From: bpayne37@comcast.net
To: gretchen@gis.nmt.edu
Cc: "dave" dave@radfreenm.org, "Rhgilkeson" Rhgilkeson@aol.com,
Lowry@vassar.edu
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2009 6:39:44 AM GMT -07:00
US/Canada Mountain
Subject: pollution: cadmium, nickel, and coal, of course
Hello
Gretchen,
google
gretchen
hoffman pnm
cadmium and nickel pollution at sandia labs.
best
regards
bill
From: bpayne37@comcast.net
To:
Rhgilkeson[at]aol.com
Cc: dave[at]radfreenm.org, dmccoy[at]swcp.com,
mccoydb01[at]msn.com, Rhgilkeson[at]aol.com
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2009
2:02:38 PM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain
Subject: First draft of
cadmium/nickel statistical analysis link attached
Hello Bob and Dave,
Cadmium and nickel data have been entered, grouped into 'before' and
'after, then sorted.
http://home.comcast.net/~bpayne37/moats/stats/s9.htm
On the sorted data, if there is lots of green at the top of a column
and lots of red at the bottom, this may mean pollution is increasing over time.
Moats et al., by inventing data, have, in some cases, shown that
pollution grows less over time in the MWL. This is indicated by lots green at
the bottom of a data column.
We need to talk, made any adjustments to
the 'before'/'after' dates, recompute, then compute U for the columns which
look to show statistical pollution significance.
Moats et al., I
believe, should be given an opporunity to review the final edited page and
comment in writing.
Let me know your comments.
Dave, I hope
you will be able to comment from Guatemala.
bill
Billy Brown 268-0933 mobile 401-8139 email
welbert53@aol.com
|