 95) on October 08, 2003 12:43 PM :
 
More jiberous on the fallicy that if you remove photos or access you are hiding something. Check this out:
http://www.darkendeavors.com/forum/thread-view.asp?threadid=52&posts=1
 

Posted by Snotty (Member # 109) on October 08, 2003 06:10 PM :
 
Hobo,

It really doesn't take that much to have a lawyer draft a letter and then mail via certification. If they are yours and you do not like how they are being used a cease letter will usually get the job done. This has happened to Consumption Junction several times.

Snotty

By the way, if you want to see someone go off the deep end, start making crap up about Mark. I have never seen someone go ballistic as quick as him. But I am in no way condoning that that type of behavior.
 

Posted by Whip&RideTJ (Member # 2760) on October 08, 2003 11:53 PM :
 
Could somebody PM me and tell me how to use paypal? I'm sick of this knuclehead.
 

Posted by Hobo Willy (Member # 95) on October 09, 2003 03:53 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hobo Willy:
quote:
Originally posted by Backcountry Colorado:
My lawyer is drawing up the cease and desist papers this week. They will hopefully be signed and on their way when I return from Moab next week. Mark needs to realize that he is not the only intelligent and resourceful person envolved in this matter. All he had to do was remove the photos, give photo credit, or ask permission to use them. [Wink]

Ray,

He is using a photo I created (and is copyrighted--see our website) back in 99. He used to link it off my site, now he has saved it and renamed it to his (http://home.comcast.net/%7Ebalarat/trailidiots.jpg).

I have no $$, can you help??

Bill
 -

Our logo is also used illegally here (linked from our site--along with the 3 photo set:
http://home.comcast.net/~roadripper/DogWalk.html


Snotty, I have NO $$ for a lawyer.
 

Posted by batavus (Member # 1118) on October 10, 2003 04:25 PM :
 
Article on LHC - mainstream media is picking this up now.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/2546136/detail.html
 

Posted by Joker (Member # 30) on October 13, 2003 11:29 AM :
 
WOW.....His website has totally changed now.....the pressure must be really getting to him... [Laugh2]


http://home.comcast.net/~balarat/ranch.html
 

Posted by bsaunder (Member # 14) on October 13, 2003 11:52 AM :
 
hum - maybe he was tired of his own words being used against him [Razz] . Or maybe he is showing that he has something to hide, as according to him that is the only reason to change a page, but there I go using his own words against him again [Big Grin]

I'm sure quite a few of us have his "old" pages saved just for posterities sake though [Roll Eyes]
 

Posted by 1BGDOG AKA 1BGDOG (Member # 652) on October 13, 2003 12:25 PM :
 
"Of course, we already know what radio station the members of Colorado4x4.org listen to. KBPI."


Wow I didn't know that I listened to this station...Oh he is making a funny.What a Chowderhead.
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 13, 2003 12:28 PM :
 
 -  -

Seems all he can do anymore is point fingers and continue his smear campaign. [Roll Eyes] [Big Grin] He's obviously trying to stir something up but I don't know what or why. The irony surrounding his efforts is that all he seems to do is stir up more support for reopening the road. [Thumbsup] This topic has been more or less dormant for months until he decided to spark the fire again. He can't maintain a link to this site either so I see he's resorted to copying entire discussion threads to his site. Aside from the fact that doing so is illegal (copyright laws, gotta love em!), the credibility of the copied text is about zero. Sorta like a company doing an in-house survey and announcing that their product was voted #1 [Laugh] I still get a kick out of him trying to connect the copyright protection efforts with us "trying to hide something." [Laugh] The sad truth is if he had simply contacted me and asked permission to link to topics on CO4x4.org I would have said yes. As I mentioned earlier it only hurts his cause to send his audience here (and hey, exposure for us is exposure for us). Instead he apparantly believes the world is HIS oyster and that he can do whatever he pleases with no regard for law or even common courtesy. Again copying copyrighted text to his own site without permission only serves to hurt his credibility.

Kinda sad to watch him spiral downward to such levels of desperation, I wonder what his colleagues think of him?

Btw, those top two smilies crack me up, especially the "bitch" one [Big Grin] I'm gonna have to use that one more often LOL.
 

Posted by Snotty (Member # 109) on October 13, 2003 02:19 PM :
 
What a loser. He is back peddling so damn fast I am sure he has forgotten what forward momentum even feels like. He is such a coward and an obvious liar. I wonder if maybe we shouldn't start a website with nothing but copies of the slander that Mark Boslough has put on the web. I would really like to take all the lies that he has published and go have a chat with the very congress man that he has claimed to have spoken to as well. I wonder what they would think of all this now.

Guess what he thought was high and mighty was really just his head in the clouds. I am sure that any respect that he has had from the people that were on his side is starting to dwindle like crazy. People will support you until they find out that you are a liar. Wonder if the Boulder Lout knows anything about this side of Mark and his Family. I wonder how they will take to be manipulated and lied to by Mark.

Maybe we should send them all the captures of his web sites and the bogus and out and out lies he has published.

Hey Mark! I know you read this all the time. Do you think that Vernon could sue you for slander and false implication of a crime that he had nothing to so with and turn that money around to finish with you and the BG issue? Now that would be justice at it’s finest. It is becoming more and more apparent that you do not care about the environment and only used that mantra to further your own selfish agenda. I notice you don’t have the balls to keep your website in its original status with its slander, out right lies and false implications of. How will the greenies feel when they figure out that you used and lied to them?

Maybe you should start thinking with your head instead of your ass. Maybe you should quit trying to steal public land.
 

Posted by Eric (Member # 1) on October 13, 2003 04:27 PM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Snotty:
It is becoming more and more apparent that you do not care about the environment and only used that mantra to further your own selfish agenda.

I don't think we have to look too far to see what the true motivation is for Mark. Let's see, a plot of land with a public road thru the middle of it vs. a plot of land without a public road thru the middle of it. Hmmm... which would you want to own? From his perspective you purchase the land with a road thru it for cheap, then get rid of the road. Instant equity.

$$$$ <-- it makes the world go around.
 

Posted by Willie G (Member # 1622) on October 13, 2003 09:12 PM :
 
As I said elsewhere, the Special Warranty Deed he brags about having is a waving red flag for any experienced attorney - it says that the seller is covering his butt because the property has hidden legal defects (and the seller knows about them) but the buyer is too dumb to ask.

Mr. Greenhorn went out on a limb when he purchased the property and VB has fired up the ol' Homelite Zip and is ready to cut it off.

[Big Grin]
 

Posted by Gunter (Member # 2943) on October 14, 2003 12:20 AM :
 
i think if one gives him enuff rope,he will hang himself(hopefully)
 

Posted by flexychevy (Member # 5) on October 14, 2003 05:51 AM :
 
quote:
Originally posted by vb:
paypal or check is fine. and yes mark lives in nm . his brother lives around the brighten area and works for the railroad. yes they would have access to machinery.