Coalition of Oak Ridge Retired Employees (CORRE)

Working for Fair, Equitable, and Competitive Benefits

For Former K-25, Y-12, and ORNL Employees

                                                                                     P. O. Box 4266                                      

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-4266

 

 

Press Release

For Immediate Release

Contact:  Sandy Dean at 865-966-8356

Email:  deansk@tds.net

 

Tennessee Congressman, DOE, and DOE Contractor management are requested to support new policy for DOE Defined Benefit Retirement plans

 

The Coalition of Oak Ridge Retirees (CORRE) sent letters today to Senators Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker and Representatives Lincoln Davis, John Duncan, and Zach Wamp requesting them to support and advocate the adoption of a new policy for the defined benefit plans of Department of Energy contractors.  The new policy would ensure that adjustments to pensions are made to compensate partially for inflation when there are sufficient funds in the plans.  The pension plans are paid for by the DOE.  Additional letters were sent to the managers of contractors in Oak Ridge operating DOE facilities there, and to the manager of DOE operation in Oak Ridge. 

 

Modification of the DOE Draft Document Notice N 351.1 is required

 

DOE Notice N 351.1 is slated to become the policy of DOE after resolution of comments and “stakeholder” input invited by DOE recently.  (Ref:  http://management.energy.gov/request_for_comments.htm)  CORRE is submitting comments to DOE on 351.1 to DOE in response to the invitation.  CORRE is recommending changes that would implement new DOE policies on the management and administration of pensions when it is finalized and becomes a DOE order.  In particular, there is a need to incorporate clarifying and defining language in the notice to provide guidelines for fair treatment of DOE contractor retirees who receive their benefits from defined benefit (DB) pension plans implemented by their contractors.  This is extremely important and urgent, as most of the 100,000 retirees of DOE contractors retired under defined benefit plans.

 

CORRE’s comments on DOE N 351.1 (attached) provide the changes that are needed to establish criteria and guidelines to be used by DOE in managing and administering DB plans, especially in assuring consideration of retirees.  These criteria would go a long way toward removing the subjectivity and neglect now involved in administering DB plans, and toward implementing a fair system for treatment of retirees across the DOE complex. 

 

 

History of the Failure of DOE to administer pension plans fairly

 

According to DOE, 45 defined benefit plans and 37 defined contribution plans serve approximately 100,000 retirees and another 100,000 current employees and future retirees of DOE contractors in 20 different states.  At best, DOE has a spotty, disinterested, and blemished record in managing these plans in a consistent and prudent manner that recognizes the history, implied promises to retirees, and underlying premises of the contractors who put these plans in place for "their" employees. Surely, a consensus should be sought among the representatives and senators of these states (and their colleagues) to see that appropriate changes are made.  The current situation requires a Congressional solution, and CORRE is asking members of its Tennessee delegation to take the lead to get this accomplished and to get closure on an issue so important to so many people in Tennessee and the other 19 states.

 

History of the Failure of DOE Pension Plan for the retirees of Oak Ridge Contractors

 

The pension plans of the contractors of DOE in Oak Ridge are among the worst in the DOE system.  The multipliers for service are among the lowest. There are no contractual provisions for cost-of-living adjustments. DOE has made no contributions out of their budget to Oak Ridge retirement plans in 23 years, living off and paying out of pension investment earnings for increased pension liabilities of new hires, raises of personnel, and pension enhancements to employees.  Furthermore, there is no corporate memory of DOE or the limited liability companies to continue practices of granting periodic adjustments to retirees as was the practice historically by Union Carbide Corp, the long-time holder of the contract for all DOE facilities.

 

See attached graphics for examples of this discriminatory practice by DOE.  (Fig 1 and Figure 2)

 

What are the principal provisions of the recommendations for DOE Policy?

 

CORRE recommends the attached detailed guidelines and criteria be used to implement and manage such augmentation, and that these criteria and provisions be incorporated into N 351.1.  The following is a summary of the detailed criteria:

 

  1. Conditions under which the separate pensions of defined benefit plans will be administered.
  2. That the under-funded plans will be funded in accordance with the Pension Protection Act (PPA) requirements.
  3. Retiree benefits from fully funded DB plans (i.e., assets/liabilities=100%) may be augmented at the contractor’s request and with the advanced approval of the Secretary of Energy (Secretary), provided the funds are available and the augmentation is based on sound management practices as regards that individual DB plan fund.
  4. Under no conditions shall the contractor propose or DOE approve a transfer of funds from the DB plan surplus for other purposes.
  5. At least biennially (every two years), DOE contractors shall review lost purchasing power of existing retirees and qualified survivors and propose appropriate augmentation of pensions. 
  6. At a minimum, the goal of DOE and the contractors shall be to maintain pensions at 75% of lost purchasing power calculated as follows and using the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  7. The conditions under which the Secretary will approve augmentation or adjustments for retirees.
  8. If there are insufficient funds, the specification of how the Secretary of Energy will budget for increases in the pension fund.
  9. Contractors and DOE are to be cognizant of historical practices at the locations managed and provisions for augmentation of DB plans for retirees and covered employees at such locations.

 

These charts that show why the DOE must have guidelines for administering defined benefit plans.

 

 

 

 

Chart 1.  There are sufficient funds in the Oak Ridge pension plan to make adjustments now for retirees.

 

 

 

Chart 2. The DOE has not made a contribution for its current employees from the DOE budget to the Oak Ridge contractor MEPP (multi-employer plan which covers most retirees) since 1984.  Why is that?  Well, DOE gave very little adjustment for inflation.

 

 

Chart 3.  Most of the Oak Ridge retirees retired when the multiplier was 1.2. 

 

 

To obtain more information

 

CORRE officials are available for provision of additional information.  Contacts:

 

  1. L. (Pete) Lotts ,  865-675-7394, allots@tds.net

Keith Kibbe,  865-938-1467, kandjkibbe@comcast.net

 

End of Press Release