Moderator's comments
During the game I found it interesting that we had some finger pointing and arguing
over plans and actions of some of the player commanders. Very realistic I thought as the
players were not always aware of the reasons why actions were taken and the errors and
mistakes of the moderator controlled commanders caused by the dice rolls. Both army commanders used a hands off approach, issuing orders through their wing
commanders and leaving the general handling of the commands to them They both also issued
orders only in response to messages from commanders, it seemed to me neither of them paid
much attention to the replays as far as using them to issue orders. The game is still not what I would like it to be, casualty rates were still very high
because of the constant fighting. I hope to do another game sometime in 2005 and am
considering ways to reduce the constant fighting to something more realistic. Below are the after action reports of Gen McCown, CSA and Gen Davis, USA and a couple from
both sides I did from the perspective of the brigade commanders
After Action Reports
Major General McCown's Report
Brigadier General McNair's Report
Brigadier General Polk's Report