Thursday, April 27, 2006

Presumption of Guilt 

Judge rescinds deal for Duke lacrosse player�-�Metropolitan�-�The Washington Times, America's Newspaper This came up in the Duke lacrosse team rape accusations.
At yesterday's hearing, Mr. Finnerty -- dressed in a dark suit, white shirt and green tie and accompanied by his family's priest -- stood quietly as Judge John H. Bayly rescinded the terms of the diversion program Mr. Finnerty entered after being charged with simple assault.

According to the terms of the program, the charges would have been dismissed had Mr. Finnerty completed 25 hours of community service and stayed out of trouble.

I don't get it. If Finnerty was involved in the rape of the stripper, throw the book at him, but until the evidence against him has been tested, why isn't he presumed innocent of the new charges, and presumed to have stayed out of trouble, in the Washington case?


Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?