| "HOLE IN ONE" FUNDRAISER FOR RFA-TX The "Golf of Mexico" Tournament proved to be a great success. RFA-TX along with the Texas Great Barrier Reef Project (TGBR) held a national fundraiser in Houston on Wednesday, October 5th to support future of the Gulf of Mexico fisheries. Fishermen from around the region showed their support for RFA and the TGBR Project. Golfers teamed up in fours for an 18-hole game on the scenic Wildcat Golf Course exhibiting t umbling fairways amidst wetlands and natural grass fields with spectacular panoramas of the Houston skyline . Following the tournament was an awards dinner and auction where RFA-TX introduced their board of directors and described the exciting TGBR Project. Auction items included full-day fishing trips, hunting trips, dinner reservations and luxurious Sakowitz Furs. "The 'Golf of Mexico' Tournament was an exciting event at a great golf course, states Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director. "We are expecting there will be a larger turnout next year and to eventually grow into a Pro AM event." The TGBRP will be the world's largest artificial reef program, of which will create an artificial reefing corridor spanning the entire length of the Texas coast. The reef will be positioned in state waters from 7.5 to 8.5 miles off of the beach varying 40-90 ft in depth. The TGBRP will extend from Port Isabel to Sabine Pass, and be divided into 5 segments due to shipping lanes. "This was a vision of RFA-TX board members and will prove to be the conservation move of the century affecting numerous species," states Jim Smarr, RFA-TX State Chairman. Up to 4,000 artificial reefs per year will be deployed in an effort to provide Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for red snapper and a multitude of other sportfish species important to our coastal economies including kingfish, grouper, ling, dorado, redfish, tarpon, flounder, sea trout, sailfish and mahi-mahi. RFA would like to thank the sponsors and participants who supported the "Golf of Mexico" Fundraiser. Your contributions to the TGBR will leave an everlasting legacy for the future of Texas fisheries. Support RFA-TX, visit http://www.rfatexas.org or contact State Chairman, Jim Smarr at jimsmarr@austin.rr.com or (361) 463-1558. To learn more on the TGBRP, visit http://www.texasgreatbarrierreef.com and watch the Fox 29 News clip at: http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=1035042&version=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1. CONGRESSMAN PALLONE AND RFA IN AGREEMENT ON WEAKFISH The following letter was written by Congressman Frank Pallone urging ASMFC to adopt no further reductions for weakfish. September 26, 2006 Mr. Preston P. Pate, Jr. Chairman Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1444 Eye St., NW , 6th Floor Washington , D.C. 20005 Dear Chairman Pate: On behalf of fishermen in my congressional district, I am writing to urge that the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) adopt the status quo option when it finalizes Draft Addendum II to Amendment 4 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Weakfish. As you know, weakfish is one of the most popular species among recreational fishermen. Given the chance that drastic reductions could be made in the 2007 summer flounder quota, there is a distinct possibility that fishermen could see severe reductions in two major fishing opportunities, with serious economic repercussions. Moreover, as was the case during consideration of Draft Addendum I, there is still no scientific evidence that fishing mortality is the cause of the recent decline in the size of the weakfish stock. As noted in Draft Addendum II, "[t]he SAS does not attribute the large decline in biomass to this slight rise in fishing mortality. Natural mortality has risen and has become a much greater portion of total mortality than fishing mortality." It would simply be unfair to penalize fishermen for a stock decline that is not connected to fishing mortality. There is little reason to believe that a further reduction in fishing mortality would solve the current decline in weakfish biomass. There are clearly natural factors at work, even though the Commission's scientific advisors do not seem to understand them well. It is troubling that, more than a year after the Weakfish Management Board delayed action, there is still very little understanding of what is causing the weakfish stock to decline. I am also concerned that the peer review panel did not support the conclusions of the Technical Assessment Committee's stock assessment report. Clearly, there is more scientific work to be done to better understand what is happening to this stock, and I urge the TAC and the Commission to do more as soon as possible. Now is not the time to further restrict fishermen, but to work more to understand what is affecting the biomass levels. I hope that you will take my comments under consideration and retain the status quo for fishing levels. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, FRANK PALLONE, JR. Member of Congress RFA's weakfish comments will be posted on www.joinrfa.org. MASSACHUSETTS DMF ADDRESSES DOGFISH PROBLEM The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (Mass DMF) has taken advantage of recent spiny dogfish stock assessments to initiate a movement to reopen a small-scale directed commercial fishery for the species. The scientific analysis to support this movement to reopen this fishery was presented to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) by Mass DMF Deputy Director Dr. David Pierce. The highlights of that analysis identity the fact that spiny dogfish is no longer overfished, that overfishing is not occurring and predation on juvenile cod by dogfish is hampering cod rebuilding efforts. Over the past several years, spiny dogfish have infested both the inshore and offshore areas of Massachusetts Bay and the Gulf of Maine. Both the party/charter boat and private vessel recreational angling communities have been severely affected by the infestation of this species. On the offshore grounds, tuna fishing along with groundfish fishing have seen trips steadily become efforts in futility. Dogfish are so thick that boats are at times surrounded by the hundreds of dogfish. Natural baits intended for tuna, bluefish, and groundfish are immediately inhaled by the swarms of the dogfish. Some charter captains even report that they can hear the dogfish bumping into the hull of their boats. The inshore waters have experience those same problems while targeting striped bass, fluke, winter flounder and sea bass. Currently, the ASMFC annual coast-wide commercial quota for spiny dogfish is 4 million pounds with a 600-pound trip limit. This basically equates to a by-catch fishery. Under the proposals set forth by Mass DMF, the spiny dogfish quota would increase to 6 million pounds and there would be a 3,000-pound daily trip limit. These increases would allow for a small-scale directed commercial fishery which would be a welcoming event for the recreational sector in Massachusetts. The ASMFC will be addressing this issue at the October meeting and will likely hand down a decision for the 2007 fishing year. RFA PRESENTS REPORT TO CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION ON MLPA RFA's Jim Martin attended the California Fish & Game Commission meeting on October 5-7 in San Diego and presented the California Fisheries Coalition "Lessons Learned" document, now available for download at http://cafisheriescoalition.org. This is an excellent document worth reading by anyone interested in the MLPA and where we go from here. Signed by 24 stakeholder representatives who served in the central California MLPA process, the statement reflects the recommendations of fishermen on how the MLPA process can be improved and the mistakes made so far. There was an item on the agenda for the Commission to take public testimony and discuss which subregion to choose for the next phase of the MLPA process. Many of the fishermen chose to speak on improving the public process rather than advocating one region over another. A group of fishermen from United Anglers of Southern California argued that the process should move north. Needless to say, most fishermen do not want any part of the MLPA process. The Commission decided to hold off their decision until they have a special meeting, most likely in Sacramento, to take public testimony from NorCalers on where to move the MLPA process next. The Commission gave us time on the agenda to present our peer review of the Socio-economic Analysis of the impacts of the proposed central California MPAs. Barbara Walker, Ph.D presented the review in a concise, easy-to-understand manner. The Commissioners became more engaged than usual and had a lot of discussion on how to improve the analysis in the future. In general, the Commission expressed a desire to regain control over the MLPA process. CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION MULLS CHANGES TO SPORTFISHING REGS The Fish & Game Commission is taking public testimony on possible changes to sportfishing regulations. There is a three-year cycle for this process and the final decision will be made in December in Los Angeles. Some changes are being proposed by the Department of Fish & Game (DFG) and others are being proposed by the public. RFA has been working with Jim DeMartini, who represents a group of sport crabbers out of Bodega, to make it a violation to pull somebody else's crab gear. This would seem like a no-brainer, but the regulatory process sets some tall hurdles. RFA-NorCal has attended long meetings with enforcement, local north coast prosecutors and defense attorneys, and we have testified before the Commission on this proposal. The proposal has widespread support after narrowing the scope of the regulation to the bare minimum. "After all that work on what we thought would be a simple matter, it is gratifying to see that the DFG has accepted our proposal," states Jim Martin, RFA-NorCal Chairman. The Commissioners were positive in their response on August 4 in Sacramento. RFA anticipates to put the brakes on crab thieves as early as this season. You can read all of the public's proposals, along with the Department's analysis & recommendations, here: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/2006/dfganalysisocean.pdf. Of those proposals, only a few made the cut as proposed regulations so far. You can read them here: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/2006/proposedregs06.htm#sf The only other major change for saltwater/anadramous fish to consider will be the proposed punch card and annual bag limit of three (3) on sturgeon, with a narrower slot limit (46"-60"). The RFA supports the punch card and annual bag limit, but we have questions about the narrower slot limit. |