"It is increasingly clear that the Swiss theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar
(d. 1988) is among the most lastingly significant theologians of the
twentieth century, and certainly in the pontificate of Pope John Paul II (he
has been called "the Pope's favourite theologian")."
Words from the web
site of Stratford Caldecott (Plater College,
Oxford)
http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/balthasa/introduc.html
The text presented in
this document was discovered on the Overview site
http://www.lasalle.edu/~garver/overview.htm
….
Which was found via
the specific Balthasar site
http://www.catechesis.net/vonbalthasar/vonbalthasar_research.htm
Bold face
emphasis added by editor of this web page.
OVERVIEW
The following summary is drawn from
Balthasar’s own "Retrospective" (1988).
He starts with the philosophical
wranglings of humanity: we recognize our own finitude and contingency as
well as the contingency of the world of things around us—and yet we are
aware of being itself as something absolute and unlimited. Various
philosophical and theological attempts have been made at explaining the
problem of being.
Some (such as Parmenides) have tried to
say that all things are infinite and immutable being, while others (such as
Heraclitus) have said that everything is movement and becoming. The
Parmenidean solution—which is also that of Buddhism and neo-Platonis
m—falters since anything finite must be non-being, an illusion to be
discovered, and the One is attained only through mystical experience. The
Heraclitean solution must end in contradiction, identifying life with death,
wisdom with folly. We are left then with an inescapable dualism between
finite and infinite, contingent and necessary, and so on.
But leaves the question of the source of
this duality. On one hand the duality may be the result of a falling away
from or rupture with a primordial unity and thus salvation is achieved
through a reabsorption into the infinite One—but this is theopani sm. On the
other hand, perhaps the infinite had some need of the finite in order to
perfect itself or to actualize its potential or the like—but this is
pantheism. Wither case founders on the problem that the infinite is reduced
to the finite.
According to Balthasar only theology—in
particular Christian Trinitarian theism—could give an adequate response to
these philosophical problems and, in fact, the solution could only be given
to us by the infinite Being Himself, revealing Himself from Himself. But,
asks Balthasar, could creatures such as us understand the revelation? He
answers that this is the case only if the God of the universe is the God of
the Bible since this God is the creator of the world and man, of the ear and
of language. This is the God who constituted man to receive this revelation
of the God who speaks and hears. This is the fundamental openness of man to
the divine and so, simultaneously, knowledge of God and self-knowledge are
inseparable.
Some further observations. Humanity
exists only in dialogue with the neighbor—even infants are only brought to
consciousness of themselves by love, as Balthasar is fond of saying, only by
"the smile of the mother." This truth reveals four things. First, (Editor’s
insert: the absolute transcendental) love unites the different
as one even as it establishes that difference. Second, since love is joyful,
(1) being must be beautiful. Third, since love is good, (2)
being must be good. And finally, since love is true, (3) being must
be true. (1,2 &3 =the, dare we say, relative transcendentals within
being, within love)
There we have the basic outline of the
Trilogy: aesthetics (beauty) =Love of the Spirit, dramatics
(goodness) = The Fathers will, and logic (truth) =Intelligibility
of all reality in The Son . We also have its major motif: while there is
an absolute distinction between God and the creature, there is also an
analogy between them and s o God is beauty, goodness, and truth.
Thus, we conclude the following. First,
since we exist only in interpersonal dialogue, God Himself must exist as
interpersonal dialogue. Speech—the Word—is of His essence. Second, since God
is truly God and in no need of the creature, He must be the tr ue, the good,
and the beautiful in Himself. So the analogous manifestation of these
realities in the creature is only partial and finite. For example, for us as
humans our unity as humans could either be that each of us is part of one
humanity or that ea ch of us is an individual. Only in the Trinity is such
partial unity resolved since God’s unity is precisely in the individuality
of the Persons.
Balthasar’s Trilogy, then, is an attempt
to examine the True, the Good, and the Beautiful as they are
concretely revealed (and not just as philosophical abstractions), working
with the assumption of the analogia entis and the internal relations
between these attributes. Thus the beautiful is also true and good. A thing
appears to us as beautiful and in doing so gives itself to us. Such
self-giving is the essence of goodness. And in giving itself it bespeaks
itself, revealing the truth of its elf.
In reference to God we have a theological
aesthetic. God appears in theophany to Abraham, to Moses, to the prophets.
Finally God appears to us in Christ. But we are left with questions. What
makes this appearance distinct from every other phenomenon? What is
different about the God of Israel from the idols of the pagans? What is
different about the God of Israel from the vain philosophies of men? What is
unique about the glory of this God revealed in Christ hung upon a Cross and
Resurrected from the grave?
We also have a theological dramatics. God
gives Himself to us in the drama of salvation. But more questions. How does
the absolute freedom of God in Christ interact with the relative, but real,
freedom of us? How is the final victory achieved?
And finally we have a theological logic.
In Christ God has made Himself truly known, in the God-man. How can an
infinite Word express Himself in a finite word? This is related to the two
natures of Christ. How can finite men come to understand the unlimited riches
of the Word of God? This is the work of the Holy Spirit.
[See Footnote below on St. Anselm]
Balthasar concludes this retrospective of
his work by noting that Christianity alone is capable of answering the
question why God created a world of which he had absolutely no need in order
to be God. The monotheisms of Judaism and Islam cannot answer this question.
The doctrine of the Trinity alone tells
us that God is one, good, true, and beautiful because His is essentially
Love which both establishes the Other and their Unity. Thus God has no need
of the creation, but freely creates it out of a Love which is already fully
expressed. Moreover, since the Trinity necessarily includes otherness, the
creation is not a fall from infinite perfection, but an image of God’s own
otherness even while it is distinct from God. Since the Son is the express
image of the Father, He can assume to himself the creation which already
images God. He can do so without, on one hand, dissolving the created order
or, on the other hand, merely extrinsically adding something to a creation
that is already complete in itself.
Balthasar concludes:
All true solutions offered by the
Christian Faith hold, therefore, to these two mysteries [the Trinity and the
Incarnation], categorically refused by a human reason that makes itself that
absolute. It is because of this that the true battle between religions
begins only after the coming of Christ. Humanity will prefer to renounce all
philosophical questions—in Marxism, or positivism of all stripes—rather than
accept a philosophy that finds its final response only in the revelation of
Christ. Foreseeing that, Christ sent his believers into the whole world as
sheep among wolves. Before making a pact with the world, it is necessary to
meditate on that comparison.