Tonewoods…and multi-piece bodies

Tom S

Much is made of how specific woods "sound." There are those who feel strongly that specific body woods lend certain tonal qualities to a solid-body electric guitar, and there are those who feel they can describe (predict) these specific tonal qualities in detail. There are a number of guitar-builder and guitar-parts websites that even ascribe very detailed tonal aspects to individual woods, as if these qualities were well-understood and universally accepted.

Now the first question that should come up when reading these detailed descriptions is "How is it that a piece of wood can impart a tonal qualitiy to a solid-body electric guitar?"

The only reasonable theory is that sound waves generated by plucked strings pass through the body to some degree, are affected in some way by the wood, and are then transmitted back to the pickups which are mounted to the guitar in any one of a number of ways.

Since the primary reception of sound waves that will be transmitted to the guitar's electronics takes place at the the top of the pickup, which is pointed away from the body and toward the strings, this may seem a bit unlikely to have much of a noticeable effect. Because in this scenario, the sound wave would originate above the body, pass into the wood, and then be required to somehow bounce back to the pickups. Hmmm. But for argument's sake, let's say this is true.

If it is true that individual wood species can lend specific tonal nuances to a solid-body electric guitar's sound, then it can only be due to the way sound is transmitted or propagated through the wood, and the consequent affect of that on the frequency spectrum generated by the sound wave. In turn, there are only a few feasible mechanical properties of wood that could account for variances in how the sound wave is affected, even within a single species. They are:

  • The density of the wood, including the size and nature of cell cavities and pores
  • The grain tightness, direction (fiber orientation), and/or grain pattern of the wood, mostly as it relates to the wood's modulus of elasticity (tendency to be temporarily deformed; more an aspect of strength and functionality)
  • The current moisture content of the wood

 

Now if these factors affect the sound wave moving through the wood, which they would have to do in order to affect the frequency spectrum, then variances in these factors from one piece of wood to another should be expected to have varied affects on the sound wave. No two slabs of wood are the same, nor can they be expected to propagate a given sound wave in the exact same manner. So what affect can we expect if the sound wave has to travel through two or more pieces of wood, joined by a barrier of hardened glue?

It has been shown that sound can be propagated through wood for detecting defects.1 Yet this has been demonstrated using ultrasonic sound waves, and is dependent on an entry and exit point of the sound wave. In other words, there was no "bounce-back" effect or reverberation involved. As mentioned above, that would be required in a solid-body electric guitar.

In addition, the mechanical properties that could potentially affect a sound wave can vary quite a bit, even between two pieces of a given species, let alone between different species. So how can any timbral attributes be reliable or accurately assigned to any particular species?

"Clear straight-grained wood is used for determining fundamental mechanical properties; however, because of natural growth characteristics of trees, wood products vary in specific gravity, may contain cross grain, or may have knots and localized slope of grain. Natural defects such as pitch pockets may occur as a result of biological or climatic elements influencing the living tree. These wood characteristics must be taken into account in assessing actual properties or estimating the actual performance of wood products." 2

So with variances in grain tightness and pattern, how the wood was sawn, and any possible inherent defects within a specific piece of wood, how would it be possible to ascertain how that piece of wood will affect the frequency spectrum of a sound wave passing through it?

It's possible that the changes in the speed of the sound wave could have an effect on overtones of a note or other parts of the spectrum. Yet if the sound is affected by the change in speed at which the wave is transmitted through the wood, then we have to go back to the same mechanical properties of the individual piece that would cause that change. We might theorize that this change could be consistent in a given wood species. However...

"There is no recognized independent effect of species on the speed of sound. Variability in the speed of sound in wood is directly related to the variability of modulus of elasticity and density."2

That means every piece of wood has to be judged on its own merits, even two pieces from the same species. So any affect on the sound due to variances in the speed of the sound wave would not be attributable to the difference in species.

In a nutshell, it would seem that any sonic characteristics attributed to a particular species would be very hard to define with any degree of accuracy or consistency. Even if it could be done, those characteristics could at best only be ascribed to a single piece of the wood because in a multi-piece body, there would be complete disconnects in the continuity of mechanical properties between the joined pieces.

So in an absolute best-case scenario, any tonal qualities of a specific species of wood used in a solid-body electric guitar, assuming they could actually be defined, could only legitimately apply to a one-piece body. Variances in two or more adjoining pieces, plus the glue, would certainly play havoc with the sound wave passing through it, rendering any tonal predictions impossible.

So whatcha think? Remember, we haven't even gotten to the possible effects of finishes (or the lack of effects).

 

 

References:
1. Lumber defect detection by ultrasonics. Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Madison, WI Research Paper FPL 311, 1978
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp311.pdf

2. Mechanical properties of wood. Green, Winandy, Kretschmann: From Forest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–113. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/ch04.pdf