Version 0.3
Copyright © 2006 by Zack Smith,
All rights reserved.
The two-party political system that we have
in the USA is defective. It doesn't work.
Reason 1
It is really one party, playing "good cop, bad cop".
One side encourages unlimited selfishness, the other
gullible generosity. One side is mindlessly warlike, the other
mindlessly pacifist. They strive to differentiate themselves
from each other,
but each side serves their corporate masters, who
are running the show,
uncritically and efficiently.
Reason 2
The two parties act together to keep third parties
out of the system except at the local level.
Thus both Republicans and Democrats in Congress
OK'd
the introduction of electronic voting machines,
whose purpose is to rig elections.
Example in Pennsylvania
As has been demonstrated in Pennsylvania,
the corrupt two main parties are perfectly willing
to act to prevent 3rd parties from being able
to put their candidates on the ballot.
The Green Party had a list of 50,000+ signatures
to request being put on the ballot but
because the judges in charge of verifying
those lists were Democrats, the judges deliberately
disqualified tens of thousands of signatures
using the flimsiest of excuses possible.
As a result, the Greens were artificially put below the
minimum threshold for getting on the ballot.
And who has the lawyer that led the charge against the Greens?
Reed Smith, former attorney for John Kerry's
presidential race.
NY Times story.
Green Party Convention 2007 video of Nader giving details.
Reason 3
The rise of punditry on both conservative and liberal
sides means people are making money off of
- over-dramatizing fringe issues
- ignoring undramatic common issues where a reasonable
concensus could be achieve
- ignoring highly important issues that elites
don't want brought up.
Pundits steer clear of issues that might unite both sides,
or aggressively mock and belittle anyone who brings them up --
taking any opportunity to call them fringe lunatics or
conspiracy theorists,
issues like:
- The systematic rigging of
elections in 2000 and 2004 by removing Democrats from
voting rolls, which even the Democratic Party fuss over.
- The controlled demolition of
the World Trade Center by (most likely) CIA and Mossad
on 9/11.
- The need to abolish the Federal Reserve,
which is neither federal nor a reserve, but is the means
by which bankers have rigged the US economy to make a killing.
Reason 4
The emphasis on "fair and balanced" journalism,
which university journalism professors stress is so important,
has meant that the only issues that are covered
are ones that "both sides" approve of,
i.e. the "balance" struck is between
"right" and "left", and the "fairness"
is fairness to them, not anyone else.
The implication is that no other viewpoint exists.
Yet the two-party system is not genuinely
two independent parties in the first place,
so truly the balance is essentially between two types of loyalist,
at best, and the fairness is that of one loyalist
against another. If you are not loyal to
America's elites and their corporations,
you are not allowed to take part.
To give you an example, I called up an NPR,
which is partly taxpayer-funded,
station asking why they had not covered
the probable rigging of 2004 elections.
They said they couldn't do so because it would not be
a balanced show i.e. Republicans benefitted
from the rigging so they would not take part.
If NPR were to host such a show, which was unlikely
they said, it would be a one-sided discussion
involving the victims of fraudulent elections
accusing the perpetrators and/or
beneficiaries. In response to my assertion
that the media have a duty
to investigate wrongdoing, the producer
simply ignored what I said.
Reason 5
Notice the mind-numbing mantra of both
liberal and conservative establishment
propagandists:
They say, "You must be either liberal or conservative."
Oh, really? Why believe that is true?
It's a false choice.
Choose neither.
Liberal politicians
and the liberal establishment
are as useless and dishonest as conservative
politicians and their organizations,
because there are both merely faithful lackeys
of the big business, almost always acting against
your interests.
In most countries there are many more political
choices because they have
proportional representation, which
ensures that even small parties get seats in government.
Reason 6
The bogus differentiation between two
parties has led to two different cultures,
both freakish in their own way.
Two separate cadres of culture-creators
who find employment serving each mindset and
demographic. For instance, there is liberal media
that is inquisitive, frantic, sympathetic,
and insistent that everyone is a victim. And there are
conservative media are blaming, unsympathetic,
morally self-righteous, and insistent that
punishment cures all.
Neither cadre of culture-creators
wants to encourage self-criticism or critical thinking,
because these defeat the mindless tribalism each
espouses and profits from.
Related links
Links
- Architecture
- Automotive
- Bicycles and bicycling
- Books (my summaries and quotes from books)
- Computer hardware
- Benchmarks (Linux)
- My reviews
- Computer software
- Consumerism
- Digital cameras
- Mobile (cellular) phones
- Frugality
- My own experiences with certain companies.
- Corporations
- Cuisine / Food
- Do it yourself (DIY)
- Economics
- Education
- Electronics
- Environment
- Film & Theater
- Food: see Cuisine.
- Freedom & Liberty
- Frugality: see here
- Fuels: alternative
- Games
- Health
- History and Archeology
- Humor
- Internet
- Language
- Mathematics
- Media
- News
- Politics
- Real Estate
- Religion and Atheism
- Sciences
- Psychology
- Anthropology
- Tribalism (aggressive irrational group behavior)
- Biology
- Chemistry
- Physics
- Travel
- Trivia
- Videos
|
|