
The leap of faith
by Jim Renton
research
Our nation ensures social welfare through Social Security.
However, the
United States cannot ensure the welfare of its own welfare system.
To save
Social Security, Americans in general do not favor an increase
in the
payroll tax, a cut in benefits or an increase in the retirement
age.
Furthermore, Americans are relying upon Social Security as their
sole source
of income at increasingly alarming rates. Social Security is
intended to
supplement retiree income, not account for 100% of it. Through
elimination
of the potential options, that leaves one necessary action: invest
the
Social Security trust fund in the stock market as President Clinton
proposes.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle (Social Security,
Sec. C, p 16),
many people are concerned that investing Social Security's trust
fund in the
stock market will not only jeopardize their future income, but
would result
in the federal government influencing economic decisions. These
concerns
are uneducated assumptions.
Under the proposed plan to invest a portion of the Social Security
trust
fund in the stock market, only new and previously unanticipated
Social
Security money would be invested. Part of President Clinton's
plan entails
allocating "more than $2.7 trillion in expected budget surpluses
over the
next 15 years or 62% of the total to directly bolster Social Security's
cash
reserves. Of that, nearly $700 billion or 25% would be invested
in the
stock market." This plan would eliminate the risk of losing
payroll tax
money because only budget surplus revenue would be invested.
Many who
oppose Clinton's plan have lived through the Great Depression,
one of the
bleakest times in American history. While the Great Depression
was
triggered by a crash in the stock market, it is unlikely that
any such crash
will ever occur again. Currently, the stock market has many new
controls in
place, such as curbs and limits on margin accounts, which may
prevent
another market crash. Examine the absolute worst case scenario:
the market
crashes and the $700 billion investment is worth $0. In this
event, there
would still be about $2 trillion in a trust fund. Furthermore,
Clinton
proposes that beneficiaries have the so-called "safety net
feature of a
basic, monthly retirement stipend, rather than leaving future
retirees
entirely at the mercy of the stock market and their own investment
savvy."
Investing the Social Security trust fund in the stock market only
allows us,
as beneficiaries and future beneficiaries, the potential to receive
benefits
from a social welfare system that would otherwise risk extinction,
commonly
known as bankruptcy.
Of course there is the issue of who would make the actual investments.
Many people are concerned that their Social Security money will
be
controlled by politicians who might have their own special interests
or
political agendas. President Clinton proposes that the money
be invested
"in broad-based stock indexes similar to the Standard &
Poors Index under
the control of a private Social Security Investment Board, as
independent in
theory as the Federal Reserve." Currently the Federal Reserve
regulates and
monitors the economy. To date, there have been no reports of
conflict of
interest within the Federal Reserve. Therefore, an independent
management
board for Social Security would ensure that wise investment decisions
are
made which benefit all beneficiaries. Furthermore, "a central
independent
board would have only 1 cent administrative overhead per $100
invested
compared to $1 per $100 invested if accounts are owned through
private
individual brokerage accounts." Social Security beneficiaries
and future
beneficiaries would benefit from this tremendous savings as a
result of
having their money invested by a non-biased board.
Now is the time to act. Let us not wait until the system is
closer to
bankruptcy. Let us explore what many have referred to as the
unknown now,
with a small percentage of unanticipated funds before we need
to consider
any more radical decisions such as reducing benefits. As Social
Security is
the social welfare system for our nation, it belongs to us, the
people.
Therefore the government, which holds the key to Social Security
and in
essence, our future, needs to adjust the system to the needs of
it's
beneficiaries. Don't cut benefits, as many Americans rely on
Social
Security for a large portion of their income. Don't increase
the retirement
age because more and more Americans are retiring in their 50's
to play golf
in Florida or do whatever, wherever. And don't increase the tax
we pay,
because it's already being grumbled about by many Americans.
But do
increase our retirement income. It's time to accept some greater
risk, just
as the founding fathers did when declaring the colonies the United
States of
America and to take the leap of faith by investing in the stock
market.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"A look at the plan to save Social Security." San
Francisco Examiner,
January 31, 1999,
Sec. C, p. 16.
Return to English 122 syllabus
Return to English 122 main page
Questions? Brian McKinney (bmckinne@home.com)