Sex Personals:

When you have sex with a women every man is faced with the challenge of where to cum. There are many options: In her ass, vagina, face, stomach, eye, teats, chest, ear, and back. When the man is about to erupt in his fussion of manhood he has a split second to decide this very important question. Where to cum? Every now and then you have different moods, you must use these emotions in order to utilize all the different areas of the vulumptious womenhood of your partner. My suggestions is to try something new every day, and find the one you like the most.

YES!!!! it does exist. BUT, you have to know when, now we all know that not all women get fired up when you nibble on those little spots and swell them up, but, if your patient and work on the timing, you can make it work. hers what ya' gotta do. example: my lady gets wet when i suck and bite on them, but she goes insane when i squeeze them and bite them, now knowing that, i have learned that if i take my left hand and squeeze the tit and nibble on the nipple and stroke her clit, let me tell ya, daddys HOME baby. now the moral of this story is as followes, take the time to see what makes her tick, then work onit. it wont happen over nite, but, if your paatient you can find the combonation and make the connection!

If one looks at the world today, it is obvious that a single male is regarded as a pariah in many circles, Swinging and Naturism being the two relevant to this article. When examining the reason why, it becomes obvious that this is the result the way in which Society as a whole regards sex, the human body and the differences between men and women (physical and otherwise). There has been much talk about the emancipation of women, with women demanding (and being given without question) equality in many aspects of life. However, both men and women have too much of a vested interested in maintaining the “segregation”, the status quo, for any changes to be too extensive. As a result, these alterations in the way Society regards it’s members have had the effect of admitting women to Society as a whole, to the degree in which they want to be admitted (i.e. as much as they want and no more), while totally excluding single men at the same time - such exclusions often manifest themselves in a far more distasteful way than the worst ever suffered by women. Note: have we forgotten the lessons of history where the Nazi’s ostracised large proportions of their Society, the Jews. I know their methods were far more extreme but the underlying philosophy was the same – regarding their “victims” as a lower form of life and the only thing to do was to ensure that there was not even a remote possibility of contact. For example: I read once of a naturist club where the Membership Director was proud, get this, PROUD of the fact that his club allowed ALL single women to join without question whilst any single male who applied, if not rejected out of hand as was usually the case, would sometimes be called in for interview.

Now the “Interview”, if you can call it that, consisted of deliberately subjecting the single male to the most humiliating, offensive and insulting treatment imaginable. He would be required to strip naked, while the dirty old men in charge of the so-called Interview remained fully clothed. A few minutes later, one of the women members of the club, a single female described by this pervert of a Membership Director as “a right cracker”, would come into the “Interview” room. She would parade around naked, in deliberately sexually provocative poses, while serving tea or some such inconsequential activity. When this single male showed the inevitable physical sexual reaction in response to this intentionally blatant display of pulchritude, they would use that as the reason for refusing him membership, claiming his reaction meant he was obviously unsuitable; in effect making fun of him for a perfectly normal human reaction to this deliberately sexually arousing behaviour. These dirty old men retained their clothing during the “Interview” for the sole purpose of increasing the humiliation suffered by the single male. Now, believe it or not, women are still regarded as sex objects in some form or other by society at large, as is proven by the immoral behaviour of these perverts (the Membership Director and his cohorts). This I know will immediately provoke a storm of protest but just think about it. On how many beaches do you see the sign “no topless sunbathing”. A man can walk down any street bare-chested but a woman cannot; exposing her breasts in public will in many cases result in her being arrested for “indecent exposure” and is frowned upon by most. And why? Bare breasts mean sex.

The second example is women’s makeup, blusher for instance. Blusher is used to simulate the colour of a woman’s skin during the moment of orgasm. The third example is the high heels that women wear. These force the feet into the formation a woman’s foot assumes again in the moment of orgasm. I mentioned the status quo earlier. As justification for this I would point out how many Swinger Ads you see where one couple makes the ad and it is for “single women only”, or says “no single males”. (Sorry about the crudities in the remaining paragraphs but I can’t think of a different way to phrase it, can you) If you think about it, then you would realise that the use of the “no single males” phrase in Adverts on Internet Swing sites is just plain illogical. The reason it is illogical is a combination of the fact that a bloke has only got so many “bullets in the barrel” and that women claim to demand sexual satisfaction. As a result, if women asserted their claim for equality then they would insist on encounters which would provide them with enough cock to obtain satisfaction or alternatevely that they would not be so secretive about doing so. The idea or principle of sexual equality is therefore a total fallacy, and will remain so as long as the phrase “no single males” is used by anyone. A sexual encounter is, more often than not, regarded as being a largely one-way affair, where the amount of satisfaction the woman gets from it is subservient to that of the man. But in my opinion it isn’t one way, the pleasure the woman gets is just as important that of the man (and I know that I am in the minority of males, single and married, who would think so – if you’ve got a partner who disagrees then you’re lucky). If my opinion was not true, then why would the “no single males” idea even exist…In many ways, applying this bigotry is like cutting your throat to spite your stomach because it unavoidably restricts the number of possible cocks for the women to choose from. It is time that women started demanding, and receiving, sexual equality in the bedroom (figuratively speaking because sex shouldn’t be restricted to the bedroom), to stop hiding behind these “no single males” adverts and thus to ensure that they get a wide choice of possible cocks with which to have a truly satisfying sexual encounter. 

The Friendfinder Network: experienced leader in online personals since 1996!