This is one version of http://www.nikonians.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi from your personal cache.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page.
Since this page is stored on your computer, publicly linking to this page will not work.

Google may not be affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content. This page may be protected by copyright.


Preview your message below and make any necessary changes using the post form below the message.
Subject: "RE: Exposure Latitude and Noise on the D70"
Lorin (et al),

OK, I don't have any formal wear handy and the weather is terrible so this will have to do

This time it's 9 images in 1EV steps from -4 to +4.

D70 50mm f/22 ISO 200 on tripod using timer (ambient light, no flash)
30ss upper left to 1/8s lower right

Loaded with ACR into CS adjusted to the same Exposure in ACR:

This time the +4EV and +3EV do look different; but +2 EV to -4EV look pretty much the same!

But take a look at these 400% crops:

Underexposing definitely hurts!

So, it still looks like expose to the right, even if it's two stops.

Bill

Original Message
"Exposure Latitude and Noise on the D70"
Posted by bclaff on 12-Oct-05 at 10:55 PM
I took the following 9 images varying exposure by 1/3EV from +1 1/3EV in the upper left to -1 1/3EV in the lower right:

D70 50mm f/1.8 ISO 200 on tripod using timer (ambient light, no flash)
1/8s upper left to 1/50s lower right

The raw images were brought into PhotoShop CS using Adobe Capture Raw (ACR) and identical settings.
The progression from overexposed to underexposed is fairly clear.

I brought the same images into CS with ACR and using the Exposure value to compensate for the over and under exposures.
Here is the result:

At first glance these exposure adjusted images all appear to be identical.

Finally, from these adjusted images I prepared 400% crops from the center of each image:

Close examination shows that there is more apparent noise in the lower right (underexposed images) than in the upper left (overexposed images).

This experiment supports at least two conclusions:

  1. Shooting raw and adjusting exposure in ACR can be very forgiving.
  2. "Exposing to the right" results in the least amount of visible noise.

Of course both conclusions are provided you don't clip image areas you care about.
(In this case, for example, there are specular highlights even in the most underexposed image.)

Bill

Click here to go back to the previous page Go back   Click here to see help FAQ     
Conferences Post form
Your Message
Name*: bclaff
Subject*:
Message*:
 
HTML Ok
Use [] in place of <>

HTML Reference
 
Images Ok
 
Use of smilies in posts ok
Smilies lookup table
Attachment:
Click here to choose your file
Check if you DO NOT wish to use emotion icons in your message
Subscribe to this topic to receive email notification when a new message is submitted.
 

Powered by DCForum
© 1997-2004 DCScripts. All rights reserved.


Newsletter |  News & Podcasts |  About Us |  Contact |  Terms of Use |  Your Privacy |  Your Membership |  Advertise |  RSS 2.0 |  FAQ's

Copyright © Nikonians 2000, 2