The assignment was to write a short piece based on an article from Science. It was completed from the first encounter with the article in about an hour and a half.

 

 

The familiar dinosaur faces of books and movies may have to be redrawn, showing once again the challenge of speculating about extinct animals from their fossil remains.

Research reported in the August 3 issue of the journal Science suggests that dinosaur nostrils were near the tip of the dinosaur snout, rather than farther back as usually assumed.

The confusion arises because the fleshy opening that we call a nostril is not preserved in fossils. The underlying cavity in the skull, which is preserved, covers a large fraction of the head in dinosaurs. In the past, the nostril has been placed near the rear of this cavity, in part because the large, sauropod dinosaurs were at first thought to live in water. Indeed, the nostril of Diplodocus was placed on the top of the head, where it could serve as a snorkel.

Although sauropods have for several decades been seen as land creatures, the nostril has remained in the back of the nasal cavity. In the current study, Lawrence M. Witmer of Ohio University used two lines of reasoning that it really belongs at the front.

First, Witmer looked at the nostrils of 62 different species, including birds and alligators, some of the closest living relatives of dinosaurs. After marking the nostril with a special paint, he used x-ray images to locate the nostril relative to the underlying bony cavity.

In almost all cases, the nostril was close to the front edge of the cavity. Indeed, in some distant species, like humans, the nostril is beyond the front of the cavity, with the help of cartilage. The simplest assumption is that dinosaur nostrils were also near the front.

In addition, Witmer observed in dinosaurs, near the expected forward nostril position, signs in the fossilized bone of a high density of blood vessels. In related species, such blood vessels support a special structure found close to the nostril.

Second, Witmer argued that having the nostril at the rear simply makes no sense. To smell danger or food, the nasal opening should be as far forward as possible, while to assist in taste it should be close to the mouth. Moreover, for air to be heated and moistened, it must flow over the nasal tissues. If the nostril were at the rear, most of the cavity would simply be a dead end. Thus the position of the nostril may play an important role in the temperature regulation of dinosaurs, a topic of active debate.  

An accompanying article in Science quoted Christopher Brochu, a paleontologist from the University of Iowa, as saying of the work, “He’s looking at something that a lot of us took for granted and applying some common sense to it.”

© 2003 Don Monroe