Chez Watt 2006 Winners
Customer: Hello. I wish to complain about this so-called 'scientific theory'
what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very establishment.
Salesman: Oh yes, 'Intelligent Design'. What, uh... what's wrong with it?
Customer: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. Its vacuous, that's
what's wrong with it!
Salesman: No, no, uh... what we need now is to 'teach the controversy'...
Customer: Look matey, I know an empty 'argument from incredulity' when I see
one, and I'm looking at one right now.
Salesman: No, no, it's not empty: it's just being elaborated. Remarkable
theory, 'Intelligent Design', innit, eh? I mean, just look at all these
books and articles: millions and millions of words...!
Customer: The verbiage don't enter into it, my lad. It's stone dead. It's a
non-starter. Empirically untestable, it belongs in metaphysics. This
'theory' makes no predictions; has no contribution to make beyond extended
polemics; and can't even be honest about who it thinks the 'Designer' was.
Bereft of all logical and epistemological credibility, it has no scientific
status! If certain right-wing and fundamentalist pressure-groups hadn't hit
upon it as a way of opposing decades of uncomfortable scientific and social
progress, it'd be pushing up daisies! It's off the table. It's kicked the
waste-paper bucket. THIS IS A NON-THEORY!
Salesman: Well, I'd better replace it then. [takes a quick peek around]
squire: looks like that's all we've got...
Customer: I see, I see. I get the picture.
Salesman: I've got a piece of coal that looks quite a bit like a human
tibia, if you squint at it...
Customer: Pray, is it part of a theory that unifies the paleontological and
biological sciences and leads to a powerful understanding of observed
homologies and the nested hierarchy of life?
Salesman: Not really.
Customer: WELL IT'S HARDLY A BLOODY REPLACEMENT FOR DARWINISM THEN, IS IT?
The number of the Beast
The Neighbor of The beast
The neighbor across the street from the Beast
Estimated number of the Beast
SSN of the Beast
The number of the High-Performance Beast
Number of the milliBeast
The Denominator of the Beast
The Imaginary Number of the Beast
The Binary Number of the Beast
The Hexidecimal Number of the Beast
The Area Code of the Beast
The Zip Code of the Beast (somewhere in Chicago)
The Psychic Beast ($6.66 for 666 seconds - over 18, please)
MSRP of the Beast
The price, including sales tax, delivered
Price, with leather, sun-roof, and radials
The Wal-mart price of the Beast
The gas the Beast runs best on
The road the Beast likes best
The temperature at which to roast Beast
Retirement plan of the Beast
Minimum Daily Required dosage of Beast
Annual Percentage Rate on a mortgage from First Beast Bank
Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of the Beast (revised)
Spreadsheet of the Beast
Operating system of the Beast
CPU of the Beast
BMW of the Beast
>>>Now be a good chap and cite a reference
that actually proves that the
>>>ToE has any significant impact on how the ToE influences cures and
>>>possible treatments for cancer instead of being a cheerleader for the
>> 2006 Jan 26; "Human Endogenous Retrovirus (HERV)-R family in
>> primates: Chromosomal location, gene expression, and evolution.", By
>> Kim HS, Yi JM, Hirai H, Huh JW, Jeong MS, Jang SB, Kim CG, Saitou N,
>> Hyun BH, Lee WH. Division of Biological Sciences, College of Natural
>> Sciences, Pusan National University, Busan 609-735, Korea; PBBRC,
>> Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Pusan National
>> University, Busan 609-735, Korea.
> Use your own words, instead of this cheap cop-out.
> "Dembski came to give a talk in Berkeley.
All I got was this designer
> t-shirt, but he wouldn't tell me who the designer was."
> > Question is phony as it assumes Creationists
knowingly embrace ignorance.
> Creationists not only embrace ignorance, they lower the lights, and play
> Barry White songs, while tryinig to get it's bra off
> ID theory
> was NEVER formulated to answer the "who," "what," "when," "where,"
> "why," and "how" questions.
[Having trouble finding this one.]
> Same here. I like to compare t.o to a science lecture in the
> middle of a Jerry Springer show, but maybe that's just me.
> > > There are various methods that have been used to
> > > construct ships.
> > Not in the early Bronze age.
> The Bronze age merely refers to the widespread use of iron.
> > > "ology" indicates what precedes is considered supernatural or Divine.
> > > Christology is the study of Christ as God, as is Buddhaology (the study
> > > of Buddha as God). Demonoogy is the study of persons who think demons
> > > are Divine. Maryology is the belief that Mary is Divine etc.etc. .
> > Personally, I think atheism (and you enforce this) is similar to a
> > lobotomy gone terribly wrong.
> Whereas fundamentalism is similar to one that succeeded?
2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002