Sunday, December 30, 2007 11:28 AM
Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:07 PM
Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:00 PM
I hope everyone had a nice Christmas, got to see your children and hold the Grand Kids, even Great Grand Kids, and that travel was uneventful. This time of year is so special. Love and merriment are everywhere. I’m glad you’re all back or on your way back to Eagle Creek. It’s more special here when we are all present, which brings me back to thinking about next year.
Who can believe that it’s 2008 already, the start of yet another year in our lives? Sometimes I have to ask myself where I am. I’m somewhere between the last curtain call and the end. So what’s that like? Here at Eagle Creek it fantastic. I’m 5 years retired this month and the time has gone by faster than the tread mills in the fitness center.
So I have to stop and think how 2008 is going to change us here at Eagle Creek. We are going to lose some close friends as they move on to a better place. Some will move back to be close to their children and some will stay here with the only family we have left. This is why we are so fortunate here at EC. We are family, we care and we love and we mourn. When members leave us, they are still with us in our minds and thoughts that we share over a drink with our friends and that usually starts us remembering when such and such happened. Which gets me to thinking are there any old friends or associates that maybe I should be contacting this year to say thank you or even I’m sorry or I should have.
Each year our life is filled with change and it’s up to us on how we accept this. The only day that I have is today and it is my goal not to cause any harm and make each encounter as memorable as I can. So I am thankful for all the blessings that we have here at Eagle Creek.
Happy New Year
God Bless
Dennis Farley
Sunday, December 16, 2007 8:03 PM
Should you want to sign the Petition below, please contact R. Nedoba at 775-3640
(to print , right click on the petition and select "Print Picture")
![]() |
Sunday, December 16, 2007 8:39 AM
Jim Lackey


Saturday, December 15, 2007 12:48 PM
Wednesday, December 12, 2007 10:15 AM
|
To our co-members and neighbors at the Eagle Creek Golf (and Tennis) Country Club We wish all of you, irrespective of political conviction and religious faith Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu .....whatever) A Very Happy New Year replete with Good Health, Peace, Friendship and Contentment
David
and Gladys Schechter
Stonegate
M303
|
Tuesday, December 11, 2007 12:24 PM
|
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
10:01 AM
Dennis, thank you for Creek Chat.
We'd like to wish everyone a Merry Christmas and a very
Happy 2008.
Annette & Joe Iannuzzo
|
Saturday, December 08, 2007 7:34 AM
Friday, December 07, 2007 8:00 AM
I have been trying to think of a Christmas message for us here at Eagle Creek. Today is December 7, 2007
I know there are a lot of us here that were in the service from 1941 to 1945 when the world as we knew it then was at war. Those Christmases from 1941 to 1945 (not to forget Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan) must have been something. They were and are filled with prayers for those serving and the hope that they return safely. The fear of the loss of a loved one was paramount in everyone’s mind. But we gathered up our strength and took time to pray and buckled down for the long haul. We persevered and survived.
All of you here at Eagle Creek that served and are serving, thank you for our freedom. I went on to serve my country in the Navy from 1958 to 1963. There were still Chiefs that had come through the war and even had ships sunk out from under them and they survived. They never complained and they took change in stride. You always knew where you stood with them.
Maybe we should take a moment and think just how important is it when we can complain about an assessment or the Waterfall or things that don’t measure up to our expectation. Let’s look where we have been as individuals and what we have done to improve our lot in life and those around us.
I don’t think any Governor of this club is looking for power or applause. I think they stepped up to the plate to serve this membership and to pass on what they can to improve the Eagle Creek Experience.
We are all lucky to be here and to be healthy. We have been blessed by God to use our talents and have achieved great success through him that bought us here. Each of us has a story that is special and unique. We can reach back and gain strength from those experiences. I wish you would share some of those about your Christmases here at Creek Chat.
We are a small community with a common thread running through us that we did something to earn this place at this time. For that I am thankful.
On this Christmas let’s all think about how we can be of better service to the other members of Eagle Creek. We are only here a short time and we should all leave this place better than when we arrived.
Continuous improvement through constant kindness to each other should be our goal.
And to all a good night.
Merry Christmas
Dennis Farley
Wednesday, December 05, 2007 9:51 PM
Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:58 PM
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 5:14 pm
Much has already been said about the
front entrance project so I will not add to that, but I do wish to
address the process by which these projects came about in the first
place.
The process that was followed and gave us a result that has so many
people upset is very worrisome to me. After reading all the minutes
verbatim since March, I am beginning to get a picture of how this came
down.
Sometime in April the original 951 Ad Hoc Committee chaired by Ron
Ruecker, consisting of about 10 other folks, presented their
recommendations to the Executive Committee.
At the April 24 Board meeting, the Exec Committee chose to refer the
matter to the entire Board, where, in the absence of Ron Ruecker, the
chairman, it was presented by Lowell Lam, a member of the 951 committee.
After some discussion, Dean Swartzwelter made a long "whereas" motion
essentially saying that there were too many alternatives and opinions
being offered by owners and it was just too costly to pay for studies
for all these alternatives, so they should just design a conceptual
survey to determine what the majority of people wanted. That motion was
approved. Coincidentally, Swartzwelter just happened to already have
such a conceptual survey ready to present to the Board and send to the
owners. A motion to send that survey was approved by all except Lam and
Knepper who questioned the language of the survey.
At the June 24 meeting, Swartzwelter presented his summary of the
results of the survey. Ron Ruecker, disagreed with this summary. After
token comments by the Board, Swartzwelter made another "whereas" motion
that essentially said the survey had been discussed, but offered no
evidence of majority support for the project. It also said the only
remaining issues to be explored were the front entrance and property
lines. It stated that the Ad Hoc 951 Committee's work was complete,
insinuating their input was no longer needed for the entrance and
finally the project was passed to Lowell Lam of the Grounds Maintenance
Committee.
Discussion followed the motion and, in spite of the opinion of Ron
Ruecker that the survey results were "ambiguous because the survey
questions were not definitive and did not include costs", the motion
passed.
At the July 26 meeting, Lowell Lam presented his plan for the fountain,
which was approved by the Board. Strangely, none of the original 11
members of the original 951 Ad Hoc committee are mentioned as assisting
Lam to put together a plan.
At the August 28 meeting, Lowell Lam presented a long report outlining
all the costs associated with all the 951 projects. He pointed out in
his presentation that he was assisted by Lyle Scharenberg and Stu Wolf
in addition to Ann Berger and Noah Bess. Again, the question. Why were
no members of the original committee included since they were the ones
who had spent hours and hours studying the project?
This whole scenario bothers me on several levels.
First, the survey that appears to have been created by one man,
Swartzwelter, and used to justify the project was very unscientific and
designed to get the result the author already wanted. The Board used the
results even though it was pointed out to them that it was flawed and
was clearly not a mandate by the owners.
The motion to not accept the recommendations of the original 951 Ad Hoc
Committee at the Board meeting when some members, including the
chairman, were absent, was clearly a maneuver to blindside the work of
the original committee. Unfortunately, it was successful. Why was it not
sent back to committee for them to make changes more palatable to the
Board
which would have been the professional approach instead of throwing out
the baby with the bath water?
Finally, the appearance is that the projects were pushed through by a
group of "good ole boys" so they would be completed before most of us
returned for the season and could not debate the issue until it was too
late. What was the hurry? We could just now be hearing what the owners
really want while we have more people here and get the projects done by
spring.
All of this has the earmark of a clandestine backdoor action that I find
offensive and unprofessional and leaves me with little or no confidence
in the members of this Board. In response, I will do everything in my
power to see that my representative does not get re-elected in March
unless I see some assurance that this type of thing will not happen in
the future. I urge others to consider the same action regarding their
representatives. We need people representing us that we can trust to be
above board and honest with us.
Dr. Randy Van Alstine
Monday, December 03, 2007 9:02 PM
Saturday, December 01, 2007 3:24 PM
Saturday, December 01, 2007 8:46 AM