Dan’s Chess Teaching Philosophy
National Master Dan Heisman (610-649-0750) danheisman@comcast.net
Return to Main Chess Page
Return to Lesson Page
So you are thinking of taking lessons from me and want to know about
my chess teaching philosophy? You came to the right place! This
page includes special notes (in green) for teaching on the Internet
Chess Club (ICC), where contact is not face-to-face. Also,
see my Adult Chess Lesson Guide, which is
similar, but less philosophy and more about taking chess lessons in general.
-
My full-time job is chess instruction, so my reputation is important.
Therefore, I will do whatever I can to make sure my students are happy
and learning as much as they can during the teaching session. Of course I can't
please everyone, but I do try.
-
I primarily teach by going over student’s (slow) games. This
just makes sense, as I need to see what you are doing wrong before I can
help you get better. I believe that a series of pre-programmed lessons
does not do a student any good, as they most likely do not meet his needs.
For example, a student who is still missing some basic tactics and losing
pieces does not need a lesson on King and Pawn vs. King endgames!
This also means that the practice part of the homework should include a
few slow games between lessons. On the
ICC I use "square circling" and "line drawing" to illustrate my ideas as
I go over a game or position. The student can see the moves and illustrations
by using the "follow PhillyTutor" command.
-
One of the main goals of a lesson is to concentrate on what YOU are doing
that needs help. Therefore one of my goals is to not
spend too much lesson time doing things you could be doing for homework,
unless you ask. This includes playing games against my
students, going over lots of tactical problems, studying opening lines, etc.
If there is anything you don't understand, by all
means bring it up at a lesson. I would rather spend
time with you seeing how well you are applying what you learn rather than
teaching you generic things you can easily pick up from my writings, etc.
That is why 60-70% of my lesson time is reviewing your slow games.
However,
if there is something you need to learn during the lesson for any
reason, I will teach it to you directly.
-
The customer is always right
(but that doesn't mean they know what is best for them!) I do have lots of pre-programmed lessons
for those who either want these or for whom their games indicate that they
need them: These pre-programmed lessons include: Most openings, Pawn Structures
and Break Moves, King and Pawn against King, Basics of Rook and Pawn Endgames,
Piece Mobility, Comparison of Bishop and Knight, Lucena and Philidor Rook
Endgames, deGroot "thought process" positions, Hypermodern Theory: Center
Control vs. Center Occupation, Time Management, Piece Value, The Four Boxes
of Planning, and many more.
-
Tactics are the most important part of chess, so I primarily like
to talk about tactics and how the student can get better at tactics. Most
homework, if the customer wants to study, is based on getting better at
tactics until the student is good enough that studying other things is
worthwhile. Occasionally students would rather study other things,
so I give them non-tactic homework to augment their tactical study. Advanced
students may be studying anything: famous games, openings, endgames, planning,
etc. For beginning students, I recommend "Bain's Tactics for Students";
for advanced students who know Coakley's excellent (and misleading title)
"Winning Chess Exercises for Kids"; see my Guide
to Chess Books.
-
I use the Socratic Method of teaching - This means
that rather than telling a student something they need to know (or telling
them an answer to a question), I often ask a series of leading questions
letting you figure it out for yourself. That way your understanding
and retention are MUCH better. It is like that old saying, "Give someone
a fish and you give them dinner; teach someone to fish and they can feed
themselves for the rest of their life." If the Socratic method
frustrates you, let me know and I will try to modify it; if you don’t know
an answer, try to guess, but if you feel you are getting nowhere by guessing,
just say "I don’t know" and if I feel that I can no longer lead you to
the answer (or that you truly are unable to figure it out), I will tell
you. Occasionally we are reviewing and I know the student
knows the answer, so when they say "I don’t know" I will give them a hint
like, "Of course you do!". But I will eventually tell you anyway,
if you can't remember.
-
Learning chess takes a long time. I have no magic fairy dust
or magic words to make you instantly better. If you are looking
for instant results, I suggest another coach (but seriously, don’t go to
anyone who promises you great results in a short period of time; they cannot
be legitimate. If chess were that easy, everyone would be good by
getting a few weeks of lessons, and you know they aren’t!). Many
students take 2-3 lessons and stop because they are disappointed when they
are not a lot better; it would not be likely that you would show great
improvement in such a short time. So if you only want to take 2-3
lessons, that is OK with me, but you shouldn't expect much. A reasonable
frequency is once a week for an hour or once every two weeks for 1.5-2
hours.
-
A chess coach is primarily a guide. The student does most
of the work and learning by playing and studying between lessons.
The coach helps them by making sure they are studying what is most helpful
for their needs and playing the most helpful opponents and time controls.
-
I use guidelines (or principles) to give you something to think
about and help you find the right move. For example, the two most
important chess guidelines are Keep All Your Pieces Safe and Make
Sure All Your Pieces are Doing Something. But there are literally
hundreds of guidelines, such as First Look for all Checks, Captures,
and Threats or Knight on the Rim and Your Future is Dim.
Keep in mind that these are just guidelines and not rules! If a guideline
says not to do something, but it wins, Play Whatever Wins (a strong
guideline!). However, keep in mind that when
a beginner thinks he has found an exception to a guideline, he is probably
wrong!
-
You have to be willing to try to play slow in slow
time-control games - Not everyone can, but those who want to play fast and
without thinking are not going to get as much from instruction since they are
not trying to make decisions based on what they are learning.
-
Let me know what you like! I start out by teaching almost
everyone new in a similar manner (modified by age, inputs prior to the
first lesson, etc.). However everyone is different and I try to adjust to individual needs and tastes. However,
sometimes you have to tell me your preferences! I keep written
notes on each lesson with each student, but obviously they are somewhat
sketchy because I am concentrating on teaching you. Occasionally I fail
to write down something that was important to you and I heard it, but I
failed to write it down. If this is the case, forgive me and remind
me, and I will write it down! Although I try to properly adjust
for each student, occasionally we just do not "click" and you might be
better off with someone else. If so, let me know and I will understand.
-
Regular Lesson Yield the Best Results, But not everyone has the
time or financial resources to do so. If you need to stop for a while
or wish to take lessons spread out by a fair amount of time, please
be truthful with me and just say that you are going to take a break and
you will get back to me (but only if you really intend to do so; See #9).
One reason for this is that on the ICC I do take
time to look at my student’s games and to occasionally say Hi! to see if
they have any questions (I am just basically friendly); if you have stopped
taking lessons from me, but didn’t tell me, then I don't need to look at
your games and also you might think that my Hi! is a solicitation to get
more lessons. I wouldn’t do that, but if you stop taking lessons
from me and don’t tell me, you may feel that way. If you stop taking
lessons from me and DO tell me, then you can be assured that my Hi! is
just me being friendly!
-
Early Lessons For Beginners Usually Include the Rules and Keeping
Score. For over-the-board (OTB) students, it is necessary that
they learn how to keep score in algebraic notation; otherwise, they are
not able to bring me their games so we can go over them. It is also
a US Chess Federation rule that you must keep score, if you know how, during
your OTB games. Also, in early lessons (OTB and ICC)
we often spend time going over the rules. You would be surprised
how many students initially think that when you promote a pawn you can
only get back a piece that was taken off the board! And players who
play in tournaments need to know the draw rules and, OTB especially, the
clock rules.
Letter
to Prospective Student:
Thanks for
your inquiry. I would be honored to be your chess instructor. If you need any
references, please let me know.
Many of my
students are your age (as am I!) I have been teaching (and writing) chess
full-time for over 10 years, and your general story is not unusual - many
students take up chess again as their children grow up, or as they discover
the ease of internet chess after playing as a youngster.
I would prefer
to call you and discuss this rather than writing a long email; I have
unlimited calling in the US so if you would send me your phone number and a
good time to call I would be glad to do so. But a quick summary (much of which
is also found at my Lesson page http://mywebpages.comcast.net/danheisman/Lessons/chess_lesson.htm ):
As I point out
in many of my award-winning Novice Nook columns, particularly "The Theory
of Chess Improvement"
...there are
basically two ways to improve at chess:
1) Add
positives (new knowledge, chess patterns), and
2) Subtract
negatives (find out what you are doing wrong, find ways to minimize doing so
in the future)
Many students
stagnate because they read chess books to do #1, but keep making the same
mistakes and so plateau.
In my lessons
I concentrate first on learning what your strengths and weaknesses are, and
then later primarily use Homework (see http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman68.pdf )
to add positives while I go over your recent games to see how well you are
applying recent ideas and to help you identify and subtract negatives.
When going
over games I concentrate on the five areas where you get the biggest bang for
the buck, i.e. Basic tactics, Piece activity, thought process, time management
(a frequent bane of many players like yourself), and applying general
principles. I am especially well known for my work in thought process and time
management (if you are interested, see many of my Novice Nooks and Thinking
Cap columns via http://mywebpages.comcast.net/danheisman/Articles/Novice_Nook_Links.htm).
I use the
Socratic method - I rarely "tell" you things, preferring to ask
questions to make you think about what you know to come up with new ideas or
conclusions. I find this helps the student both understand the ideas and
remember them better, but it is sometimes a little frustrating as I am pushing
your envelope, and that is always a little uncomfortable for some.
I am a very
enthusiastic instructor - I rarely speak in a monotone. I use constructive
criticism, and tell my students that is what they are paying me to do - please
do not take it personally.
If you want to
know if our chemistry will "click", please read the "Will
click/Won't click" in the middle of the page:
As for your
games, I would much prefer going over them with you "live", but if
you want more about my instructional insight than this email provides, let me
know and I will also peruse them and send suggestions. Might I add that a
mistake played in 10 seconds is quite different than that same mistake played
in 10 minutes, so without the time dimension it is sometimes hard to properly
critique a move and its underlying thought process error. I hope that makes
sense.
I know that is
a lot, but you seemed to want to know as much as possible. I apologize if I
overdid it!
PS: One
of my Novice Nooks is "Finding a Good Instructor":
...and another
is "An Improvement Plan"
Hope these
help.
Return to Main Chess Page
Return to Lesson Page