Activists Plan to Aid Terrorists

As reported in the New York Daily News, New York City police are bracing for an onslaught of “radical anarchists” who are making plans and providing online internet instructions for disrupting next month’s Republican Convention, while at the same time depleting police resources necessary to provide security against terrorist attacks at the Convention.

"It is the height of irresponsibility," said NYC Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly.  He added, "These hard-core groups are looking to take us on. ... They have increased their level of sophistication and violence."

Not surprisingly, similar plans have not been laid out for the Democratic Convention.  This is because these are the very people who, along with less violent but equally hate-laden degenerates such as Michael Moore and Whoopie Goldberg, make up the most vocal portion of Kerry-Edwards supporters, a contingent from which Big John and Little John refuse to distance themselves or to refute. In reality, there is no great difference between these people and the anti-war activists of the late 1960s and early seventies who blocked military supply trains and harassed returning veterans with shouts of “baby-killer” and “war-criminals”.  Just as before, these new activists would provide aid and comfort to the enemy, which is a federal crime, and many would in effect be entering into a treasonous alliance with the enemy to overcome national security.  The Revolutionary War actions of  Benedict Arnold, who delivered plans for the defense of West Point to British agents, were no more treasonous than this effort to intentionally divert security resources from their primary concern; that of providing security against terrorist attacks at the Convention.  

 In the worst possible scenario, a successful terrorist attack at the Convention would be the direct result of these traitorous actions, which go far beyond any acceptable definition of “dissent”.  In the event that the activists carried out the published plans but no terror attack occurred, they would still be guilty of treasonous acts because of their stated intent to create diversions.  I hope that at least a few of these malcontents take this into account when considering their participation in these activities. I would also expect the Kerry Campaign to condemn, not merely disavow, these tactics before they are actually undertaken.  Failure to do so would in effect condone such actions.

 Perhaps the most frightening thought is that, in the unlikely case of a Kerry victory in November, their treasonous activities would be overlooked and these very same people would be praised for their efforts to end the Bush presidency, being seen as forward-looking, trend-setting American heroes. It would not be surprising to hear John Kerry praising them as people who reflect the true values of America, just as he did for Whoopie Goldberg and Chevy Chase during the recent Democratic fund-raiser at Radio City Music Hall; an event that Democrats are now too embarrassed to show to the public.

Also see Paul Lewis' comments "Democrats plot to increased their level of violence at the GOP Convention" at Blogs for Bush   

RETURN TO ARCHIVES PAGE