Home   Uninsured   Racism    Medicare    Medicaid/Medi-Cal    Mental Health    Healthcare Reform    War    Economics    All Articles   Search

2009-01-09 -- Health Spending at Record Rate

"Prof. Uwe E. Reinhardt, a health economist at Princeton, said: "The
increase in health spending is no surprise whatsoever. This is what
the American people asked for when they abolished managed care." Many
consumers rebelled at limits on their choice of doctors and
 hospitals."

How short the Time's memory is. What consumers rebelled at was managed
care withholding vital tests and procedures which cost both health and
lives.

The AP's take on the story was even more cold-blodded:

"Early indications, however, are that growth in spending slowed in
2003,  'We are expecting some slowdown to occur ... as a result of the
economic slowdown,' Katharine Levit, a CMS official and the lead
author of the report  said. ... The recession, however, increased
financial pressures on private employers and governments alike. The
common response was to shift costs to employees and beneficiaries. ...
In particular, states already are imposing limits on the Medicaid
program for the poor in an effort to restrain costs.  ...  Similar
shifts in the future could slow the rate of growth in health care
spending, the report said. "As consumers share more of the increases
in cost, the value of health services will be more closely weighed
against other purchases, underscoring the considerable value of some
services and the discretionary nature of others," they wrote."



New York Times, January 9, 2004

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 8 - Health spending accounts for nearly 15 percent of
the nation's economy, the largest share on record, the Bush
administration said on Thursday.

The Department of Health and Human Services said that health care
spending shot up 9.3 percent in 2002, the largest increase in 11
years, to a total of $1.55 trillion. That represents an average of
$5,440 for each person in the United States.

Hospital care and prescription drugs accounted for much of the overall
increase, which outstripped the growth in the economy for the fourth
year in a row, the report said.

Complete data on health care spending in 2003 are not yet available,
and some experts say the rapid growth of the last few years may be
slowing.

Prof. Uwe E. Reinhardt, a health economist at Princeton, said: "The
increase in health spending is no surprise whatsoever. This is what
the American people asked for when they abolished managed care."

Many consumers rebelled at limits on their choice of doctors and
hospitals.

The increase comes before baby boomers become heavy users of care. It
does not reflect the increased demand for prescription drugs likely to
result from the Medicare law signed last month by President Bush.

"We've had two successive years of rather dramatic increases in the
share of gross domestic product going to health care," said Katharine
R. Levit, director of national health statistics at the department.
"Everyone, from businesses to government to consumers, is affected."

Projections put health spending at 17.7 percent of gross domestic
product, or G.D.P., by 2012, the government said last February.

Health spending surged in recent years while the economy sputtered. As
a result, health spending rose from 13.3 percent of the G.D.P. in 2000
to 14.1 percent in 2001 and 14.9 percent in 2002, the report said.
From 1992 to 1999, the share was stable.

Ms. Levit said that factors driving the growth in health spending
showed "signs of dissipating in 2003." Typically, she said, it takes
two or three years for changes in the economy, like the 2001
recession, to affect the health care sector.

Likewise, Kenneth L. Sperling, a health care consultant at Hewitt
Associates, said there had been a tapering off of the sharp rise in
the use and prices of hospital services and prescription drugs. He
expected the trend to be reflected in a lower rate of growth in health
spending in 2004.

Spending for hospital care reached $486.5 billion in 2002, a 9.5
increase over the prior year. It was the first time since 1991 that
hospital spending had grown faster than health spending generally.

Ms. Levit said the increase reflected a growing demand for hospital
services and rises in the number of admissions, the length of hospital
stays, the cost of malpractice insurance and the wages and benefits of
hospital employees. In addition, she said, hospitals have shown an
increased ability to negotiate higher prices as the constraints of
managed care have waned.

The new federal figures were published in the journal Health Affairs.

Even though more than 43 million Americans are uninsured, the United
States devotes more of its economy to health care than other
industrial countries. In 2001 - the last year for which comparative
figures are available - health accounted for 10.9 percent of the gross
domestic product in Switzerland, 10.7 percent in Germany, 9.7 percent
in Canada and 9.5 percent in France, according to the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development.

Public spending on health care accounts for 45 percent of all health
spending in the United States, compared with a 72 percent average in
O.E.C.D. countries. But health spending has outpaced economic growth
in most of those countries, putting pressure on government budgets.

Prescription drugs accounted for 10.5 cents of every dollar spent on
health care in the United States in 2002, and for about one-sixth of
the increase in health spending.

Drug companies cite those figures in arguing that they have been
unfairly vilified as a major source of rising health costs.

But another statistic helps explain why drug costs have become a
potent political issue. They account for 23 percent of what Americans
spent on health care out of their own pockets, and 51 percent of the
increase in such spending, in 2002.

Total out-of-pocket spending on health care rose $12 billion, to
$212.5 billion in 2002. Out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs
rose $6.1 billion, to $48.6 billion.

Insurance coverage of drugs has grown in the last 20 years, Ms. Levit
said. But consumers' out-of-pocket spending on medicines exceeded the
amount of their own money that they spent on hospitals, doctors,
dentists or nursing homes in 2002. Drug spending rose 15.9 percent in
2001, 16.4 percent in 2000 and 19.7 percent in 1999.

Cynthia Smith, an economist at the Department of Health and Human
Services, said the increase "has arisen largely from increased use of
new drugs, rather than from increasing prices of existing drugs."

Mark V. Pauly, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said he
saw no evidence that the increase in health spending had been
"cosmically harmful to society." Indeed, he said, "for middle-class
people with health insurance," the value of the health care they
receive is often worth the additional cost.

But Mr. Pauly said the increase in health costs and spending tended to
hurt the uninsured.

Since 1985, the report said, per capita health spending has grown more
slowly under Medicare than under private insurance. Liberals say that
shows Medicare is more efficient. But conservatives trace much of the
difference to the fact that private insurers have provided more
generous benefits.