THE DRUM and CANNON
News Analysis and Commentary From a Conservative Perspective

Jack.jpg (11663 bytes) America today is suffering in the throes of hedonism and narcissism. Political correctness has impaired the expression of free and rational thought, and moral relativism has diminished our willingness to defend our freedom and liberty. Personal responsibility has given way to the accumulation of perceived "rights".  The blandness of mediocrity has made the concepts of individual ambition and drive become embodiments

of evil and objects of scorn to many. Civility and respect have been replaced by crudeness and vulgarity, patriotism and honor are regarded with contempt.  Our schools are more concerned about teaching self-esteem and self-expression than they are in imparting an  education. History has been revised so as to make our Nation's past a cause for self-flagellation. Never before has so much information been available, but most Americans remain  as uninformed  as ever. Are all of these the inadvertent fruits of unprecedented prosperity and freedom? Was this the intended goal of our nation's founders, who guaranteed to all of us the right to "the pursuit of happiness?" I think not.

That is why I write.
                                                                                                                                --
Jack Ott

IN THIS ISSUE

QUOTES OF THE WEEK
Bob Schaffer
Thomas Sowell
Tony Snow

==================

FREE TICKETS

I have 4 extra tickets for the Robbie Knievel (son of Evil Knievel) Event at the Ford Center this weekend if anybody wants them.

He's going to try to jump 500 Obama supporters with a bulldozer.

Should be a good time!

THIS WEEK'S ARTICLES

BAD NEWS FOR JOHN McCAIN
(Commentary)
Republican gets mugged on the way to the Forum

A NEW BATCH OF BUREAUCRATS TO PROTECT THE COUNTRY?
(Commentary)
Is Obama serious about a new civilian department to provide national security?

WILL OBAMA LEARN ANYTHING?
(Commentary)
If Barack Obama is as intelligent as they say he is, he will heed the generals' advice.

COLORADO'S SENATE SEAT BATTLE HEATS UP - PART 2
(Commentary)
Former Colorado Repub- lican Congressman Bob Schaffer came out with guns blazing in the first scheduled debate with his Democratic opponent, Congressman Mark Udall.

WHY DIPLOMACY WITH IRAN ISN'T WORKING
(Commentary)
For diplomacy to work, there needs to be credibility.

TONY SNOW: 1955-2008
(Commentary)
Like losing a brother...

THIS WEEK'S BEST ON THE WEB
The D&C's picks of the best current articles from the blogospere

===============
PROUD MEMBER

CCM.jpg (4836 bytes)
http://www.ccmajority.com/vclogo.jpg (3939 bytes)
==============
PERSONAL
ENDORSEMENTS

==============

McCain.jpg (4864 bytes)

Vote for

JOHN McCAIN

for President

Official Website

Meet a REAL American

"My commitment will be to cut taxes, reduce the size of government and bring the war to the swiftest possible conclusion without leaving the region in chaos, or an enemy emboldened to attack us elsewhere with weapons we dare not allow them to possess."

VOTE FOR ACTION, NOT HOPE

"Dreams" are fine, but they are no substitute
for solid leadership, experience, and values.

=============
SUPPORT
MITT ROMNEY
Romney3.jpg (6226 bytes)
FOR VICE-PRESIDENT

==============

Bob_Schaffer2.jpg (6990 bytes)

Bring back responsible and effective government

Elect
BOB SCHAFFER
to the
U.S. SENATE
from Colorado

Links to:

Bob Schaffer Campaign

Schaffer vs. Udall blog

Make a Donation

Volunteer to help

Honoring and promoting proven and traditional American values

==============


It's time to take back Congress

JOHN LEREW

for
U S CONGRESS

Colorado CD-7

==============

 

Send the first combat veteran of the War on Terror to Congress


Mike_Coffman.jpg (4916 bytes)

Service, experience, responsibility

MIKE COFFMAN
for
U S CONGRESS

Colorado CD-6

Trust a proven leader

==============

 NEW BOOKS 

7thPsalm.jpg (6853 bytes) 

Based upon the lives of real people and actual events, many of which were NEVER reported, SEVENTH PSALM reaches the pinnacle for action thrillers in the new millennium: Terror attacks in New York and England generate a three-
continent search for the terrorist leader who has assumed Osama bin Laden’s role as the “world’s most wanted.”  The pursuit is joined by a battle-hardened British SAS officer and his beautiful cohort from Israel’s ultra-secret Shin Bet. The pair join forces in the chase for the terrorists and Iraq’s missing cache of WMDs, as US Air Force F-15s swarm into battle and Israeli tanks blast into action against new and unexpected enemies!  SEVENTH PSALM races from the shifting battle lines in the war on terror to the ravages of war-torn Sudan; from the halls of power in London and Washington to the back alleys of Berlin and Hamburg…All with shocking results that leap from the headlines of tomorrow’s London Times!

Available now online at:
Barnes and Noble
Amazon.com

==============  

A_26_Vietnaam.jpg (4816 bytes)

THE NIMRODS is an accurate true-life story, told by a former A-26 navigator/co-pilot who flew 182 combat missions in the Vietnam War, and a mag- nificent band of A-26 pilots and navigator/ co-pilots who flew--from 1966 to 1969--countless high-intensity nighttime dive-bombing missions in "The Secret War in
Laos". Perhaps more important, it describes the lessons learned and their applications to today's War on Terror.

Available now at: authorhouse.com 

===============

UncleSam.jpg (6836 bytes)
Don't leave before you visit POLIQUIPS II

CLICK HERE

===============
ARCHIVES

2008 articles

2007 articles

2006 articles

2005 articles

2004 articles

===============
MISCELLANEOUS

See a touching tribute
(actually four tributes) to our nation's men and women serving in the front lines in Iraq and Afghanistan

===============

Wafa_Sultan.jpg (4050 bytes)

Arab-American psychologist Wafa Sultan discusses the fallacies of extreme Islamic doctrine during a debate on Al Jazeera television

Click HERE

NOTE: Because this woman was courageous enough to express her views about radical Islam to the world, a fatwah was issued against her and she has been forced to go into hiding to protect her life.

===============
READERS' COMMENTS

Because we have received
more "spam" entries than
we have reader comments, we have taken down the
automatic "COMMENTS" feature. Instead, we wel-
come comments via e-mail,
and we will post them
manually. In your com-
ments, please include the name or subject of the article for which you are commenting.

Add a comment HERE

Read posted comments
HERE

===============
LINKS

A COWBOY'S IN THE WHITE HOUSE

A LINE OF SIGHT

ADVANCE USA

AMERICAN LEGENDS

BLACK FIVE

BLOGS FOR BUSH

BOB SCHAFFER FOR US SENATE

BOOT MURTHA / VETS FOR THE TRUTH

CLEARCOMMENTARY.COM

COALITION FOR A CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY (CCM) (NEW)

COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVE

CONSERVATIVE'S FORUM

FACE THE STATE

FREEDOM'S WATCH

GLOBALSECURITY.ORG

GOP.com

GOPbloggers

GOP Hub

GROUND STATE

HUGH HEWITT'S WEBSITE

IRAQ THE MODEL

JEFF BLANCO.BLOGDRIVE

JEFF LUKENS.COM

LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS

MARK SILVERBERG

MICHAEL YON

MICHELLE MALKIN

MILTRACKER

M-J IN THE REPUBLIC

MOVE AMERICA FORWARD

NEW MEDIA JOURNAL.US

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM

PATRICK RUFFINI

PIRATE BALLERINA

POWER-LINE

PUNCH

REAL CLEAR POLITICS

REDSTATE

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ALLIANCE

ROCKY MOUNTAIN POLITICS

ROSSPUTIN.COM 

SALT AND LIGHT

SCRAPPLEFACE

SCHAFFER V. UDALL: 2008 COLORADO SENATE BATTLE

SMALL WAR JOURNAL

SWIFT VETS and POWs FOR TRUTH

THE COLORADO INDEX

THE HOTLINE

THE MUDVILLE GAZETTE

THE OPINION JOURNAL

THE PATRIOT POST BLOG

THE VICTORY CAUCUS

THE WEEKLY STANDARD

TOWNHALL.COM

U S CENTRAL COMMAND

U S JOINT FORCES COMMAND 

USA WAKE UP .ORG

VETS FOR THE TRUTH / BOOT MURTHA

WESTERN STANDARD.CA
Visit one of Canada's few conservative newspapers out of Calgary

WILDFIRE POLITICS

===============
About
The Drum and Cannon

Contact
The Drum and Cannon

=============== 

FWlogo.jpg (3579 bytes)

SEE AND HEAR veterans and their families discuss their war experiences at

FREEDOMSWATCH

===============

soldiers_angels.jpg (5485 bytes)

Support our troops? Actions speak louder than words.

Soldiers' Angels

===============
  
HALL OF INFAMY

The following is the list of "White Flag Republicans" in the 101st Congress who supported non-binding resolutions opposing the chance for victory in Iraq. The Drum and Cannon, as a member of The Victory Caucus, opposes their re-election to Congress.

Sen. Susan Collins - ME
Sen. Gordon Smith - OR
Sen. Arlen Specter - PA
Sen. Olympia Snow - ME
Rep. Michael CastleDE
Rep. Howard CobleNC
Rep.Thomas DavisVA
Rep. John Duncan TN
Rep. Philip EnglishPA
Rep. Wayne Gilchrest
        –MD
Rep. Robert InglisSC
Rep. Timothy  Johnson
        -
IL
Rep. Walter Jones NC
Rep. Richard Keller – FL
Rep. Mark Kirk – IL
Rep. S. LaTourette – OH
Rep. Ronald E. Paul – TX
Rep. Thomas Petri – WI
Rep. James Ramstad
       – MN
Rep. Frederick Upton
       –
MI
Rep. James T. Walsh
       – NY

===============
   wtc_9_11.jpg (4497 bytes)Liberals deny it or think that 9/11 was an aberration. There are nut-jobs who think it was a government conspiracy. Elitist intellectuals deny that a threat even exists. The average American has put it out of his or her mind. It is time to move on, they say.

Unfortunately, it is time to Wake Up America before it is too late.

CLICK HERE
===============

WORLD TIME


Click on MAP
to see where
it is daylight or night time
anywhere in the world
Time shown is Coordinated Universal Time/Greenwich Mean Time (UTC/GMT). US timezones can be selected instead.  For the time in other key areas of the world, add  the following to UTC/GMT:

Iraq +3:00*
Afghanistan +4:30
London +0:00*
Paris +1:00*
Berlin +1:00*
Rome +1:00*
Moscow +3:00*
Cairo +2:00*
Israel +2:00*
Iran +3:30*
Islamabad +5:00
Japan +9:00
Melbourne +10:00**


===============

Please Press "1" for English
phone_button.jpg (983 bytes)

===============

flagpole.jpg (1894 bytes)

WE SUPPORT ISRAEL
"Israel has a right to defend herself....Every nation must defend herself against terrorist attacks and the killing of innocent life."
President Bush

CURRENT FEATURES: Week of July 20, 2008

Quotes of the Week

I worked my way through college on a farm. We had an old phrase that went like this: 'If you want the water to clear up, you've got to get the hogs out of the stream.'
                           -- Colorado Senatorial candidate Bob Schaffer
________________________

Politicians' top priority is to solve their own problem, which is how to get elected and then re-elected. Barack Obama is a politician through and through, even though pretending that he is not is his special strategy to get elected.  -- Thomas Sowell
________________________

We know in our hearts, intuitively, from our first years as children, that the universe unfolds with a discernible order and that moral laws, far from being convenient social conventions, are firm and unalterable. They predate us, they will survive us.
                                                                              -- Tony Snow
_______________________

Bad News for John McCain 

I have always wished that I could be a political cartoonist. Despite having exhibited some artistic abilities in my younger days. Drawing people, even cartoon characters, was not my forte, despite the efforts of my artistic sister who always encouraged me. But mainly, I stuck to cars and airplanes, and eventually learned to merely admire (or condemn) the talents and works of these graphical satirists, especially those of my favorite cartoonist, Michael Ramirez. 

After reading the commentary by Ross Douthat entitled McCain's Iraq Dilemma at The Atlantic.com, an idea came to me for a cartoon that matches the storyline. Since I would not even attempt to draw it, readers will have to use their imaginations. 

The cartoon features John McCain in a barrel, sans clothes and dignity. The barrel is labeled “Iraq Policy”. In the background, running away with McCain’s clothes, are Barack Obama, Iraq’s Prime Minister al-Maliki, and perhaps George W. Bush. 

To assert that McCain was mugged by recent events is an understatement. After chiding Obama into visiting the war zones in the hope that he would concede that McCain had been right all along, and that Obama would have to flip-flop over the issue of timelines, it turns out now that the opposite may take place. Al-Maliki all but endorsed Obama’s 16-month criteria, although an aide to the Iraqi PM quickly denied that he had done so and that it is still too early to establish timelines, Nonetheless, Obama left Iraq with a victory of sorts and no change in his position on the withdrawal of American troops. The adulation that Obama received in Germany only poured salt on the wounds. 

Granted, after his Iraq visit, Obama did acknowledge that things had turned around in Iraq, even though he seemed to credit the Sunni Reawakening and the Shiite militias’ stand-down more than he did the Surge. But because of the encouraging words of Iraq’s PM, his stand on the 16-months withdrawal timeline was reinforced. 

John McCain made the most of it by proclaiming that, because Obama had been wrong about Iraq before, especially about the Surge, so he must be wrong now. In a political campaign, then was then and now is now. This latest rebuttal by McCain was not a convincing argument, and he will need to do much better if he is going to regain the advantage in the “War on the War”. Complicating the issue for McCain is the fact that, because of the successes that have been achieved in Iraq, the 16-month figure could be quite correct. It certainly appears to be in the eyes of the Prime Minister.  

What McCain needs to point out is that although 16 months could indeed be a proper time frame, at this point we just do not know. The results of the ongoing negotiations with the government of Iraq over the status of American forces after the expiration of the UN mandate on December 31, 2008 should and will be the determining factor. A major part of those negotiations will involve the determination as to when the Iraqi Army and police will be significantly trained and equipped to assume full responsibility for security throughout Iraq, and when they and the government will be able to provide total stability within the country. Even then, there will not be a total guarantee, but at least the decision will be based on more than a simple timeline and campaign expediency.  John McCain must fully and accurately present this in order to regain the initiative on campaign issue of the War in Iraq.

 (0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes)

A New Batch of Bureaucrats to Protect the Country?

Often when browsing my favorite blogs I find that the “comments” are as informative if not more so than the blog articles themselves. On Thursday there was an ongoing battle over at Hugh Hewitt’s website regarding a report that Barack Obama has proposed a new civilian national security force.

According to the report on the website, Obama’s exact words were, “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” And the battle between liberals and conservatives in the comments section was on.

To many of the conservatives, this was nothing less than a call for the establishment of an American Gestapo to enforce the rules of the new Socialist Order that many expect to come about if Obama is elected to the Presidency in November.

Then there was this reply comment from a liberal reader who wrote:

Its clear his civilian national security would consist of peace corps, americorps, Social Investment fund network, Social Entrepanuer Agency, American Oppurtunity Tax Credit, Energy Corps, YouthBuild, etc. 

He may as well have added the Boy Scouts of America to the list, which illustrates how naīve and delusional liberals can be regarding national security issues, not to mention their problems with spelling. Perhaps he thinks that some persuasive Peace Corps volunteers would be able to coax Osama bin Laden to leave his cave and surrender to American authorities, or that Energy Corps volunteers could protect our nuclear power plants from sabotage by Islamic terrorists. In any event, any connection between national security and the organizations listed is quite a stretch, even for a Liberal. 

A discussion on the same issue took place this morning on one of the local conservative radio talk shows. Apparently, the idea for a civilian national security force came during a speech in which Obama was promoting the idea of having our public school system getting students actively involved in community projects as a part of their curriculum. Most of the callers to the talk show, being conservatives, expressed views similar to those discussed above. One caller, however, took the opposite view. After introducing himself as a member of the American Communist Party, he went on to vigorously defend Obama’s proposal. That was not at all surprising. He stated that this community activity should not be voluntary, but rather, mandatory for obtaining credit toward graduation from high school. He said that it would give young people an appreciation for community activity and teach them community responsibility—typical progressive groupthink. 

If this new, civilian security force is to be “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the military, the logical question is how it would be funded. Mike Rosen, the talk show host, offered that no one in Congress, even among those on the left side of the aisle, would introduce legislation to establish a new $700 billion bureaucracy. As a later caller suggested, no doubt satirically, the solution would be to cut the military budget in half and give the other half to the civilian organization. However, that would not be at all surprising if Obama were elected President. He has already promised to slash the military budget and divert the money to social projects. It wouldn’t be surprising at all.

 (0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes)  

Will Obama Learn Anything?

After months of pontificating about how debilitating America’s efforts in Iraq are, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has finally decided to visit the war zone to learn the facts. Better late than never, I always say. Of course, he will always be able to take the standard liberal approach by assuming a “don’t confuse me with facts” stand, much like his Democratic colleagues did during the two appearances before Congress of General David Petraeus. After all, in the eyes of many members of the American Left, the military profession ranks a step or two below that of used car salesmen and nothing that it says has any merit or credibility.  

More likely, he will take a straddle-the-fence approach by adopting the position that, even though our involvement in Iraq is totally wrong, since we are there now it would be wise to adopt a more flexible position and adopt and wait-and-see approach to how the currently ongoing negotiations with the Iraqi government turn out regarding the status of U.S. forces after December 31 when the UN mandate expires. This way he does not have to take a definite position, hoping to somewhat appease his Far Left supporters such as MoveOn.org, as well as the more moderate independent voters to whom he has been pandering since his nomination was ensured after winning the primaries.  

 Obama continues to assert that Iraq is not the “front line” against the threat posed by Islamic Jihad, but rather the real battle is taking place in Afghanistan. The War in Iraq, he claims, only serves as a distraction in our real battle against the forces of al Qaeda. In doing so, he overlooks historical as well as present-day facts. The first is that, in the early days of the War in Afghanistan, not only did we overthrow the Taliban government there and establish a democratic one, but we also brought about the isolation of al Qaeda’s leadership in the caves and mountains of western Pakistan where they presently remain, unreachable by U.S. forces and effectively protected by a weak Pakistani government. The majority of the fighting taking place today is between NATO and Afghan forces against Taliban insurgents who seek to be restored to power in Afghanistan. While it is true that our successes there have not been as stunning there as it has been in Iraq and the Taliban has regained much of its strength, direct confrontation with al Qaeda has been fairly minimal. 

The story in Iraq has been quite different. There, we have all but defeated al Qaeda’s Iraqi surrogates and successfully turned most of Iraq’s population of 27 million people against them.

Because of our success in Iraq, we have the opportunity to deal al Qaeda a major defeat, something that we would not be able to do in Afghanistan without the full cooperation of the Pakistani government or, in a highly unlikely event, a full-blown invasion of western Pakistan by NATO forces. Whether or not Obama comes to understand this remains to be seen. The question as to whether or not he supported the war initially has become totally irrelevant. The real question before American voters when deciding who to vote for is whether he will support finishing the work that our military has undertaken in Iraq, or whether he will throw it all away to support a principle that is no longer in question. 

Joel Arends is an Army Reserve Captain and served with the Army’s 1st Cavalry Division in Iraq. He is currently the executive director of Vets for Freedom, and also writes for National Review. In his July 18, 2008 article Trust We Can Believe In, he wrote,

Senator Obama should sit down one-on-one with our battle-hardened field commanders; men like generals Petraeus and Odierno, and ask them for advice. If he does so, he will be confronted with a stark choice, perhaps the most pivotal of his career: siding with our commanders on the ground, or continuing to side with George Soros and Moveon.org.

For some reason, it is difficult to envision Barack Obama sitting down with anyone and asking for advice, but for anyone who is intelligent enough to know what he or she doesn’t know, it is obvious. They say that Obama is an intelligent man. We shall see.

 (0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes)  

Colorado's Senate Seat Battle Heats Up - Part 2

Former Colorado Republican Congressman Bob Schaffer came out with guns blazing in the first scheduled debate with his Democratic opponent, Congressman Mark Udall. They are competing for the Senate seat currently held by retiring Republican Wayne Allard. Nationally, it is projected to be one of the most closely watched Senate battles in this year’s elections, with Democrats hoping to gain a veto-proof majority in the Senate. 

The format was one in which the public submitted questions to the candidates before the debate, and selected questions were then asked of the candidates. Each candidate was allowed to respond to a question, and one rebuttal response was also permitted. 

The debate focused mainly on energy issues, with “Big-Oil Bob” trading barbs with “That Boulder Liberal”, epithets pinned on each other during the run-up to the heat of the campaign season. Schaffer echoed the conservative theme song, “Drill Now”, while Udall maintained that drilling for new oil resources was not the answer to high oil and gas prices. Schaffer parried this by claiming it was time to elect people to Congress who understood both fiscal policy and energy issues. 

Udall’s standard general response to Schaffer’s more frequent specificity was that the way to solve our problems is to work together rather than to continue partisan divisions in Congress. Eventually, this frequent response drew chuckles from the Schaffer supporters, who significantly outnumbered the Udall supporters in an audience of an estimated 800 people. Schaffer pointed out that Udall’s repeated calls for the further study of energy issues before issuing specific policy solutions were simply more of the Democrats’ delaying tactics that have been so evident in Congress. Using a little “down-home” humor, Schaffer referred to these tactics with the observation, “I worked my way through college on a farm. We had an old phrase that went like this: 'If you want the water to clear up, you've got to get the hogs out of the stream'.“ 

Perhaps the highlight of the event came when the subject of the questioning shifted to the War in Iraq. Specifically, the question asked when we would know when we had achieved victory in Iraq and, therefore, when we would leave that country. This time the question went first to Schaffer. Demonstrating that he was correctly anticipating such a question, Schaffer read from 2002 Congressional Resolution that supported the use of force to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s regime. He then asked the audience for an expression of agreement for or against the Resolution. As expected, the Udall supporters loudly expressed their disagreement. Schaffer then informed them that the Resolution had been submitted by Congressman Udall himself, and the Schaffer supporters erupted. As reported later in the Rocky Mountain News, Republican activist Kendal Unruh called the move "the best political checkmate I've ever seen in a debate." 

Udall’s finest moment came when he called for a demonstration of support for our troops, a tactic often used by political debaters who sense that things are not going their way. As expected, supporters from both sides stood and applauded, one of just two demonstrations of agreement during the hour-long debate. The other came when both candidates expressed opposition to the Army’s desire to expand their southern Colorado training area into the Piņon Canyon. Schaffer based his objection on a lack of planning, and Udall stating that the Army had not justified their case for expansion.

When the questioning turned to their positions on healthcare, one of Mark Udall’s sillier responses clearly illustrated how badly he realized he had been doing in matching Schaffer’s knowledge of the issues. Regarding the importance of universal healthcare, Udall said, "Because this isn't only about our economy, it's about our national security. To win the war on terror, we have to have every American as healthy as possible. By working together we can do that." 

Schaffer supporters had no doubt whatsoever who had won this debate, Even Bob Schaffer’s campaign chairman, Dick Wadhams, reminded this observer of a smiling pastor at the end of a Sunday service, broadly smiling and shaking hands with the crowd as they were filing out of the auditorium. There were few smiles on the faces of Mark Udall’s supporters.
__________________________

Related articles, pictures, and comments to be found at:

schaffer v. udall: 2008 colorado senate battle

Rocky Mountain Right

FACE THE STATE

Denver Post

Rocky Mountain News

9News.com
_________________________

(0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes)  

Why Diplomacy with Iran Isn’t Working 

The Bush Administration is rattling its sabers and the Israelis have been conducting extensive military maneuvers. Meanwhile, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and his supporters continue to clamor for talks and other diplomatic moves such as stronger trade embargoes. All three are committed to putting an end to Iran’s development of a nuclear arsenal. But that is not all that these efforts have in common. None of them is likely to work, because they all lack the same element: credibility.  

From an Iranian perspective, the Israeli card is probably the most worrisome. Since Israel has the most to lose in the event that Iran acquires nuclear weapons, an Israeli action would be the most likely to take place. That being said, Iran’s counter to that threat is probably sufficiently lethal to serve as a deterrent to unilateral action on Israel’s part, for two reasons. The first is the proximity of Israel to Iran, which strategically includes the strong Hezbollah presence in Lebanon. Secondly, Israel would probably not have sufficient resources to knock out Iran’s nuclear facilities plus its retaliatory capabilities in one, quick strike. I therefore look upon unilateral action by Israel to be a last resort, one that would be taken only when their backs were to the wall and they were fully expecting to receive significant damage to their own country. 

A unilateral strike by the U.S. would be more effective and greatly reduce, if not eliminate, Iran’s ability to retaliate, at least against the U.S. That is why Iran has stated that it would attack Israel whether or not it actually participated in a strike. Because of the strong Iranian-backed  Hezbollah forces already deployed on Israel’s border in neighboring Lebanon, plus Hamas in the Gaza strip to the south, a retaliatory attack against Israel would not have to come from Iran proper.  

The current political situation not only in the U.S. but throughout the world makes an American attack on Iran an unlikely occurrence, despite all of the saber-rattling, unless Iran does something extremely rash like closing the Straits of Hormuz or launching a first-strike attack on Israel. If such an attack were to take place, it would not only have to eliminate Iran’s nuclear capability but destroy Iran’s missile force and naval capabilities all in one strike, which would be no small task. 

Because of this, strictly diplomatic efforts alone to convince Iran to give up its efforts to develop nuclear weapons are a waste of time and effort, because they lack credibility. Even the threat of imposing ever-tightening economic sanctions provides little incentive for Iranian cooperation since the UN is unlikely to agree to go all the way, at least in the eyes of the Iranian government.  

Recent reports of clandestine efforts within Iran to destabilize the government, if true, offer what is probably the best chance of success for resolving the crisis. In this case, even a limited increase of economic sanctions would likely result in increased dissatisfaction on the part of the average Iranian, thereby making it easier to stir unrest against the ayatollah leadership and the government of President. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. We believe that such reports are true, if for no other reason than that it makes so much sense. Whether these efforts are eventually successful is not the point. What is more important is that Iran’s leadership must be convinced that they have the potential to be successful, which in turn will put pressure on Iran’s government to accept a diplomatic solution. As is the case with most tyrannical governments, losing the lives of one or two million of its citizens is nowhere near being of equal concern as is the threat of being overthrown by those same people.
____________________________

Related Articles:

Israel, Iran, and the Bomb
By JOHN BOLTON
July 15, 2008 at Wall Street Journal Online

Tehran's efforts to intimidate the United States and Israel from using military force against its nuclear program, combined with yet another diplomatic charm offensive with the Europeans, are two sides of the same policy coin. The regime is buying the short additional period of time it needs to produce deliverable nuclear weapons, the strategic objective it has been pursuing clandestinely for 20 years.
____________________________

Report: Bush Backs Israel Strike Plans on Iran
July 13, 2008 at Newsmax.com

The Sunday Times of London reported this weekend that "President George W. Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations with Tehran break down." The Times report quoted a senior Pentagon official as its source.
___________________________

(0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes) 

Tony Snow: 1955-2008

It was with shock and surprise to learn yesterday of the death of former FOXNews anchor and Presidential Press Secretary Tony Snow. While many of our nation's notables have already commented on his passing, and his outstanding personal qualities duly noted, we would add just one thought.

While he has been widely acclaimed as an oustanding individual, a beloved husband to Jill and father to this three children, he was also a man that any caring man or woman would have wanted as a brother.

Rest in Peace, brother.

(0) Comments              Read Comments               Post comment 

starline2.jpg (6379 bytes)

THIS WEEK’S BEST ON THE WEB

The Rules For Democrats And Republicans
By DOUG PATTON
July 21, 2008 at GOPUSA.com

I must have missed these rules before because, mea maxima culpa, I have been violating most of them by calling Sen. Obama inexperienced, vague, wishy-washy, vain, ostentatious, hypo- critical, and dangerous. I guess it's too late to change now, so I will just be waiting for his proposed Civilian National Security Force to come get me.

*****************************

The Audacity of Vanity
By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
July 18, 2008 at WashingtonPost.com

For the first few months of the campaign, the question about Obama was: Who is he? The question now is: Who does he think he is?

We are getting to know. Redeemer of our uninvolved, uninformed lives. Lord of the seas. And more. As he said on victory night, his rise marks the moment when "our planet began to heal." As I recall -- I'm no expert on this -- Jesus practiced his healing just on the sick. Obama operates on a larger canvas.

If Barack Obama was truly the Christian that he claims to be, he would know that humility is one of the religion's primary teachings. Instead, this clown seems to think that he's the Second Coming of Christ.

*****************************

The Gathering Threat to Freedom
By KEN BLACKWELL
July 17, 2008 at Townhall.com

The clauses (in the First Amendment) on free speech, a free press, freedom to assemble, and freedom to petition the government to allow us to express ourselves personally or through the press to speak about any issue. The clauses on the establishment of religion and free religious exercise protect our right to believe according to the dictates of our own conscience. These are the twin pillars of a society where hearts and heads are free.

Alarmingly they are under siege by the forces of statism.

*****************************

Inflation and the Bush Legacy
By GEORGE MELLOAN
July 17, 2008 at Wall Street Journal Online

Federal deficits have to be financed, and the debts of Congress, combined with those of state and local governments, business corporations and consumers, have taxed the investment powers of even trading partners like Japan and China, who hold huge dollar surpluses. The weak dollar, and inflation, particularly affecting the price of oil, is the end result.

*****************************

Reid: No drilling votes in debate over oil speculation

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Monday that he would not allow a vote on an amendment giving states new authority to seek oil off their coasts when he brings a Democratic energy bill to the floor later this month.

*****************************

Are Facts Obsolete?
By THOMAS SOWELL
July 15, 2008 at GOPUSA.com

Nothing is more frustrating than to hear friends or family members make what they believe to be statements of obvious fact that are based either on misinterpretation, a lack of understanding, or, most maddening, a lack of verification. This is especially true when the subject is political.

*****************************

Political Diary -- Harry Reid's Position Paper on Drilling
By KIM STRASSEL
July 14, 2008 at Wall Street Journal Online

Democrats may never have had the political courage to impose such towering European-style gasoline taxes directly, but Mr. Reid's policy diatribe at least explains why Democrats have found it so easy to sit on their hands rather than take steps to increase domestic supply and bring down $4 gasoline.

*****************************

Political Diary -- Obama's Bear Market?
By STEPHEN MOORE
July 14, 2008 at Wall Street Journal Online

Stephen Moore reiterates what conservative pundits have been saying for months--that an Obama victory in November will wreak havoc on the stock market and the U.S. economy in general. The effects of his probale success, in fact, has already been seen in the market downturn.

*****************************

Heller's "Gaffe" the Strong Medicine GOP Needs
Posted by CHUCK MUTH
July 10, 2008 at The Loft

Longtime liberal columnist Michael Kinsley famously defined a “gaffe” in politics as “when a politician tells the truth.” If you accept that definition, and I do, then Nevada Republican Rep. Dean Heller committed a gaffe of canyon-sized proportions this week.

I hope he keeps it up

*****************************

A Falst Frenzy on Global Warming
By PAUL WEYRICH
July 9, 2008 at Townhall.com

He [weatherman John Coleman] blames the media for wanting a crisis and thus reporting pro-global warming stories. But when 31,000 scientists refuted global warming a month ago the media hardly mentioned it. He said that compares to 2,000 pro-global warming scientists on the UN climate change panel who claim that the issue is settled

*****************************

 

Blogroll Links

gopb-logo_sm.jpg (14127 bytes)

MilBlog_logo.jpg (10131 bytes)

Prev | List | Random | Next
        Powered by RingSurf!