D&M Revision to 30x30x21NS
"Focused Angles"
by Clinton J. Harrold

This is my viewpoint of the correct initial math of the D&M Pyramid at Cydonia, Mars. Based upon a bisected circle
whose bisection is a commonality between two apposing 30 degree acute angles and a 21 degree acute angle , midpoint ,perpendicular and south of bisection .This is what I call the "Focused Angle's"

This observation was the result of reproducing the original Depetro - Molenaar data in AutoCAD and coming to the
conclusion that if the D&M was a "Rosetta Stone" for CTG (circumscribed tetrahedral geometery), then a number of assumptions had to be made:


1) The 19.5 deg angles so repeatedly made through out the site ..must be exact (19.5000000)

2) Whoever observed the site would make the connection of the tetrahedron in a sphere.. because of planetary surface
disruption signatures, confirming the 19.5 as a red flag.

3) That because a tetrahedron is the simplest 3D object, and the effect represented in the planets is obviously a basic
law of planetary mechanics, then the setup for such an effect must be fundamentally simple.


I then started to look at geometery around the D&M structure and quickly noticed that the front sides (if angles A and B were correct) were apposing 30 deg acute angles with a common line, and that the sides were constructed from a 20.8 deg acute angle exactly midpoint on that common line.

Those angles focal points then made a circle "where the points touch" that circumscribed the entire construct. This was interesting for the fact that this seemed to reenforce the "tetrahedron in a sphere" even in 2 dimensions. Dimensional analysis of the resulting geometery actualy showed that the 19.5 was really 19.6 and the circle center point was below the rear face of the D&M.

Realizing that one angle was not integer I bumped it up to 21 deg (a number with a long history of being special) and started over with a circle, bisected it and created two 30 deg acute angles facing one to the other with the bisection being the common line(equator) ,whose focal points ended at the circle . Then found midpoint on the equator and made a 21 deg acute angle perpendicular and focusing "south" to the circle.

Next remembering that the western side of the D&M was NS, rotated the entire construct to match the left side 0 deg. Then reconstructed the A&B angles, ..the back two were elementary.

Then I noticed that the exact center of the D&M's rear face was also the exact center of the circle the D&M was built with, and the 19.6 was now 19.50000000

The following are revisions to the D&M based on the 30x30x21NS Focused Angle's:

A: 60
B: 120
C: 85.76989248
D: 68.46021503
E: 34.23010752
F: 49.50000000
G: 44.73010752
H: 55.76989248
I: 100.5000000
J: 19.50000000
K: 23.73010752
L: 10.5
M: 30
N: 21


If the 19.5 "Red Flag" is to be just that, then this must be the way that the D&M is to be constructed to reveal the internal dimensions that are intended to be observed, and Ill bet that there's a constant here related to CTG or at least another "Red Flag" pointing to one.

Below is the "layout" used to construct, note the 90 deg angle from west side to back, perhaps the recient observations
of a right angle in this area was intended to reenforce the NS alignment of the west side, or to provide a right angle for recognition of artificial origin.

This Mars Web Ring site is owned by Clinton J. Harrold. Want to join the Mars Web Ring?
[Skip Prev] [Prev] [Next] [Skip Next] [Random] [Next 5] [List Sites]