|
III
THE
SETTLEMENT OF LYNN
EDMUND and Francis Ingalls, arriving in
Lynn, were received kindly by the Indians, who were of the
Pawtucket tribe, and the Indians gave them leave to dwell there
and occupy what land they would. It may naturally be
conjectured that there was some consideration in the way of gifts
or bargaining in this arrangement with the Indians. However, these
Indians were few and humble, having suffered severely during a
recent war with a hostile tribe, the eastern Taratines, and from
disease. The Indian chief of Saugus was Montowampete, a younger
son of the great Nanepashemet, and he lived with his tribe on the
southern slope of a hill, known later as Windmill hill, and later
still as Sagamore hill. How Edmund and Francis sought this place
and proceeded to it we may conjecture. It is only a few miles from
Salem. They may have followed an Indian trail through the
woods or they may have coasted around by boat and landed
on the beach,
perhaps at Deer Cove.
Anyhow,
Edmund chose for his dwelling "a fayre plain" beside a
sedgy pond, which became known as Ingalls pond and so appears on
the maps of only 50 years ago, but is now called Goldfish pond.*
The site
of the house that Edmund Ingalls built was between Nos. 33 and 43 of
Bloomfield street at the present time. John Augustus Ingalls, who
owned this part of the land and lived and died upon it, in plowing,
while still a young man, uncovered ancient brick, which doubtless
formed part of the house. This was perhaps about 1830. I have talked
with other old men, who remember the ancient well, just south of the
site of the house. The malt house that was built later was farther
down the slope, near the pond.
There hangs in the museum of the Lynn Historical Society a
painting which purports to be anno 1700 and to show the homestead of
Edmund Ingalls. I think that this may be apocryphal. However, its
representation of topography is correct and it may have been done by
an artist who pictured the description of some old man who had seen
the original. There is enough plausibility in this conjecture to
justify me in offering an engraving from this painting.
I have been unable to trace the history of this painting. No
one living within my memory has had any recollection of this house
and its accompanying buildings. However, the tradition in respect of
them is strong and Alonzo Lewis writing in 1829 refers to them and
describes things substantially as shown in this picture. But surely
it was not the first house built by Edmund Ingalls, which was rather
a cabin of logs, cribbed up and plastered with clay, and thatched
with straw and rushes laid upon poles, as was the manner of
constructing primitive dwellings. The more comfortable house
doubtless followed after he had become established. I conjecture,
moreover, that this was subsequently the home of Robert Ingalls. To
this I shall refer again when I describe the house of Nathaniel
Ingalls further on.
Francis Ingalls in 1630 built a tannery on
Humphrey's brook where it is crossed by Burrill street, in what is
now Swampscott, and he is supposed also to have built a house and
to have lived there. His vats existed until 1825, when Alonzo Lewis
reports observing them. This tannery was a primitive affair,
comprised in a building about 30 x 16 ft. Near to its ruins were the
remains of an ancient brick kiln.
The Eight Towns of Essex County in 1643.
The natural thing was for Edmund and
Francis, probably in company with other men and especially the
Woods, to explore the country around Salem and when they found the
place that they liked a habitation had to be erected, their families
remaining in Salem in the meanwhile. Their friends came along to
help put up the house. Among them was Zachariah Hart, who on this
day did more labor, sweat more, ate and drank more and swore more
than any other man. A diarist subsequently wrote that "there
was discourse much of hys skill and
handiework and of hys godlie exhortations on ye ocacion. But it hath
been given oute yt he did use manie prophane workds mch to ye
scandall of those aboute. And upon hys being reprimanded
therefore he did stoutlie denie ye same; whereat they greatlie
wondered, there being so manie witnesses. But he further sayd yt if
jt so seemed to them, he could say yt was onlie a wrong working of
ye tongue, there being no evil speech in hys hearte."
Yet this must
have been a fearsome time for these newcomers. Only a year later
Obadiah Turner wrote in his journal that "some of us did go
afar into ye wildernesse . . . And this did wee yt wee might
discover what ye land and productions of this our heritage
be. ... As wee journied wee did sometimes see skulking
about among ye trees what we conjectured to be Indjans or Devils.
... But wee doe soon expect to have over from Nehumkeage a big
ordnance whereby to defend ourselves from ye one, and some goodlie books and catechisms to fortifie against ye other. And God
being on our side wee feare not what Indjans or Devils can
doe."
The way to
Salem even in 1631 was "harde to travell by reason of ye
stumpes and rockes yt be in it." In Salem "they now have
some bigge saws wherewith to make boardes," but the men in Lynn
had to do as best they could with their axes, adzes and small saws,
and "what few boardes wee can from time to time make out to haul
hither." There were some cold winters and "ye
famishing wolves howle piteouslie about our habitations in ye nighte." In the spring the settlers early set about the
planting of "payr and appill trees" having in mind that
"cyder is a good drink," and planting flax for spinning
and weaving. Salt was got from sea water, being needed for the
curing of fish, whereof many were caught. Thus may we picture the
early life of Edmund and Francis Ingalls in America.
Map of East Lynn
The roads are shown as of the 17th century.

Nevertheless, the rapid multiplication of
the families testifies to the relative ease of getting a living from
the new land. This is not to imply that our ancestors were not
required to work hard. During the first few years they experienced
many hardships and always were they obliged to toil, sweating in
summer and shivering in winter. The felling and hewing of trees and
the handling of heavy timber in the erection of houses and barns;
the pulling of stumps and the hauling of great stones in the
clearing of land; the breaking up of the virgin turf with primitive
plows; all of these tasks and others necessitated great muscular
exertion and long days.
On the other hand, the soil was of
unexhausted fertility, the pasturage was good, and the privilege of
fishing was free. The forests furnished the chief material requisite
for building and all needful fuel. The fields and the beaches, the
brooks and the sea yielded plenty of food and of wide variety,
while from the forests and pastures game, nuts, sugar and
berries were also to be had. The hides and skins of
animals killed for food afforded leather. For the manufacture
of clothing flax and wool were raised and were spun and
woven in the homes. Thus, with the natural resources and
the labor of strong arms the major things necessary for
existence were at hand.
The great things that were missing were iron for tools, nails
and utensils; ammunition; potteryware and cordage; but
especially the metals. The production of iron did
indeed begin at Saugus in 1639, but it was on only a small
scale. Brick also was scarce in the early days, though
soon it also began to be made locally, a brickyard being
started in Lynn in 1630. However, there were for a long
time many things of such natures that had to be imported.
Thus
it will be perceived how a sturdy yeoman was able to get
along in the new colony, bring up a large family and enjoy
a good living without being able to accumulate any gold
and silver. Such surplus of produce as there might be over
the requirements for living was bound to find
expression in the acquisition of land and cattle rather
than in money. In fact money was so scarce in the colony
that in 1637 the General Court ordered that wampumpeag be
treated as currency and this use continued for more than
20 years thereafter.
As
the children of the large families grew up their labor
became available to their parents, the sons working in the
fields and forests and the daughters in the home, cooking
and sewing, spinning and weaving. It was therefore
advantageous for a man to have a large family, inasmuch as
he enjoyed some years of labor for the mere cost of
supporting the boys and girls while they were little. Even
after the boys attained manhood some of them would
continue to live on the farm, assisting their father and
looking forward to succeeding him, when he became too aged to
work.
An early
home in saugus.

Out of this general description of early colonial
economic conditions we may imagine the life of Edmund and Francis
Ingalls, in no wise differing from that of the other pioneers in
Saugus (Lynn) and the seven other towns of Essex County. In so far
as there was any government, this part of Saugus was in the
jurisdiction of Salem. I conceive that Edmund and Francis Ingalls
and their companions, and also the settlers who came during the
next few years, were what we should now call squatters. They had
obtained leave from Endicott to settle where they would and had
made arrangements with the Indians. Their immediate requirements
for land were small, and indeed what they could clear and plough
was limited. They probably did not attempt to lay out metes and
bounds, but built their dwellings at considerable distances apart,
so that their operations would not conflict. In 1638 official
allotment of the lands was made by the town under authority of the
Court. Just how this allotment was arranged is not at all clear. I
shall refer to the position of Edmund and Francis Ingalls in
respect of it when I come to the description and history of their
land.
*Mr. Stetson put goldfish in a pond on his estate in Swampscott.
Some boys captured some of them and
put them in Ingalls Pond, to
which they then began to refer as the goldfish pond, whence the
present name. I do not believe there was any official renaming.
Collins Swamp, a little to the north, which appears as such on a
map of 1852, became Silver Lake, which is purely fanciful, while
for Goldfish pond there was at least a reason.
pp. 11-18
|