Correspondence: Charlie Price to Alexander; DOE/ Erbschloe to Price

First Blog          Last Blog

643 Peachtree Lane

Kingston, TN 37763

November 8, 2005

 Phone: 865-376-9636

Email: pceprice@aol.com

 

 

Senator Bill Frist

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

 

Dear Senator Frist:

 

We are asking for your help in increasing our retirement benefits and decreasing our cost of living.  It is becoming more and more difficult for us to support ourselves. The cost of necessities and taxes keep rising and we need to hire help as we get unable to do home maintenance ourselves.  Both of us have health problems that require some expenses not covered by insurance.  But our income has not increased except for small adjustments in Social Security.

 

We are probably more fortunate than many of our age.  We both have college educations. Both of us worked until we reached retirement age and earned reasonable salaries.  Elma taught school and has a Tennessee teacher’s retirement plus Social Security benefits.  Charles worked 30 years in Oak Ridge AEC/ERDA/DOE facilities as an engineer, first for Union Carbide Corp., then retired in 1992 after Martin-Marietta took over as contractor for DOE; he received the standard employer provided pension plus Social Security.  We were able to save a modest amount in IRAs and are now taking mandatory withdrawals.  We have lived in the same house for 42 years and it is paid for.

 

We ask that, as our representative, you carefully consider government spending and the tax burdens placed upon us.  Please do whatever you can to keep the cost of necessities down.  Just yesterday, we had to buy a new car battery and were astounded at the cost.

 

Should we not expect some increase in our pensions?  We understand that DOE will not approve an increase in Charles’ and other Oak Ridge retiree pensions although there are funds that were set aside during work years to pay for retirement.  Many other Oak Ridge retirees are upset about this and find that DOE contractor retirees in other parts of the country have received better benefits.  We don’t know if you have any influence over DOE but it seems to us that our representatives should make sure they treat us equitably. Tennessee school teachers are not paid very well and their pensions are meager.  This is one reason the USA is slipping in educating our children.  It would help if something could done to obtain better teachers; improved salaries and pensions might be one way.

 

We appreciate your dedicated service to us and our country.  Please consider our concerns.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Elma R. Price and Charles E. Price

 

1/7/06 – this same letter sent to Rep. Lincoln Davis and Sen. Lamar Alexander.  No response yet from Frist.  A “bland” letter received from Davis but no commitment.  Alexander replied and said he would ask DOE for a response.

 ===========

 

 

========Below is the letter sent to Charlie Price and wife from DOE Washington ===========


Department of Energy

Office of Science

Washington, DC 20585

Office of the Director

December 29, 2005

    Mr. and Mrs. Charles Price

643 Peachtree Lane

Kingston, Tennessee 37763

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Price,

This is in response to your November 8, 2005, letter to Senator Lamar Alexander in which you requested assistance in obtaining an equitable adjustment for pensions for former Oak Ridge employees. Senator Alexander requested that the Department of Energy respond to you directly and copy his office.

The private sector companies that manage the Department of Energy (DOC) facilities in Oak Ridge (UT-Battelle, LLC, and BWXT Y-12, LLC) continue to meet with and receive input from representatives of the Coalition of Oak Ridge Retired Employees (CORRE). When they find inequities the companies seek to change their benefit plans. On January 1, 2004, for example, an ad-hoc increase was given to eligible retirees or their surviving spouses who were receiving less than $600 or $400 per month, respectively.

These companies report that they have a surplus in pension assets; however, the amount in the pension fund can fluctuate up or down based on the performance of invested pension assets. Additionally, the surplus has already been reduced by recent plan enhancements and changes in the Internal Revenue Service mortality tables that are used to determine pension liabilities. These companies have a fiduciary responsibility to protect pension benefits for both current employees and retirees.

In 2004, UT-Battelle commissioned a Benefits Valuation Study that, according to the UT-Battelle Chief Financial Officer, shows the defined benefit plan to be approximately 14 percent higher than the comparators' plans. These comparators include several universities, Argonne National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Battelle Memorial Institute, and private industry giants such as General Electric, Motorola, Merck, Honeywell, and Dow Chemical.

The UT -Battelle Benefits Manager has confirmed that retirees are receiving, at a minimum, the promised dollar value of their pension plans. According to UT - Battelle, it has met or exceeded all legal requirements for pension payments to retirees.

 

Mr. and Mrs. Charles Price


If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 586-5440, or Gerald Boyd, Manager, Oak Ridge Office, at (865) 576-4444.

Sincerely,

(original signed)

Donald R. Erbschloe

Acting Chief Operating Officer Office of Science

cc:

Senator Lamar Alexander

Attn: Elizabeth Howell

800 Market Street, Suite 112

Knoxville, TN 37802

Jill Sigal, CI-lIFORS

Eric Nicoll, CI-20/FORS

George J. Malosh, M-2, SC-OR

Robert J. Brown, M-3, SC-OR

Daniel H. Wilken, AD-40, SC-OR

 

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Top of topic   Last Blog

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Subject: Correspondence: Charlie Price to Alexander; DOE/ Erbschloe to Price

Blog Title: What constitutes Equitable?

Author: Al Brooks E-Mail: brooks50@comcast.net

 

Comment: I guess the word 'equitable' has been redefined in the last twenty years. Assuming that my western counterparts and I had equitable salaries at my retirement twenty years ago, my multiplier factor of 1.2 compared to 2.5 gave me an initial handicap of 108 %; followed by an inflation loss of 55 %over a twenty year period compensated by adjustments of 26.7 %. This is a current handicap of about 65 %. That may be called equitable in DC but in TN it's called a rip-off.

 

Seriously, 'equitable' is a subjective word meaning different things to different people. Even the statement "In 2004, UT-Battelle commissioned a Benefits Valuation Study that, according to the UT-Battelle Chief Financial Officer, shows the defined benefit plan to be approximately 14 percent higher than the comparators' plans." is of little use unless the basis for the comparison is disclosed. 'Equitable' includes approximate equality in the following: a) Compensation for equivalent, actual job content with consideration of local costs-of-living, b) Use of similar pension models and equivalent plan parameters including service allowed, multipliers and inflation adjustments, and c) A comparison of actual pension results. In the reply from DOE/Erbschole there is a glaring absence of the south-west DOE installations which have for years been considered a peer group for Oak Ridge. The lack of these installations in the study raises a very serious question. It is also peculiar that: if the Oak Ridge pensions are truly 14 % above some national average, the DOE has not publicized the fact and why they made a recent adjustment of 23%. I'll reserve final judgment until I can get a copy of this fabulous report, Benefits Valuation Study, if I can. I shall repeat my pension analysis including the multiplier effect.

 

See http://home.comcast.net/~brooks50/PensionInflation.htm for more details of the model and backup data.

 

This DOE claim of a 14% above average pension plans has prompted a new analysis of the overall Oak Ridge pension plan equity against an average of DOE installations. Oak Ridge has only 44% of the overall equity of the averaged installations. These results conflict with the DOE claim.

 

Goto Top

 

Late Breaking Information

 

Just received, a copy of a recent letter DOE to CORRE re Pension Equity – DOE compares recent plan benefits PLUS Social Security payments to the terminal wages to reach the conclusion that the Oak Ridge plans are generous: the initial combined benefit being 90% of the terminal wages. While this, if true, explains some of the difference between local analyses and DOE claims, it does not explain why the pension benefits are not adjusted for inflation. More on this in an amended analysis. AAB

 

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&