|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| X Trials | Katrina journals |Teen suicide | Teen pregnancy | School violence | Travel | Journals | Daily Sketch | Awards | Contact us | ||||||||||||
January 2, 2006
-- Movie review --
Harry Potter's magic remains strong in Goblet of Fire
By
Rachel Glogowski
The
fourth film of the spellbinding series, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
is just as magical as the others, if not more.
In
the movie, members of two other wizardry schools stay at Hogwarts, which is the
site of the Triwizard Tournament.
One
representative is chosen from each of the three schools to compete in the
tournament, which consists of three highly dangerous tasks -- one of which has
to do with, you guessed it, dragons.
But,
as “fate” has it, the enchanted goblet selects Harry Potter’s name,
despite the fact that he is too young and that he is the second person to be
chosen from Hogwarts.
And
so Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) has no choice but to compete in the risky tasks.
(Ironically, he seems to have the most difficulty not in completing the
challenges, but in finding a date for the Yule Ball.)
Although
the movie has its humorous one-liners, young viewers might be frightened during
parts of it. This film is certainly the most scary of the series.
The
special effects in this movie rival those of the other films in the series. In
particular, there is one breathtaking scene where Harry is riding his broomstick
through the school grounds.
Although
I enjoyed the movie, I did not see a big difference between this one and the
first three.
It is
your average good-versus-evil story. Sure, it has its twists and turns, but it
is essentially Harry against Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and his followers.
And, once again, this plot has a underlying coming-of-age theme.
But
this movie was lacking in some respects.
Unlike
the book, the film fails to explore the coming-of-age theme in depth. It leaves
too many questions unanswered: such as what is to come of the relationships that
are new to this particular story, including Hermione’s (Emma Watson) with a
foreign student. Obviously, it is
difficult to cram all of the details of the fairly large book into a
two-and-a-half hour movie, but perhaps the filmmakers could have done a bit of a
better job in choosing what should and should not have gone into it.
Despite
its small flaws, overall, I enjoyed Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.
Whether or not it is better than any one of the others in the series is up for
debate.
But one thing is for sure: moviegoers of all ages will enjoy this enchanting film.
|
|
© 2006 by The Tattoo. All rights reserved. | ||