
I am taking a picture of my parents: I am ready to click, but first I say, "Smile." I want them to be pleased with the print. In addition, I decide to stand closer so the print will show some of the detail of their faces; I move them out of the bright sun, so they won't be squinting; I focus on them, to avoid the distracting background; and so forth. I have used the camera in a creative way - I am being "artistic."
The photographer, even when he merely says "smile" is involving some part of his creative, discriminating, aesthetic sense in his picture taking. He involves his vision, his brain, his heart, and his/her self in varying degrees up to the moment of click. His product, I claim, therefore is art.
If we say beauty is "in the eye of the beholder," I claim photography is art at the moment of the click. There is more: After the click comes the processing, whether in the chemical darkroom or, more likely now, the processing in the computer. At this stage the potential for creative and artistic effort is unlimited. Cropping to select only the contributing parts of the camera frame; rotating the image to straighten the horizon; adjusting the image by sharpening (or blurring) selected parts of the picture; increasing (or decreasing) contrast; even adding clouds from another picture to an otherwise empty sky (see below); and possibly much more to create, artistically, the final product. Anything and everything except, perhaps, putting the smile on the frowning face.
