|
As
the author of this Web site I will add my comments, which
I have printed in blue. Comments
on the Final Summary Report: NHTSA has documented almost 4 (3.891) safety related incidents per thousand vehicle reports. While Volvo says, "Volvo indicated that this (vehicles going into limp home mode without need) was the most severe consequence of an ETM fault." I I think this is a case were the problem occurred to some other person. If it had happened to a Volvo executive or his spouse or his child, he would have a different additude, however, he/she would have just checked out another vehicle from the car pool. (Note:
the following NHTSA report has been reformatted to enhance
the readability (Their report was in all caps and no
paragraphs) but the text is all there.))
Summary: On
November 14, 2006 Volvo submitted a defect information
report to NHTSA concerning ETM (Note:
the definition of ETM is never mentioned.)
failures
in Model year (MY) 1999 through 2001 VOLVO models (not
including the S40 and V40), MY 2002 S60 and with naturally
aspirated engines and MY 2002 V70s. According to Volvo
"A combination of throttle positioning sensor
irregularities
(Note:
read FAILURE),
a dirty throttle housing and/or inefficient software
calibration may cause a warning lamp to light and the
subsequent onset of limp home modes. (Note:
they never mention the wearing out of the throttle
position sensor.) Subsequent
onset of limp home modes, Volvo further stated that,
"This resulted in a high number of these vehicles
going into limp home mode without need." (Note:
Volvo claims that ETMs were being replaced unnecessarily,
just a very few in my opinion, and do not mention all of
the driveability problems before a code is set and the ETM
will be replaced under the 10-year, 200,000 mile warranty)
Volvo
indicated that this was the most severe consequence of an
ETM fault in the subject vehicles. (Note:
what about all of the crashes listed below.)
The
recall remedy is a software upgrade introduced by Volvo on
March 16, 2006 in a costumer satisfaction program. At the
time of the notification, 161,202 vehicles of the
population of 331,301 had already had the software
uploaded and were therefore not included in the population
count of the recall. ODI'S
analysis of complaints to ODI and Volvo, Volvo field
reports and warranty data found that ETM failure could
result in (1)
engine
stall; (2)
mechanical
limp mode; (3)
lunging
forward during low speed driving maneuvers; and (4)
faltering
during high speed merges or when crossing traffic. (Note:
NHTSA demanded copies of the customer repair
reports and NHTSA looked at thousands of pages to compile
the data)
ODI
identified 12 crashes related to ETM failure, with: ·
3
caused by stalling incidents, ·
2
caused by mechanical limp mode and ·
1
from the faltering condition. ODI’s
analysis of complaint data and information obtained from
consumer interviews identified: ·
1,289
incidents with safety related consequences (389.1 per
100,000 vehicles) ·
479
involving engine stall
(144.6 per 100,000 vehicles) and ·
729
involving mechanical limp mode (220.0 per 100,000
vehicles). ODI's
analysis of warranty claim narrative text shows at least
14,965 warranty claims with codes indicating and ETM fault
resulting in vehicle operation in mechanical limp mode
(4.5% of the subject vehicles).
Volvo’s
recall addresses ODI'S safety concerns with ETM failures.
ODI will continue to monitor the subject vehicles
to determine if additional action is required. This
engineering analysis is closed.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||