 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Here are ten learning objectives for today’s class organized by the five course aims.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Describe changes in locomotion, perception, memory, and language
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Walking: evidence for both genetic programming and learning;
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | systems approach to development of walking
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Inborn preferences: more face-like
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Affordances----links to motor movement
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Relate changes in the infant’s brain to changes in motor activity, perception, and memory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Maturation of frontal lobe (part of brain) leading to inhibition of impulses which helps baby not do certain areas (A not B)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | How did Piaget describe infant’s thought processes AND explain change in their thought process?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Assimilation v. accommodation: which one leads to shift in stage?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | How do recent research support and weaken Piaget’s views on infancy thought?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Baillargeon’s experiments on possible and impossible event
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Explain change using Vygotsky’s concept of the zone of proximal development
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Will discuss next lecture
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Aim 3: Comparing change in diverse situations
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Compare two examples of how cultural customs can influence the development of motor activities.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Cradle-boarding and Afro-Caribbean and White-European kids
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Aim 4: Analyzing arguments
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Analyze the evidence that infants are more precocial than Piaget had thought.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Example: Think of Baillargeon’s work: she is ASSUMING she knows when babies are surprised
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | Aim 5: Proposing solutions
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | A father worries that his 9-month old infant is suddenly wary about new people and new experiences. He suspects that the infant may be disturbed experiences in day care. Provide an alternative explanation by referring to what is known about changes in infant memory and categorization.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
    | You are linking cognitive phenomena like “object permanence”, “proto-categories”, and “memory” with a social behavior: feature of new people. Describe how in terms a layperson can understand.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Journey Through Childhood: Tape 1 Module 3 Infants and Toddlers (19 minutes)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Perceiving objects, surfaces, and people
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Nelson on infant face perception and recognition of emotions
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Babies don’t YET make distinctions in complex emotions
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Interaction opportunities provided by the environment are called …
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Adolph on perceiving surfaces and locomotion
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | What does the crawling and gap experiment demonstrate and the slope experiment demonstrate?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Memory of proper and dangerous affordances do not carry over with change from crawling to walking.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Baby Emma knows the cat is still whole even if part of the cat is obscured by an arm. This is called…
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Object constancy in video but Object Permanence is also okay
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Object permanence and memory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Infants understand object ___________ when they search for objects that are hidden from view.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Stranger wariness emerges between 9-12 months of age and is one indication that the infant’s __________ capacity increasing.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | Piaget’s stages of sensorimotor development
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | GENERAL characteristics of this stage
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | How is Piaget’s understanding of infants being refined or revised.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
  | E.g. Ballargeon’s experiment and signing kidsw
|
 |
 |
|


 |
 |
 |