| |
STATE
ATTORNEY GENERAL AND MICROSOFT
ENGAGING IN SMEAR CAMPAIGNS
State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer in conjunction with high level executives
from Microsoft have begun in what can only be described as one of the worst
orchestrated smear campaigns against legitimate internet business interests of
recent times. Without any ability to back up their far fetched allegations
against OptinRealBig.Com, LLC and its President, Scott Richter, Mr. Spitzer and
Mr. Smith, General Counsel for Microsoft, have held news conferences making
factually erroneous allegations that both Optin and Mr. Richter violated various
state laws. Even during their own press conference, when asked about specific
factual allegations, neither man was able to articulate one violation by Optin
or Mr. Richter. Notably, Microsoft’s press releases primarily consist of advertising for
various anti-spam products. When Optin specifically asked Microsoft’s counsel for any factual basis for it’s claims against Optin and Mr. Richter, only silence
and a referral back to the Attorney General’s office was given. When the Attorney General was
asked for a specific factual basis, Optin was told the Attorney General’s office did not have to provide one. Be assured,
they will have to provide one in a court of law which is where Optin intends to
not only defend, but defeat this latest intrusion into private business by
government overreaching. Which overreaching is illustrated by Mr. Spritzer’s (sic) public proclamation that he intends to
bankrupt Optin and Mr. Richter. A declaration which far exceeds any legitimate
interest Mr. Spitzer has in enforcing his State laws. Mr. Spitzer’s reliance on Spamhaus will also be revealed as a
fatal error because Spamhaus is an offshore, anonymous organization which has no
legitimate connection with internet businesses in the United States.
Optin’s counsel has obtained a copy of the complaint filed
by the New York State Attorney General’s office. There is not one allegation directed to Optin nor is there one attachment which evidences or attributes any of the
claimed wrongdoing to Optin or Mr. Richter. If there were 10,000 false and
fraudulent emails sent by Optin, it would be good legal practice if the Attorney
General would see fit to attach at least one. Even in the body of the
complaint, there does not exist one specific factual allegation against Optin or
Mr. Richter. Instead, Mr. Richter and Optin have been lumped with other email
marketers and generalized facts claiming spam. The complaint by Microsoft is
even far less specific as the only allegation contained therein claims that
Optin and Mr. Richter published email. An activity which is undertaken by any
person around the world which sends any email and is not in any violation of any
state law.
Optin is one of the largest email deployers in the United States. All email
lists used by Optin consist of persons or entities which have agreed to receive
such email. On an average Optin receives only one complaint for every three
million emails sent. This is far below any average set by any Internet Service
Provider to constitute spam email. Furthermore, Optin sends legitimate email
using truthful from lines; working “opt-out” links; and appropriate advertising
subject lines. Furthermore, Optin does not “hijack” any computers to send
emails. There is absolutely no evidence presented by the Attorney General or
Microsoft to the opposite.
Finally, Optin will not encourage the smear campaign initiated by the New York
Attorney General and Microsoft. Rather, it will vigorously defend itself in a
court of law and will prevail as one of the most legitimate internet marketing
institutions in the United States.
|
|