| Fidelity pressured by human rights groups
By Amanda B. Kish, CFA
In general, I'm not a big fan of socially responsible investing. I certainly believe its aims are noble, but I think investing is one place where you don't want to constrain yourself to companies that meet certain social guidelines. I think it's wiser to invest your dollars in those companies that offer the greatest potential for growth, and donate your time or money to causes about which you feel strongly. That said, this situation may be an exception. The genocide in Darfur is truly horrendous, and the world as a whole needs to see what's going on there. In a case like this, I can't fault activist groups for pressuring Fidelity to divest this stock. Besides, Fidelity's holdings in PetroChina were a relatively insignificant portion of the firm's overall portfolio. Selling off its exposure probably won't meaningfully affect any Fidelity fundholders -- which should, of course, be the company's primary concern. Sometimes, industry leaders must set an example for others. I think Fidelity can gain a lot of good P.R. here, not to mention social progress, at very little expense to itself or its loyal fundholders. |