Wednesday, November 29, 2006

The Swarm of the College Super-Applicants -- New York Magazine 

A New York Magazine article, The Swarm of the College Super-Applicants, discusses college applicants who appear to be overqualified for college admission, and has their chances handicapped by IvyWise's founder Katherine Cohen. David Bernstein discusses the article here on the Volokh Conspiracy. In the discussion that followed, one subthread discussed the things that are considered besides grades, SATs and race like extracurriculars include research, athletics and charity work. Commenter Mark Field suggested that a candidate who achieved perfect SATs by spending every spare minute studying was less impressive than a candidate who had perfect SATs and had spent 30 hours a week playing soccer or at a volunteer job. I agree, and not only (Mark's point) because the second candidate achieved the same score with less effort. I've come to realize that the athletes, the "dumb jocks" were learning discipline and time management and interpersonal skills that have served them, and will serve them, well throughout life, lessons that we "nerds" didn't understand. Countering Mark's point, what about the candidate with perfect SAT scores who spent the 30 hours or more watching television, or engaging in any other (for the sake of argument legal) leisure activity that doesn't particularly build discipline or strength or character? I'd say it depends. Does the candidate who was able to "phone it in" throughout high school have what it takes to rise to the greater challenge in college? Will he? Will the college help him, or will it drown him with the firehose of knowledge?
Here were my statistics for the 1978-1979 school year, my senior year: Courses: Class Standing: SATs: Extra-curriculars: Athletics:

I didn't do any preparation for college admissions. I didn't visit a single school the summer before, but I did read "A Small Circle of Friends". I think the college advisor had given presentations during my junior year, but mostly I tuned her out. When she handed out the CUNY applications in the fall I asked when she'd be handing out the other applications, and she was aghast that I hadn't spent the summer collecting them. (I remember driving out to Queens late in December to borrow an application, maybe to MIT, from a classmate who'd decided not to apply.) My father gave me a lot of help with the application essays. I had a vague notion that I wanted to be away from home, but not so far away that I couldn't come home from time to time, which favored Boston.

Princeton had given me an early "unlikely" before they upgraded to "likely" and then admitted me, but that had soured me on them, which is too bad, because I might have done well at a smaller school. I think Yale was my Early Admission school, and they were very hard on Bronx Science that year -- it was my only rejection. MIT was an easy acceptance, but I was still pre-med, and that would have made a difference. We were allowed only six applications -- teachers were forbidden to write recommendations for students who had filed more. I think Columbia and U Penn were my safeties, but I got the fat envelope from Harvard and that was it.

The New York Magazine article makes me wonder if I would have gotten in, or even if I'd bother trying today. In 1979 Asians were beginning to take over from Jews as the dominant demographic at Bronx Science, but we didn't factor that into our guesses. We knew Blacks and women had an advantage.

But it also has me thinking about whether Harvard should have admitted me, if I should have accepted, and what should have been different.

I didn't know until years after college that I probably have a mild Attention Deficit or depression or Asperger's Syndrome. I was highly lacking in discipline and maturity, but mostly I needed to spend a year partying to get it out of my system. I needed to learn about alcohol, and smokable substances, and girls.

I was horribly misled. I listened to my father about pre-med (and when I finally dropped that after an advisor asked me, sophomore year, "do you want to go to medical school?" and I realized I didn't, the easiest major to complete with my math and physics credits was Applied Math/Computer Science) and didn't listen to him about not taking sophomore level courses. I listened to my high school teachers about putting a fact in every sentence, so when I took the writing test I didn't know that I would never finish the passage in time, and didn't provide analysis in my essay, so I was sent to the speed reading course (the one that is sometimes cited in the press as "Harvard is accepting freshmen so dumb they need to take remedial reading") but I already read some 800 words per minute, so that didn't help, and I started to ignore my Harvard teachers same as in high school. I took Harvard's placement exams and believed them when they said I should take sophomore math and sophomore chemistry, not realizing the speed and intensity of the instruction. I didn't have basic college inorganic chemistry. I only got a good grade in organic chemistry because William von Eggers Doering (who at 89 years old is still associated with the University!) played a dirty trick and told the class aromatic substitutions wouldn't be on the final exam, but they were, and I still remembered them from high school.

After a while I became an "invisible student". I went to sections, but few lectures. I learned to operate a machine shop, a radio station, a film projector, and a shuttle bus; hung out on the house committee, and got drafted into the Undergraduate Council. I played a lot of video games and slept in a lot.


My conclusion is that this particular student, who did exceedingly well without trying, should have been admitted, but needed much better mentoring. With proper guidance I could have made a lot more from the opportunity.
Update: Over on the Myspace copy of this blog, ePrep asked for a link. Done. Without endorsing them, they seem to be saying a lot of things with which I agree about "Test Prep and College Planning".


Comments:
I've been thinking a lot recently about how Harvard was kind of a waste for me. I didn't care about classes at all (though I did reasonably well grade-wise), and didn't do much else besides structured activities run by one intensive extra-curricular.

I hadn't come to the conclusion that I shouldn't have been accepted, though. I've been told that Harvard is particularly bad for people who need guidance, and while I'd like to agree, I don't see how things would have been different at another school, even a much smaller one.

(You can probably figure out who I am, but I'd like to remain even more anonymous than usual for now.)
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?