There’s More Than One Way To Be A Sissy.
The always wonderful GayProf wrote an interesting piece about the media’s obsession with the Larry Craig scandal and what that may tell us about how society views gays. It’s an excellent post. In that post, GayProf provided a link to another post by Kenneth Hill. I thought Kenneth made some excellent points. However, I didn’t buy it. Actually, it kind of irritated me. And here’s a passage from that post that essentially sums up the tone of the article,
Basically . . . people hate a sissy, aka anyone who acts too gay (read: too effeminate).Please note that Kenneth discussed other issues and provided an overall compelling argument. But I found it devoid of true objectivity. In fact, this very statement and other comments made in the post seem to place gays into two categories—sissies and non-sissies. And, according to Kenneth, in order for gays to be free, we all need to accept our sissies. That’s a good point, but, again, I have major issue with this and other statements.
First of all, as most probably know but tend to forget, gay people are a very diverse group. The sissies that Kenneth speaks of probably represent a small minority of the gay population. Interestingly, this small sample seems to get a lot of attention. More about that a little later. My major beef with Kenneth’s piece is that he seems to ignore the fact that there’s more than one way to be a sissy, so to speak. Relative to many straight men, I’d be considered a big ol’ sissy. Now, that doesn’t mean I’m more effeminate than a fabulous drag queen. I’m actually considered straight-acting by most, but I will never deny that I have female-typical traits and interests. In fact, I celebrate those traits. I mean, have you read my blog? Check out the banner and some of the side bar pics.
I also don’t get what he means by too effeminate. I mean, I know what he’s talking about, but, again, I find that phrase a little off the mark. Gay men are first and foremost living, breathing mammals, and, in all sexually reproducing species, diversity is the rule rather than the exception. Sorry, I study animal behavior for a living; please bear with me. Anyway, my point is: Effeminate gay men are as diverse as any group of human beings or animals, for that matter. Whoever came up with this sissy/non-sissy dichotomy is just foolish and lazy.
Ok, I’ll admit that generalizing and keeping things simple can often be very effective and desirable, something John Kerry should know by now. However, I expect more from intelligent gay men. Why? Because these men are near and dear to my heart. And I have to say that I found it quite objectionable that Kenneth lumped Carson Kressley and Chris Crocker in the same category. Carson Kressley and youtube sensation Chris Crocker may seem identical on the surface, but when you really start to compares these two gay men, you will immediately see that they are as different as night and day. Chris seems to enjoy making vulgar comments, dancing provocatively, and doing other questionable things. Casron, on the other hand, has established himself as a respected television personality. His quippy comments and success as a fashionista have made him what he is today.
Finally, I’d like to comment about the homophobic statements directed at Chris Crocker. Of course, I think that’s deplorable. And it is a sad reminder that gay men who don’t conform to societal standards—gender norms and other rules—are often subjected to verbal and/or physical abuse. However, the behavior exhibited by Chris should not be considered gay-typical. Even straight women are subjected to hateful comments if they appear “too” sexual. In fact, Paris Hilton, a woman I can’t stand, is often bashed throughout the blogosphere. Yes, the media may often shower gay men like Chris Crocker with the wrong type of attention, and society can be harsh. There’s no question about that. But society also praises certain effeminate gay men (see Tim Gunn). What I’m trying to say is that being effeminate (or even too effeminate) isn’t the same thing as being histrionic (and effeminate). Again, there’s more than one way to be a sissy.
Labels: Celebrities, Culture, Gay, Gold, Homosexuality

5 Comments:
Thanks for the shout-out. You make a good point about diversity and the multiple ways that gender is performed within the queer community.
I took Hill's piece, though, to be more about perceptions of gender rather than a discussion of actual people. In particular, it seems like he is reacting to a segment of the queer community that eschews anything feminine and valorizes a [problematic] vision of masculinity.
It also seems to me that the "sissy" men who society adores are also often sexually neutered. While I adore Tim Gunn, his public image is one of being solitary and not at all sexual (ditto for all the Queer Eye Guys).
I actually find some "sissy" gay men rather attractive. but i'm some sort of freak of straight-girl nature.
One of the problems with these terms is that they are all boringly, frustratingly limitingly binaristic. i'm a girl. i am not histrionic. i am not especially butch, but i'm not a model of femininity either. so is an effeminate man like me - a girl who isn't girly? or is an effeminate man one who is like the girliest of girlies? how do we understand the butch lesbian, the female masculine? all these terms and ideas end up being so restricting for the way we understand and interact with each other.
i agree with the gayprof, though (and you know, reading that name just makes me think of dreamy, dreamy Ben from queer as folk) - the "sissy" men that are A-OK in mainstream culture (Jack on will & grace, mr. gunn, the queer eyes) - are weirdly asexual. when we see these fellows holding hands and kissyfacing with their partners - then i'll feel a little more comfortable.
Well done and well said. One of my best friends is a gay guy who some of my other friends think is too effeminate, whatever that means. He sometimes swishes his hands and his voice has a lispy quality.
They probably think I have too many masculine qualities because I assume I am equal to everyone else. I am also opinionated and say what's on my mind, and I don't mind being blunt and straightforward. This whole sexuality issue should be dead in the water. I look for kindness, decency, and caring individuals. I don't care how feminine or masculine they seem.
Thanks for the comments about my Sissies piece. I agree with you that I didn't explore all the nuances of sissy-dom. I suppose I struggled with how to say it all within one blog post as I agree with you that the sissy spectrum is very large. The smallest voice lilt or teeniest lift of a pinky can catapult one into the club before you can say Paul Lynde. Chris Crocker isn't the standard bearer by any means.
You make some good points and I appreciate you weighing in, criticisms and all, on the big gay sissy debate.
Ah, Gayprof & cb, you are both right; the gay men who are usually accepted in our culture are often asexual. And that’s very problematic.
Thanks, Ms. Place. It's interesting that women are still expected to conform to certain gender roles in this day and age. Well, things have certainly improved over the years, but women who don't act a certain way are often seen as deviant by many people.
Kenneth, I apologize for saying that your piece lacked objectivity. And I understand what Gayprof is saying. I think I missed the big picture. Also, thanks for your kind words.
Post a Comment
<< Home