Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Tongue piercings
Labels: inventions, sneakers
Links to this post:
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
A better mousetrap
Labels: inventions, sayings
Links to this post:
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
The Next White President
Links to this post:
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Notorious
Labels: movies
Links to this post:
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
It was 20 years ago today
Labels: anniversary, Diane
Links to this post:
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Zeugma, Syllepsis, and Petsmart
Over on the Volokh conspiracy they were talking about zeugmas and syllepses. If I have it right, zeugma is any yoking in a parallelism (I went to work by bus and by bike) while a syllepsis has a mismatch (She blew my nose, and then she blew my mind.)
What is the word for a word that can be split two ways? For instance:
- Is Petsmart "Pets mart" or "Pet smart".
- On Arrested Development, the combined Analyst and Therapist was called the AnalRapist.
- The site penisland wasn't about stationery, it was about penes.
- Is the online world Runescape "Rune scape" or "Run escape"?
- I used to work in Billerica - when I use that as a user name, people think it's Bill Erica.
Labels: language, rhetoric, syllepsis, volokh, zeugma
Links to this post:
Friday, October 31, 2008
Attribution of polar warming to human influence : Abstract : Nature Geoscience
Links to this post:
Friday, October 24, 2008
Just speculating
Labels: contracts, free markets, laissez-faire, oil, speculators, zero-sum
Links to this post:
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Laissez fail
Labels: economics
Links to this post:
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Drinking in public at the ballpark
Officers on paid detail assisted Fenway Park security in removing 24-year-old Warren Woods and another fan for their behavior during the game. Police said the men became verbally abusive and continued to be belligerent once outside the park. Woods was charged with being a disorderly person and drinking in public.It seems he was drinking before he was ejected, that is while he was at Fenway Park. If drinking at Fenway Park is drinking in public, then there are tens of thousands of people guilty of that every game (assuming the stuff they sell as "beer" contains alcohol.)
Labels: beer, drinking, drinking in public, Fenway, Jagermeister
Links to this post:
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Menthol the bait to trap smokers, researchers say
Hoping to lure a new generation of smokers, tobacco companies routinely manipulate levels of menthol so that their cigarettes prove more appealing and less harsh to novice users, Boston researchers reported yesterday. Scientists from the Harvard School of Public Health scoured thousands of pages of industry documents from the 1980s through 2006 and commissioned laboratory tests of cigarettes to confirm a long-suspected link between menthol levels and marketing strategies. The researchers found that tobacco companies embrace a Goldilocks approach when launching brands: Add too little menthol, a chemical that has an effect akin to anesthesia, and tobacco retains its intense bite. Add too much, and first-time smokers are overwhelmed. Add just the right amount, and cigarettes become powerfully seductive.Evil I say, Evil! Next up: This salsa comes in mild, medium, and hot - is this part of the Mexicanization-of-America plot? And what about coffee coming in Decaf, regular, and French roast? Are the French in on it too? (Note how Kraft too suddenly and quietly took Postum off the market -- they're part of the conspiracy too.) How dare they give us consumers what we want?
Labels: tobacco
Links to this post:
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
The House That Ruth Built
Labels: Yankee Stadium, Yankees
Links to this post:
Friday, June 20, 2008
Gloucester Pregnancies
Labels: DSS, Gloucester, YFZ
Drop an email if you have a chance.
Links to this post:
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Globe warms up to light-free Earth Hour - BostonHerald.com
The environmental group WWF urged governments, businesses and households to turn back to candle power for at least 60 minutes starting at 8 p.m. wherever they were. ... Earth Hour officials hoped 100 million people would turn off their nonessential lights and electronic goods for the hour. Electricity plants produce greenhouse gases that fuel climate change. ... Darkened restaurants glowed with candlelight in San Francisco while the Golden Gate Bridge, Coit Tower and other landmarks extinguished lights for an hour.Assuming for the sake of argument that climate change is a bad thing and that human-based activities are a significant factor, what's the "carbon footprint" of candlelight compared to efficient electric lights?
Links to this post:
Monday, March 17, 2008
Chess joke
My kids have been playing Runescape for a few years. Recently the folks behind it, Jagex, have added a site devoted to games, FunOrb, and I've been playing rapid chess there myself (online games against other humans.)
Is this joke original with me, or did I hear it somewhere?
Two great chess masters sit down to play a game. White opens with pawn to king four (e4 for you youngsters). Black silently studies the board. Minutes go by, and after an hour Black tips over his king and says "You have an unbeatable position."
I suspect that nobody who is not a mathematician or computer scientist would find this funny.
Links to this post:
Friday, March 14, 2008
Eliot Spitzer
I’ll throw in my two cents. I doubt I’ve got anything to say that hasn’t been said already somewhere in the blogosphere.
- Governor Spitzer was doing his part to help wayward girls. That’s commendable.
- Dinesh D’Souza disagrees with Alan Dershowitz, pointing out the prostitution has victims, in this case Mrs. Spitzer, their daughters, the citizens of New York, and Professor Dershowitz. No man is an island, so it follows that every choice has consequences, good or bad, for non-participants. That doesn’t make them victims, and doesn’t justify criminalizing the behavior, if freedom is to have any meaning.
- I agree with those who are enjoying the exposure of former-prosecutor Spitzer’s hypocrisy, and the irony of the situation.
- In his dissent to Lawrence v. Texas, Justice Antonin Scalia suggests that the holding, that "majoritarian sexual morality is not even a legitimate state interest" means laws against prostitution cannot "survive rational-basis review."
- Around here, the Woburn and Burlington police have been running stings and surveillance operations to find escorts who are working in private rooms in local hotels. I understand that streetwalking may be as disturbing to other users of the public streets as other vendors and business nuisances, but they are going after the same sorts of Internet-based escorts as Governor Spitzer did business with. They are engaging, in private, in activities which would be completely legal were it not for the commercial aspect. There are enough crimes with actual unwilling victims here (things like bicycle and GPS theft) that I’d much rather the limited police resources be directed towards solving or preventing those crimes.
- I heard Professor Dershowitz on WBZ-AM (haven’t been able to find this in a transcript online) saying something along the lines that if every politician who engaged in some indiscretion had to resign, we wouldn’t have any elected officials. I disagree. If these laws, which the Professor seems only now to be loudly complaining about, were enforced against every minor violation, the bad laws would be repealed.
Labels: Dershowitz, Prostitution, Spitzer
sincerely,
John (aka Smoky Jack).
Links to this post:
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
New Amsterdam
I'm watching the new Fox show New Amsterdam, the one whose premise bears an entirely accidental resemblance to Pete Hamill's Forever, about an immortal guy living in Manhattan (hmm -- I wonder what kind of rent control he's got on his apartment!)
Besides the hundreds of girlfriends in the 400 years he's been alive, he's had so many identical dogs that he calls them by number. (His current dog is "36".)
I don't know where the show is going. Last night it seemed to go in a Quantum Leap direction -- theorizing that one can flashback within their own lifetime, John Anderson remembers a time with parallels to the present when he failed to set right what once went wrong, so he'll do the right thing now. It's not clear how many interesting places he's been -- is it Zelig or Forrest Gump or Mr. Peabody and the Wayback Machine? (Unlike Hamill's protagonist, he can leave Manhattan, and can even leave the five boroughs.) Anyway, we learned that during the Civil War he was a medic in the Washington, DC area.
Which means we may well finally have a show that's about Abraham Lincoln's Doctor's Dog!
Labels: New Amsterdam, TV
Links to this post:
Friday, February 29, 2008
Leap Year Day
Labels: Bissextile, bleg, Leap year
Links to this post:
Leap Year Day
Links to this post:
Friday, February 15, 2008
The Associated Press: Obama a Hit in Japanese Town
According to an AP story, the central Japanese city of Obama (population 32,000) has adopted its namesake candidate, who has never visited.
Obama gives good speeches and has a good voice, so I want him to do well. And, of course, we share the same name," said Seiji Fujiwara, a hotel executive and leader of a local support group established earlier this month for the Illinois senator.
Isn't that racist, calling an African-American well-spoken? Isn't that just a codeword for articulate, because as Joe Biden found out early last year, it implies that unlike white people, it is surprising that African-Americans are articulate.
I wondered about that reasoning by Eugene Robinson, or Jesse Jackson. Would it be off-color or suggestive if someone compliments a white candidate because that implies this particular feature is notable because it is rare in whites?
Labels: race Japan Obama
Links to this post:
Saturday, February 02, 2008
Rape by deceit, sloppy reporting
Labels: rape, reporting, Wendy Murphy
Links to this post:
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
What's a "character flaw"
Drug or alcohol abusers who relapse, even after long periods of abstinence, are often reviled as too weak or undisciplined to straighten themselves out. But a UNC Chapel Hill psychologist has found evidence that suggests, in fact, that addicts’ brains may be wired in a way that makes them more prone to give in to temptation. The research, published in the December issue of the Journal of Neuroscience, provides further evidence that addiction is a disease, not a character flaw, said Charlotte Boettiger, an assistant professor of psychology at UNC Chapel Hill and the lead author of the paper released last week.I thought character was our intrinsic, and largely immutable, makeup (compared to personality, which can be more variable, or mood, which is highly variable.) Merriam-Webster online distinguishes character as the aggregate of moral qualities by which a person is judged apart from intelligence, competence, or special talents (distinguishing character, disposition, temperament, temper, and personality). Many non-physical, personality, traits are genetically influenced. Some people have to work harder than others to get to the same place -- for some things, no amount of hard work can compensate. How does the fact that a particular trait, in this case impulsivity and the tendency to addiction, is genetically influenced preclude it from being a character flaw? What does it matter if something is a character flaw or not? I want the driver I'm sharing the road with to be sober. I don't care if he's sober because he doesn't have a particular craving for alcohol, or if he's sober because he's managed to overcome that craving.
Links to this post:
Monday, January 14, 2008
Winters in Northeast getting milder - no, really - BostonHerald.com
“Winter is warming greater than any other season,” said Elizabeth Burakowski, who analyzed data from dozens of weather stations for her master’s thesis in collaboration with Cameron Wake, a professor at the University of New Hampshire’s Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space.Remind me again why this is a bad thing?
Links to this post:
Monday, December 10, 2007
Illuminating aircraft
Links to this post:
Locking down Saugus High
Labels: guns, lockdowns, schools
Links to this post:
Whatever are they trying to say?
Police investigate death of man hit by cruisers Associated Press - December 10, 2007 9:15 AM ET DOVER, Vt. (AP) - An autopsy is expected to be performed today on the body of a man who was struck by two state police cruisers in Dover. Police say they still don't know yet what killed 22-year-old Gerald Peterson of Dover, who they say was laying in the road when he was hit.I read this wire service story in this morning's Boston Herald
DOVER, Vt. - The Vermont State Police and Dover police are investigating what is being called the untimely death of a 22-year-old man hit by two state police cruisers while laying in the travel lane of Route 100 early yesterday morning. The victim is identified as Gerald Peterson of Dover.Inquiring minds want to know what or whom Mr. Peterson was laying. To their credit, The Burlington Free Press reports thusly:
DOVER -- The Vermont State Police and Dover police are investigating what is being called the untimely death of a 22-year-old man hit by two state police cruisers while lying in the travel lane of Vermont 100 early Sunday morning.
Labels: grammar
Links to this post:
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
Beowulf
If they can make an entire movie in Aramaic, why isn't Beowulf being released in the original? [Then again, the same guy who made the Aramaic movie had to have his first movie dubbed from Australian into English.])
I heard that Blockbuster is going to downsize and concentrate more on new releases. (link?) Isn't that what they're already doing? I know this because I once asked a clerk there for "Witness for the Prosecution" "What?", and reminding him "with Tyrone Power" only got "Who?"

Any resemblance?
Labels: Aramaic, Beowulf, MelGibson, OldEnglish, TyronePower
Links to this post:
Thursday, November 01, 2007
Zero Sum
Jordan's Furniture ran a promotion this past spring: If the Red Sox won the World Series, the entire purchase price of your furniture would be returned. So that he could cheer for the home team, Eliot purchased an insurance policy. (Soon after Warren Buffett bought the company, Barry stopped doing the commercials.) Newsradio was interviewing folks and they kept saying "It's win-win, the Red Sox are happy, the fans are happy, the customers got free furniture, and Jordan's was insured." Never mind the Indians and the Rockies, somebody has to pay for all this, namely the insurance company. To be fair, the Boston Globe story cited does note this.
On the other hand, home prices are falling. The bubble has burst, and prices, which aren't supposed to drop because "they aren't making any more" land, are down to a level not seen for, oh, two or three years. This is supposed to be a tragedy, but people aren't buying houses for fuel. One family moves out, another family moves in. There are still millions of people (30% of the country, half of New Yorkers) who don't own the house they live in. For every home-seller who loses a dollar because his house isn't worth as much as he hopes, there is a home-buyer who gains a dollar because he didn't have to spend as much as he might have - and there are some people who can afford houses who wouldn't be able to otherwise.
Labels: economics, housing, prices, zero-sum
Links to this post:
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Foo Dogs - It’s the economy, stupid
Early this week the Herald ran a puff piece about the two million dollar house that Paul Pedini, a vice president at Modern Continental, the company responsible for the Big Dig built incorporating steel and concrete scrap from the Central Artery demolition. The article mentioned that among the castoffs were two foo dogs that had been at the Chinatown Gate and have since been replaced as part of the contract.
The stories mentioned that the statues were gifts from Taiwan in 1982 - not exactly ancient history.
Herald muckraker Michelle McPhee is trying to make this out to be the Mayor Curley's Desk for the new century. She featured quotes from Amy Lung from the Chinese Progressive Agency who said "The Big Dig contractor has no connection to China, and no right to the statues" (although she didn't say that there was nothing wrong with the pair that went to the Kowloon Restaurant which does have a connection to China.) City Councilor Stephen Murphy said "They belong in Boston, not Lexington." And City Councilor Sam Yoon said "These statues obviously had great sentimental value to the Chinatown community." 
But the most recent article shows that sentimentality isn't what's most important. Yoon wants the statues auctioned with the proceeds going to the Chinatown crime watch: "By auctioning these statues, Mr. Pedini himself could be the highest bidder for them," he said. In other words, he doesn't care if the foo dogs are in Lexington, or if they belong to someone with no connection to China, as long as he gets the money.
Labels: BigDig, China, FooDog, News
Links to this post:
Saturday, October 06, 2007
You break it, it's yours
"You break it, it's yours", or as the lawyers say, "Strict liability".
Carol Gotbaum died in police custody at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport.
Phoenix Police spokesman Sgt. Andy Hill defended his department saying in part: "Officers did everything they could to save the life of a citizen."
I suppose leaving her alone, and not putting her in the handcuffs that seem to be the cause of her death, or as the doctors say, "Primum non nocere" never occurred to them.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
At Harvard, we don't piss on our hands
Researchers from the American Society for Microbiology and the Soap and Detergent Association made headlines lately when they hung out in public restrooms ("No, we're not watching you wash your hands, we're hoping to have anonymous sex with a US Senator") and observed that only 57% of men at Turner Field washed their hands after using the bathroom, compared to 95% of women. The gender gap got big play, and also that many more people reported in a telephone survey that they wash after using the bathroom than actually did. The ASM even maintains Washup.org, a site dedicated to hand washing. Their fact sheet notes that the CDC says "the single most important thing we can do to keep from getting sick and spreading illness to others is to clean our hands." That's fine, but what is it about unzipping my fly, or touching my own penis, makes my hands particularly more unclean than they were before?
Biostatisticians love to count and do regression studies. Sowhere's the study that after controlling for people who wash their hands before eating or preparing food, and after contacting animals, feces, other people, and dirty surfaces, determins if men who wash their hands after urinating get sick any less often than those who don't piss on their hands?Links to this post:
Saturday, September 15, 2007
New Hampshire breaks its promise, jails man for asking them to keep it
New Hampshire doesn't have a sales tax, except 8% on hotel rooms, restaurant meals, car rentals, and tobacco, electricity, communications and real estate transfers are also taxed.
New Hampshire doesn't have an income tax, except on income earned by deferring consumption and investing.
New Hampshire local property taxes go to local services, except $4.92 per thousand goes to a statewide education pool.
This dearth of tax revenue means that New Hampshire has to fund its roads with turnpike tolls. Due to the locations of the toll booths, these tolls tend to hit folks traveling to and from Massachusetts, and within the town of Merrimack, particularly hard.
Formerly, New Hampshire sold tokens for 12.5 cents each ($5 for a roll of 40) that were good for 25 cents of toll. In order to motivate people to use electronic transponders, which provide a discount of only 30%, New Hampshire stopped selling the tokens in 2005, and stopped honoring them on Janyary 1, 2006.
The NH State Senate approved a measure that would have allowed a partial redemption (the tokens would have been usable at 12.5 cents, no discount or interest) in April 2006, but the NH House rejected the measure.
Praise is due to an elderly Braintree, Massachusetts man, Thomas Jensen, who showed more principle than the entire Granite State this week, choosing to spend 3 days in jail rather than pay $150 for allegedly stealing services by paying for his toll with the tokens New Hampshire had sold him with the promise that they could be used for that purpose.
There aren't that many tokens in circulation. How much could it cost New Hampshire to accept them at tolls, as they come in, compared to the cost of holding a trial and keeping Jensen in jail for three days?
I had replenished my roll before they went off sale and I had less than a roll in each car. I go through the Merrimack tolls to visit my parents about once or twice per month. If I'd known New Hampshire wouldn't be keeping its promise I might have signed up for a transponder at the discount price of $5, or maybe not. It certainly doesn't pay for me to buy one at $25 -- with its expected lifetime I'm better off paying full price ($5 per year for the transponder, versus $3.60 per year discount for one round trip per month), or taking the Burque and Daniel Webster Highways. In any case, I don't like the loss of privacy. (See this story about EZ Pass records being used by divorce attorneys.)
An earlier story in Fosters, on the trial, by Adam Krauss also illustrates the lying and lack of intelligence that is too rampant among police. Trooper First Class James Downey testified that there was no contract involved in the sale of the token because "they're not signed ... If I go and buy a candy bar at the store, I don't have a contract with that store." For a contract to be valid there must be offer, acceptance and consideration. Senior Magazine's article specifically addresses contracts that exist in the selling of food. (There was no argument that the sale of tokens was for real estate or couldn't be complete in a year or was otherwise subject to the statute of frauds.)$nbsp;But if Downey is right and there is no contract, why do we owe New Hampshire 50 cents as we exit the Everett Turnpike?
Labels: contracts, NewHampshire, NH, tokens, tolls
Links to this post:
Monday, September 10, 2007
Racially segregated nursing homes
The article noted that she lives in Boston at South Cove Manor, "one of the nation's only all-Asian nursing facilities". That seems strange, but the web site for South Cove Manor proudly states "Serving the Chinese elderly is our sole mission," repeating that mission statement on the admissions page.
How do they get away with racial discrimination like this?
Links to this post:
Saturday, September 08, 2007
The Privileged Classes
1. State Treasurer Tim Cahill
The Boston Herald reported on September 7 that Massachusetts State Treasurer Tim Cahill's daughter was busted at Logan Airport for trying to bring peaches home from Italy. He had to pay a $300 fine for forgetting something was in a bag, and that seems a lot less than folks who forget there is a gun in their bags face. (Here's a recent story about Kansas City Chiefs star Bill Maas who made that mistake, and facecs a $500 fine and 6 months in jail, plus a $10,000 TSA fine.) A gun could be useful on a plane -- the heros of flight 93 had to make due with a serving cart. But fruit from the Mediterranean? There is a very real risk that it could harbor insect pests. (That page from the USDA's APHIS site lists peaches first among the fruits that Medflies can attack.) I don't leave the country very often, but I certainly know there's a restriction on agricultural products.
In any case what concerned me was Cahill's statement about the Customs agents: "It didn't appear to me that they knew who I was nor cared." (He said he told the agents he was a government official but never identified himself as the treasurer -- and apparently he never asked "Do you know who I am?" -- maybe because that had just failed for Larry Craig in another airport.)
Why should Customs agents have cared? Why does Cahill think state officials should be treated any differently than other people?
2. Law Enforcement
In early July (I'm way backed on stuff I want to blog about), Glen Johnson wrote a piece for the AP, "Vehicle stickers raise questions about police favoritism". He describes a "thin blue line" sticker. He quotes Kenneth Waters, "For what purpose does the spouse display the 'thin blue line' decal on their automobile? Why immunity from the law of course."
Johnson says the state police don't treat drivers who display the stickers any differently, but spokesman Eric Benson uses weasel words when he says "The State police does not officially recognize" them (emphasis added).Over on Police World "La. Officer", also quoted by Johnson, in a thread from early 2004, tries to have it both ways. He writes "everyone that I stop has the same chance of getting a ticket or not" but he had just written "If I stop someone with one of these stickers, and they are not leo or direct family of leo, they are almost certain to get written for whatever I can write them for." He also wrote "I do know of officers stopping non leo with the thin blue line stickers and politely telling the suspects that if the sticker is gone by the time they get back to the unit to get the ticket book, then they will probably leave with only a verbal warning if there is no warrants out for them." -- which means that he is violating his own oath of office for allowing his brothers in blue to violate, under color of law, these drivers' constitutionally protected right to free expression.
Tpartrg310 on Police World explains that he puts the logo on his car "to identify [himself] as law enforcement officers. And that more than likely we were 'good guys' and probaly armed." I'm a good guy, and I might be armed -- I think I'm going to do my part for law enforcement and get one of those stickers.
Labels: Cahill, police, privilege, unequal_treatment
Links to this post:
Wednesday, September 05, 2007
Mapping own DNA changes scientist's life - CNN.com
So J. Craig Venter has published his own human genome. He used to run the Celera Genomics Group. The CNN story says that when Celera satisfied the Human Genome Project in 2000 (or 2003 according to the project's link, above) what they published was a composite.
I remain confused. What did HGP have?
HGP's site says there are between 20 and 25 thousand genes, but 3 billion base pairs. There is no one human genome, because we're different. And Venter has published 6 billion letters (is he counting each pair twice? That would be like counting each letter in anything twice, once for the ink, and once for the negative space.)
I figure my readership (all one of you) is by definition interested in minutiae, so maybe you can explain the subtleties.
Labels: genetics
I believe he is counting each pair once, but each pair has 2 letters so 3 billion pairs = 6 billion letters but then again I just hang out with ex-Math team uber-wiener-dog types, never was one myself. I may have calculated wrong ;-)
Yes, it is a bit redundant info since A implies T, C implies G.... but... there really are 6 billion nucleotides, so if you wanted to count it that way I suppose it is justifiable.
Links to this post:
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Everybody is above average
Links to this post:
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Concentrated or high volume (quality or quantity?)
Labels: conundrum, quality, quantity
Links to this post:
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Phil Rizzuto
The Scooter is dead.
I'm too young to have seen him play, but I grew up with his Money Store ads and his announcing the Yankees on the radio.
I remember one call from a late 1970s summer, a pennant race not unlike the current season, except then the pennant meant more, and I had not yet gone over to the dark side. Rizzuto's call went something like this: "It's a long fly ball. It's going... It's going! (pause) Holy Cow! (pause) What a fantastic one-handed catch!"
Baseball was a lot more fun to listen to when Rizzuto was announcing.
I never got around to sending him a fan letter, and I never got around to sending one to Milton Friedman before his death last fall. I think that leaves only Yogi Berra still alive of my childhood heroes.
Labels: Heroes, obituary, Rizzuto, Scooter, Yankees
Links to this post:
Saturday, August 04, 2007
The Rime of the Ancient Mariner
It is an ancient Mariner,
And he stoppeth one of three.
`By thy long beard and glittering eye,
Now wherefore stopp'st thou me ?The Bridegroom's doors are opened wide,
And I am next of kin ;
The guests are met, the feast is set :
May'st hear the merry din.'
I've always believed in experiencing art with as many senses as possible, for better understanding. When I watched Hamlet with my kids (it's a ghost story!) I served Havarti. I read them The Cremation of Sam McGee while waiting for a school bus in sub-zero weather. Last week I realized a long-held dream, reading to them Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner while out at sea (OK, we were barely out of sight of land while taking a ferry across Long Island Sound.)
The two boys wandered off, but my daughter stayed to hear the end, which I reached just as we pulled into Port Jefferson harbor. I don't know how much they got, but like so many things that one understands only when older (10 is not about Bo Derek wearing nothing but corn-rows, it's about a mid-life crisis) I finally understand the poem. It's about old people forcing young people to miss parties by telling long, pointless stories!
Labels: coleridge, mariner, poetry
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
Fireworks
I particularly like chrysanthemums, and different colors.
I've just watched the Boston Pops fireworks on television for the first time in years. (Having come back from the display two towns over in Wakefield -- a break in tradition, instead of watching the Merrimack, NH display from behind my parents' complex -- I was going to take whatever I had leftover illicitly brought back from New Hampshire and destroy it by fire, but it was raining and getting cold, so I watched the show. It's been so long I didn't realize that it wasn't on public television.)
I don't like shells that make shapes. A few ovals are OK, even a rectangle, but the smiley faces and stars were too much. I also don't like the shells they had at Wakefield that have a chrysanthemum and the a 4-direction white blast in the center. It's good to know the technology keeps improving. I once saw the Macy's display -- I hear that this year they were using shells that land on the water and keep burning.
Maybe next year is the year I see the Charles Basin live. The kids aren't old enough, and I'm too old, to grab a space on the Esplanade. Last year my employer was moving to an office in Kendall Square that had a view of the barge, and I figured that's where I'd be today, but I am no longer with that emp-loyer. All I would have needed were some battery-operated lights to put my recently-acquired canoe in at around Soldier's Field and paddle down to the Basin, but my crew wasn't willing. Apparently that's easy enough.
Labels: Boston, changes, Fireworks, pyrotechnics, technology
Links to this post:
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
New Hampshire brings back outlawry
Answers.com cites West's Encyclopedia of American Law on Outlawry:
A declaration under Old English law by which a person found in contempt on a civil or criminal process was considered an outlaw—that is, someone who is beyond the protection or assistance of the law.
During the Anglo-Saxon period of English history, a person who committed certain crimes lost whatever protection he or she had under the law, forfeited whatever property he or she owned, and could be killed by anyone. If the crime committed was treason or a felony, a declaration of outlawry was tantamount to a conviction and attainder. Outlawry for a misdemeanor did not, however, amount to a conviction for the offense. The Norman Conquest led to significant changes in the law governing outlawry, eventually leading to its abolition.
It seems that New Hampshire has revived this status. An AP wire story seen in this morning's Boston Herald describes video of the police stop on May 11 during which Bruce McKay attacked Liko Kenney, who then shot and killed McKay before being killed himself by a passerby.
According to the story, "Prosecutors say McKay was justified in using nondeadly force on Kenney, 24, partly because of a violent confrontation between the two men four years earlier."
We can't ask Victoria Snelgrove how nondeadly police pepper spray is, because she was killed by Boston Police using similar so-called non-lethal force. And in any case deadly force is justified against an attacker using incapacitating force (cite?) because there is no reason to think that the attacker will stop once the victim is incapacitated, and if the victim doesn't defend himself while he has the capacity he will lose the opportunity to defend himself.
But what does that statement by the prosecutor mean? McKay and Kenney had had a confrontation four years earlier. This certainly justified McKay being cautious and calling for backup. Why is that sufficient provocation to justify McKay attacking Kenney?
Moments after Kenney shot McKay, former Marine Gregory Floyd killed Kenney using McKay's gun. Quoting further from the story, "The attorney general also said Floyd was justified in shooting Kenney." McKay was already dead. I haven't seen any evidence that Kenney was threatening Floyd or anyone else. So what justified Floyd's executing Kenney?
Has New Hampshire revived outlawry, and had it declared Kenney to be an outlaw?
Update: The Concord Monitor story gives more details: Floyd claims to have killed nineteen people before Kenney, and Floyd threatened to murder passenger Caleb Macaulay unless Macaulay complied with his orders to either "stop crying" (per Macauley, note that Macauley had also just been pepper-sprayed by McKay before seeing his friend killed) or "to get out of the car and get on his knees" (per Floyd.) Macauley also noted that Floyd ordered him to pick up McKay's gun, which Macauley had the sense to realize would have given Floyd an excuse to murder him as well. The story notes that Kenney was apprehensive about the encounter with McKay and requested that another officer handle the stop instead.
Labels: murder, outlawry, police
Links to this post:
Saturday, June 23, 2007
How big is a capital region?
Links to this post:
Saturday, June 16, 2007
Performance Enhancers
Links to this post:
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
The Sopranos
Links to this post:
Friday, March 16, 2007
Happy birthday, Diane
Labels: cancer, Hodgkins, Lymphoma, Memoriam, obituary
Links to this post:
Friday, February 16, 2007
DSS: Inflating by adding garbage
In a January 25 article, Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi opened the testimony before the House Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, which he forme dafter Haleigh Poutre allegedly was beaten into a coma by her adoptive parents in 2005 after the Department of Social Services decided against taking her away from the couple despite the girl's history of previous injuries by saying, "The number of children confirmed as abused and neglected in 2005-- 35,214 children -- would fill Fenway Park. Half were aged 7 and younger." He said said Massachusetts has the nation's third-highest rate of child abuse and neglect cases. DSS received court permission to remove Haleigh from life support, but when doctors said she showed signs of improvement she was moved to a rehabilitation hospital, where she remains. The state was criticized for moving too quickly to end life support. But then embattled DSS Commissioner Harry Spence acknowledged that cases such as Haleigh's grab public attention. But he said only about 100 of the 28,000 families DSS works with involve cases of grave danger to a child. He said Massachusetts has the second-lowest rate of death among child abuse victims, behind only New Hampshire, and the vast majority of cases his agency handles involve neglect such as failure to ensure a child is properly fed, bathed or supervised.So it seems to me that DSS is inflating its numbers by calling more situations abuse and neglect than other states, and than commonly accepted meanings of the term. The overwhelming majority of the 28,000 families they work with do not involve grave danger at all.
Labels: DSS
Links to this post:
Monday, February 12, 2007
Dr. Faustus
Links to this post:
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Barbaro
Links to this post:
Saturday, January 20, 2007
I forgive Frank Hargrove for sexually abusing me
Links to this post:
Monday, January 08, 2007
Longest period without adding a state
Links to this post:
Friday, December 22, 2006
Government Display of Christmas Trees:
John Rowe wrote:
Let's just declared Christmas to be a secular holiday and move on. I just got a Christmas card from the most fervent atheist I know.and I responded:
Sure, in fact why not declare belief in Jesus as secular, then all the unbelievers aren't practitioners of other religions, they're being unpatriotic. Nothing in the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses prohibits patriotism, right?
Responding to: Constitutional concerns aside, what is the libertarian argument for spending government resources to put up Christmas trees? This libertarian, who tends to be yellow-dog in his fervor (though not anarcho-capitalist), and very strict in his interpretation of what it means to "establish" a religion, doesn't particularly mind when the line gets blurred between local governments and community associations. A city of 8 million people is beyond local democracy, but a town of 30 thousand is small enough that it can't do much damage, it doesn't take many people to make a change, and it isn't so big that moving with your feet isn't an option.
If all other religions are suppressed does that not "Establish" Atheism as the state religion? No more than "No talking in the library" establishes ASL as the national language. Brooks Lyman (Brooklineman?) draws a parallel between the synagogues, Jewish businesses, etc. (whose existence doesn't offend him) and the government acting in promotion of a particular religion: It seems to be a small number of paranoid, publicity-seeking victim cult types who raise all these stinks, whatever the issue. Can't we just ignore them and get on with our lives? How the Hell did they manage to get a foot into the courtroom door on these issues? Nobody is offended by members of the dominant sect practicing their religion in their own churches or private lives.
How about Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer? Is he an antlered expression of Christianity? There were certain Jewish homes in the 1960s where Charlie Brown[*] Christmas and Rudolph were acceptable, but Little Drummer Boy was over the line. (Frosty was no problem.) Different people may draw their lines differently. [*]This may have been more based on the Charles Shultz exception (similar to the Chinese restaurant exception) than a deep analysis. Linus' speech from Luke 2:8-12 was my first exposure to Christian theology. Of course in addition to the line of "what we may bring into this house", the line for "what from the Christian celebrations of their holiday is it acceptable for us to share" is different from the line for "what is neutral, and acceptable for the proper role of government, and what is sectarian and not proper." Tom Cross writes I'm agnostic, and I celebrate Christmas. As I wrote earlier, analogies don't always hold. Just as all kosher food is hallal, I can't think of anything in Jewish liturgy or practice that is forbidden to Christians. A Christian is free to eat matzah and hear the story of the exodus. The reverse is not true: A Jew is forbidden to invoke the Trinity. The line isn't clear or bright, but there are some things that are too much like practicing another religion and are thus forbidden to Jews. Tom can do Christmas as much as he wants: there is no Agnosticism that he is denying or violating.
It is more likely that people of deep faith have taken a cultural symbol and wrapped it in religion because, for them, the religious aspect of Christmas is of primary importance. I can accept that, but that doesn't mean everyone else must believe the same as they do. Or people of shallower faith have taken a religiously-linked practice and claimed it is secular because they can cast a bigger tent. That doesn't mean that everybody has to get under that tent. Good point, David M. Nieporent, that there are a lot of people who have not secularized Christmas. It may be somewhat ironic that the only way to keep this Christian holiday from becoming secular is to refuse to celebrate it, thereby serving witness that it is not secular. Just as the only way to get the school to close on Rosh Hashonah may be to keep your children home from school, not that you particularly care, because use it or lose it. A lot of Jews avoid majority-sect practices as much as possible, to avoid a loss of tribal identity. A much as I like eggnog and pfeffernuse and pretty lights, they may have a point.
Talking about this with Dad, he sees anti-Semitism and asks:
What is the message sent when SeaTac takes down all its Christmas trees and then blames it on the Jews?
To which DavidE responded: This sounds awfully much like the argument of "don't make waves or they'll come kill the Jews." That's a discredited argument. and I clarified: It's more like "See, I told you there were anti-Semites out there. You can always find a stick to beat a dog, so don't worry about making waves, but be ever vigilant, and know that whether you accept them imposing their holiday on everybody, or ask for an acknowledgement that theirs is not the only sect, they'll use it to attack you." The message he heard SeaTac sending was "The Jews are trying to kill our holiday, just like they killed Our Lord." (Why did the Grinch have garlic in his soul? Why do some people think Ebenezer Scrooge is Jewish?)
Can anyone show a direct Christian tie to the tree other than the fact it is used as decoration during the multi-holiday season surrounding the Winter Solstice by Western cultures? There is no multi-holiday season, except that for any date you can find other holidays nearby. What's a "direct" tie? Some scholars think Jews learned circumcision from the Egyptians, but the Egyptians aren't here any more, so a brit millah is very Jewish. (If you're circumcised on the 2nd day in the hospital or at age 13, then it's not Jewish -- if you happen to have a Balsam Fir growing in your yard, that's not Christian.) Eating matzoh and drinking wine -- Christian or Jewish? It depends on the context, seder or communion. Some customs change (few enough people, Christian or not, consider Halloween to be All Hallow's Eve that it's not a big deal.) But as much as those who would like it to be universal want it to be, Christmas has not become secular. That some non-Christians adopt some Christmas customs that their own belief system doesn't prohibit doesn't make them any less Christian.
David M. Nieporent wrote: [H]ypothetically, let's conduct a poll. If you pointed to a tree with lights and such on it and said, "What's that?", what percentage of passersby would respond with one of: 1) A Winter Solstice Tree, 2) An Evergreen Tree 3) A Pagan Tree 4) A December Tree 5) A Multi-Holiday Season Tree And what percentage would respond: 6) A Christmas Tree Do you think that the number of people answering 1-5 would get out of the single digits combined? And I noted: For better or worse, if that tree happened to be in a Jewish home, the answer might be "It's a Chanukah Bush. No really. We don't have any Christmas Trees in this house, no sirree. No Christmas here, this is a Jewish house." Nieporent responded: I thought the whole "Chanukah Bush" thing was a semi-joke that died out a few decades ago. Of course, that still sort of supports my basic point: even when some Jews were doing that, they didn't say "It's a Christmas tree, which is okay because Christmas trees are secular." They said "It's not a Christmas tree [because Christmas trees are for Christians]. It's a Chanukah Bush."
If you believe, as some historians do, that Christmas was moved to be around the solstice, then it's pretty clear that there is a non-coincidental multi-holiday season, since New Year's Day is near the solstice for a reason.
The Christmas tree on the traffic island in Woburn Four Corners is actually a Memory Tree. It even has about 8 signs saying so.
Yes, if multi-holiday season means Solstice-Christmas Eve-Christmas-Boxing Day-New Year's Eve-New Year's Day there is a multi-holiday period. My objection is to the Christmas-Chanukah-Kwanzaa multi-holiday period that gets honored.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
The Birds is coming
is extremely useful and essential for me!With the best regards!
Jimmy
Links to this post:
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
We are all Level 1 Sex Offenders
Offender 1211 admitted sexually assaulting a girl in 1992, for which he was imprisoned for about a year. Since then, the man has become a Muslim, attends sex offender counseling regularly for treatment of pedophilia, and has been crime free. The board classified him as a Level 1; he wanted to be free of lifetime sex offender supervision because he maintained that he was not a public safety risk.
Justice John M. Greaney said the board got it right. "The fact remains that there is no objective certainty that Doe can be trusted to alone with children," he wrote.Where is the objective certainty that Justice Greaney can be trusted alone with children?
Links to this post:
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
The Swarm of the College Super-Applicants -- New York Magazine
Here were my statistics for the 1978-1979 school year, my senior year: Courses:
- bc Calculus
- Computers self-designed elective, numerical analysis. I think I spent most of my time on a program written in BASIC and running on our time-shared HP2000E to calculate polar equations [cardiods and such], convert them to rectangular coordinates, and use the 110 baud TeleTypes to display them. Besides the polar-to-rectangular conversions, which were right out of the book, my biggest cleverness was to pre-scan each line, and only advance the typehead as far as the rightmost printing character before issuing a carriage return. At 110 baud, that mattered. At graduation I won a prize for Numerical Analysis for this work. My brother later used that driver for his Rubik's Cube solver.
- Senior Math Team (during lunch)
- Organic Chemistry (abridged college level, it later became a gut course, but it was serious, and taught by somebody with industry experience)
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Expository Writing (college credit -- my only wise move, I transferred into this class for the spring semester, realizing I needed a taskmaster like Mr. Sodikow for the discipline)
- Social Studies: US-Soviet relations, WWII to present elective (I wanted Constitutional Law, and that would have made all the difference, but it didn't fit in my schedule. The teacher, William Stark, later became acting principal, and the Board of Ed screwed itself by letting him get away instead of giving him the position permanently. We did a mock tri-party SALT talks [China got to play too], and I represented the Russian military expert. I wanted to launch a pre-emptive nuclear strike, but my teammates rejected this. I wish I'd had Mr. Stark to explain things ten years later.)
- Russian (second year; I'd already completed 3 years of French)
- Gym
- My 97 out of 100 GPA unofficial placed me 7th out of a class of 750.
- Verbal 760 (second time, only 730 first time)
- Math 770 (both times)
- Key Club (co-founder, secretary-treasurer -- and I met my first girlfriend there)
- Chess Club
- War Games Club (then transitioning from Avalon Hill simulations to fantasy role-playing)
- Yearbook -- that was my homeroom, and I think I was a photographer, but I don't recall ever having anything published or doing much work for them
- Honor Society
- Math Journal -- I remember selling copies in classrooms
- Computer Society -- a kid gave a lecture about how with parts like the ICs in a TI-58 he thought you could design a computer that would fit in a briefcase
- I was a volunteer at Einstein Hospital before my junior year, as part of my pre-med bit, and a member of the local volunteer ambulance corps. I didn't do anything the summer before my senior year except try to sell Fuller Brushes (after paying for samples I ended up at a net loss for the summer) and sometimes visit Shorehaven which I'd finally joined the summer before my senior year.
- Nothing official
- I'd practiced with the Swim Team one off-season, but I wasn't quite good enough, and getting to DeWitt Clinton at 7am and then walking to school wasn't fun
- We played a lot of Ultimate after Chess Club
- My sophomore year I'd taken the wrestling elective in gym. I didn't grow until before senior year so I underweighed the next-lightest kid by 7 pounds and never won a bout. Juniors had health ed instead of gym. I used to like the trampoline until they took it away for fear of a broken neck and a lawsuit.
- I'd finally become disgusted with the public transit system, so I rode my bicycle the 5 miles to and from school almost every day that year
I didn't do any preparation for college admissions. I didn't visit a single school the summer before, but I did read "A Small Circle of Friends". I think the college advisor had given presentations during my junior year, but mostly I tuned her out. When she handed out the CUNY applications in the fall I asked when she'd be handing out the other applications, and she was aghast that I hadn't spent the summer collecting them. (I remember driving out to Queens late in December to borrow an application, maybe to MIT, from a classmate who'd decided not to apply.) My father gave me a lot of help with the application essays. I had a vague notion that I wanted to be away from home, but not so far away that I couldn't come home from time to time, which favored Boston.
Princeton had given me an early "unlikely" before they upgraded to "likely" and then admitted me, but that had soured me on them, which is too bad, because I might have done well at a smaller school. I think Yale was my Early Admission school, and they were very hard on Bronx Science that year -- it was my only rejection. MIT was an easy acceptance, but I was still pre-med, and that would have made a difference. We were allowed only six applications -- teachers were forbidden to write recommendations for students who had filed more. I think Columbia and U Penn were my safeties, but I got the fat envelope from Harvard and that was it.
The New York Magazine article makes me wonder if I would have gotten in, or even if I'd bother trying today. In 1979 Asians were beginning to take over from Jews as the dominant demographic at Bronx Science, but we didn't factor that into our guesses. We knew Blacks and women had an advantage.
But it also has me thinking about whether Harvard should have admitted me, if I should have accepted, and what should have been different.
I didn't know until years after college that I probably have a mild Attention Deficit or depression or Asperger's Syndrome. I was highly lacking in discipline and maturity, but mostly I needed to spend a year partying to get it out of my system. I needed to learn about alcohol, and smokable substances, and girls.
I was horribly misled. I listened to my father about pre-med (and when I finally dropped that after an advisor asked me, sophomore year, "do you want to go to medical school?" and I realized I didn't, the easiest major to complete with my math and physics credits was Applied Math/Computer Science) and didn't listen to him about not taking sophomore level courses. I listened to my high school teachers about putting a fact in every sentence, so when I took the writing test I didn't know that I would never finish the passage in time, and didn't provide analysis in my essay, so I was sent to the speed reading course (the one that is sometimes cited in the press as "Harvard is accepting freshmen so dumb they need to take remedial reading") but I already read some 800 words per minute, so that didn't help, and I started to ignore my Harvard teachers same as in high school. I took Harvard's placement exams and believed them when they said I should take sophomore math and sophomore chemistry, not realizing the speed and intensity of the instruction. I didn't have basic college inorganic chemistry. I only got a good grade in organic chemistry because William von Eggers Doering (who at 89 years old is still associated with the University!) played a dirty trick and told the class aromatic substitutions wouldn't be on the final exam, but they were, and I still remembered them from high school.
After a while I became an "invisible student". I went to sections, but few lectures. I learned to operate a machine shop, a radio station, a film projector, and a shuttle bus; hung out on the house committee, and got drafted into the Undergraduate Council. I played a lot of video games and slept in a lot.
My conclusion is that this particular student, who did exceedingly well without trying, should have been admitted, but needed much better mentoring. With proper guidance I could have made a lot more from the opportunity.
Update: Over on the Myspace copy of this blog, ePrep asked for a link. Done. Without endorsing them, they seem to be saying a lot of things with which I agree about "Test Prep and College Planning".
I hadn't come to the conclusion that I shouldn't have been accepted, though. I've been told that Harvard is particularly bad for people who need guidance, and while I'd like to agree, I don't see how things would have been different at another school, even a much smaller one.
(You can probably figure out who I am, but I'd like to remain even more anonymous than usual for now.)
Links to this post:
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
When is it acceptable to call a shirt a wifebeater?
Wannabe rapper Kevin Federline stands to lose everything but the wifebeater on his back in his divorce from pop tart Britney Spears.(Discussing the ramifications of the prenup on November 14, 2006.)
Links to this post:
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Marley brothers fight to ‘save’ Christmas
“In five years, I fear there’ll be no Christmas,” said Marley, a self-made developer. “This is America. When you come to America, you come here because of what it offers you. Don’t come to this country and try to change things to suit you.”Good for him. I didn't come to America, neither did my parents.
Shopper Russell Smith, 40, of Boston, said, “It seems illogical to redefine a holiday. Either say nothing or say, ‘Merry Christmas.’ ”Yes. Calling it a "winter vacation" doesn't make it anything but a Christmas vacation.
“Christmas,” Marley lamented, “is under attack. This year, I will not shop in any store that does not display the words Merry Christmas. Christmas holds a special place in everybody’s heart who celebrates it. To each their own. It’s that simple.”Good for him. I wish him luck in his quest to remind people that Christmas is only for people who celebrate it. The USA very clearly prohibits the establishment of a religion. Christmas is not a civic holiday, it is a religious holiday, and it should be accomodated, but not celebrated, but the government. If Macy's or Sheehan's choose to "celebrate" any holiday, that's purely a business decision, and they should do only what brings in the most business. If the Marleys can convince these stores that pretending a religious holiday does not exist while simultaneously celebrating it is bad business because it offends everybody, both those who celebrate the holiday and those who don't, good for them. Update: Their web site is wwww.savingchristmasinmass.homestead.com
Links to this post:
Friday, November 03, 2006
All Look Same
Links to this post:
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Does Boston Latin Academy have a dress code?
Despite warnings from their headmaster that costumes would be prohibited, about 50 students showed up dressed as superheroes, a life guard, a priest, a soldier in green fatigues, cows, clowns and the devil.This seems pretty typical of the school administrators I've dealt with: water guns and skateboards are a problem, so institute a dress code. I looked on the BLA site for guidance as to what the seniors were doing wrong. Under Students BPS Policy Handbook was a pointer to the Boston Public Schools' Guide to the Boston Public Schools for Families and Students. Page 48 of that manual says of School Uniforms:... a group of about a dozen seniors refused to change and were not allowed into school and are considered truant.
[Maria] Garcia-Aaronson, headmaster of the 1,700-student school for 15 years, said she stopped allowing students to wear costumes two years ago because of safety concerns. Previous students brought water guns to school on Halloween and sprayed classmates, causing fights, she said. Others rolled down school hallways on skateboards.
Under the Boston Public Schools School Uniform Policy, each school must choose one of three options:Is there any information content in that? And since it's system-wide, shouldn't it be called the Boston Public Schools Uniform School Uniform Policy?
- no school uniform;
- voluntary uniform or dress code; or
- mandatory (required) uniform or dress code.
The manual continues:
Even if your child's school has a mandatory uniform policy, you have the right not to participate. To do this, send a letter to the principal stating why your child is not participating. School staff must allow students who are not wearing uniforms to attend school.Garcia-Aaronson's actions don't seem to be in accordance with the written policy.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Hysteresis Navigation
Links to this post:
Monday, October 23, 2006
Globe columnist rejects rights of co-op members
John Walsh thought he was living the American dream. Until, that is, he ran head-on into Jonathan Winthrop. The two men come from very different worlds -- and Jonathan Winthrop has every intention of keeping it that way.Turns out that Winthrop (direct descendant of Governor John Winthrop) doesn't want to approve rags-to-riches Walsh, CEO of Elizabeth Grady, for the purchase of a unit in the co-op whose board he chairs. Walsh says Winthrop doesn't want him and his wife in the building because "we are not their kind of people", but admits the co-op board itself wants to buy the space. Winthrop may be being a jerk and a snob, but that's his right. Bailey quotes Walsh "What kind of example do I set if I walk away?" The example he sets is that he respects the rights of others. He should buy a Louisberg Square townhouse instead.
Given from where he descends, there must be a jerk gene in that line.
Links to this post:
Thursday, October 12, 2006
The Concrete Under My Feet
Links to this post:
Wednesday, September 06, 2006
Little League and the rules
I'd meant to post on this before, but I've been busy, and as usual the Volokh Conspiracy blawg beat me too it. They repost an item from the Ethics Scoreboard, asking:
On August 11 in Bristol, Conn., a Little League team from Colchester, Vt., only had to retire its Portsmouth, N.H. opposition in the top of the sixth inning (Little League games are six innings rather than nine) to win the game 9-8 and move on to the New England regional championship game.
But there was a problem. The Vermont team had made its third out in its half of the fifth inning before player Adam Bentley got to the plate. The Little League has a strict rule that requires every player to bat at least once a game, and the penalty for violating it is forfeit. Vermont's coach Denis Place realized, to his horror, that even though his team had the lead entering the last inning the only way it could avoid losing by forfeit was for Bentley to get an at bat. For that to happen, the New Hampshire team would have to tie the score or take the lead, requiring the teams to play the last half of the sixth inning.
Place held a meeting of his players at the pitcher's mound and instructed them to let New Hampshire score a run. The plan: walk the first batter, and ensure that he made it home with the assistance of wild pitches and intentional errors so the game would be deadlocked at 9-9. Then, hopefully, win the game in the bottom of the sixth inning, with Adam Bentley getting his mandated turn at the plate.
Not so fast. The New Hampshire team's coach, Mark McCauley figured out what was happening and ordered his players not to score. So after a walk and two wild pitches allowed a New Hampshire runner to reach third base, the player refused to advance to the plate despite another wild pitch and a fielding error. McCauley also told his players to strike out intentionally, preserving Vermont's lead but guaranteeing a successful New Hampshire protest that, under the rules, would require that New Hampshire win by forfeit.
This obviously led to a ridiculous spectacle: one team trying to give up a run while the other team was trying to make outs and avoid scoring. The perplexed umpires understandably chose to end the debacle by ejecting Place and his pitcher from the game. Vermont won 9-8…and then New Hampshire was awarded the victory by forfeit, because Adam Bentley never got his turn at bat. The New Hampshire team advanced to the next round.
The Question: Whose conduct was unethical?
I commented on the VC as follows:
It's already been written in this blawg (I can't find the reference, but it was in regard to Paul Hamm and the South Koreans in the 2004 Olympics, a situation discussed for example here) that all of sports is arbitrary rules. Personally I <b>do</b> go to the game to watch the manager think. (Actually if I go to the game it's to participate in a summer ritual and to drink a beer in the sun, and the only games I've been to since the 1994 strike were two at the Lowell Spinners last year: one was rained out after a long, wet, wait; the other my kids got bored, all the schtick notwithstanding, and we left halfway through. I won tickets to see the North Shore Spirit this year, and I'd planned to see the fireworks, but both Saturday night home games last month it was too cold)but if I watch the game I'm concerned about the strategy.)
There was a similar question a week before this game: With first base empty and one out left, is it wrong to intentionally walk the strongest hitter so that you can pitch to the next, much weaker batter, who happens to be a cancer survivor?
Of all the rules involved the stupidest is that the bottom of the last inning is skipped. It makes a good deal of sense if the home team is already ahead and assured of the win (still discounting that individual players compete for records) but it makes no sense when, as here, the team that is nominally ahead needs to do something to assure its win.
Baseball in particular is a team sport. The sacrifice fly is the most obvious example: the coach is asking the batter to do something that will not get him on base, in order to let another player score a run for the team.
The stupidest rule, in my opinion, is in effect in some forms of co-ed volleyball, requiring that if a side hits the ball three times on a single play, one of those contacts must be by a woman. Players ought to be treated the same regardless of sex.
Side note: Ethics Scoreboard reports that there is a Little League Pledge, as follows:
Looming over all of this is the Little League Pledge, a statement that dates from the Eisenhower administration and is recited with reverence by the players before every game:
I trust in God
I love my country
And will respect its laws
I will play fair
And strive to win
But win or lose
I will always do my best
I don't remember that pledge from when I played, but I don't see any inherent conflict. Intentionally walking a batter is both playing fair and doing one's best.
Links to this post:
Little League and the rules
I'd meant to post on this before, but I've been busy, and as usual the Volokh Conspiracy blawg beat me too it. They repost an item from the Ethics Scoreboard, asking:
On August 11 in Bristol, Conn., a Little League team from Colchester, Vt., only had to retire its Portsmouth, N.H. opposition in the top of the sixth inning (Little League games are six innings rather than nine) to win the game 9-8 and move on to the New England regional championship game.
But there was a problem. The Vermont team had made its third out in its half of the fifth inning before player Adam Bentley got to the plate. The Little League has a strict rule that requires every player to bat at least once a game, and the penalty for violating it is forfeit. Vermont's coach Denis Place realized, to his horror, that even though his team had the lead entering the last inning the only way it could avoid losing by forfeit was for Bentley to get an at bat. For that to happen, the New Hampshire team would have to tie the score or take the lead, requiring the teams to play the last half of the sixth inning.
Place held a meeting of his players at the pitcher's mound and instructed them to let New Hampshire score a run. The plan: walk the first batter, and ensure that he made it home with the assistance of wild pitches and intentional errors so the game would be deadlocked at 9-9. Then, hopefully, win the game in the bottom of the sixth inning, with Adam Bentley getting his mandated turn at the plate.
Not so fast. The New Hampshire team's coach, Mark McCauley figured out what was happening and ordered his players not to score. So after a walk and two wild pitches allowed a New Hampshire runner to reach third base, the player refused to advance to the plate despite another wild pitch and a fielding error. McCauley also told his players to strike out intentionally, preserving Vermont's lead but guaranteeing a successful New Hampshire protest that, under the rules, would require that New Hampshire win by forfeit.
This obviously led to a ridiculous spectacle: one team trying to give up a run while the other team was trying to make outs and avoid scoring. The perplexed umpires understandably chose to end the debacle by ejecting Place and his pitcher from the game. Vermont won 9-8…and then New Hampshire was awarded the victory by forfeit, because Adam Bentley never got his turn at bat. The New Hampshire team advanced to the next round.
The Question: Whose conduct was unethical?
I commented on the VC as follows:
It's already been written in this blawg (I can't find the reference, but it was in regard to Paul Hamm and the South Koreans in the 2004 Olympics, a situation discussed for example here) that all of sports is arbitrary rules. Personally I <b>do</b> go to the game to watch the manager think. (Actually if I go to the game it's to participate in a summer ritual and to drink a beer in the sun, and the only games I've been to since the 1994 strike were two at the Lowell Spinners last year: one was rained out after a long, wet, wait; the other my kids got bored, all the schtick notwithstanding, and we left halfway through. I won tickets to see the North Shore Spirit this year, and I'd planned to see the fireworks, but both Saturday night home games last month it was too cold)but if I watch the game I'm concerned about the strategy.)
There was a similar question a week before this game: With first base empty and one out left, is it wrong to intentionally walk the strongest hitter so that you can pitch to the next, much weaker batter, who happens to be a cancer survivor?
Of all the rules involved the stupidest is that the bottom of the last inning is skipped. It makes a good deal of sense if the home team is already ahead and assured of the win (still discounting that individual players compete for records) but it makes no sense when, as here, the team that is nominally ahead needs to do something to assure its win.
Baseball in particular is a team sport. The sacrifice fly is the most obvious example: the coach is asking the batter to do something that will not get him on base, in order to let another player score a run for the team.
The stupidest rule, in my opinion, is in effect in some forms of co-ed volleyball, requiring that if a side hits the ball three times on a single play, one of those contacts must be by a woman. Players ought to be treated the same regardless of sex.
Side note: Ethics Scoreboard reports that there is a Little League Pledge, as follows:
Looming over all of this is the Little League Pledge, a statement that dates from the Eisenhower administration and is recited with reverence by the players before every game:
I trust in God
I love my country
And will respect its laws
I will play fair
And strive to win
But win or lose
I will always do my best
I don't remember that pledge from when I played, but I don't see any inherent conflict. Intentionally walking a batter is both playing fair and doing one's best.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
The Foiled Plots
Links to this post:
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Half a world away
Links to this post:
Monday, August 07, 2006
At the tone the time will be...
Links to this post:
Sunday, July 30, 2006
Price Elasticity of Demand for Gasoline
Links to this post:
Thursday, July 27, 2006
What else is wrong with the Big Dig?
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
Brokeback Hartz Mountain
Links to this post:
Friday, June 30, 2006
Corporal Gilad Shalit and the Gaza invasion
Links to this post:
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Offensive Name: Operation Mount and Thrust
Links to this post:
Thursday, June 01, 2006
Calabasas Calif. bans smoking as a form of expression
Links to this post:
Friday, May 26, 2006
Flashback
Links to this post:
Thursday, May 04, 2006
Archetypical Origin of the Species picture
What is the archetype of the Origin of the Species or Ascent of Man picture, such as the one parodied above in the Mutts comic strip, or in the opening of the Dilbert animated cartoon, and so many other places, the one that shows either the fish and some early reptile crawling up the shore from the primordial swamp and various more "advanced" animals, or the one that shows an ape and a caveman and a moden man? One source hints it was a Victorian theme.
Update: See also Lucky Cow, May 27, 2006:
Update: And also Flying Mcoys, July 23, 2006:
Links to this post:
Monday, May 01, 2006
Idiots write letters to the Herald
The Herald has it correct: Sex offender registries are a good idea (Sex offender sites protect the public," April 24 [sic -- it appears the editorial ran April 19]). As the father of two young children, I demand to know if there is a convicted pedophile or rapist in my neighborhood. It is very easy not to be on the list -- do not commit a crime that would mark you as a sex offender. People who commit these crimes either know or should know the consequences of their actions, and should suffer because the victim will suffer for a lifetime after robbed of his or her innocence.What a maroon! Sex offender registration may be required ex post facto, since it is not considered punishment. Among the sex offenses in Massachusetts are public urination (although as I've written, merely doing something in a bathroom is not enough for it not be gross and open lewdness either), gay sex, and having sex with your future wife when she was underage. Meanwhile Meghan Enos of Plymouth writes
I found the numbers of those polled to be OK with bare breasts interesting ("More to breast flashing than meets the eye," April 24). Now let's see how many people would still be for it if there was a baby attached, using breasts for their natural intent?Who says that attracting members of the opposite sex, by announcing that one is a healthy and fertile member of one's own sex, is not a natural intent?
I suppose it would be politer for me to headline the entry "I strongly disagree with these recent letters to the Herald, some of which may have been edited by the Herald to appear worse than their authors intended" but this is my blog, primarily a write-only/read-never affair, so I'll stick with the hyperbole.
Yes, breasts are sexualized ("have become" implies a timeline that predates any currently lactating breasts) but I don't think that many people are offended by nursing in situations where they wouldn't be at least equally offended by an actual bared breast not about to be covered by an infant, certainly not if they are allowed equal freedom to look in both situations. (Again, you didn't say, only implied, that they would be.)
I do know a mother who is more offended than I about public nursing (of the discreet, "Oh yes, now that you mention it, she's not just holding that baby to her chest, she's feeding it, and there's no bottle involved" variety); OTOH I think it was impolite by not recognizing that she would make her guest feel awkward because of that reality that breasts are sexualized and are generally kept covered, when a certain new mother, while I was visiting to see the baby, opened her blouse and exposed herself preparatory to nursing said baby.
The "natural intent" argument you mention, often used by those defending nursing in public, is not dispositive. As I noted above and elsewhere, urination, while certainly natural and generally hygeinic, can also be a sex crime if not done privately enough.
Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.
Links to this post:
Self-incrimination
In Massachusetts, and three other states, juries in criminal trials cannot be told if a defendant refused to take roadside tests or a Breathalyzer. ... But Yarmouth police are hoping to change that - through public education about the laws, visits to local town boards, and intensive efforts to stop and arrest drunken drivers. They have also spoken with state legislators about helping change what they consider a loophole rooted in the state constitution. ''I think it's the most serious crime,'' Yarmouth police Lt. Steven G. Xiarhos said. ''It kills thousands of people each year and many of them are innocent people. Is that the way we want to live?''Why does Lt. Xiarhos want to stop there? Why shouldn't the Constitutional right against self-incrimination also be abolished for less serious crimes like rape and murder?
Links to this post:
Un Año Sin Inmigrantes
Links to this post:
Friday, April 28, 2006
Isn't that the whole concept of aversion therapy?
Michael Femmia, [attorney for the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton] ... called allegations regarding the burned child “false.” [referring to a device used to administer electric shocks as part of aversion therapy.]Excuse me, but isn't that the entire purpose and proper functioning of the device?“No one has been hurt by the device,” Femmia said.
Links to this post:
You are like a hurricane
Links to this post:
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Presumption of Guilt
At yesterday's hearing, Mr. Finnerty -- dressed in a dark suit, white shirt and green tie and accompanied by his family's priest -- stood quietly as Judge John H. Bayly rescinded the terms of the diversion program Mr. Finnerty entered after being charged with simple assault.I don't get it. If Finnerty was involved in the rape of the stripper, throw the book at him, but until the evidence against him has been tested, why isn't he presumed innocent of the new charges, and presumed to have stayed out of trouble, in the Washington case?According to the terms of the program, the charges would have been dismissed had Mr. Finnerty completed 25 hours of community service and stayed out of trouble.
Links to this post:
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Lexington School Supt. picks and chooses laws since he knows better than parents
The book, “King & King,” where a prince marries a fellow prince instead of a princess, was used in a lesson teaching different types of weddings. Lexington Superintendent of Schools Paul Ash said the school has no legal obligation to tell parents about the book, ''We couldn't run a public school system if every parent who feels some topic is objectionable to them for moral or religious reasons decides their child should be removed. ''Lexington is committed to teaching children about the world they live in, and in Massachusetts same-sex marriage is legal."In Massachusetts it is also a legal requirement that parents be notified of sex ed. Ash appears to be picking and choosing which laws to hide behind. MGL Chapter 71, section 32A states
Every city, town, regional school district or vocational school district implementing or maintaining curriculum which primarily involves human sexual education or human sexuality issues shall adopt a policy ensuring parental/guardian notification. Such policy shall afford parents or guardians the flexibility to exempt their children from any portion of said curriculum through written notification to the school principal. No child so exempted shall be penalized by reason of such exemption.Besides the poor grammar (curriculum is singular) it's not clear what the law actually requires. If Ash is going to claim that "King and King" is not part of a curriculum that primarily involves human sexuality, any school can get around this law by combining 51% calculus with 49% sex ed. The simplest reading of that section means that every parent who feels some sex topic is objectionable to them for any reason at all may remove their child; and all parents already have the right to remove their children from the public schools, though that's the only way they're going to get the education their taxes suppport. Is Ash suggesting that if gay marriage were illegal he wouldn't teach it in his school? Somebody should point out to him that being king is illegal in Massachusetts (US Constitution, Article I, section 9, "No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States"), and I'm not aware that fornication and adultery laws have been explicitly overturned here, but I doubt Ash supports "abstinence until marriage" sex ed.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
Dead person unbuckled
Lancaster police say David E. Zoller, 33, of Littleton was driving a white van Saturday night [April 22, 2006] that crossed the center line on Route 62 and crashed into the side of the car where seat-belted, 21-year-old expectant mother [Katelyn M.] Disessa was sitting.Just something to remember the next time a traffic cop says he's never had to unbuckle a dead victim.
Danielle Simas of Shewsbury was killed in a crash on February 25, 2000 after her 1994 Nissan Maxima skidded off Interstate 290. State Police Sgt. Timothy White noted that Simas was ejected through the rear window even though she was wearing a seatbelt.
A number of prominent bicyclists are killed in accidents, and more often than not they're wearing helmets.
UpdateTrooper Paul Barry was wearing a seat belt in the early hours of June 15 when, driving-while-tired from working a detail after his regular job with the State Police, he apparently fell asleep at the wheel and drifted into the breakdown lane, where he struck a truck, and later died of his injuries.
Links to this post:
Sunday, April 23, 2006
The magic of apartments
Links to this post:
Thursday, April 20, 2006
MHT is Manchester-Boston Airport
Links to this post:
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Sex offender registries and discrimination
The Massachusetts Sex Offender Registration law, MGL Chapter 6 section 178N, Misuse of Information says
Information contained in the sex offender registry shall not be used to commit a crime against a sex offender or to engage in illegal discrimination or harassment of an offender.It's not clear from the statute what kind of discrimination is illegal. If it's illegal on other grounds (such as race) this is awfully redundant. This is typically summarized, as when the local newspaper announces that an offender is living nearby, that the information may not be used to discriminate. If it can't be used to discriminate, what good is it? Isn't telling my kids "Stay away from that particular neighbor" or even after the fact noting that a re-offender is on the list discriminating?
Links to this post:
Thursday, March 16, 2006
Solomon Amendment
Links to this post:
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Heelies
[Sergeant Steven A. ] Brown said police will also investigate whether Carmichael's footgear was a factor. Known as heelies, the sneakers have wheels in the heel that allow wearers to glide when they want to. The sneakers have been banned by many school districts around the nation due to safety concerns.And it was all over the television news this morning, various pediatricians noting how dangerous they are, although I see that by late today the Bridgewater Chieof of Police said they were not a factor. Did anybody think Heelies were supposed to protect you in the event you got hit by a car? My 9-year-old is into his second pair. (He wore down the heel of his front-foot shoe on the first pair.) They're expensive (no more than many sneakers) but well made. I've never seen anyone pick up any particular speed with them, nor build up speed like a traditional skater. Apparently it's fun, and it's different enough to bug the over-thirties (which I must be, several times over, to remember when that was too old to be trusted), but given that they're slower and less efficient than running, and not AFAIK suitable for acrobatics or inclines like boards or skates, I don't see them as any more than a passing fad.
Links to this post:
Friday, March 10, 2006
Re-employed
Links to this post:
Monday, February 27, 2006
Narnia
Links to this post:
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Building 19's wife-beater shirts
Links to this post:
Friday, February 17, 2006
No shit, Sherwood
Links to this post:
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
Infamous neo-Nazi literature
- Black knife sheath Mine is olive green
- Three Nazi flags taken off bedroom walls I've got lots of other flags
- Two cell phones
- Dog tags with Nazi symbols
- Aryan pin
- Samurai sword I've got a Ginsu knife
- Belt of approximately 85 rounds of ammo
I don't use belt ammunition, but I shoot .22, which is bought by the brick- Large knife and sheath
I've got a machete- Two bumper stickers
: “I dress this way to scare your kids” and “My day is not complete until I’ve terrified a complete stranger.” Mine reflect my politics, nothing so cutesy - Goodbye note addressed to his mother
- Books: “The Turner Diaries,”
“The Hitler File,” “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” and “Spandau: The Secret Diaries” I bought "The Turner Diaries" after they got so much mention after the Murrah Building was blown up. I don't have much on the Nazis, but I do have a couple of books about Al Quaeda purchased after 9/11 - Two DVDs: “The Occult History of the Third Reich” and “American History X”
- Swastika rubber stamp
- German cross belt buckle
- Folder with racist notes
- Binder with “white power” symbols and slogans
Mine are mostly "White Pride" -- my children attend the Malcolm S. White Elementary School - Notebook of hate lyrics
- Sock and paper towels with possible blood stains
- Computer
- Digital camera
- Unmarked CDs
Links to this post:
Monday, February 06, 2006
Brokeback Mountain
I think that pretty much covers it regarding that particular plot criticism. Nathan Lane (gay and also, like you, non-homophobic) had the same reaction to the film on a Today show segment I saw. I live in Boston too, but personally I cut the movie some slack on the theory that in 60's and 70's Wyoming, a lot of people (both straight and gay) felt more psychologically constricted by their environment than we do in 21st century Boston. (Though, I might add, we'll see what happens here in 2008 when MA residents may get to choose whether to enshrine homophobia into the state constitution)
I'm gay, and my boyfriend and I went to see it together. I liked the movie, he didn't like the movie. For non-homophobes, my bet is that whether you like it or not has more to do with whether you happen to like the slow storytelling style of Director Ang Lee, as well as the screenwriters (who also wrote The Last Picture Show, if that gives you a point of reference). I think it's just a matter of taste...some poeple like it, some don't.
Links to this post:
Saturday, January 07, 2006
BostonHerald.com - Masha's Law - Coninued victimization?
Kerry said the penalty for illegally downloading music was three times the penalty for downloading kiddie porn now. “Even though Masha’s despicable abuser is in jail and awaiting even further sentencing, the damage to Masha continues in a very real way every single day,” Kerry said.How does possessing, downloading, or viewing an image taken of Masha years ago damage her today?
http://pennystockinvestment.blogspot.com
Links to this post:
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Big push makes little difference to the speed of a baby's delivery - Health - Times Online
women who were coached to push during labor fared no better or worse physically than those who were simply told to "do what comes naturally."As Sam Lister of the Times puts it
IT HAS long been the one task seized on by nervous husbands hanging round the delivery room: coaching their wives through labour. At a loss for the vocabulary or posture for the occasion, many men resort to pacing, perching and instructing, like a neurotic cox urging on his crew.The Boston Herald report (undoubtably from wire services, but I couldn't find it) concludes by suggesting the new fathers stick to passing out cigars. The Times article concludes by noting that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in Britain says that "emotional support is vital to the mother during childbirth, improving the chances of a problem-free natural birth and reducing the need for emergency Caesarean sections. However, the institute recommends having another woman present as preferable to the father." Before I found the original, that was my objection to the Herald's version. The Statesman's article also noted that the fathers do good, quoting a midwife who said "The dads provide love and support, she said. 'They feel relieved when they're told they don't have to coach them.' " I was present at both the conceptions and the births of my three children. I took the childbirthing class with my wife. I didn't coach; I left that to the obstetrician. But I was there for emotional support, and as her dedicated advocate and helper for anything she needed. I enjoyed witnessing the birth, and welcoming the babies into the world. And after 9 months of being a very unequal partner, it was a good beginning to the next phase, which required the full efforts of both of us.According to new research, however, regimented coaching of a woman through childbirth, whether by a hapless husband or trained assistant, is of almost no benefit and can even increase health complications.
Links to this post:
Sunday, December 25, 2005
Chanukah -- It's hard to be a Jew on Christmas -- An analogy
Links to this post:
Exclusionary rule doesn't apply to evidence gathered during warrantless home inspection
WARNER, N.H. --A husband and wife accused of endangering their children by living in a filthy home have lost their attempt to keep some evidence out of their criminal trial. Bryon and Wendy Ruff were charged with five counts each of child endangerment in August, two weeks after the town's health inspector condemned their home. They argued that photographs and other evidence gathered during the inspection shouldn't be used against them because the police officers who accompanied the health inspector did not have a criminal search warrant. But a Henniker District Court judge has ruled that the search was proper and that the evidence can be used in the trial, which is scheduled for next week.Why doesn't the exclusionary rule apply?
Links to this post:
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
It's a Christmas Tree, no matter what you call it
And on the Volokh Conspiracy, in a thread that started about Hostility to Atheists, I wrote: Dave Barry has said that "Seasons Greetings" (which is a traditional expression, not a watered-down-in-an-attempt-to-be-inclusive "Happy Holidays", although see also McKenzie, Robert and McKenzie, Douglas on what exactly are the 12 days of Christmas) is as meaningful as greeting someone with "Appropriate Remark!" One is also reminded of a grocery store attempting to be inclusive in its weekly circular: "To our Christian friends, we wish a Merry Christmas. To our Jewish friends, we wish a Happy Chanukah. To our Atheist friends, good luck." Meanwhile, those who are calling for the Protection of Christmas Act should take a good look at just what difficulties American Jews have with holding seders, and fasting on Yom Kippur, and building succot. It isn't that hard to practice any religion in this country. OTOH, I live one town over from Lexington, home of one of these creche bans, and my city still puts up a creche each year, and the schools are still teaching, explicitly in the words on one Christmas Pageant song, that everybody has a holiday this time of year, and implicitly, that Chanukah is the high point of the Jewish religious calendar. My children are half-breeds (making them halachically gentile -- it's a long story) and in 2005 we are still facing the issue that I never faced in the Bronx of whether taking part in (one half of) their heritage will subject them to negative social pressure. FWIW, my all-Jewish birth family celebrates both solstices with a passing recognition of the change in the trend of daylight length. And what's with Kwanzaa? How did what is at best an ethnic or cultural statement so quickly obtain the status of millenia-old religious celebrations, while Festivus remains a joke?
Links to this post:
Sunday, December 11, 2005
Scalpers don't stop real fans from getting tickets
It’s the only way to cut out the scalpers, free up season tickets, and let the ordinary fans get back into their ballpark.He concludes that his scheme would mean
a much better chance they’d be bought by people who actually want to see the game.To whom does he think the scalpers are selling the tickets? Who does he think is occupying every seat at every game (post-season excluded)?
John Henry, to his credit, has dismissed any suggestion that the Sox should try to pocket that $100 million themselves by auctioning tickets to the highest bidder. He knows that would price many fans out of the market.No matter how they slice it, there are only 3 million seats in a season (36,200 seating capacity time 81 home games is 2,932,200.) Some fans are getting seats for less than they'd be willing to pay. Some fans don't go to the games because the price is too high. No matter the price the Red Sox sells them to the public, and no matter the final markup price, it's going to be that way. What better way to judge how much a seat is worth to a fan than how much he's willing to pay, how much he's willing to give up for that seat?
Links to this post:
Wednesday, November 09, 2005
Randy Chapman (Herald "As You Were Saying") doesn't think things through
The major problem with our existing laws is that it is legally permissible to have a drink or two or three and drive a car. Juries at drunk driving trials are actually instructed it is not against the law to drink alcohol and drive. It is only when the person is impaired or reaches the magical .08 blood alcohol level that he has committed a crime. This fuzzy line almost guarantees bad decisions. We have created a situation where people will inevitably drive drunk. We expect individuals who may be impaired to make rational, intelligent decisions about whether they are alright to drive. But unless someone is a toxicologist, he or she will not know if their blood alcohol level is a .08. They may feel fine because they are impaired. Many people confess they have consumed alcohol, felt fine and then drove home only to wake up the next day and realize their lapse in judgment. So what is the solution? Perhaps it is time to make it illegal to drink any alcohol and drive a car. The penalty does not have to be as severe as it is for drunken driving, but it can still send a message. We punish people for not having an inspection sticker or not registering their cars. Is it such a big leap to tell people to not drink and drive?I don't have to be a toxicologist to know that at 195 pounds, two drinks completely unmetabolized is well below the legal limit. The Commonwealth used to post the "buddy wheel" to tell you this. After two, or four, drinks my inhibitions may be loosened, my judgement may be weakened, but I can still do the math. But what is Chapman calling for? Since I have already drunk alcohol (at least once in my life) am I forever barred from driving a car? Otherwise, it still comes down to an allowable amount of alcohol. Whether it's the old pilot's "24 hours, bottle to throttle", or the 0.2% young-adult standard that Chapman praises, and which is probably within the noise level, there is a line, and it is equally bright.
Links to this post:
Normally used to kill small animals
[Melrose Detective Sgt. Barry] Campbell said the air-powered weapon used on Bobby [Hansen, shot while trick-or-treating] is normally used to kill small animals.What kind of weapon would that be?
Links to this post:
Monday, October 17, 2005
Short People (Randy Newman, 1977)
Links to this post:
Saturday, October 15, 2005
Thing that makes me go "Huh?"
Links to this post:
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
BostonHerald rewrites its own history, re Wilkerson, rather than offering correction
State Sen. Dianne Wilkerson, whose stint in politics has been marred by campaign finances and tax violations, was sued by state officials yesterday for refusing to document nearly $80,000 in ques- tionable use of campaign funds over a two-year period, including purchases of pizzas and a bra.On October 4, the Herald published a letter from Wilkerson's communications director Matuya F. Brand which opens
Among items repaid by the cam- paign to Wilkerson were $71.88 in groceries from the Super 88 Super- market, submarine sandwiches, pizza, taxi rides, a stay at the Bev- erly Hilton in Los Angeles and a $60.76 brassiere, the suit states.
The article "Wilkerson's finances draw state lawsuit" (Sept. 29) reports an expenditure of $60 for a bra, when in fact the receipt was for Bras- siere Jo, a restaurant in the Colon- ade Hotel.That sounded interesting, so I went back to the original article. I first searched online, and found the two paragraphs quoted above now read
State Sen. Dianne Wilkerson, whose stint in politics has been marred by campaign finance and tax violations, was sued by state officials yesterday for refusing to document nearly $80,000 in questionable use of campaign funds over a two-year period, including purchases of pizzas.I didn't see any acknowledgement or correction in yesterday's or today's Herald, just a quiet editing of its own error.Among items repaid by the campaign to Wilkerson were $71.88 in groceries from the Super 88 Supermarket, submarine sandwiches, pizza, taxi rides, a stay at the Beverly Hilton in Los Angeles and a $60.78 bill at a restaurant Brassiere Joe, the suit states.
The typo, Brassiere Jo, is in the Herald's version, if not in the author's letter.
Links to this post:
Thursday, September 22, 2005
Price Gouging
Q: What is price gouging? A: The Attorney General has specific regulations in place concerning price gouging in petroleum-related businesses, such as gasoline. It is an unfair or deceptive act or practice, during any market emergency, to sell or offer petroleum products for an unconscionably high price. Q: What is a market emergency? A.: A market emergency means an actual or severe energy supply interruption. The Governor has the exclusive authority to declare an energy emergency in the Commonwealth. Q: What is an unconscionably high price? A: If the price charged represents a gross disparity between the price of the product, and either the price at which the product was sold by the business immediately prior to the market emergency, or the price at which the same product can be bought by other buyers in the same area, AND this price difference is not due to increased costs from suppliers or increased costs due to an abnormal market disruption.I see where the AG is investigating stations that charged too much for gasoline. Why isn't he issuing criminal complaints against the station owners who kidnapped the drivers, carjacked their cars, and forced them to buy gas at their stations? And while he's at it, why isn't he investigating why we don't have massive lines at gas stations, like in the 1970s, or ration coupons, like during World War II? And why stop at gasoline? Why is milk $2.19 at White Hen, $2.49 at Market Basket, and $3.49 (or more now) at Stop and Shop? Why are the same brand of prophylactics $3.89/dozen at Target, but $11.99 at CVS? Why is a comparable house $150,000 in Lawrence, but $1,500,000 in Martha's Vineyard? Why is a year's work worth $30,000 in a factory, but $3,000,000 in the corner office?
Our country is in debt until forever, we don't have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
We have lost friends and influenced no one. No wonder most of the world thinks we suck. Thanks to what george bush has done to our country during the past three years, we do!
Links to this post:
Sunday, September 18, 2005
DA: charges not warranted in Snelgrove shooting - What about Lawrence?
- "There is no evidence that any officer on Lansdowne Street acted with any intent to commit a crime"
- police made a string of serious errors in the events leading up to her death, but that none of those mistakes rose to the level of criminal charges
- "Poor judgment, however, is not the standard for criminal charges."
- Police said some of the revelers were throwing bottles
- "The fact that the officers were placed in such a chaotic situation on Lansdowne Street was the result of poor crowd control planning by department commanders"
- "It's always easy to judge things in hindsight rather than from the eyes of the person who is living that moment out. No one could, obviously, suggest for a moment that Deputy Superintendent O'Toole or any officer present that night ever intended or thought for a moment that these consequences would ever come about," said Timothy Burke, attorney for Deputy Superintendent Robert O'Toole, who ordered officers who were not properly trained in use of the pepper-spray guns to use the weapons.
- "Officer Milien's decision to fire was negligent, but not wanton and reckless, a legal standard which must be met to support a charge of manslaughter," Conley said.
Milien's attorney, Thomas Drechsler, called Conley's report "a recognition that the officers were reacting to an extremely volatile and dangerous situation which presented a serious risk to public safety."Getting killed by being shot in the eye by a cop is also a serious risk to public safety.
There is another case pending in Lawrence. Marine-of-the-year Sgt. Daniel Cotnoir fired a shotgun into the air in the early hours of August 13, 2005 after members of a noisy crowd leaving local nightclubs threw an empty bottle through his bedroom window. Nobody was killed, but two underaged drinkers were treated and released after being struck in the leg by fragments.
"It was never this man's intention, as he tells me, to hurt anyone," said his lawyer, Robert Kelley. "It was only his intention to fire a warning shot when he was placed in a threatening situation."
"I just thought he wanted to scare us to get away from the area," said [Stephanie] Tejeda [cousin of the shot 15-year-old], who attended Cotnoir's arraignment Monday in Lawrence District Court. "Who shoots at an open crowd?"The Boston Police Department, apparently. Cotnoir is currently free on bail. We'll see if the Essex DA holds Cotnoir to the same standards as Conley held Milien.
Update: Cotnoir was charged, and on June 29, 2006, acquitted.
so far yours is in the Top 3
of my list of favorites. I'm
going to dive in and try my
hand at it, so wish me luck.
It'll be in a totally different
area than yours (mine is
about seo toolbar tools)
I know, it sounds strange, but it's
like anything, once you learn more
about it, it's pretty cool.
If you don't mind, I'd really appreciate
being able to come back and get a
few tips and suggestions from you,
if that's alright, alright?
Thanks,
Tiffany Burrell
Keyword Queen!
ps. I confess, that's not my real picture! :-)
The blogosphere can be a jungle, as Chrysler is finding out. The U.S. division of DaimlerChrysler AG recently launched a Weblog called thefirehouse.biz designed to spark rollicking online exchanges between the ...
Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
I have a poker tournament site. It pretty much covers poker tournament related stuff.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)
Links to this post:
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
The Umpire Strikes Back -- you heard it here first
First umpire: “Some are balls and some are strikes, and I call them as they are.” Second umpire: “Some are balls and some are strikes, and I call them as I see 'em.” Third umpire: “Some are balls and some are strikes, but they ain’t nothin' ‘til I call 'em.”You heard it here first in 1995. (Or, using Google Groups, the earliest you may have heard it is here in 1992. It's an old joke, and I first heard it from Peter Newbatt Smith, now an attorney working for The Center for Public Integrity in D.C. Responding to a question from Senator Cornyn that cited Lindgren's blogging of the joke, Roberts identified with the umpire who says they are balls and strikes regardless of the call. I have always thought the third umpire is correct. The ball did or did not cross the plate within the strike zone, just as the accused did or did not do the bad act with the requisite criminal intent, but the scoring, like the finding of guilt or innocence, or the counting of votes, is dependent upon the umpire or the judge. The scoring has more consequence than the actual position of the ball.
Links to this post:
Saturday, September 03, 2005
Ann and Dale McFeatters on the poor response to Katrina
As a nation, we are good at post-mortems, analyzing and explaining tragic events _ the '68 riots, the Loma Prieta earthquake, 9/11 _ and learning from the results. The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina demands a commission to answer this question: How did an event that had long been predicted and presumably prepared for turn into the New Orleans catastrophe?And Ann McFeatters of the Block News Alliance writes "Once again, the government failed so many"At first it looked like New Orleans had dodged a bullet, with the greatest devastation falling on its hapless neighbors to the east. But then, after Katrina had passed, three levees failed, flooding the downtown, forcing the evacuation of a major city and turning much of its population into homeless, destitute refugees. How could this happen?
It's not as if the consequences of a levee breach were a surprise. Planners had long said a doomsday storm was a matter of when, not if, and an eerily prescient Times-Picayune story three years ago laid out pretty much what came to pass this week. And charges are coming to light that even though there were known defects in the system, the levees were seriously underfunded. Once the breaks occurred, there seemed no plan of action, with material and equipment in place, to repair them.
WASHINGTON -- There can be no subject more worthy of our attention right now than what happened when Hurricane Katrina rained catastrophe on the Gulf Coast. I predict that the world will be riveted by how quickly the thin veneer of civilization was peeled away in the most powerful nation on Earth, as looters ruled the streets of New Orleans, as dead bodies floated by, as thousands of the barely living waited in desperation day after day without food or drinking water or sanitation or power or a place to sleep or a way to contact their families.Meanwhile Osama and our other enemies are looking for another dam that could be blown up, or some other weakness in our infrastructure....
How can we not be outraged when we think of the billions of dollars we've spent on homeland preparedness after Sept. 11, 2001, yet watched as babies died for lack of water and food and electricity three days after the hurricane hit?
We understand that the flooding was a separate catastrophe from the hurricane. But why were there no plans to evacuate the one out of every three residents of New Orleans too poor or disabled or incompetent or unwilling to leave just before the storm struck?
Thousands of reservists from Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama are serving in Iraq. Yet where was the National Guard as people in Mississippi and Louisiana desperately begged camera crews for help?
Why were water and food not airdropped to the thousands of the sick and the elderly and the children who went days with no help?
Links to this post:
Friday, September 02, 2005
Cornelius Chapman calls on reparations to Blacks by the Stones
As the Rolling Stones "Bigger Bang" tour moves across the country with the force of a financial hurricane, it is time to ask the troubling question that will not be hear from the lips of the group's lascivious logo.Sigh. Has Chapman given any thought to what the logical conclusion of this reasoning is? I don't buy into the whole racial-identity politics, so my mind, addled not by drugs but by the recent events on the Gulf coast and my own economic and health woes, can't come up with but one example before I start foaming at the mouth. We all have always been dwarves standing on the shoulders of giants. Meanwhile, Ty Taylor gets booted from Rock Star: INXS, and plays the race card. See my earlier post on Elton John's similar complaint about American Idol. Update: the Herald published at least two letters critical of Chapman in the days following.Do the Stones owe reparations to African-Americans?
Seriously.
Consider the Stones' company profile: there has never been a black member of the group.
Even the most drug-addled Stones fan knows that their product is a priated version of African-American music. In some cases the group paid royalties to living artists such as Chuck Berry, whose works they copied. In most other instances -- Robert Johnson's "Love in Vain," for example -- they were able to get what they want for free.
Links to relevant non-commercial content remain welcome.
Links to this post:
The Trigger Effect (1996)
How tenuous is man's hold on civilization when survival becomes an issue? When the lights go out and stay out for several days, suburbanites Matthew and Annie learn the hard way that man is "by nature" a predatory creature. Matthew's long-time friend, Joe, happens by on the second day and a rivalry between the two friends simmers as Annie cares for her sick baby. When rumors of looting spread through the neighborhood, the two men buy a rifle for protection but Annie throws it in the pool. Later, that same night, Joe hears a prowler downstairs and awakens Matthew. They chase the stranger from the house and out into the street where a neighbor shoots him to death. No longer safe in their own home, they decide to drive to Annie's parents some 500 miles away. Before they reach their destination, more trouble comes their way when they stop to siphon gas from an abandoned car and discover the driver in the back seat... Is this what is meant by "man's inhumanity to man?"That's why I don't live in a big city. When the next big mid-plate earthquake hits the northeastern United States, I wonder if the breakdown in order that David Koepp predicted and that we're seeing now in New Orleans will reach Woburn, or southern New Hampshire.
Links to this post:
The Volokh Conspiracy - Comment on "Armed Response to Looters":
Links to this post:
Wednesday, August 31, 2005
FAA applies economics, but only to toddlers
FAA officials have decided not to require toddlers under two years of age to occupy their own airline seats, the Bloomberg news service reports. The rationale, according to the FAA, is that parents forced to pay for a toddler's plane ticket might decide to drive instead, putting the family at greater risk than if they flew, Bloomberg reported.Wouldn't this reasoning apply to older passengers as well? I regularly drive instead of flying because of the costs, not just the cost of the ticket and getting too and from the airport, but the non-economic costs of the "security" measures, which are nothing but show. If I were travelling with other friends or family to the same destination, within about 250 miles, we would almost certainly drive together. Since any people forced to pay for an extra plane ticket might decide to drive instead, should the FAA stop requiring that passengers beyond the first in a party purchase their own tickets?
Links to this post:
Why I'm not contributing to Katrina relief
- "Let the bastards freeze in the dark"
- These victims knowingly lived in a hurricane-prone region, on land that is below sea level
- The federal government is going to contribute millions of dollars, which came from me and other taxpayers, for "emergency relief"
- That program was rife with corruption after last year's Florida hurricanes
- I'll be personally contributing one or two thousand dollars extra this year to petroleum companies, some of which extra, including the current spike, will be blamed on Katrina
- I'm an unemployed software engineer, while the industry is claiming visa quotas must be lifted due to a desperate labor shortage
Links to this post:
Herald Columnists: Lack of destruction takes the wind out of our sails
If you were secretly disappointed yesterday when the roof of the Superdome failed to crash down on NBC anchor Brian Williams, you weren't alone. "I would say I was mildly disappointed," said Kiss 108 morning man Matt Siegel. "My colleague Bill Costa was devastated. Normally on Mondays he gets his manicure and pedicure but he stayed and watched TV for two hours waiting for the thing to cave in." When it didn't, Siegel said, Costa felt betrayed. All that build-up, anticipation. Hundreds of thousands at risk. Oil field devastation. Caskets floating out of cemeteries. Caskets floating out of cemeteries? Well that's what they said, those breathless reporters in slickers flapping so madly you expected both slicker and reporter to shoot off into the stratosphere, like human cannon balls.OK, it looks like a levee broke, and much of New Orleans is under water. Petroleum prices are spiking on the news. But Eagan has a good point about storm hype. Herald Columnists may be available only to subscribers. If you're not a subscriber, become one, but in the mean time, ask
I had to chuckle at Margery Eagan's column about disappointed nitwit media folks when the New Orleans Superdown wasn't wiped off the map. Having weathered Category 4/5 Ivan on Grenada, my wife and I are nauseated rather than thrilled by these types of disasters.Gary Thober took her to task in an e-letter. In her column today Eagan writes about the Spirit of New Orleans, but doesn't apologize for, or even mention, her earlier column; neither did the Herald issue any sort of clarification. On the other hand, when we ask why people did not heed the warnings and evacuate, some blame must be placed on the prior false alarms and hype. Related story: A glitch in the Reverse 911 system in the town of Ipswich sent up to 15 calls in rapid succession at dinner time to the same homes warning about Eastern equine encephalitis. Yet the town's emergency management director Charles Cooper was disturbed that so many calls went to answering machines, busy signals, or were hung up on, saying "People should listen to anything from the Ipswich Public Safety Department." How many times?
Links to this post:
Tuesday, August 30, 2005
All You Can Eat
Links to this post:
Monday, August 29, 2005
First He Cries: Getting to Shortstop
Links to this post:
Sunday, August 21, 2005
The Tippling Tiplets
Links to this post:
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Gaza pullout
Links to this post:
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Lowell - A lot to like
Links to this post:
Tax Holiday
Links to this post:
Tuesday, August 09, 2005
The Fighting Jews
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
Marriage to minor can't stop sex charge
It is unlawful in Kansas for a person under 16 to have sex -- unless they are married, [Whitney] Watson [, spokesman for Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline] said. Otherwise, the law says they can't consent to have sex. He didn't know how many people under 16 might be married.Notwithstanding that analysis and the headline, this Nebraska case may not address the issue as the child bride, now 14, was already pregnant when she got married at age 13.
"The idea... is repugnant to me," said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning. ... He said the marriage is valid, thanks to the "ridiculous" Kansas law, "but it doesn't matter. I'm not going to stand by while a grown man... has a relationship with a 13-year-old -- now 14-year-old -- girl."It would be interesting if Bruning were presented with a case of two 16-year-olds who were lawfully married outside Nebraska and without evidence of pre-marital sex.
Links to this post:
Monday, July 25, 2005
Three Harvards
Links to this post:
Friday, July 22, 2005
Holyoke Mall to forbid unescorted teens -- possible long-term consequences
Hoping to crack down on unruly behavior, the mall managers will ... require shoppers under 18 to be accompanied by an adult on Friday and Saturday between 4 p.m. and closing time [starting] on Sept. 9. The new restriction will be policed by security staff checking photo identification cards at the mall's entrances.A Toys R Us opened in my neighborhood when I was about 14. This was my first opportunity to go to this television icon (this was in the late 1970s -- the north Bronx can be a backwater relative to popular suburban culture.) A sign on the door prohibited those 16 and under from enterin alone. Even though I am a middle-aged parent today, and do regularly use the local Toys R Us, I still resent that policy, and have that much less goodwill towards that company as a result. The Mall probably has the right to exclude this class, and maybe it will realize increased revenues from more sales from fewer customers who are there primarily to shop as compared to many young visitors who may shop incidentally to hanging out, but this policy is not without a long-term downside. I should note that I have recently begun to take advantage of the public spaces provided by the Burlington Mall as a non-shopper, to enjoy the air conditioning and to keep my children occupied. We usually end up using the laptops at the Verizon FIOS kiosk or throwing pennies at the animatronic alligator at the Rainforest Cafe. I understand that malls provide varying attractions to bring in potential customers (some more ornate than others) and I usually drop a few dollars, especially at the Chick-Fil-A at the food court, when we visit. I'm doing my part to breed the next generation of mall rats; I hope they have an air-conditioned placed to hang out when they become teenagers.
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 20, 2005
Standard gauges and sizes throughout history, railroads and hydrants
Links to this post:
Monday, July 18, 2005
Servers that lose stuff
Links to this post:
Saturday, July 16, 2005
Louisiana adds years to sentence for rapists who refuse to be castrated
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
On Civil Disobedience
JUDGE: Counsel, you say that your failure to meet the deadline was an act of civil disobedience, designed to demonstrate the injustice of the court's approach in this case? And that as a result, we should reverse the trial court's dismissal of the case and remand? COUNSEL: Yes, your honor. JUDGE: Now counsel, you do understand how "civil disobedience" works, don't you? COUNSEL: I don't understand the question, your honor. JUDGE: Well, the way that civil disobedience works is that you believe the law to be unjust, and so you are willing to be punished for violating it in order to demonstrate the injustice of the law. For this to be a true act of civil disobedience, therefore, you would have to be willing to accept the punishment, and through that willingness to accept the punishment, you demonstrate the injustice of the law. So, for instance, Martin Luther King's act of civil disobedience was his willingness to be arrested and go to jail in order to demonstrate the injustice of the laws. So, if this was a true act of civil disobedience on your part, aren't we obliged to affirm the ruling of the district court dismissing the case? COUNSEL (after long pause): Um, your honor, I would like to amend my argument...Dilan Esper comments:
Funny story, but it raises a serious issue-- I don't think a lot of people understand how civil disobedience works.On the other hand, sometimes a protest is simply a protest. My freshman year in high school (which means you should probably stop reading here) just as NYC was going into its financial crisis, the Bd of Ed dumped a teacher from HQ onto Bronx Science, causing us to lose the most junior faculty member. A bunch of us protested. The Times picked up the story (Dec. 4, 1975, IIRC). We assembled outside the school for a few periods after lunch. The next day our social studies teacher said "I am allowed to deduct 5 points from your final grade for cutting a class, but I will not do so, but I expect a 10,000 word essay tomorrow on why you (who were not here) were cutting class." We groaned. He said "Those of you who groaned have just demonstrated that you were not out there in principle, you were out there to skip class. When I marched across the Brooklyn Bridge in 1968 to Jay Street, I knew that I could lose my job, but I was willing to do that, because that was the price of civil disobedience. Blah, blah, blah." (He ultimately told us we didn't have to write the essays.) A few months later he was "excessed" as the budget crisis deepened. I saw him leaving the school. I thought but didn't ask him if he was glad he had lost his livelihood, and if he wasn't, did it prove that he was a hypocrite for telling the students that were not sincere for demonstrating against budget cuts and reassignments.
Links to this post:
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
Fireworks
The Pawtucket Red Sox canceled plans for Fourth of July fireworks at McCoy Stadium last night as a precaution after an explosion during Sunday's display slightly injured five employees of a pyrotechnic company. But Pawtucket fire and public safety officials urged the PawSox to cancel last night's fireworks until investigators could better understand why a fireworks shell exploded so close to the ground, setting off other fireworks prematurely. Pawtucket's ''public safety director, along with the fire chief and the police chief, thought it was best that we all sit back and analyze what happened before we rush into another show," said PawSox president Mike Tamburro. ''There are certainly plenty of other nights for fireworks." However, Tamburro stressed that he remains confident in Telstar's safety record, noting that the 26-year-old company has staged dozens of fireworks displays for the team over the last decade without injuries. ''This really might be a case of just a freak accident," he said. ''Sometimes it's freak accidents that cause the most problems." Telstar's Bergeron said the accident occurred midway through the show when a shell exploded either on takeoff or as it was falling back to the ground, sending a cascade of hot embers into fireworks that were supposed to be launched during the grand finale. Firefighters said one crate of fireworks tipped over, sending fireworks shooting toward a group of employees near the launch site, in a parking lot behind the right field wall.Remember kids, always leave fireworks to the professionals to guarantee safety.
Links to this post:
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Monotheism is not a religion
Links to this post:
Monday, June 27, 2005
Public Displays of the Ten Commandments
Links to this post:
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Betsy Hart's divorce
the act of staying together, of persevering, in and of itself often ended up producing a happy marriage. Now that's connection. Another "connection" is understanding that marriage is about more than any two people. (Which means, for starters, that those two people don't have the right to pursue a fleeting notion of happiness at the expense of a child or spouse.)Now, as with Ann Landers three decades ago, her husband has left her. <Nelson Muntz>Ha Ha</Nelson Muntz>
Links to this post:
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
Salem's `Bewitched' statue
As popular as the TV show was, some residents of Salem are less than thrilled that Samantha is getting a prominent place in the city. During the 1692 witchcraft hysteria, 19 men and women were executed.If Salem, all of Salem, treated the event solemnly, they'd have a leg to stand on. This is the city with Halloween as its national holiday, that celebrates modern witches, and whose witch museum is touristy kitsch. (Better to visit the House of Seven Gables, Salem Willows, or Pickering Wharf.) In any case, what is the connection between the witches of folklore, like in MacBeth, turning people into frogs, and modern practitioners of wicca? So much of what I hear is "No, that is not us at all" -- so why share the name?
Links to this post:
Friday, June 17, 2005
If not now, when?
If I am not for myself, then who will be, but if I am only for my self, what am I? And if not now, when?So why is it that innw? (If not now, when?) pulls up a Frito-Lay site advertising Doritos?
Links to this post:
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
Handicap stalls in public bathrooms (Dear Abby)
You don't leave your car in the Handicap spot because you might not be there to move it when somebody who "needs" it needs it. (I've been told by guards to move on when waiting in a car in such a spot, and in those cases I usually obey and wait in the traffic lane.) Most of the time there are other spots available, but less convenient.
But the handicap-accessible bathroom stall, or the Cripple Stool as Larry the Cable Guy calls it, is just a regular stall with a wider door and such.
If there are two open stalls and a handicapped individual will need one before you're going to be done, then you're obliged to use the less accessible stall. Otherwise, they've got no greater claim or entitlement than anybody else. (An argument could be made that they have less, but we're still too socialistic for that.)
Accomodations have been made, but that doesn't equal entitlement. If the aisles in a library are made wider, and the shelves lower, so that some people who were physically unable to use the library are now able to do so, these people have no more claim to the library than any other patron.
If every stall in the library in the Dear Abby situation were handicap-accessible, the handicapped individual wouldn't have the right to go to the head of the line.
Links to this post:
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
A night in the city
Links to this post:
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Historic Baseball: Red Sox-Braves is crosstown rivalry
I guess this is old news to anybody who reads the sports pages. I tend not to. Here are the matchups for MLB's crosstown interleague weekend.
| Yankees | Mets | Subway! |
| White Sox | Cubs | Chicago |
| Astros | Rangers | Texas |
| LA? Anaheim? Angels | Dodgers | LA |
| Arizona | Detroit | Why? |
| Tampa Bay | Florida | Florida |
| Washington | Toronto | formerly Montreal |
| Philadelphia | Baltimore | If they say so |
| Cleveland | Cincinnati | Ohio |
| Colorado | Pittsburgh | Why? |
| St. Louis | Kansas City | I-70 |
| Milwaukee | Minnesota | Upper Midwest |
| Oakland | San Francisco | Bay |
| San Diego | Seattle | Why? |
Links to this post:
Friday, May 20, 2005
Some kids should be left behind
Links to this post:
Wednesday, May 18, 2005
Secondary Metals
"Your Primary Source for Secondary Metals."Great slogan. I think secondary metal means recycled scrap metal.
Links to this post:
Tuesday, May 17, 2005
I grow old
Links to this post:
Monday, May 16, 2005
Cute and memorable commercials
Links to this post:
Friday, May 13, 2005
Michael Ross executed in Connecticut
Consider the mathematician who is sentenced to death. He is told that he will be killed some time in the next n days, and, because this is a humanitarian court, to spare him some dread, he will be killed on a day when he does not expect it. He is sent back to his cell. He realizes that if he makes it to the nth day, he will know that since that is the last possible day to execute him, that that is the day. But since he can't be killed on a day when he expects it, he can't be executed on that day. This means that on the day before that, there are only two days open for his execution. Since it can't happen on the following day, the nth day, he must be executed on that day, the (n-1)th day. But since he will have realized this, he will expect it, and he can't be executed on that day either. By induction, this applies to the (n-2)th day and so far, all the way back. Secure in the knowledge that he can't be executed he goes to sleep. The next morning the jailer wakes him up and hangs him.If the statute of limitations for murder is to be finite, we will want it to be particularly long. I don't think we'd want a murderer trying to beat out the last few months until 20 years, or his 65th or 80th birthday, trying not to get indicted until he can beat the rap on a technicality. Whereever there is a bright line, being just over that line will be perceived as a technicality.
Links to this post:
Thursday, May 12, 2005
Why does statute of limitations not run when accused has been out of state?
Links to this post:
Monday, May 09, 2005
First He Cries
it was time to visit Lady Grace to buy post-mastectomy breast prostheses. They come silicone and non-silicone. The silicone prostheses are heavier -- eliminating, for the formerly-large-breasted, one of the major beneficial side effects of a mastectomy, the end of backaches and shoulder pain. But the salewoman explains "They feel so much more natural!" I want to know "Who is going to be feeling them?"

