Allies and Aliens -
Thoughts on the Visitor Agenda
©2006 by Craig R. Lang, MS CHt
It is a beautiful afternoon - lovely blue skies and a few
fleecy white clouds. As I sit on my
front porch, laptop in front of me, writing his article, I marvel at how
peaceful our world can be. Earlier, I
had been making some minor edits to my upcoming book, the
Summers' talk was one of the most thought provoking and sobering I have attended in a long time. It had the same effect on me as reading David Jacobs' book, The Threat, and for about the same reason. For this talk was about covert alien intervention on Earth and the potential subjugation of humanity.
In this presentation, Summers discussed his ideas, channeled from a consortium of beings that he calls the "Allies of Humanity." These speak of an alien agenda, what the visitor presence means to us. Their message was disquieting, at best. He states that, while we do not know the agenda of the Visitors, the Allies tell us that they do not have our interests in mind.
Summers states that humanity is not ready for contact. We are far too primitive, too divided and too warlike. No civilized beings would want to have contact with us - at least if they have our interests in mind. Thus, those who do contact us probably do not have good intentions, but are here to exploit us in some way. We do not know their agenda, but the Allies warn us that our freedom and indeed, our very existence as sovereign stewards of this pale blue dot, are at risk.
He cited as an example, historical precedent - specifically,
the native populations of
Summers also states that we sit atop of a gem. Earth is a precious place, a gold mine of resources and biodiversity, and a world coveted by others. Furthermore, we live in a highly traveled part of the universe. While most in our present civilization do not believe in the reality of extraterrestrial civilizations or star travel, Summers tells us that both are common. Earth is not isolated, but is at a crossroads of the universe [my term - CL]. Thus, we earthlings are at risk.
According to Summers, what is required first is awareness - of their presence and of our own nature. We need to understand that we are all one and that we are responsible for our world. We are the native species of Earth and we need to present a united front in the presence of "them." If we do not exercise our sovereignty, we will lose it.
Summers describes a multi-step alien strategy. The plan begins with observation and selected contact, followed by abduction, hybridization and eventual assimilation into our society. In the final stages, they corrupt our beliefs such that we view them as superior beings. Misinformation or disinformation about "Them" is a key element in the strategy. The intent is to present themselves as gods or saviors. Only they can save us from our problems - our coming environmental catastrophe, pole shift, apocalyptic war, etc...
Summers states that the "hybridization and assimilation" step is in progress now - with the abduction phenomenon being the prime example of this. The hybrids that Hopkins, Jacobs and many other researchers, including myself, have discerned are the realization of this step. During his talk, I asked the provocative question of what we should do - given that hybrids already seem to be among us. Have they already become a threat? If so, then might some type of "witch hunt" become necessary? His response was that rather than being "among us," they would tend to be people in power - an elite few, rather than an assimilated many.
If this is the case, then, as these power-figures assume control, will humanity become increasingly open to an alien presence? Ultimately, Summers suggests that we might see these new leaders handing over the keys to the kingdom, much as Montezuma did with Cortez. However, he indicated that simply exposing them would be sufficient. The intervention cannot succeed once known. In Summers' view, it is vital that we expose these "agents" for who they are.
To me this sounds like The Manchurian Candidate, the story of a brainwashed sleeper agent who rises to power, yet is really owned by the enemy. Is this the case? My extension of what Summers says is that we need to ask whether key people in power have connections with the UFO phenomenon. If so, then what? So far, I have not seen any indication that those in power have alien ancestry or allegiance. Yet perhaps as people rise to power, this may bear researching. What is their real allegiance? Is it to Earth, to a nation, or to something else? If so, then what is that something else?
I also have to question his portrayal of the hybridization strategy, given what we have seen of possible assimilated hybrids so far. Several cases in the literature, plus some of my own, suggest that they try to keep a low profile, barely registering on the radar of society. They seem to want to blend in - perhaps to spread their influence at the grass roots level.
Are the Visitors good or evil? I ask, 'good or evil for whom?' Furthermore, who are "They" of which we speak? Researchers tell us that there appears to be more than one group of visitors out there and their intentions appear to vary widely. There is a wide range of views of the alien presence, with two ultimate extremes - alienophobia, a visceral (perhaps violent) revulsion against their presence - and deification, welcoming them as saviors/gods. I suggest that neither is wise. In their book, Healing Shattered Reality, Bryant and Seebach say much this same thing - stressing the need for objectivity and discernment. We need to understand our relationship with them, while at the same time realizing our own power to say "No."
Do we really have the power to say "No" and enforce it? Summers states that there is a universal prohibition against military intervention against native species. Thus, they will not conquer us outright. Given their obvious technological superiority, and seeing how UFOs can vastly outperform our most advanced military assets, they could have conquered us long ago, if that were their intent. However, they need to be more subtle, to have us "invite" them in - perhaps as gods or saviors. Summers says that if we are aware of their true nature, we can avoid this deception.
I have always been suspicious of channeled information, and the "Allies" material is no exception. Like all such revelations, it must be treated with discernment. However, what Marshall Vian Summers said bears deep consideration.
In The Cosmic Bridge, I postulate a benevolent federation, speculation based upon the paper, A Possible Extraterrestrial Strategy for Earth,[i] written by James Deardorff. However, it is entirely possible that there are many civilizations. And if Summers is correct, Earth is located in a well-traveled region of the universe, with many visitors having many different intentions. Thus, while there might be a "prime directive" type of quarantine in place, perhaps it is a leaky one.
What can we do at present?
Probably not much. Perhaps the
best thing we can do is to develop some type of political/spiritual unity
movement - to build the united front - an organized species of humanity. At the same time, we need to act to prevent
the potential (or real - per the recent Al Gore documentary, "An
Inconvenient Truth") disaster that is rapidly bearing down upon us. Changes are coming - we are in for a
transition, perhaps the oft-mentioned "2012" or other
apocalypse. I can easily see a coming
collapse of our civilization, leaving us open to some entity posing as a
"savior" from the stars. In
such a case, as with the natives of
Summers states that during such times of rapid change, we are vulnerable. Yet he also says that the Allies will not intervene. They have observed the goings-on with respect to abduction in recent times and they wish only to warn us through selected individuals, Summers being one of them. In Summers' words, it is up to us to save ourselves. If all of this sounds paranoid, I believe that it is. Yet I have heard more than one UFO researcher quip that if you are not paranoid, then you don't understand (!).
In The Cosmic Bridge, I offer speculation on the alien agenda that is very different from what Summers says. Yet ultimately, I believe we simply do not know why the Visitors are here. I do not believe we should base our actions upon channeled revelations through one person. Yet the spiritual foundations of many cultural groups within our society center upon just such channeled sources (some examples: the 10 Commandments, The book of Revelation, The Koran, etc.). Thus, let's for a moment neglect the channeled nature of the information from the "Allies of Humanity." When we do so, we find that the Allies offer us some very practical, sound spiritual advice - that of caution and discernment in the face of influences from elsewhere.
Summers states that the core of freedom is spirituality, and
most technological civilizations became so at the expense of their spiritual
being. Thus, they abdicate their freedom in favor of imperial expansion. Any
truly free species - some of which form the "allies" - have
maintained their spirituality, rather than pursuing a technological course.
They are powerful but solitary worlds - non-imperial in nature. Summers
suggests that in order to remain free, a species must unite under such a
spiritual banner. [Note: This would be
consistent with what Budd Hopkins, David Jacobs and other abduction researchers
write about the "culture" of the Visitors - that there is little
spirit or emotion to the alien realm].
Summers further states that spirituality is the key to human unity. He emphasizes knowledge, and indicates that
much of this is spiritual in nature. It
is the vital awareness that we humans are all one; we are part of a populated
universe; and good and evil apply "out there" just as much as they do
here. At its core, humanity's greatest
need is for unity in the presence of a busy and sometimes hostile universe.
What does this mean in practical terms? Assuming we do unite, how do we confront such an alien presence? Summers' response is that we must assert our authority as a species - perhaps under a common banner with a spiritual focus. Can we do this in the foreseeable future? Given the present tangled politics of our world, can we possibly unite in a common stewardship and defense of our world? At present, this would not seem likely.
Do the Visitors mean us ill, or are they here for some other purpose? Is Summers correct? In either case, what does this say about an "alien agenda" and what does it imply for human destiny? My answer to all of these is, "I don't know." I can only conclude that, as we look into the Visitor presence in increasing depth, we find that it is stranger than we can imagine. Furthermore, as humanity prepares to venture out into the heavens, we may find that the stakes are even higher than we can envision.
