Opinion
/ Editorials
The Latest View - 8/22/02
Mount
Rushmore, MSNBC, & the Manchurian Candidate...
The U.S. Hall of Shame...
3/5/02
- Stephen Schneider, PhD.
Past Views...
3/5/02
- Duplicity
and "Doonesbury"
2/18/02
- Ranking The Presidents.
11/13/01
- Religious Commentary Baaaddd, Social Engineering Gooooddd!!!
11/2/01
- America
is the Solution, not the Problem
10/23/01
- To Profile or Not to Profile - Objective Reality vs. Posturing.
10/14/01
- No
Double Standards Please, One Will Do Fine...
10/6/01
- Evidence for
Action: The case against Islamic terrorism.
10/3/01
- The Legacy of
Heroes
9/30/01
- With
friends like these...
9/28/01
- Know
Thy Enemy - Part II: Radical Islam
9/23/01
- Know Thy Enemy - Part I: The Home Front
9/18/01
- Rebuttal
to “A Different Point of View”
9/17/01
- An anniversary...
9/12/01
- A
Call to War
5/22/01
- The
Energy Crisis, Global Warming, & American Apathy
3/21/01
- Class
Bigotry
and the "Death Tax"
2/10/01
- My
Two Cents - Clinton's Legacy
6/10/01
- My
Two Cents - Reagan's Legacy
9/20/94
- Taxation
as theft
11/15/94
- The
Bill of Rights - VOID where prohibited by law
3/10/94
- The
Lottery - A Voluntary tax on the lower middle class |
The Latest View...
Duplicity and
"Doonesbury."
3/5/02
To: Jim Willse,
Editor, The Star Ledger of NJ
Dear Mr. Willse
I am writing this letter to point out a problem at your paper.
For many years now the Star Ledger has been engaged in a practice which is
either based on flawed journalistic policy or is outright bias.
Every Sunday morning, on the front pages of the comics section, I am
treated to the liberal proselytizing of one Gary Trudeau. It is not so
much his leftist drivel that annoys me, as the fact that its location, in
the comics section, is not only inappropriate, but also goes unopposed,
week in and week out.
Addressing the first part of this complaint - "Doonesbury" is carried by
your paper seven days a week - but only on Sundays is it moved to the
comics section. The remainder of the week, your paper tacitly acknowledges
the agenda driven nature of "Doonesbury" by running the strip on the main
pages of your Op-Ed section.
This inconstancy is frustrating enough on its own, but would not be such
an obvious demonstration of your paper's hypocrisy if Trudeau's strip were
at least balanced by "equal time" - or in this case, "equal comic strip
space" - by a daily strip which represented a more conservative political
viewpoint (such as maybe Mallard Fillmore to cite one example).
Put bluntly and succinctly, the comics section is no place for partisan
political opinion or rhetoric of any kind - this should be reserved for
the Opinion and Editorial section of a newspaper. If it HAS been
determined by the newspaper staff that this is appropriate fare for the
Sunday comics, then both a respect for the diversity of ones audience as
well as journalistic integrity dictates that balance and equal opportunity
for differing views be provided.
Ax "Doonesbury" from the Sunday comics or level the playing field a bit -
either that or just come clean about your paper's agenda.
Sincerely,
John W. M. Flaherty
Home
| About
| Opinion /
Editorials | News
| Contact Info |
Links

|