While trying this method, and variations on it, I (and many others) discovered a simple and intuitive method for getting the scope very accurately set to 90° dec (relative to the mount, ie, parallel to the polar axis of the mount). That quickly suggested a variation on the "polar alignment scope" method. A standard polar alignment scope is a small finderscope-size scope attached to the mount and parallel to the mount's polar axis. It generally has a glass reticle with the star pattern of the polar area etched into it. Then all you have to do is adjust the wedge so that the star pattern on the reticle matches the stars seen in the alignment scope. My idea was to just use the finderscope as a substitute (since this method puts the finderscope parallel to the polar axis), with a small star-chart (or just your memory) substituting for the reticle.
Step 1: Collimation will affect the accuracy, so you may want to collimate first (this is covered in the owner's manual). Make sure the finderscope is properly aligned with the main scope (also covered in the manual). It is useful for this alignment method (and many other purposes) to rotate the finderscope tube so that the crosshairs correspond to the RA and dec directions. .
Before going to step two, you'll want to check that the dec setting
circle is at least approximately calibrated. Meade's
instructions
for this are also horrible, so here's a quick way to check and
calibrate
if you're not sure: aim the scope at any convenient object and
note
the reading on one of the dec setting circles. Now rotate the
scope
180° (12 hours) in RA, and then flip the OTA back to the original
direction
by
moving in dec, so that the scope is now pointed in the same
direction (the scope will be upside down now!).
Find
the same object again, and note the reading on the dec setting circle
again.
(Make sure that you read the same circle as before! It will be on
the other side now!) Ideally, it should read the same (but in a
different
quadrant of the circle). If not, adjust the circle (loosen the
center
knob with the Meade emblem on it, then rotate the circle to adjust,
then
retighten) so that it reads halfway between the first and second
reading.
It is also convenient (but not absolutely necessary) at this point
to roughly calibrate the RA circle. Roughly polar align the scope
(adjust the wedge so that the azimuth is approximately north, with the
wedge altitude approximately equal to your latitude, or just set the
dec
to 90° and adjust the wedge so that polaris is near the center of
the
finderscope), then pick your favorite bright star and calibrate the RA
circle according to it.
Step 2: In this step we use a
simple
method to get the scope very accurately parallel to the polar axis of
the
mount (as a side benefit, we can then also accurately calibrate the dec
circle). Also this method provides a chance to check the
fork
arm/tube alignment.
Aim the scope at 90° dec (according to your dec setting
circle).
Now loosen the RA clamp and look in the finderscope. Rotate the
scope
in RA (ie, around the polar axis). Ideally, you should see the
stars
in the field of view rotating around the center. If it is, re-check at
higher accuracy by repeating this proceedure while looking through the
eyepiece of the main scope rather than the finderscope. In
practice,
you will probably see the stars moving around a fixed point that is not
centered in the field of view. (The fixed point may not even be in the
field of view!) That fixed point is where the polar axis of your
mount is actually pointed, and represents the true 90° dec
direction
for your mount (but not true 90° dec in the sky, because the wedge
hasn't been fine tuned yet). Using the dec fine control knob,
adjust
the scope in declination until the "fixed center of rotation" point
appears
as close as possible to the center of the field of view. If you
can't
get the "center of rotation" to coincide with the center of the field
of
view, and the scope is collimated, the problem is that your fork arms
and/or
optical tube are not properly aligned and so the polar and dec axes are
not perpendicular. This is a common and badly overlooked problem.
Click here
for my page on correcting this problem. Even if you can get
the center of rotation centered in the field of view, it's posible for
both the fork arms and the tube to be out of whack in ways that cancel
each other at 90° degrees dec, so it's best to check anyway.
Meade doesn't seem to check this very accurately at the factory, and
errors
of 1/4 to 1/2 degree are common, which translates immediately into
similar
sized pointing errors when using the setting circles. Note that
this
is true even when using digital setting circles.
Once you're done, do not move the scope in dec- you'll need it set at its current position for step 3.
Now the scope is accurately parallel to the polar axis of the mount, so this is a good time to check the reading on your dec setting circle and recalibrate to 90° if necessary. If you adjust the circle retighten the center knob very tight as the circle is prone to slipping.
Step 3: All that is left is to fine-tune the wedge. Rather than adjusting the scope for the "Polaris offset" as above, we'll do it the other way- leave the scope at 90° and find the true pole using the finderscope as a polar alignment scope. The image below will be our "reticle" and shows the brightest stars near the pole.

Adapted from Cartes du
Ceil, aka "Sky Charts",
an excellent freeware star-charting program.
This is approximately what you'll see through an 8X50 finder with
the
wedge properly adjusted and with the RA set at some multiple of 6h.(the
6X30 finder will show a somewhat wider field at lower magnification-
the
circle here has a diameter of 4 degrees). The numbers around the
edge are the RA, so this is where setting the finder crosshairs
parallel
to the RA and dec directions helps. Setting the RA to a multiple
of 6h will make the crosshairs correspond to the RA lines shown here,
which
aids in the alignment, since we're not using a real reticle here.
It's important to note that your view will be rotated by some angle,
depending
on the current time, but if your crosshairs are set to the RA and dec
directions,
they will match the 0, 6, 12, 18 hour RA lines shown.
| Update! I found a neat little program by Jason Dale that draws a chart similar to this, but rotated for your current time and longitude. The chart lines in that program only correspond to up/down/left/right, but it's useful to help you get oriented. Remember to set your longitude in the program! (Not specified in the help file, but it's the second icon on the toolbar). Also, click the first icon ("new chart", and click "show view through telescope", to get an inverted view, to match the finderscope view. |
The crosshairs in this picture are centered on the true pole (as of the year 2000- due to precession of the equinoxes, the position of the pole shifts very slightly over time, but this map will be reasonably accurate for at least a decade or so). Polaris and the two other stars shown may be the only ones you'll see under moderately light polluted skies- at any rate, the two dimmer ones are the brightest other than Polaris in this field (ie, within 2 degrees of the pole). The 6X30 finder may show a few other stars about as bright as the two dimmer stars shown here, but they'll be further from the pole.
Now that you've got an accurately aligned scope and calibrated dec circles, the only thing needed to find objects with the setting circles is to fine tune the calibration of the RA circle (using the same method mentioned before- it will be accurate now that the scope is accurately polar aligned- just aim the scope at your favorite bright star and adjust your RA circle to match the star's RA).
This method of polar alignment will give an accuracy of a small
fraction
of a degree, easily enough to find objects using the setting
circles.
You can refine this method by using a significantly
"deeper" star chart and looking directly through the main scope,
however
that's rarely necessary, and maneuvering the scope near the pole can be
frustrating (analogous to using an alt-az mount near the zenith).
Even without this refinement, this method is more than sufficient for
astrophotography
(see my astrophotography
samples), and far faster and less tedious than the "drift"
method.
The only times I've used the advanced version is 1) mounting a 12"
LX200
on a permanent mount at a new
local public observatory, and 2) correcting
the fork arm/optical tube alignment.