|
THE GREAT OIL DEBATE: AMSOIL
by Ed Newman
AMSOIL Marketing
and Advertising Coordinator
Appeared in the February 2001 Issue of American Iron
Magazine
AMSOIL: Manufacturer of the
first API rated synthetic motor oil offers experience and insights
INTRODUCTORY
THOUGHTS...
The cover of the
most recent Forbes ASAP exclaims in large red letters, "What Is True?" The
magazine chooses a theme for each issue and in an age of information,
misinformation and disinformation, it comes as no small surprise that
people are confused about almost everything. Contradictions and competing
viewpoints abound. No question about it, it's not easy being a consumer
sometimes.
Nowhere is this
more of a problem than in the area of motorcycle lubrication. On the one hand bikers are told by
equipment manufacturers that automobile oils are not capable of protecting
their bikes. On the other
hand, a synthetic motor oil company like AMSOIL has been providing
motorcycles with superb performance and protection for nearly three
decades. What's a motorcyclist to believe?
This spring Donny
Petersen defended, even recommended, the use of synthetic motor oils. In
November Harley-Davidson responded, taking Donny to task and challenging
many of his assertions. A
rebuttal by Chuck Goldmann (ExxonMobil) provided readers with an excellent
overview of synthetic motor oils and their advantages over petroleum.
I'd like to commend
American Iron for creating this opportunity for the exchange of ideas
regarding the care and feeding of our machines, and to Donny's courage in
putting his convictions down in black and white as a starting point. It's always easier to say nothing
than to go on record and get fired at from every angle. The likelihood of getting shot is
significantly reduced when you avoid the front lines.
This article is a
response to all three of the abovementioned articles. AMSOIL synthetic
motor oils were the first API rated synthetic motor oils in the world when
introduced in 1972. With
nearly three decades of experience, and documentation, AMSOIL can make a
contribution to this "Great Oil Debate." Our tech services staff has been
answering questions by concerned Harley riders for ages anyways. We might as well attempt to
present publicly what we have been saying all along.
My premise is this:
Everyone knows synthetic oil is better than refined petroleum. Why not use it?
SYNTHETICS OFFER
SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE AND PROTECTION
The advantages of
synthetic motor oils are well known and have been written about for
decades. I have SAE (Society
of Automotive Engineers, Inc.) papers in my files that repeatedly endorsed
the various benefits of synthetics.
Whether extended service life, improved fuel economy, increased
power, reduced friction and wear, resistance to breakdown, better low and
high temperature protection, you name it, the documentation is out there.
The studies have been done.
All of this leads
one to ask a couple fundamental questions. Is the Harley V-Twin engine
different from all other engines in the world? Is there something so unique with
a Harley engine that all of the lubrication rules that apply to all other
four stroke engines must be thrown out the window?
Yes, theirs is
air-cooled and can run hot.
For this reason alone one would think it even more important to
have a premium synthetic motor oil.
One of Donny's
comments that bears repeating came near the conclusion of his April
column. "The Motor Company
didn't reinvent the air-cooled engine and, therefore, its engines don't
require specially formulated, Harley-only fluids." This summary remark
stands at the crux of the debate.
DUAL QUALIFIED
OILS
There were two
topics which the previous writers waded into with great detail which I
would like to re-visit briefly here:
dual qualified motor oils and additive chemistry.
Historically, one
of the biggest problems AMSOIL has faced when selling motor oils to the
motorcycle market has to do with this notion that automobile oils can't be
used in motorcycles. Chuck
Goldmann did an excellent job of explaining how some motor oils might not
be suited for both applications, but that some motor oils most
certainly are. (I won't fault
him for mentioning that he personally uses a Mobil product. As you would expect, we use AMSOIL
products, which Chuck knows are very good.)
There are actually
two issues here. The first is
that the motor oil be capable of meeting both passenger car and diesel
performance requirements. The
second issue has to do with the use of friction modifiers. The truth is that friction
modifiers have never been a real performance issue. OEMs (bike manufacturers),
however, created such a strong public perception against them that in 1998
AMSOIL re-formulated its two leading oils for the motorcycle market. Later, because of the continued
misinformation that an automobile oil cannot be used as a motorcycle oil,
AMSOIL took the last step of producing two grades of AMSOIL synthetic
motorcycle oil.
Public perceptions
and fears can drive consumer behavior, whether true or not. Last year's Millennial Day
Meltdown fear resulted in tremendous sales of generators and packaged
dried foods. The fear driving
this debate revolves around the question of whether it is acceptable or
safe to use anything but Factory oil.
CHEMISTRY
CLASS
All of the articles
presented chemistry lessons.
I'm not sure how important many of these details are for riders,
but it is fascinating for those of us who are so inclined.
Do we really need a
chemistry degree in order to choose a motor oil? No. But it's good to remember that
all motor oils are not created equal.
It is unlikely that
any major motor oil company today is going to produce a really bad
product. But is “adequate” what riders really want? If you are going to change it
frequently, if you are going to be a kind, tame rider who never gets on
the throttle, well, Harley-Davidson Oil is just fine, as most motorcycle
oils probably are. But if
you're the kind of rider who puts your machine through its paces, who
makes modifications that bump your horsepower to the next level, if you're
cranking it up and you want to know your engine has the protection it
needs, or simply want the best, a premium synthetic motorcycle oil is the
lubricant of choice.
Here's how I see
it. Additive chemistries are
just that: additives. They
are chemicals that have been added to the base stock. These chemicals have various
functions. But the final
product can only be as good as the foundation you build on. Quite honestly, there would be no
synthetic motor oil market if the only thing you needed to do to get
premium performance from crude oil was put some chemicals in it. The fact is, petroleum has its
limitations. All oils are not
created equal.
A premium product
does not end with the base stock.
Additive selection makes a difference. Chuck Goldmann notes that not only
is selection important, the process of assembling the motor oil is also
important. In short, you want
an experienced manufacturer who understands the interrelationship of the
various components of the lubricants being produced. It is not simply a matter of
putting ingredients together.
Harley-Davidson
noted, correctly, that "you cannot distinguish between a good motor oil
and a better motor oil by additive metals analysis alone." Remember, though, that this is not
the same as saying additive metals don't make a difference. The truth is a manufacturer can
skimp on certain chemicals to keep costs down and consumers will not
notice anything, even though there are consequences. I would like to use an example
from a different industry that readers may understand.
In the realm of
house paint, not all paints are created equal. If you take a really cheap white
paint, you may need three coats of paint to cover a medium colored
surface. If you take a very
high end professional paint, you can cover that surface with one
coat. I once painted a black
door white with a single coat of premium high quality paint. All of these paints look white
inside the pail. But the high
quality paint has a higher additive content. By increasing the amount of
titanium white, an additive, you can get better coverage. This additive is expensive,
however, and people often do not wish to pay the price, so paint
manufacturers produce low end products to satisfy the consumer who wants
to buy on price. Savvy
consumers who value their time are willing to pay more to get the better,
one-coat coverage.
When it comes to
additives, AMSOIL spends more so that the oil exceeds, not simply meets,
the demands of a long life lubricant. High TBN, and sufficient zinc and
phosphorous, helps reduce engine corrosion and wear, increases oil service
life and reduces maintenance costs.
REAL BENEFITS FOR
RIDERS
What does all this
mean for readers? There are
two very real and noticeable benefits for bikers who use a premium
synthetic motorcycle oil like AMSOIL. First, the engine runs cooler. Reduced friction results in cooler
operating temps. If you are
riding hard out on the desert or stuck in city traffic in L.A., you can
definitely feel the heat from your hog. What can you do? You can't install air
conditioning. You can use a
premium synthetic and run perceptibly cooler.
The second benefit,
extended drain intervals and longer service life, is appreciated by many
AMSOIL users. Instead of
having to change the oil midway through the season, you simply change the
filter. The oil's additive
package is beefy enough so that the oil is good to go for up to three
times the equipment manufacturer’s recommendation or one year, whichever
comes first. If you are
uncomfortable with extended drains you can still change at normal
intervals and needn't have fear if inconveniences cause you to go beyond
your normal oil change interval.
Another, less
noticeable but very real benefit of a beefy additive package in a
synthetic is this: at the end of the year, bikers in northern tier states
also appreciate knowing that the anticorrosive characteristics of a
premium synthetic are better than their petrol counterparts. There is less likelihood of rust
and pitting on parts inside the engine as it sits idle through the
winter.
WARRANTY
ISSUES
A major concern
many riders have had pertains to the warranty issue. Harley Davidson has
created the impression that if you are a rider who uses any oil besides
Harley-Davidson oil, you will void your warranty. Many motorcycle shops believe this
to be the case, although the writer of the November Harley-Davidson
article indicates that "in a pinch Harley-Davidson recommends that a rider
use one of the API C category oils as a substitute for Harley-Davidson
360." Nevertheless, the
impression is out there that the warranty will be voided if you use
another product, and since the bike has cost a good chunk of change, no
one really wants to gamble with that much money on the table. Fortunately,
there is a law called the Magnusson-Moss Act that says, in layman’s terms,
an OEM cannot require a consumer to use an OEM part or fluid in order to
maintain warranty coverage unless that part or fluid is provided free of
charge.
I can't speak for
other oil companies, but I can say that AMSOIL warrants its oil against
lubrication related failure.
We have 28 years experience and wouldn’t be in business today if
engine failures were a problem.
We have more experience with synthetics and extended drain
intervals than anyone in the industry.
MARKETING
Don, in his April
column, wrote: "There is
nothing wrong with Harley oil, and it is a good fossil oil to run in your
bike. It is just that modern
marketing can be very skillful in making the consumer paranoid about using
anything but the manufacturer's suggested oil. There are better oils out there.
Period." Right on,
Donny. I can't agree more.
It would appear
that Harley-Davidson has not made it a goal to empower riders to make
choices. They have made a marketing decision, forced reliance on
Harley-Davidson. Is
this what riders want? Do
riders really want to be stuck with no options regarding motor oil
selection? Do riders want to be forced to use inferior oil when they know
other products can provide better protection, reduce heat, increase
horsepower?
They say it is not
a marketing issue, however, Harley-Davidson has chosen not to help their
customers use other products. There are no factual reasons for this. Their
oil does not offer the benefits of a synthetic, and it is clearly a
marketing move.
A lot of riders
change ignitions and make other modifications to run their Harleys at
higher RPM, modifying their bikes to get more horsepower. This puts more stress on the
engine, creates more heat. These modifications may also present warranty
problems as well. Perhaps even a majority of riders modify their bikes to
increase performance, and most really ought to be using a higher
performance motor oil. It
would appear that Harley-Davidson is not interested in helping these
riders.
With more heat
generated, oil breakdown does occur. The graph on oxidation performance in
the December issue shows a shocking difference between HD 360 and Mobil 1
V Twin oil. This chart and
many other tests for benchmarking performance prove emphatically the
superior capabilities of synthetic motor oils. Why, then, has Harley-Davidson
refused to promote the performance benefits synthetics offer? It might be that being affiliated
with one oil supplier for so long has slowed Harley-Davidson’s adoption of
advancements in lubrication technology.
IN SUMMARY
Synthetic
motor oils offer numerous performance advantages over conventional
petroleum based products. For
this reason, in nearly every other market – from trucks to cars to heavy
duty equipment to sport vehicles – synthetics have been greeted with
increasing enthusiasm. The
technology is proven. The
benefits are many. There seems to be no good reason why motorcycle owners
should be discouraged from embracing this trend. |