DNA of the Daniel Family of Middlesex VA

New! Feb 2012 - a new matching test in!


William Daniel Sr. of Middlesex ("Capt. William") named four sons in his will: William, Robert, James, and Richard. We currently have DNA test results for three of these sons as shown in the tree below; lines are colored based on matching tests and the test kit numbers are included.
Mouse over a name for some further identification facts (doesn't work in all browsers, sorry).
We are very interested in finding a descendant of Richard and are always hunting. If you can help in this quest please contact Pam.

1Cpt. Wm d. 1698 Msex, md.1 ??, md.2 Jochebed --- 2Wm Jr. d. 1723 Msex, md.1 Constance Vause, md.2 Mary Moseley 2Robert d. 1720 Msex, md. Margaret Price 2James d. 1748 Msex, md. Margaret Vivion 2Richard b. 1678 Msex, d. 1727 Essex, md. Elizabeth Wortham 3Obadiah d. 1778 VA Goochland, md. Sarah Moseley 3Robert d. 1781 Msex, md. Elizabeth Carter 3Robert 1691-1742 Msex, md.1 Elizabeth ---, md.2 Mary Meacham 3Henry 1701-1767 Msex, md.1 Mary ---, md.2 Betty --- 3James b. 1709 Msex, d. 1761 VA Cumberland/Albemarle, md. Jane Hicks 3Peter b. ca1706 Msex, d. 1777 VA Stafford, md. Sarah Travers 3Charles b. 1708/9 Msex, d. VA Orange, md. Jane Mickleborough 4Moseley 1744/5-1795 VA Goochland, md. Nanny Thurston 4Ichabod 1756-1829 VA Goochland, md. Rachel --- 4Robert 1741-1782 Msex, md. Sarah Mickleborough 4Chesley b. 1730/1 Msex, d. 1814 NC Granville, md. Judith Woodson Christian 4Josiah b. 1743/4 VA Albemarle, d. 1811 NC Granville, md. Elizabeth Key 4James b. 1747 VA Albemarle, d. 1820 KY Christian, md. Sally Cocke 5William b. ca 1776 VA Goochland 5Travis b. Msex, d. 1805 VA Essex, md. Peggy Dillard 5Robert d. 1801 Msex, md. Phoebe Sadler 5JamesK b. 1766 NC Granville, d. 1851 MO Jackson, md. Sally Brown 5Thomas b. 1769 NC Granville, md. Elizabeth Satterwhite 5Leonard b. 1770 NC Granville, d. 1852 NC Rutherford, md. Ann Graves 5Samuel b. 1790 NC Granville, md. Elizabeth Holloway 5Benjamin d. GA Laurens, md. Lucretia Burgamy 5RobertC b. ca 1765 NC, d. GA Burke, md. Penelope Lane 6John b. VA, d. 1832/35 OH Gallia, md. Elizabeth Leadman 6Josiah b. 1805 NC Caswell, d. 1886 MS Union, md. Mary Denton 6JamesB b. 1808 NC Caswell, d. 1904 NC Orange, md. Jane Stuart 6GeorgeB b. ca1817 NC, d. aft1880, md. Rebecca Savage 7JamesJ b. 1831 AL Green, d. 1912 TX Johnson, md.1 Mary Lytal, md.2 Mary Long 7WalterK b. 1837 AL, d. 1928 MS Union, md. Susan Dunnam


Observations, results, answers derived from our tests

1. The mismatch:
Note that matching tests from multiple sons of a man prove his DNA "profile". The tests (in red) for William Jr. and Robert match each other, but differ from the tests (in blue) for James. For an analysis of this mismatch and a solution to the discrepancy see here.

2. The branch markers:
a. The members marked *23 show 23 at marker #447, which now defines this branch, all the other tests in red show a 22 at this marker. Any descendants of this branch can be expected to show a 23. Future testers with something other than 23 at marker #447 are almost surely not from this branch.
The current tests prove this branching marker at the level of Robert (md. Sarah Mickelborough), son of Robert (md. Elizabeth Carter), son of William Jr. The next challenge is to find a tester from a brother to this branching Robert. If he also shows a 23 at marker 447, it will show that the branch marker actually starts with their father Robert (md. Elizabeth Carter). The eligible brothers, i.e. other sons of the older Robert, are: William (1731/2-1783, md.1 Elizabeth --, md.2 Hannah Wood; John (1733-1772, md.1 Sarah Reid, md.2 Elizabeth Rice; Christopher (1736-1793, md. Mary Mickelborough).
b. The members marked *37 show 37 at marker CDYb; the modal is 36. These two tests (20231 and N75969) are from two different sons of Josiah (md. Mary Denton), but Josiah's brother shows the modal, so the mutation began with Josiah. Descendants of this branch can be expected to show a 37.
c. The members marked *17 show 17 at marker 458; the modal is 15. See #4 below for more information about the proposed line which probably makes this a branch marker for Obadiah.

3. Finding the correct fit, correcting previous errors in identification:
a. Tests #20231 and N75969, representing James J. and Walter K. Daniel, show DNA supporting the almost certain place of their father Josiah Daniel (b. 1805, md. Mary Denton) in the family of James K. Daniel, son of Josiah Daniel. There is already much evidence for this, location and dates, various namesakes, the presence of an unnamed son in early census that fits, etc., but migration at a critical age for this younger Josiah means that one necessary record that clinches it is still to be found. However, the DNA match makes this placement of Josiah almost certain.
b. Like the test of Josiah (#20231) described above, the test representing George B. Daniel (marked "anc.dna") shows DNA supporting his almost certain place in the family of James K. Daniel, son of Josiah Daniel. There is already much evidence for this, location and dates, various namesakes, the presence of an unnamed son in early census that fits, etc., but migration at a critical age for this George B. means that one necessary record that clinches it is still to be found. For a very good description of the evidence see the discussion at rootsweb about this George B.. The DNA match makes this placement of George B. almost certain.
c. Test #143930 resolves a longstanding confusion over various William H. Daniel's of Alabama and Georgia, all born in close years (ca 1826); the correct William H. has now confirmed his place as the son of Samuel Daniel and Elizabeth Holloway and thus his Middlesex ancestry by DNA! See Jan's fuller info and happy announcement here!
d. Test #48481 represents James Daniel (1747-1820) who md. Sally Cocke. In his counties of Christian KY, Person NC, and Granville NC there is always another (often more than one) James Daniel. Old works melded them and made errors in placing the various James's, resulting in some very "creative" genealogies. These errors became so "written in stone" that, even when the different James's were eventually distinguished by research into their lands, ages and other data from the records, it didn't seem proof enough to overturn the old errors. DNA finally placed this James (48481) in his correct line, as the record evidence showed. For further details on this work see "James Daniel is the Son of James of Albemarle".

4. NEW - Using a special mutation to propose a likely line membership and a potential branch marker:
Test #223826 is a new arrival in Feb 2012. The oldest documented ancestor so far is John Daniel, b. VA, md. 1832 in WVA Kanawha to Elizabeth Leadman (b. ca 1815), John d. young in 1832-1836 in OH Gallia, leaving only one son. The son Christopher Columbus Daniels and all further descendants consistently go by Daniels. While documentation must still be found to help the following theory, the two step mutation at marker 458 makes this tester a very likely descendant of Obadiah, s/o William Jr., s/o Capt. William. A one step mutation on this test could merely be used to suggest a relation to Obadiah, but it could also have represented a mutation that could have happened in any of the other branches.
Obadiah had four sons, Moseley, John, Ezekiel, and Ichabod.
By elimination, Ichabod is not the ancestor, his descendants are well documented and the entire family goes to TN after Ichabod's death.
Ezekiel d. before 22 Jun 1790 when his will was probated. His estate goes to his siblings and their heirs, i.e. he died unmarried and childless.
John had a son Garrett, but it currently looks like he may have also gone to TN (this idea still needs more proof).
Moseley had three children, William, Sarah, and Mary. Moseley died ca 1795 and his children are named in a chancery suit in 1801 regarding their uncle Ezekiel, with William representing himself and his underaged sisters. William drops out of the Goochland records before 1830. Sister Sarah md. Francis Blankenship in 1809 VA Goochland, and it looks certain that they moved to WVA Kanawha before 1830. Brother William had several children, including sons in the right years to be this test's ancestor John who also md. in WVA Kanawha. My theory is that we may be looking at the herding of some family members: perhaps Sarah (Daniel) Blankenship and her brother William (or maybe a son of William) went to WVA Kanawha together. Again, there are more records in the WVA and OH counties to be checked for more evidence about or disproof of this theory. John doesn't show up in the 1830 census, but he may be just a bit too young.
Other answers to this interesting match may show up elsewhere as well - I have shown the link in the chart with a broken line for John as a proposed son of William s/o Moseley based on the tightly matching DNA.

5. Getting on the right track:
Tests #13086 and #20707 have previously been thought to come from other lines, but their match shows them to be somehow related to the Middlesex Daniel family. Although there is still a ways to go to find how they fit into the family, at least the searchers now know in which direction to head and which erroneous lines they can now discard.
Placing these tests directly into Middlesex families has proved difficult thus far and the research on them has led both to some burned counties in NC and SC, breaking through has not been possible to date. One question to ponder is whether it's possible these tests actually come from a related line that didn't start in Middlesex, but arrived at a different time and place.


Below are the DNA results for the Middlesex Daniels. The branch mutations at markers #458, #447, and CDYb are shown in bold and outlined together. The significance of the 66/67 Davis match is explained here (This is the same article mentioned and linked to in #1 above.).

Ancestor, remarks

Kit #

H
a
p
l
o

3
9
3

3
9
0

1
9

3
9
1

3
8
5
a

3
8
5
b

4
2
6

3
8
8

4
3
9

3
8
9
-
1

3
9
2

3
8
9
-
2

4
5
8

4
5
9
a

4
5
9
b

4
5
5

4
5
4

4
4
7

4
3
7

4
4
8

4
4
9

4
6
4
a

4
6
4
b

4
6
4
c

4
6
4
d

4
6
0

G
A
T
A

H
4

C
A
II
a

C
A
II
b

4
5
6

6
0
7

5
7
6

5
7
0

C
D
Y
a

C
D
Y
b

4
4
2

4
3
8

by sons of William Jr d. 1723 Msex


Obadiah d. 1778 Goochland-son Ichabod

100256

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

17

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

Obadiah d. 1778 Goochland-son Moseley-son William -
   proposed son of William=John d. 1832/35 OH Gallia

223826

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

17

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

Robert d. 1781 Msex-son Robert-son Robert-son Travis

142779

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

23

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

Robert d. 1781 Msex-son Robert-son Robert-son Robert

119371

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

23

16

20

26

12

14

15

15













by sons of Robert d. 1720 Msex


Robert 1691-1742-son Samuel 1729-ca 1798 NC

126627

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

Henry 1701/2-1767-son Robert 1744-1784

108355

I1

13

22

15

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

James d. 1761-son Chesley 1730/1 VA-1814 NC

40078

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

James d. 1761-son Josiah-son Jas K.-son James B.

20230

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

James d. 1761-son Josiah-son James K.-
   probable son of James K. = Josiah-son James

20231

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

37

12

10

James d. 1761-son Josiah-son James K.-
   probable son of James K. = Josiah-son Walter

N75969

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

37

12

10

continued

11

8

15

15

8

11

10

8

9

10

12

22

25

15

10

12

12

16

8

13

27

20

13

13

11

12

11

11

12

11




James d. 1761-son Josiah-son Jas K.-prob son Geo B.

172081

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

continued

11

8

15

15

8

11

10

8

9

10

12

22

25

15

10

12

12

16

8

13

27

20

13

13

11

12

11

11

12

11




James d. 1761-son Josiah-son Thomas

176514

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

James d. 1761-son Josiah-son Leonard

N86320

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28


























James d. 1761-son Josiah-son Samuel-son William H.

143930

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

35

12

10

James d. 1761-son James 1747 VA-1820 KY

48481

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

unknown connection to Msex


Benjamin NC-GA, md. Lucretia Burgamy

13086

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15

11

9

19

21

15

15

16

19

35

36

12

10

Robert C. NC-GA, md. Penny Lane

20707

I1

13

22

14

10

13

14

11

14

10

12

11

28

15

8

9

8

11

22

16

20

26

12

14

15

15














by sons of James d. 1748 Msex


Peter-son Travers

4163

R1b1b2

13

23

14

10

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29


























Charles-son Thomas

59830

R1b1b2

13

23

14

10

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29

16

9

9

11

11

24

15

19

30

15

15

18

18

11

11

19

22

15

14

18

17

38

39

12

12

continued

12

12

12

11

9

15

16

8

10

10

8

10

10

22

23

17

10

12

12

15

8

22

20

12

11

13

11

11

13

12




Samuel Davis 1799-1865 KY Nicholas

93703

R1b1a2

13

23

14

10

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29

17

9

9

11

11

24

15

19

30

15

15

18

18

11

11

19

22

15

14

18

17

38

39

12

12

continued

12

12

12

11

9

15

16

8

10

10

8

10

10

22

23

17

10

12

12

15

8

22

20

12

11

13

11

11

13

12




Daniel surname, no info but potential match

N73223

R1b1a2

13

23

14

10

11

14

12

12

12

13

13

29





























PLEASE - If you are a Daniel male, or have a male Daniel relative, please join the DNA project and help all Daniel searchers in their quest! The join site is here.
If you know you are a Middlesex Daniel or if your results match any of ours, I also hope you'll allow me to include them on this page.


Comments or connections?
Email me at

(Sorry, have to copy by hand, the harvesters and spammers have gotten to be too much.)

Return to my main Genealogy Page












































































track webpage visits
Coupon Offer Codes