RFA National News Releases

Thursday, March 01, 2007

 

RFA WINS ONE FOR ALASKA’S HALIBUT FISHERMEN

RFA Press Release Header

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 28, 2007 
CONTACT: James Donofrio

RFA WINS ONE FOR ALASKA’S HALIBUT FISHERMEN

 

Anchorage, AK- With the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) proposing a 50 percent cut in Halibut catch for Alaska's recreational anglers, the charter boat industry in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska were facing the threat of a potentially crippling reduction.  The IPHC proposal would have reduced the state's current bag limit from two halibut per day to only one, placing a severe strain on an industry that thrives on the high demand of anglers, both resident and non-resident, seeking halibut in Alaskan waters.

 

Last month the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) launched an intense lobbying effort with the full force of its entire membership, including a letter writing campaign to Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.  To further reinforce their efforts, RFA officials and Capt. Greg Sutter of the Alaska Charter Association met with high level Commerce and State Department officials to ensure that IPHC's proposal would be rejected.  "Although the IPHC voted to cut our bag limit, the decision was still subject to the approval of our government", stated Capt. Greg Sutter.

 

Members of the sportfishing community knew that a one-fish bag limit would not only devastate Alaska's recreational and tourism industries, but also undermine the recently re-authorized Magnuson Stevens Act (MSA), which mandates that all proposed regulations consider public input.  According to RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio, "We have fought long and hard to guarantee that decision-makers listen to and respond to the concerns of recreational anglers."

 

RFA continues to support and defend the rights of Alaska's sportfishermen as it has for the past twelve years.   

 

 

If you would no longer like to receive this press release, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

 

RFA NEWS 43rd EDITION

RFA Newsletter Header

February 15, 2007 Edition 43

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!


Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast


RFA SUPPORTS SAVE THE BAY

RFA is teaming up with Save the Bay and the Rhode Island Saltwalter Anglers to support the passage of bill H-5165, recently introduced by Representatives Raymond G. Gallison, Peter F. Kilmartin, Peter G. Palumbo, Peter T. Ginaitt, and Douglas W. Gablinske. This act would prohibit purse seining for the harvesting of Menhaden in Narragansett Bay and Rhode Island waters.

“The role of menhaden in the Narragansett ecosystem is a very significant one”, explains Rhode Island native and long-time angler Michael Laptew. “They are a filter feeder, capable of restoring the bay”. RFA’s stance is that this bill is essential to keeping Narransett Bay clean, thereby sustaining the regions fisheries.

RFA SEEKS FEDERAL PROTECTION

OF HISTORIC RECREATIOANL FISHERY

At the January 2007 Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) meeting, the final recommendation of the board in addressing rebuilding the tautog (tog) stock was to cut recreational harvest by 28.6% and “closely monitor” a perceived problem with the illegal tog fishery. This action angered many recreational fishermen who, through public comment and at public hearings on Addendum IV, have been asking the ASMFC to take the illegal fishery serious. In New Jersey, recreational anglers have gone on the record as early as 1991 pleading with fisheries managers to address this problem.

“After pleading for 15 years with no major response by ASMFC to address this problem, shame on us to think that anything but status quo will occur. We have got to try something different” states RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio. “The states are incapable of controlling the illegal fishery and ASMFC has exhibited habitual complacency concerning this matter. At this point, all options through the traditional channels are either exhausted or closed. We really see no other alternative than to rise above the bureaucracy of the ASMFC and pursue a solution through federal legislation.”

Since 1981, recreational tautog harvest, in numbers of fish and pounds landed, has decreased by 63.6% and 52.1% respectively. This level of reduction, combined with relatively stable legal commercial landings, was ineffective in spurring recovery and illustrates two important aspects of this fishery; it is unlikely any further reductions on the recreational sector will result in any improvement to the tog stock, and that a significant source of mortality is not currently accounted for in the management of the stock. All evidence points to a massive illegal fishery.

“The illegal tog fishery is out of control. We are reaching out to Congressman Frank Pallone to craft legislation in such a way, be it a no-sale provision or simply a ban on all tog sales, that States will be able to enforce the law with the resources available to them at this point in time” continues Donofrio. “It is irresponsible to pass regulations that are otherwise unenforceable in light of most State’s minimal budgets. Implementing a federal no-sale-of-tog law may in fact be the easiest and cheapest option for most States.”

The traditional tautog fishery is primarily a recreational fishery. Though not a glamorous fish, it carries a strong following in the private vessel sector as well as with shore based anglers. For party/charter boats and tackle businesses, tog filled gaps created when regulations on winter flounder and summer flounder shortened their seasons. Since the late 1980’s, tog biomass has been declining and fishing mortality rate remains above the F rate target.

RFA-TX FIGHTS 5 FISH REDUCTION IN LOWER LAGUNA MADRE

The Lower Laguna Madre ( LLM) is one of only five hyper-saline bay systems in the world - and two in Texas - characterized by high salinity, a shallow depth averaging 2’, and 75% grass covered bottom with very clear water.

Recently, a group of South Texas fishing enthusiasts have been pressuring the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) to reduce Speckled Trout limits from 10 to 5 fish and implement a "regionalization plan" where it could be managed as a separate fishery from the rest of the coast.

Currently, there is no evidence that gives validity to the claims that overfishing is occurring in the LLM. In fact TPW's own LLM project leader Randy Blankenship stated that this is "not a fishery in crisis". We at RFA-TX feel that there are more pressing issues that need to be addressed in the LLM such as fertilizer runoff and nutrient build up, water flow issues due to passes being silted shut and not maintained, and wastewater flow from the Arroyo Colorado. We feel that adjusting the daily limits is not a panacea and that, even if limits are reduced, we are still left with an ecosystem suffering from the aforementioned problems. Not to address those concerns would be careless and irresponsible. We feel that the matter deserves a much closer look before implementing a half measure solution.

RFA-TX has met with TPWD and the head of Coastal Fisheries, Dr. Larry McKinney, to express our concern for this matter in great detail. TPWD will make a final decision at the Commission meeting on April 4th and 5th in Austin, TX. We encourage all interested parties to attend and speak.

MLPA PROCESS HITS SNAG ON OPEN MEETINGS ACT

Responding to a question from RFA's Jim Martin, the legal counsel for the California Fish & Game Commission advised the commissioners that the Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act applies to the meetings of the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Science Advisory Team, which provided "guidance" for the design of the proposed network of marine protected areas (MPAs) in central California.

"I don't know if this is the silver bullet people have been hoping for in this highly unusual stakeholder process," said Martin, "but one thing is certain: the process will change for the better from here on, as a result of Deputy Attorney General William Cunningham's opinion." Rather than RFA using our own legal counsel to explore the question, we felt it would be better to ask the Commission's own counsel to provide advice to the Fish & Game Commission before the public process gets even more skewed in north-central California, the next phase of the MLPA implementation.

At issue is the lack of public notice, failure to provide the public with written materials, and lack of notice for subcommittees of the Science Advisory Team, also known as the "SAT." The SAT was composed of marine ecologists rather than fishery management scientists – and many of the scientists were recipients of grants from environmentalist foundations like Pew Charitable Trusts. "We had situations where meetings were announced the night before they occurred, rather than with ten days notice as required by law," reported Martin. "Even worse, subcommittees of the SAT were formed, developed policy guidelines, and these policies were presented to the F&G Commissioners, and the BRTF as agreed to by the whole team. The Bagley Keene Act requires, in our view, that the entire team meet and make motions, take votes, just as any legislatively authorized body, like the Fish & Game Commission, must do."

Special thanks go to Joel Greenberg, RFA-SoCal Chair, and commercial fisherman William James, who did the research on Bagley Keene and passed the information on to the California Fisheries Coalition, a partnership of over 25 fishing associations in California formed to deal with the MLPA. To learn more about the MLPA, visit www.fishpolitics.com.

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

RFA Newsletter Footer


 

FW: RFA NEWS 42nd EDITION

 

RFA Newsletter Header

 

January 26, 2007 Edition 42

 

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!


Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast


 

NOAA FISHERIES ANNOUNCES 2007 FLUKE LIMIT

 

Silver Spring, MD- Summer flounder, also known as fluke, has been at the center of much debate since last summer. With National Marine Fisheries Service proposing a crippling harvest level for 2007, the recreational fishing industry feared it would not have any fluke season at all.

 

In 2006, fluke anglers enjoyed a total allowable landing (TAL) of 23 million pounds split between the commercial and recreational communities. This season, however, the fluke TAL will see a 6 million pound decrease. This TAL cut was brought about by an emergency rule in an effort to rebuild the stock. Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA), limits are placed on summer flounder in an effort to rebuild their stock. This season’s 17.112 million pound limit was authorized by a recent amendment to the MSA, which was signed into law on January 19th, and is estimated at having a 75% probability of achieving the rebuilding goal.

 

“When we had originally heard the proposed five million pound limit last summer, it was obvious that the very concept would be devastating to fluke anglers on the east coast”, explained Jim Donofrio, executive director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA). “Thankfully, some members of congress were willing to explore an alternative for rebuilding. Our request was for a five year extension, and we’ve been given three years.”

 

While the recreational fishing industry has been given some reprieve, it will still feel some pain this season. Donofrio stated “RFA recognizes that this amendment does not address the long-term issues concerning Fisheries Management or keeping the recreational community fishing. It is unfortunate that we haven’t been granted flexibility for the management of all species.”

 

Fluke is the most popular species of fish harvested by recreational anglers in the mid-Atlantic region, bringing in over $300 million in revenue to communities up and down the east coast. 

 

 

 

 

IPHC CUTS ALASKA’S HALIBUT BAG LIMIT

 

As the result of a closed meeting held earlier this month, the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) has taken the liberty of cutting Alaska’s recreational halibut bag limit by 50%, allowing only one per person.  What truly disturbs us about this decision is that the IPHC decided the fate of Alaska’s sportfishing not in Alaska, but in Canada.   This action severely undermines the newly reauthored Magnuson Stevens Act (MSA), under which we are assured a transparent process with public involvement. At this time, RFA is urging the US State Department and US Department of Commerce to investigate the legitimacy of this process.

 

 

 

PACIFIC COUNCIL ADOPTS NEW RULES ON KLAMATH SALMON AND TUNA BAG LIMITS

 

            Paving the way for a 2007 recreational salmon season, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council passed an amendment to the Salmon Fishery Management Plan that would allow for "de minimus" ocean fisheries to occur, even when the conservation goals of 35,000 natural spawner Fall Chinook salmon are not predicted to return. This gives the Council guidance about how to craft ocean salmon seasons without getting approval for an emergency rule from the U. S. Commerce Department when the fall run is projected to be poor. While recreational anglers were relieved by the decision, which is likely to be approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), commercial salmon trollers can hope at best to hang on by their fingernails. The inside skinny was that this amendment would lead to fairly decent recreational seasons in California and Oregon, because our impacts on Klamath stocks are minimal compared to the commercial fleet. The Council also adopted a new bag limit on albacore tuna, with a ten fish bag south of Pt. Conception and a twenty-five fish bag north to the Oregon border. This option was supported by the RFA and all of California's sportfishing advocates.

 

 

DOUBLE SHOT A DOUBLE SUCCESS!

 

                On January 16 captains and crews from over 40 of the finest sportfishing yachts on the East Coast gathered under the big top at Sailfish Marina for the kick off of the 2007 Palm Beach Double Shot—the simultaneous running of the 44th Annual Buccaneer Cup and the 5th Annual Fish for Life Sailfish Release Tournaments. This unique event was the culmination of months of planning and hard work by the tournament directors and a staff of dedicated volunteers. It resulted in four days of competitive fishing, great parties, camaraderie and big donations for the tournament’s beneficiaries.

                The Buccaneer Cup, a legend in the billfishing community for over four decades, now benefits the Recreational Fishing Alliance—saltwater fishing’s acclaimed political action organization. The Fish for Life donates its proceeds to the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania and the Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, both research and treatment centers for special cancers.

                The captain’s meeting and accompanying party was attended by several hundred who enjoyed the food, open bar and music by Rip Tide. The Buc kicked off the next day with teams allowed to fish three of the next four days, while the FFL started on Thursday, fishing two of three days so both events would culminate on Saturday, January 20 with a five-star dinner at the exclusive Sailfish Club in Palm Beach. The overwhelming majority of teams entered both events.

                Day one, Buccaneer Cup only, saw the live bait specialists on the Sandman jump off to a commanding lead with only 15 boats releasing a total of 39 fish. Ditch Digger had four on dead bait for second place and the classic Rybovich, Glory Days, trolled three for 600 points.

                Day two saw 32 boats fish, but it was a tough day on the water with only 35 fish caught. Sandman took a lay day and managed to stay in first in the Buc with Streaker tying at 1200 and jumping into first place in the FFL. Anejo trolled four for 800 point and second in the FFL.

                Day three dawned dark and breezy, but it didn’t do much for the fishing. A cold front was needed to get the sails snapping and it just wasn’t in the forecast. It closed with 42 fish released, Streaker surging ahead of Sandman in the Buc and staying in first in the FFL. Kids Stuff had a hot day increasing to 1400 release points, third place in the Buc and second in the FFL.

                Day four and the fishing got a little hotter with the scores tightening up under bright, sunny skies. Sandman fought back into the lead pushing their points total up to 2300 while the Streaker crew did their best to keep them honest raising their points total to 2200. Close behind also at 2200 was Kids Stuff and Anejo with Catch One tallying ten releases the last day, but not enough to get into the running after weak showings earlier in the events.

                The finals for the Buccaneer Cup were Sandman taking first place with all their releases on live bait; Streaker trolling their way to a strong second and Kids Stuff in third. Finals for the Fish for Life saw Anejo trolling up a first place win, Streaker in second and Kids Stuff in third.

                The teams gathered that evening at the Sailfish Club where Buc tournament director and Saltwater Sportsman Offshore Editor, Gary Caputi, played host and emcee to a packed crowd of nearly 300 for an evening of celebration, great food and libation. The capper for the two tournaments was the money raised, over $50,000 by the Fish for Life for cancer research and treatment, and over $70,000 for the Recreational Fishing Alliance to continue its strong political representation of saltwater anglers. The entire event was first class from start to finish and a truly premiere billfish event. For more information and to register for next year’s Palm Beach Double Shot go to www.buccaneercup.com and www.fishforlife.org.

                The staff of the Buccaneer Cup would like to thank their sponsors: Merrill-Lynch; Rybovich; Detroit Diesel/MTU; American Custom Yachts; Release Marine; Viking Yachts; Murray Products; Lowrance Electronics; Integrity Marine; Saltwater Sportsman; Motor Boating; Yachting; HMY Yacht Sales; Awlgrip Yacht Coatings; Interlux Yacht Paint; Black Bart Tackle; Hi-Seas Line; American Fishing Wire; Bill Buckland’s Fisherman’s Center and Canyon Gear International.

                The staff of Fish for Life would like to thank their sponsors: Caterpillar Marine Power and their participating distributors Ransome, Pantropic and Gregory Poole; Merrill-Lynch; Viking Yachts; Ocean Yachts; HMY Yacht Sales; MarineMax; ZF Transmissions; Christi Marine; Strataglass; Black Bart Tackle; Bluewater Chairs; Hydro Glow; Sea View; Canyon Gear International and Fisherman’s Center.

 

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

 

RFA Newsletter Footer

 


 

FW: RFA NEWS 41st Edition

 

RFA Newsletter Header

 

January 12, 2007 Edition 42

 

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!


Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast


HALIBUT ACTION ALERT

            Your action is needed now. The fate of sport fishing for halibut in Alaska will be decided in Canada, not the U.S.A., behind closed doors by the commercial fishing industry during the week of January 15, 2007.

 

Currently, Alaska's commercial fleets harvest over 90% of the US halibut quota and kill over 12 million pounds in bycatch alone.  This waste associated with commercial bycatch is close to double the amount that sport anglers catch.  Despite this unbalanced allocation, commercial halibut longliners are strongly pushing to cut recreational bag limits in half just so they can have more fish to sell.  The methods used to pursue these proposed cuts are extremely troublesome.

           

Halibut are managed under an international treaty between the U.S.A. and Canada by an organization called the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). The IPHC's main job is to continually monitor the health of the halibut biomass and then determine how many pounds of halibut can be harvested in a given year. That harvest amount gets divided between the U.S., and Canada. Under usual circumstances, the allowable catch for halibut is then managed federally by the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council (NPFMC), under the control of the National Marine Fisheries Service. NPFMC as well as the other seven federal management councils in the U.S. was established by the Magnuson-Stevens Act which mandates proper guidelines and insures public involvement in the process.

 

            This normal process is being subverted in a foreign country by the IPHC which is completely controlled by commercial fishing interests. Ironically, the Magnuson-Stevens Act which bears the name of Alaska's prominent senator, Senator Ted Stevens, is being subverted by commercial interests from the Senator's own state, and their actions will adversely effect Alaskan residents and visitors alike.

 

            We cannot allow this to happen. The Magnuson-Stevens Act was recently reauthorized by our Congress in 2006 and dictates a transparent process with public input.  It is necessary that you call, fax, or email Dr. William Hogarth, Assistant Administrator NOAA Fisheries, Senator Ted Stevens from Alaska, and your local Senator immediately.  Let them know that fishermen will not stand for this action and that the management of the halibut charter fishery must remain with the NPFMC and the US.  Please call, write and fax your concerns today.

           

 

Dr. William T. Hogarth                                     Senator Ted Stevens

National Marine Fisheries Service                                 United States Senate from Alaska

301 301-2239 phone                                                   202 224-3004 phone

301 713-1940 fax                                                        202 224-3004 fax 

bill.hogarth@noaa.gov                                     

 

 

Use the following URL to find your Senator

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

 

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

 

RFA Newsletter Footer

 


Wednesday, October 11, 2006

 

RFA Launches All-Star TX Board

RFA Press Release Header

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 11, 2006 
CONTACT: James Donofrio

RFA Launches All-Star TX Board

 

October 4, 2006, Houston, TX- RFA is proud to announce the formation of an all-star TX Board of Directors. This diverse group of individuals will be leading the charge to create the Texas Great Barrier Reef Project (TGBRP).  

 

The TGBRP will be the world's largest artificial reef program, of which will create an artificial reefing corridor spanning the entire length of the Texas coast.  The reef will be positioned in state waters from 7.5 to 8.5 miles off of the beach varying 40-90 ft in depth.  The TGBRP will extend from Port Isabel to Sabine Pass, and be divided into 5 segments due to shipping lanes.

 

"This was a vision of RFA-TX board members and will prove to be the conservation move of the century affecting numerous species," states Jim Smarr, RFA-TX State Chairman.  Up to 4,000 artificial reefs per year will be deployed in an effort to provide Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for red snapper and a multitude of other sportfish species important to our coastal economies including kingfish, grouper, ling, dorado, redfish, tarpon, flounder, sea trout, sailfish and mahi-mahi.

 

"The TGBR is like the second wall on the Alamo, when the first wall falls, i.e. NMFS, it reduces our snapper limits down to one, then we Texans will rally behind TGBR and make our stand," states Tom Hilton, RFA-TX. "We intend to illustrate to our federal fisheries managers that with a proactive artificial reefing program, we will be able to produce more snapper annually in four years than the TAC in the entire Gulf of Mexico."

 

RFA is requesting all fishermen who enjoy fishing Texas waters to help and join RFA-TX in promoting and funding this remarkable project. "After leaving the Houston meeting, I am very excited with this dynamic group of talented and dedicated individuals who will make Texas a better place for fish and fishermen," states Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director. 

 

The new board consists of State Chairman, Jim Smarr; Membership Chairman, Mikel Stapleton and Tom Hilton; Media Chairman, Dan Bulla; Treasury and Access Committee, Buddy Wheeler and Jerry Wheeler; Randy Davis, Charlie Everts, Bobby Grumbles, Tom Hilton, Steve Morris, Chris Pratka, Mark Schweitzer, Chris Thompson, Chuck Tylka, Ann Appling and Hefner Appling.

 

Support RFA-TX, visit http://www.rfatexas.org or contact State Chairman, Jim Smarr at jimsmarr@austin.rr.com or (361) 463-1558.

 

To learn more on the TGBRP, visit http://www.texasgreatbarrierreef.com and watch the Fox 29 News clip at:

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=1035042&version=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1.

If you would no longer like to receive this press release, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

 

RFA News Edition 40

RFA Newsletter Header

October 11, 2006 Edition 40

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast

"HOLE IN ONE" FUNDRAISER FOR RFA-TX
CONGRESSMAN PALLONE AND RFA IN AGREEMENT ON WEAKFISH
MASSACHUSETTS DMF ADDRESSES DOGFISH PROBLEM
RFA PRESENTS REPORT TO CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION ON MLPA
CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION MULLS CHANGES TO SPORTFISHING REGS

"HOLE IN ONE" FUNDRAISER FOR RFA-TX

The "Golf of Mexico" Tournament proved to be a great success. RFA-TX along with the Texas Great Barrier Reef Project (TGBR) held a national fundraiser in Houston on Wednesday, October 5th to support future of the Gulf of Mexico fisheries.

Fishermen from around the region showed their support for RFA and the TGBR Project. Golfers teamed up in fours for an 18-hole game on the scenic Wildcat Golf Course exhibiting t umbling fairways amidst wetlands and natural grass fields with spectacular panoramas of the Houston skyline . Following the tournament was an awards dinner and auction where RFA-TX introduced their board of directors and described the exciting TGBR Project. Auction items included full-day fishing trips, hunting trips, dinner reservations and luxurious Sakowitz Furs. "The 'Golf of Mexico' Tournament was an exciting event at a great golf course, states Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director. "We are expecting there will be a larger turnout next year and to eventually grow into a Pro AM event."

The TGBRP will be the world's largest artificial reef program, of which will create an artificial reefing corridor spanning the entire length of the Texas coast. The reef will be positioned in state waters from 7.5 to 8.5 miles off of the beach varying 40-90 ft in depth. The TGBRP will extend from Port Isabel to Sabine Pass, and be divided into 5 segments due to shipping lanes.

"This was a vision of RFA-TX board members and will prove to be the conservation move of the century affecting numerous species," states Jim Smarr, RFA-TX State Chairman. Up to 4,000 artificial reefs per year will be deployed in an effort to provide Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for red snapper and a multitude of other sportfish species important to our coastal economies including kingfish, grouper, ling, dorado, redfish, tarpon, flounder, sea trout, sailfish and mahi-mahi.

RFA would like to thank the sponsors and participants who supported the "Golf of Mexico" Fundraiser. Your contributions to the TGBR will leave an everlasting legacy for the future of Texas fisheries.

Support RFA-TX, visit http://www.rfatexas.org or contact State Chairman, Jim Smarr at jimsmarr@austin.rr.com or (361) 463-1558.

To learn more on the TGBRP, visit http://www.texasgreatbarrierreef.com and watch the Fox 29 News clip at:

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=1035042&version=2&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1.

CONGRESSMAN PALLONE AND RFA IN AGREEMENT ON WEAKFISH

The following letter was written by Congressman Frank Pallone urging ASMFC to adopt no further reductions for weakfish.

September 26, 2006

Mr. Preston P. Pate, Jr.

Chairman

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

1444 Eye St., NW , 6th Floor

Washington , D.C. 20005

Dear Chairman Pate:

On behalf of fishermen in my congressional district, I am writing to urge that the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) adopt the status quo option when it finalizes Draft Addendum II to Amendment 4 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Weakfish.

As you know, weakfish is one of the most popular species among recreational fishermen. Given the chance that drastic reductions could be made in the 2007 summer flounder quota, there is a distinct possibility that fishermen could see severe reductions in two major fishing opportunities, with serious economic repercussions.

Moreover, as was the case during consideration of Draft Addendum I, there is still no scientific evidence that fishing mortality is the cause of the recent decline in the size of the weakfish stock. As noted in Draft Addendum II, "[t]he SAS does not attribute the large decline in biomass to this slight rise in fishing mortality. Natural mortality has risen and has become a much greater portion of total mortality than fishing mortality."

It would simply be unfair to penalize fishermen for a stock decline that is not connected to fishing mortality. There is little reason to believe that a further reduction in fishing mortality would solve the current decline in weakfish biomass. There are clearly natural factors at work, even though the Commission's scientific advisors do not seem to understand them well.

It is troubling that, more than a year after the Weakfish Management Board delayed action, there is still very little understanding of what is causing the weakfish stock to decline. I am also concerned that the peer review panel did not support the conclusions of the Technical Assessment Committee's stock assessment report. Clearly, there is more scientific work to be done to better understand what is happening to this stock, and I urge the TAC and the Commission to do more as soon as possible.

Now is not the time to further restrict fishermen, but to work more to understand what is affecting the biomass levels. I hope that you will take my comments under consideration and retain the status quo for fishing levels.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

FRANK PALLONE, JR.

Member of Congress

RFA's weakfish comments will be posted on www.joinrfa.org.

MASSACHUSETTS DMF ADDRESSES DOGFISH PROBLEM

The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries (Mass DMF) has taken advantage of recent spiny dogfish stock assessments to initiate a movement to reopen a small-scale directed commercial fishery for the species. The scientific analysis to support this movement to reopen this fishery was presented to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) by Mass DMF Deputy Director Dr. David Pierce. The highlights of that analysis identity the fact that spiny dogfish is no longer overfished, that overfishing is not occurring and predation on juvenile cod by dogfish is hampering cod rebuilding efforts.

Over the past several years, spiny dogfish have infested both the inshore and offshore areas of Massachusetts Bay and the Gulf of Maine. Both the party/charter boat and private vessel recreational angling communities have been severely affected by the infestation of this species. On the offshore grounds, tuna fishing along with groundfish fishing have seen trips steadily become efforts in futility. Dogfish are so thick that boats are at times surrounded by the hundreds of dogfish. Natural baits intended for tuna, bluefish, and groundfish are immediately inhaled by the swarms of the dogfish. Some charter captains even report that they can hear the dogfish bumping into the hull of their boats. The inshore waters have experience those same problems while targeting striped bass, fluke, winter flounder and sea bass.

Currently, the ASMFC annual coast-wide commercial quota for spiny dogfish is 4 million pounds with a 600-pound trip limit. This basically equates to a by-catch fishery. Under the proposals set forth by Mass DMF, the spiny dogfish quota would increase to 6 million pounds and there would be a 3,000-pound daily trip limit. These increases would allow for a small-scale directed commercial fishery which would be a welcoming event for the recreational sector in Massachusetts. The ASMFC will be addressing this issue at the October meeting and will likely hand down a decision for the 2007 fishing year.

RFA PRESENTS REPORT TO CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION ON MLPA

RFA's Jim Martin attended the California Fish & Game Commission meeting on October 5-7 in San Diego and presented the California Fisheries Coalition "Lessons Learned" document, now available for download at http://cafisheriescoalition.org.

This is an excellent document worth reading by anyone interested in the MLPA and where we go from here. Signed by 24 stakeholder representatives who served in the central California MLPA process, the statement reflects the recommendations of fishermen on how the MLPA process can be improved and the mistakes made so far.

There was an item on the agenda for the Commission to take public testimony and discuss which subregion to choose for the next phase of the MLPA process. Many of the fishermen chose to speak on improving the public process rather than advocating one region over another. A group of fishermen from United Anglers of Southern California argued that the process should move north. Needless to say, most fishermen do not want any part of the MLPA process. The Commission decided to hold off their decision until they have a special meeting, most likely in Sacramento, to take public testimony from NorCalers on where to move the MLPA process next.

The Commission gave us time on the agenda to present our peer review of the Socio-economic Analysis of the impacts of the proposed central California MPAs. Barbara Walker, Ph.D presented the review in a concise, easy-to-understand manner. The Commissioners became more engaged than usual and had a lot of discussion on how to improve the analysis in the future. In general, the Commission expressed a desire to regain control over the MLPA process.

CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION MULLS CHANGES TO SPORTFISHING REGS

The Fish & Game Commission is taking public testimony on possible changes to sportfishing regulations. There is a three-year cycle for this process and the final decision will be made in December in Los Angeles. Some changes are being proposed by the Department of Fish & Game (DFG) and others are being proposed by the public.

RFA has been working with Jim DeMartini, who represents a group of sport crabbers out of Bodega, to make it a violation to pull somebody else's crab gear. This would seem like a no-brainer, but the regulatory process sets some tall hurdles. RFA-NorCal has attended long meetings with enforcement, local north coast prosecutors and defense attorneys, and we have testified before the Commission on this proposal. The proposal has widespread support after narrowing the scope of the regulation to the bare minimum.

"After all that work on what we thought would be a simple matter, it is gratifying to see that the DFG has accepted our proposal," states Jim Martin, RFA-NorCal Chairman. The Commissioners were positive in their response on August 4 in Sacramento. RFA anticipates to put the brakes on crab thieves as early as this season. You can read all of the public's proposals, along with the Department's analysis & recommendations, here: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/2006/dfganalysisocean.pdf. Of those proposals, only a few made the cut as proposed regulations so far. You can read them here: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/2006/proposedregs06.htm#sf

The only other major change for saltwater/anadramous fish to consider will be the proposed punch card and annual bag limit of three (3) on sturgeon, with a narrower slot limit (46"-60"). The RFA supports the punch card and annual bag limit, but we have questions about the narrower slot limit.

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

RFA Newsletter Footer

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

 

RFA News Edition 39

RFA Newsletter Header
September 12, 2006 Edition 39

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast

RFA-TX "GOLF OF MEXICO" FUNDRAISER
TEXAS GREAT BARRIER REEF PROJECT
RFA STATE CHAPTER INITIATIVE
HERRING PLAN NEEDS SUPPORT NOW
CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME COMMISSION BOWS TO COMPAIGN POLITICS ON MPAS
RANDY FRY TOURNAMENT
FLUKE DILEMMA HAS MANY ASKING WHY
MIKE LEECH JOINS WORLD CUP


RFA-TX "GOLF OF MEXICO" FUNDRAISER

RFA-TX along with the Texas Great Barrier Reef are holding the first annual "Golf of Mexico" Fundraiser Thursday, October 5, 2006. The format is a four-person modified scramble, and awards will be given for the low gross team, longest drive, closest to the pin, Hole in One (wins a 2006 automobile) and more. Individuals and teams are welcome!

Registration and lunch begins at 10:00 AM, with review of play and shotgun start at 12:00 PM.  A post tournament awards dinner and auction will follow at 6:00 PM.

For more information or to register online, please visit www.rfagolfofmexico.golfreg.com or contact the Tournament Chairman, Mark Schweitzer at (713) 960-9000.

TEXAS GREAT BARRIER REEF PROJECT

Due to the fact that our federal fishery managers are looking to reduce the recreational Red Snapper bag limit in federal water to 2 fish per person, we are looking to promote fishing for this species in Texas State waters. The Texas Great Barrier Reef Project (TGBRP) is a Public/Private program dedicated to the construction of an artificial reefing corridor spanning the entire length of Texas Coast positioned in State Waters from 7.5 to 8.5 miles off of the beach. The TGBRP will extend from Port Isabel to Sabine Pass, and be divided into 5 segments due to shipping lanes. Up to 4,000 artificial reefs per year will be deployed in an effort to provide Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for Red Snapper and a multitude of other sport fish species important to our Coastal Economies. EFH is being lost at an alarming rate due to the removal of oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico resulting in the detriment to our fisheries. In addition to providing badly needed EFH, this reefing project would restore a badly needed winter red snapper season inside Texas State waters. Texas has lost hundreds of millions of dollars due to no winter fishery, and stands to lose millions more if the Federal Red Snapper limits are further reduced as threatened by Roy Crabtree at the latest Gulf Council Meeting in Baton Rouge - thus the absolute need for the TGBRP. Alabama has been very successful with their artificial reef program and now accounts for 40% of all recreationally caught Red Snapper in the ENTIRE Gulf, even though their coastline is 1/9th the length of the Texas coastline. This success equates into countless of millions of dollars to THEIR Coastal Communities. This was accomplished through the development of permit reefing areas on a scale that cannot be over-exploited by recreational or commercial fishermen (1,260 sq. miles of reefing areas) and is key to this success story. We need to emulate their success here in Texas - reefing projects in the past and presently proposed by TPWD lack the vision shared by Alabama and the TGBRP. We need the leadership and vision presented by TGBRP in order to prevent the over-exploitation of the fish stocks on the reefs, and in the long term, loss of Billions of dollars to key coastal communities generated by offshore fishermen. Part of our team at TGBRP is Dick Stone, who headed up the National Artificial Reefing Program, providing a wealth of experience and knowledge in putting together Public/Private Artificial Reefing Program.

TGBRP will be done in 3 phases; Phase 1 will include the segments between Galveston and Freeport, and Port Aransas to Port Oconnor. Second phase will include the segments between Galveston and Sabine Pass and Freeport to Port Oconnor. Third phase will extend from Port Oconnor to Port Isabel. Projected time frame for initial reef deployments; Spring 2007. The TGBR has applied for $5 Million/year in CIAP Funding, which, if approved, will be distributed in spring 2007.

To learn more, please visit www.texasgreatbarrierreef.com or call (281) 431-0925.

RFA STATE CHAPTER INITIATIVE

The RFA is in the process of formally launching several state chapters across the country.  Although local RFA volunteers have worked together for years, it is only through a truly unified recreational fishing community that we will be able to continue protecting recreational fishing from the many forces that want to limit or eliminate our access to and right to fish for our natural fisheries resources. 

With thousands of members nationally, RFA has clearly been the most effective political action organization in the country in representing the rights of recreational fishermen and protecting the future of, and access to, our nation's fisheries.

RFA currently has state chapter volunteers working hard at the local level leading the fight against numerous critical issues affecting your right and access to fish.  RFA was built on grassroots membership, which has been the key to its success. We are reaching out to our local members who have to knowledge and networking contacts necessary to help move RFA forward.

If you are interested in leading the drive to strengthen RFA, contact Jessica Knox, RFA Grassroots Coordinator at (609) 404-1060, jknox@joinrfa.org or contact your state chapter chair posted on www.joinrfa.org.

HERRING PLAN NEEDS SUPPORT NOW

For several years, there has been a lot of concern from recreational and commercial fishermen, as well as whale-watch operators and environmentalists, about the large quantities of herring that are being removed annually from near-shore Gulf of Maine waters by large, efficient midwater trawlers. Herring serve as critically important forage for groundfish, tuna, striped bass, bluefish, whales and other marine mammals, but in recent years, it appears that virtually entire schools of herring are being removed from specific areas (called "localized depletion"), resulting in lack of feed for these important predators.

The New England Fishery Management Council has been crafting a new herring management plan for over a year now (known as Scallop Amendment 1), which would, among other things, ban midwater herring trawling in a region within 30 miles of the coast from Cape Cod to Canada (known as Herring Management Area 1A) from June 1st through September 30th annually. This would allow traditional fisheries for bluefin tuna and groundfish, as well as whale-watching, to be conducted during the summer months without the threat of localized herring depletion, which causes predators to move to other areas in search of food. However, the plan was not approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in time for the '06 season (and still has not as of early September) so the big trawlers have been pounding our coastal waters with their huge nets all summer.

Besides herring depletion, waste and bycatch have been serious concerns as well. A letter written to Dr. Bill Hogarth, the head of NMFS in Washington, DC, on July 20th by Rich Ruais, Executive Director of East Coast Tuna Association, sums up the problem. Rich wrote:
        
"I have confirmed through personal conversations with two tuna captains who have made direct observations of a massive dumping of dead herring, whale codfish, haddock and, at least one seal on the northern end of Jeffreys Ledge on July 19th, 2006, in the late afternoon.  In my conversations with the reporting captains, I insisted there be no embellishment to their description of the sighting of the dumped fish.
        
"The dead fish slick was seen to extend for at least one mile and was estimated to be a minimum of 100 yards across.  The captains reported the numbers of discarded cod and haddock visible was very substantial. Both captains reported seeing two midwater trawl vessels in the immediate area treading water.  Neither captain actually witnessed the dumping of the catch, so it is not definitively known if the two midwater boats seen were the offending vessels.  I have the name of the vessels seen in the immediate area.
        
"One of the tuna captains used a shrimp basket to quickly collect two boxes (200 lbs.) of bait and several of the whale cod from the slick for personal use.  He reported the cod to be very fresh, so the dumping most likely occurred earlier that day.  Both captains reported they could not cross the slick for fear of clogging their engine cooling strainers due to the density of floating herring.  Tuna fishermen, including these two captains, have sighted two dead whales (one small humpback and one minke whale) in the same area, although one of the whales was in such poor shape it was obvious that it was in the water prior to this recent dumping. 
       
"I cannot convey to you the outrage and disgust of tuna and groundfish fishermen over this situation.  There is very little tuna fishing effort this summer because most of the General and Harpoon Category fishermen do not believe there is adequate forage in the Gulf of Maine to hold visiting giant bluefins.
         
"I am copying the State (Marine Fisheries) Directors on this note with the hope that some will try and investigate this recent dumping and do all in their power to prevent further incidents.  I have also asked East Coast Tuna Association fish dealers to provide free disposable cameras to the few boats trying to document additional dumping incidents.
         
"What can NMFS do to correct this waste and damage to the discrete coastal herring stock from continuing?  Recent NMFS trawl surveys are showing a 50 percent decline in coastal herring abundance, confirming our reports that herring in the Gulf of Maine are in trouble.  At a minimum, can NMFS redeploy observers to 100 percent of the midwater herring fleet attempting to fish in Area 1A? I hope NMFS will recognize the seriousness of this situation."
 
Since the time this letter was written, a NMFS observer who was aboard one of the herring trawlers, implicated with the incident, confirmed that there was indeed a "dump" of an estimated 10,000 pounds of herring on July 19th. According to Rich, the observer claimed she was "too high up on the boat" to see any groundfish or mammals in the net. Could it be that the operator of the trawler knew that he had cod and/or mammals in the bottom of the net, and thus chose to dump the remaining herring and bycatch rather than risk exposing it to the observer?
 
There have been a number of credible reports this summer of similar herring dumping and bycatch incidents by midwater trawlers. RFA members are encouraged to contact Dr. Hogarth at (301) 713-2239; fax (301) 713-1940; email: bill.hogarth@noaa.gov. Tell him that Scallop Amendment 1, as submitted, needs to be approved and implemented as soon as possible, that 150-foot midwater herring trawlers have no place in the near-shore waters of the Gulf of Maine, and that these industrial-scale fish-extraction operations are far better suited to offshore waters where they will not impact small-boat commercial and recreational fishermen and whale watching. Above all, tell him we need a responsible herring fishery that will allow a good percentage of herring to remain in the sea as a forage base for a wide variety of fish and animals. That's the real message. 

For more information, contact Capt. Barry Gibson, New England Regional Director at 207-633-5929 or barrygibson6@aol.com
 
     CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME COMMISSION BOWS TO CAMPAIGN POLITICS ON MPAS
 
The California Fish and Game Commission voted to approve a network of marine protected areas (MPAs) along the central coast at its August 15th meeting in Monterey, after a two-year public process. That public process was largely ignored by the administration and the Commission.  However, the news media swarmed to cover the meeting, which turned out to be one of Governor Schwarzenegger's campaign events. Eager to convince the state's independent voters that he is "strong on environmental issues," the Governor's campaign staff took an active interest in the Commission's decision.

The Commission chose the most restrictive options possible and made these decisions with full knowledge that existing fishery management has succeeded in rebuilding important west coast fish stocks such as lingcod. They overrode many of the recommendations of the professional biologists on staff for the Department of Fish & Game (DFG).

New closures may affect fishing grounds at Ano Neuvo, Natural Bridges, Elkhorn Slough, the Monterey Peninsula, Point Sur, Big Creek, Piedras Blancas, Cambria, Point Buchon and Vandenburg.

Environmentalists, animal rights activists and self-appointed shore patrol monitors openly mocked the fishing public who lost treasured public access. They belittled commercial fishermen and charter operators who were put out of business completely with a stroke of the pen.

News reports characterized the no fishing zones as being relatively small. About 8 percent of the region between Point Conception and Pigeon Point was designated as "protected" and no-take marine reserves, they said. Additionally another 8 percent of the area was severely restricted for bottomfishing. Less than 20 percent of the region is suitable habitat for rockfish, and even less than that is prime fishing grounds. Sited incorrectly, these percentages amount to a near-total closure for bottomfishing in Central California. Based on the Fish & Game Commission's vote on August 15th, they intended to do just that.

Significantly, recreational spearfishermen did not get as harshly affected as expected during this process, despite the many proposals to ban spearfishing. Anti-fishing activists showed the Commission a video of a recent spearfishing competition at Carmel hosted by CENCAL dive clubs. Bob Humphrey and Dave Edlund, both participants in the MLPA regional stakeholder group, were shown bringing in nice stringers of fish, including a twenty-seven pound lingcod that was the biggest lingcod Edlund ever shot throughout his diving experience. These contests have been conducted for over fifty years, and the DFG has valuable data from these events. The DFG says that the catches have been stable in length and weight over that time, showing a health in our fisheries that is ignored by most news media reports. Certainly, the video of large catches being made a stone's throw from the meeting hall did not match up with claims that "rockfish are at 5 percent of their historical levels."

Where do we go from here? The rulemaking process is just beginning for the implementation of the closures in central California.  The RFA has been establishing an administrative record along with many other fishing groups. The proposals need to pass through the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This law requires that any project like the implementation of MPAs do not cause more environmental harm than good. Obviously, the shift in fishing effort will cause environmental impacts to the remaining open areas. The shift in the DFG's financial resources toward MPA research may be even more harmful to important resources the Department is already tasked to protect. Until the regulatory process has been completed it is crucial that anglers and divers stay engaged and ready to defend their interests. These objections, when made through the proper channels, can result in a scaling-back of the reserves. Beyond that, we need to support the elected officials that understand our plight. They make the laws like the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) that cause us so much heartburn.
 
Despite this temporary setback, the RFA-NorCal Advisory Board voted to continue its support for the California Fisheries Coalition and remain engaged in the MLPA process as it moves to other regions. The latest word from our sources in the DFG is that the next region under consideration will be from Pigeon Point to Point Arena.

RANDY FRY TOURNAMENT

Ocean Cove Campground, located about 20 miles north of Jenner on the spectacular Sonoma coast, once again, hosts the annual Randy Fry Tournament. The "Randy Fry" began as a freediver's tournament and this year expands to other fishing modes such as shore angling, kayak angling and surf fishing. Ocean Cove has a protected shore launch, but it's best for kayaks, nimble inflatable skiffs or small fiberglass boats under 18 feet in length. The campground sits on a bluff with million-dollar views of the Pacific Ocean, and the nearby fishing grounds are loaded with large rockfish and plentiful abalone. Trophies will be awarded for the largest abalone, lingcod, surf perch and vermillion rockfish, and contestants can compete in a variety of categories for nearshore recreational fishing: Freediving, Shore Angling and Surf Fishing, Kayak Anglers and more. The $20 entry fee includes a gourmet meal with tasty chowder and our world famous rockfish fry. Clavey River Equipment in Petaluma will offer a kayak angling demonstration, and the Sonoma County Abalone Network has provided us with a Wilderness Systems kayak to raffle. Proceeds benefit the RFA-NorCal Chapter, which led the way for recreational anglers and divers throughout the MLPA process.

For more information about the Randy Fry Tourney, call 707-357-3422 or contact Ocean Cove Campground at 23125 Coast Highway One (15 miles north of Jenner), call 707-847-3422.

FLUKE DILEMMA HAS MANY ASKING WHY

Posted by the Asbury Park Press on September 1, 2006.

The following article was written by Karen E. Wall, editor of Hook, Line & Sinker (kwall@app.com) asking the question, "What's first, fish or people?"

In my college biology lab 20 years ago, we were admonished to be sure the equipment we used was meticulously clean because outside contaminants could and would affect the outcomes of various experiments.  Twenty years later, it seems to me that this basic logic is being ignored when it comes to fisheries science and fisheries management.  The result is the crisis we're facing with the summer flounder fishery.  And make no mistake, it is a crisis.  In a state where every penny is being counted, where the cost of living is outstripping the ability to meet those costs at every turn, the prospect of job losses is a scary thing.

In Monmouth and Ocean counties, we're already dealing with the blow of the impending closure of Fort Monmouth and the job loss that will go with it. The impact of that on our economy has yet to be seen.

Now, another significant industry - fluke fishing - is under attack. An industry that produces $200 million annually and contributes 4,000 jobs - many of those here in Monmouth and Ocean counties - is facing the possibility of a shutdown and while those affected are very worried, those who can fix the mess - Congress and the Bush administration - are doing nothing to give them hope.

The issue isn't just the quota the National Marine Fisheries Service wants to inflict on the fishery. And the issue isn't merely the amendment in the pending House of Representatives version of the Magnuson-Stevens reauthorization. And it's not just about the 204 million-pound rebuilding target.  It's all of those things intertwined.

Why focus on the Magnuson issue right now? Because Congress comes back into session in six days. The House bill, with the exception of the amendment by Rep. H. James Saxton, R-NJ and Rep. Wayne Gilchrest, R-MD, is a first step toward fixing the problem - but only if the amendment dictating a two-year window to end overfishing is removed.

Why does that matter? Because we know "overfishing" isn't merely a measure of the fish being caught. Overfishing is the term fisheries scientists use when the mortality - the number of fish being removed from the biomass by whatever mechanism, be it fishermen, disease or dogfish - exceeds the percentage they feel the biomass can lose without decreasing in size.

But too often overfishing is treated as though it's a quantifiable experiment in a clean beaker, where the only element is the fishermen. And extreme environmental groups seize on it and use it to bludgeon fishermen, putting all the blame for depleted fish stocks on the fishermen.

The Marine Fish Conservation Network, which claims to support "good" fisheries management, wrote the following in a press release in June after NMFS released its 2005 report on the status of U.S. fisheries:

"Nearly 20 percent of the assessed federally managed fish stocks are subjected to unsustainably high fishing rates, or "overfishing" . . . The bottom line is that fishery managers are simply allowing fishermen to catch too many fish."

So the group that claims to support fishermen blames them for the fact that the fluke biomass has no prayer of reaching 204 million pounds by 2010.

The estimated young of year for 2005 in the fluke fishery was 14.5 million, about 10 million less than expected. That's a lot of fish - and I don't think anyone in their right mind would buy the assertion that fishermen are responsible for 10 million missing fish. That defies the logic of nature.

We teach our children in school that the little fish eat plankton, and the bigger fish eat the little fish, and the biggest fish eat the bigger fish. That's the way of nature.  Yet that lesson is lost when it comes to fisheries management.

When I sat at the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission meetings in Galloway last fall, those who raised questions about the impacts of predator-prey relationships, the loss of wetlands and pollution - the contaminants in the beaker of fisheries management - were essentially patted on the head like foolish children and told to get a drink of water and go back to bed.

Here we are a year later, with the same attitudes, and a bill that would add another arbitrary timeframe just to appease extremists who wrap themselves in the flag of environmentalism.

Why? Is the goal to force people to stop fishing entirely?  If you read the press releases, that's the message that comes through. It's not enough, in the minds of many, to just control fishermen; they want to choke them out of existence.

For what reason? Do they really think they can prevent the extinction of fish by stopping U.S. fishermen from fishing? Because they'll never succeed in that aim with the international community.  U.S. fishermen don't want to fish any species out of existence; they have as much at stake in maintaining fisheries as anyone.

There have been questions raised as to why we keep referring to Rep. Saxton in these stories. Quite simply, he is the one who introduced the amendment. It is within his power to eliminate one item that in the long run can only result in punishing fishermen more - not only in New Jersey but elsewhere, because that two-year time limit would apply to any federally managed species.

Getting a Magnuson bill passed that gives fisheries managers flexibility - something even the scientists at NMFS have said is necessary - isn't the only issue that needs to be addressed. But with Congress coming back into session in six days, there's an immediacy to it.  We can't wait until early November and hope the ASMFC will stand up to NMFS and set its own quota. They didn't last year; in fact, there were commission members who pushed even more stringent quotas than the 23.6 million that was finally set.

We can't wait to get the science in place to fight the biomass figures. Amassing that science isn't something that will be accomplished quickly. Convincing the environmentalists to "step up to the plate" won't happen and it's a wasted effort. Instead, that effort needs to be directed at the lawmakers pulling the strings.  Giving fisheries managers the muscle to say, "We can't close down the fluke fishery and damage the livelihood of thousands of people," without another arbitrary time limit and the fear of an unknown consequence for missing it, creates hope for the future.

Magnuson is on the table now. It's time for Congress to stop allowing the extremists to bludgeon fishermen out of existence like harp seals.

MIKE LEECH JOINS WORLD CUP

The World Cup Blue Marlin Championship has announced that the former president of the International Game Fish Association (IGFA), Mike Leech (RFA Board of Directors member), has joined the tournament as tournament director. The World Cup, in its 23rd annual running, is fished world wide on the Fourth of July. Blue marlin is the only eligible species with a minimum size of 500 lbs. The angler that catches the heaviest marlin is the winner. There is no second place.

Jim Hardie, President and Commissioner of Fishing for the World Cup made the announcement about Mike Leech joining the annual event. "Mike has examined over 20,000 world record applications over his 23 year career with IGFA, which will assure the continued high level of credibility associated with our event," said Hardie. The 2006 World Cup winner won with an 850-pound blue marlin caught by Christopher Brand fishing aboard the Happy Hooker with Capt. Berno Niebuhr in the Cape Verde Islands. It was the second time in the 22 year history of the event that a winner has come from the Cape Verde Islands.

Mike Leech has a strong background in offshore tournaments, having created IGFA's prestigious Rolex/IGFA Offshore Championship and Inshore Championship as well as the Junior Angler World Championship. Leech also created the first ever night swordfishing tournament, which took place in Ft. Lauderdale, FL in 1977. He has also been on the board, a judge, or observer in offshore competitions in the Bahamas, Costa Rica, Mexico, Guatemala, Panama and the United States, as well as having fished all over the world.

In addition to being involved in the judging of the event along with World Cup founder, Jim Hardie, Leech will be working with tournament sponsors to enhance their visibility and provide additional benefits. He will also be working to expand the number of locations where participatory anglers are fishing, with a maximum number of registered anglers set at 200 for 2007.

"There are several blue marlin hot spots not currently represented in the World Cup. We want to change that," said Leech. He asks, "Where will you be fishing next Fourth of July?"

For further information on the World Cup Blue Marlin Championship, go to www.bluemarlinworldcup.com or call Jim Hardie (305) 551-0320 or Mike Leech (954) 566-2813.

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!
RFA Newsletter Footer

Friday, September 08, 2006

 

RFA Members Instrumental in Protecting Striped Bass

RFA Press Release Header

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 08, 2006 
CONTACT: James Donofrio

RFA Members Instrumental in Protecting Striped Bass

Silver Spring, MD - In a move that will surprise many, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announced today, Friday, September 8, 2006 that it will continue the closure of striped bass fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).  The EEZ includes all of the coastal waters from three miles off shore out to the United States' territorial waters.


"This news is a great relief to striped bass fishermen everywhere," said Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA). "It was a bad idea from the very beginning, but we have seen this kind of thing happen before.  An idea is floated and a few who might benefit from it in the short run get it rolling like a down hill freight train.  They do not care about the long term effect to the majority of others involved in the fishery.  It is just a bad idea.


RFA and Maryland Saltwater Sportsmen’s Association (MSSA) were part of a massive letter writing campaign supporting the continued closure.  NMFS received nearly 8,000 comments from RFA members from Maine through North Carolina pointing out that lifting the harvest ban would, in the long-term, damage the stock.


"We first picked up on this issue at the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) striped bass management board meeting," said Bill Windley, President of the MSSA. "We knew that it had some appeal to a few people, but we were stunned when NMFS joined the supporters."


A federal moratorium on harvesting Atlantic striped bass in the Mid-Atlantic EEZ was implemented in 1990, and it imposed possession and harvest prohibitions by both recreational and commercial fishermen.  This conservation measure contributed to the eventual recovery of the striped bass stock and continues to keep the fishing mortality rate below the applicable target. 


"The ongoing recovery of Atlantic striped bass is arguably the crowning achievement of US fisheries management, a success that was only possible due to recreational anglers swaying policy decisions against what NMFS and the ASMFC wanted, which was to open the EEZ," continues Jim Donofrio. "Recreational anglers and their efforts are truly responsible for this success."


Striped bass produces a tremendous economic impact for the recreational fishing industry. The successful rebuilding of the striped bass fishery is responsible for generating $2.41 billion in direct sales and supporting 68,301 jobs. The unique aspect of the striped bass fishery is that it is a stable, consistent fishery, which has given anglers the confidence to make substantial investments and upgrades in the fishery.  Such a tremendous economic boom could not have been achieved without this consistency.


"Striped bass are one of the most important inshore species for recreational anglers and the recreational fishing industry," continues Donofrio. "This is a prime example of how effective conservation and management can greatly benefit coastal economies."


The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat and tackle industry jobs, and ensure the long-term sustainability of our nation’s marine fisheries.

If you would no longer like to receive this press release, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

 

RFA NEWS 38th EDITION

RFA Newsletter Header
August 15, 2006 Edition 38

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting the Rights of Sport Fishermen Coast to Coast

RFA Tells Congress to Keep the EEZ Closed
Menhaden Harvest Compromise Results in Loss for Resource
RFA Supports Clean Ocean Zone Legislation
Texas Great Barrier Reef Project
Say No to IFQs
RFA-NorCal Members Make a Strong Showing in Sacramento
Hands off my Crab Pots!
RFA-NorCal Chapter Thanks Congressman Mike Thompson
RFA Welcomes New Director of Marketing and Communications
New Jersey Governor's Cup

RFA TELLS CONGRESS TO KEEP THE EEZ CLOSED

On July 27, 2006, Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), testified before House Committee on Resources, Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans at the hearing on the conservation and management of Atlantic striped bass in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Donofrio discussed the economic and social importance of the recreational striped bass fishery and future management recommendations that will ensure the long term sustainability of the Atlantic striped bass.

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) considered a proposal to lift the harvest moratorium for striped bass harvest.  RFA testified to keep the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) closed to striped bass harvest.  Mr. Donofrio stated that the closure of the EEZ is important for the long-term sustainability of the striped bass fishery and will protect the larger age structure of reproductive, female striped bass that inhabit the deeper waters of the EEZ.  By lifting the harvest moratorium, both commercial and recreational fishing would quickly remove these larger fish, leading to a situation that initiated the near collapse in the 1980s.

Mr. Donofrio expressed that the Atlantic striped bass fishery supports a vast and diverse economic infrastructure including party and charter boats, guide services, bait and tackle shops, sporting goods stores, boat sales and repairs, marine supply houses, gas docks, marinas, retail food stores, restaurants and hotels, as well as local manufacturers of fishing boats, tackle and gear.

“It is clear to me that Congressman Frank Pallone and Congressman Jim Saxton are strongly opposed to opening the EEZ for striped bass harvest.  Furthermore, the importance of the relationship between healthy menhaden stocks and the striped bass nursery were also discussed and is apparent that the protection of menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay is critical for the long-term sustainability and health of the striped bass resource. Menhaden play a vital ecological role in the health of the Chesapeake Bay as they serve as the primary forage food for striped bass in the bay,” states Donofrio.

Mr. Donofrio adds, “I applaud the Subcommittee on Fisheries Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans for addressing this issue and commend Congressman Frank Pallone for requesting this hearing.  I also appreciate the interest of Chairman Wayne Gilchrist, Congressman Jim Saxton and other committee members who have been engaged in this issue.”

MENHADEN HARVEST COMPROMISE RESULTS IN LOSS FOR RESOURCE

Virginia Governor Timothy M. Kaine, imposed a cap on the commercial harvest of menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay Monday, July 31.  The announced cap would limit the annual catch from the Bay to 109,020 metric tons (240 million pounds) for the next 5 years.  This amount represents the median commercial harvest from 2001 through 2005.  Although commercial harvest is prohibited from expanding within the Bay, the harvest cap maintains status quo and does nothing to improve the overall health of the bay.

RFA believes that the cap on the commercial menhaden fishery is inadequate and does not address the problems with low abundance of adult menhaden in New England.  This has been a reoccurring issue for over 10 years. Localized area depletions caused by recruitment failure are linked to a disease found in striped bass.  Menhaden have been proven to be a keystone species and affect the overall health of the Chesapeake Bay, yet there is inadequate information on the impacts of the industrial menhaden fishery.  Additional research on this topic is needed.  Using as a reference period for establishing the annual harvest cap, the state of Virginia will allow similar harvest levels that initiated these problems in the first place.

“No one will deny that there are serious ecological and environmental problems in the Chesapeake Bay, many of which can be traced to a lack of menhaden” states Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the RFA.  “Capping the commercial reduction industry to 109,020 metric tons maintains conditions that prompted these problems and is clearly a loss for the Bay, watermen and the resource.  The only winners are Omega Protein.”

Omega Protein Corporation, with a processing factory located in Reedville, VA, accounts for nearly all of the menhaden harvest from the Chesapeake Bay and processes them into meal and oil for animal feeds and industrial purposes.  Over 60 percent of the overall menhaden harvest comes from the Chesapeake Bay illustrating the conditions of a localized depletion.  Menhaden is a valuable forage fish for striped bass, bluefish and many other important gamefish.  It is thought that the widespread occurrence of micobacteriosis- a systemic infection that manifests as wasting and open lesions and found to be 100% fatal in captive fish- observed in striped bass as far north as Western Long Island Sound is a direct result of malnourished striped bass that lack menhaden in their diet.

“The campaign working to establish a commercial menhaden harvest cap based on past median landings, in our eyes, represents a complete failure” continues Donofrio.  “How can anyone expect the situation in the Chesapeake Bay to improve if nothing is done the stop the massive menhaden removals currently occurring in the Bay?”

The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission approved a 106,000 metric ton annual harvest cap with no carry over provision last year. Virginia’s regulations increased the annual harvest cap by 3,020 metric tons and allows for carry over of unused harvest from year to year.  ASMFC will meet this week in Alexandria to approve Virginia’s harvest cap.

RFA SUPPORTS CLEAN OCEAN ZONE LEGISLATION

On July 24, 2006, The New Jersey/New York Clean Ocean Zone bill, H.R. 5872 was introduced in the US House of Representatives.  The sponsors of the bill are Congressman Jim Saxton (NJ-R-3) and Congressman Frank Pallone (NJ-D-6). The bill will permanently protect the NY/NJ Bight from polluting and harmful activities including ocean dumping, discharging, mining and LNG facilities, which pose a serious threat to marine resources.

Several municipalities and organizations are strong supporters of the COZ legislation.  RFA is supporting this legislation and was invited to testify at the Introduction of the Clean Ocean Zone Legislation Press Conference on July 22, 2006.

“RFA is enthusiastic to work with the COZ legislative committee.  The NY/NJ Bight is a unique and highly productive area, in terms of habitat and resources, which supports recreationally important fish.  RFA anticipates that the COZ will protect these historical fishing grounds to ensure sustainable recreational fisheries for years to come,” said Jessica Knox, RFA Deputy Director of Marine Policy and Government Affairs.

The COZ supports standard marine activity and recreational and commercial fishing and does not restrict or limit certain underwater research or exploration.  Support the Clean Ocean Zone, go to http://www.cleanoceanzone.org.

TEXAS GREAT BARRIER REEF PROJECT

The Texas Great Barrier Reef Project was selected to receive a grant application for $5 million for the state portion of the 2007 Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) award. The number of responses to the nomination request was remarkable, with the General Land Office receiving 349 proposed projects totaling more than $777 million.

The benefits of well designed artificial reef programs have been made evident to the scientific and fishing communities by successes documented from artificial reef programs throughout the country.  In the Gulf of Mexico, red snapper, along with grouper and ling, have been found to show up immediately upon deployment of artificial reefs.  It is expected that by creating additional red snapper habitat through an artificial reef program, Texas anglers will have access to the fishery during winter months; traditionally a period when red snapper are not found in these waters. “This initiative is a long-term solution to Texas achieving a winter red snapper fishery,” states Jim Smarr, RFA-TX Chairman.

Please visit http://www.glo.state.tx.us/coastal/ciap/ciap2005.html to view project nominations and the projects selected to receive a grant.

SAY NO TO IFQS

Texas RFA will be attending the Baton Rouge meeting of the Gulf Council on Monday, August 14. For the first time, Texas will be looking forward to a meeting as we have an agenda item that would allow Texas to choose the dates to fish in the Red Snapper Fishery. This will revitalize our winter tourism by creating the opportunity to fish during spring break and certain winter days to, which is critical to our coastal economy.

RFA-TX will be going on the record at this meeting, asking the Council to remand the Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) recently sent to the Secretary of Commerce. We feel IFQ’s are giving away a public resource to 52 men of which an alarming number have previous felony convictions involving illegal commercial red snapper fishing.  IFQ’s would allow the season to be expanded from ten days to thirty days under the new plan and could in fact crash the red snapper fishery due to illegal commercial overfishing.

You may submit comments by any of the following methods: E-mail: 0648-AS67.NOA@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line the following document identifier: 0648-AS67-NOA.Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. The IFQ’s are in an open public comment period, so please just say no to IFQs.

RFA-NORCAL MEMBERS MAKE A STRONG SHOWING IN SACRAMENTO

The California Fish and Game Commission took public testimony at a critical hearing in Sacramento on August 2, as the Commissioners decided which of the alternatives for a large network of marine protected areas they will choose. This decision is the most important one they will face in our lifetimes and will substantially affect fishing opportunities in Central California. Under the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA), the Department of Fish & Game is required to develop a preferred alternative for Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), along with a Master Plan to guide the evaluation, monitoring, enforcement and funding of the project. Up to 20 percent of state waters are on the chopping block for more fishing restrictions, including no-fishing zones.

The Recreational Fishing Alliance has taken a pro-active leadership role in the MLPA process. RFA members served on the Regional Stakeholder Group where the alternative "packages" were hammered out during countless hours of negotiations. "Package 1" was crafted and adopted by representatives of fishing associations, both recreational and commercial, to minimize the socio-economic impacts of the closures while meeting the scientific guidelines thrust upon them during the MLPA process. The RFA is a co-founding member of the California Fisheries Coalition, along with recreational fishing associations such as the Sportfishing Association of California, the Central Coast Fisheries Conservation Coalition (CCFCC) and the Golden Gate Fishermen's Association. The Coalition is comprised of 24 recreational and commercial fishing groups.

Private and charter boat fishermen, free-diving spearos, kayak anglers and shore anglers all showed up for the mid-week meeting of the Fish & Game Commission, which was packed to overflowing at the. The unity among fishermen for the "Fishermen's Alternative" was unanimous, and the environmentalist community was divided over a variety of proposals and issues. Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director for the RFA, introduced Dr. Carl Walters to the Commission at the beginning of the hearing. The Coalition commissioned Walters and other top marine fisheries scientists to conduct a peer review of the science used during the MLPA process. Dr. Walters made what one observer called "the clearest science presentation I have ever seen delivered to the Commission." The peer review questioned whether any of the assumptions made were quantifiable; the failure to incorporate current fishery management practices prompted Walters to ask the Commission to toss out the entire suite of alternatives because MPAs without fishery management would have to be 100 kilometers in length. He noted that the scientific literature points to the need for including the fishermen in the design of marine protected areas, and that "Package 1 was on the edge of what they can accept." After the presentation, F&G Commission President Michael Flores asked about the baseline data for measuring changes in MPAs. No such data exists.

RFA members, including Dave Edlund, Eric Endersby, Mike La Rocco, Bill Schinski, John Hayes, Gene Kramer, Larry Ankuda, Bob Humphrey, Dennis Haussler, and Mario Korf gave excellent public comment on the specifics of the proposed MPAs, with fishermen making consistent points throughout the day's testimony.

The Commission may adopt changes to the DFG's preferred alternative at their next special meeting on the MLPA in Monterey at the Beach Resort Hotel on August 15th.  We are encouraging all RFA members who can take off time from work to show up for this meeting, especially if you fish in the region under consideration for closures. This region falls between Pigeon Point and Point Conception. Specific comments about the Department's changes to the preferred alternative will be heard on that day. For more information about the MLPA, please visit www.fishpolitics.com or www.cafisheriescoalition.org.

HANDS OFF MY CRAB POTS!

The RFA supports a proposal developed by local Bodega area recreational crab fishermen to make it a violation to disturb crab pots belonging to another person. It is a sad state of affairs when individuals do not respect another one’s property, and the problem with the theft of crabs from legitimate sport crabbers is rampant. Short of taking matters into one's own hands, there is nothing that can be done, even if a crook is caught red-handed. At the Commission’s regular meeting on August 5, Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director told the Commission to take public testimony on changes to sportfishing regulations.  "It's a public safety issue," Jim stated.

Jim DiMartini, a recreational fisherman from Cloverdale, outlined the proposal to the Commission on behalf of a group of 150 fishermen from Bodega known as "the Fish Heads."  The Commissioners, as a group, were highly supportive of this proposal and expressed disbelief that this activity was not already a violation. The DFG staff also supported the proposal with the single request that the wardens not be required to enforce the marking of buoys. "We don't want to be the crab pot registry," warned DFG Deputy Director Sonke Mastrup. This regulation may be in place for the 2007 recreational crab season.

RFA-NORCAL CHAPTER THANKS CONGRESSMAN MIKE THOMPSON

RFA-NorCal Chapter wants to thank Congressman Mike Thompson (CA-D-1) for his support for our salmon fishery with an Annual Pasta Feed on August 19.  RFA members are requested to show their support for Mike Thompson, our long-time north coast congressman, who understands fisheries issues and supported our efforts to save the 2006-ocean salmon season for recreational fishermen.  The event will be held at Redwood Coast Senior Center, Fort Bragg, California from 5:00 PM.-8:00 PM.

Unless we support our representatives, like Mike Thompson, who clearly understand our concerns, who will? Please join RFA's West Coast Regional Director Jim Martin, National Advisory Board member Hugh Chatham, and former Salmon Restoration Association President Brad Clark, along with your fellow RFA members at our table at Mike's Annual Fort Bragg Pasta Feed for a silent auction, great food, and a few words with our Congressman Mike Thompson.

RSVP by August 15 to Jim Martin at (707) 357-3422.

Suggested donation is $50.  Make personal checks payable to Mike Thompson for Congress.  Send to: Napa District Office, 1040 Main St., Suite 101, Napa, CA 94559.

For more information, check out Thompson for Congress, http://mikethompson.house.gov.

RFA WELCOMES NEW DIRECTOR OF MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS

This month, the RFA is pleased to welcome a new addition to its team.  David Miller has come on-board as our new Director of Marketing and Communications, and we expect he will prove to be a valuable asset to our organization.

Miller comes to us with a seven year background in network news, and is eager to draw as much national attention as possible to our efforts.  Miller also hopes to drive RFA membership and secure national recognition through strong branding initiatives.

Currently, Miller is gearing up to create new content for our website as well as scheduling public service announcements to air across the country.  He can be contacted with any media or marketing related questions at dmiller@joinrfa.org.

NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR'S CUP

The New Jersey Governors Cup will take place at the Senator Frank Farley State Marine and Trump Marina Hotel Casino on August 15 -18, 2006.  There will be over $250,000 in payouts.

Win a 21’ Contender Boat, complete with 200hp Yamaha Outboard Engine, and Trailer. Proceeds from the sale of tickets will go to the designated Charities which include; the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), Jersey Food Bank, St Dominic’s home and the Michelle O’Neill Foundation.

Get your tickets now before they sell out, drawing will take place on Friday, August 18 at the awards dinner. To get your ticket for your chance to win a 21' Contender please call 1-877-256-0855 or log on to www.njgovcup.com, but hurry tickets are limited. You do not need to be entered in the tournament to purchase a ticket to win, nor do you need to be present to win.

Tickets are $100 each and are limited to 1000.

For more information: info@njgovernorscup.com.

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!
RFA Newsletter Footer

Monday, August 14, 2006

 

United Boatmen of New York and New Jersey and Recreational Fishing Alliance Rally Anglers to Address Fluke Problem

RFA Press Release Header

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 14, 2006
CONTACT: James Donofrio

United Boatmen of New York and New Jersey and Recreational Fishing Alliance Rally Anglers to Address Fluke Problem


With severe and eminent cuts expected for the summer flounder 2007 total allowable landings, United Boatmen of New York and New Jersey (UB) and the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) are leading the charge to find a solution.  Over 75 concerned anglers and for-hire operators packed Laurelton Fire House in Brick, NJ on Monday night to attend a rally organized by UB and RFA.  The purpose of the rally was to gather input from members of the recreational fishing community to develop a strategy to address this serious problem. 

 

“Summer flounder historically is one of the most economically and socially important fish targeted by recreational anglers from Massachusetts to North Carolina” states Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the RFA.  “The economic impact generated from expenditures including bait sales, tackle sales, rods/reels, boat fuel sales and other fishing business makes summer flounder critically important to the coastal economies.  This illustrates how severe these unprecedented cuts will be.”

 

The problem we are facing with summer flounder is directly related to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the nation’s primary legislation that dictates how to manage our federal fisheries.  As amended in 1996, Magnuson required that overfished stocks be rebuilt in 10 years, a provision that RFA strongly opposed because there was very little flexibility attached with this time frame.  This rebuilding schedule was not based on science and does not take into account other uncertainties and variables such as environmental conditions, ecological factors, predation, and loss of habitat all of which influence the size a stock can grow to.  The summer flounder population has been rebuilt to the highest size ever recorded, yet Magnuson dictates we must continue to rebuild the resource and it must be done by January 1, 2010. 

 

“RFA predicted this situation when the Magnuson Act was amended in 1996 when the arbitrary 10 year rebuilding schedule was created” continues Donofrio.  “Now we are seeing the results of poorly written legislation manifesting in summer flounder and it is very likely that salmon, red snapper, cod and other species will experience similar problems. A legislative solution is our best hope for summer flounder and this is why is RFA is so focused on the current Magnuson reauthorization.”

 

RFA and UB have outlined a plan of attack focusing on two topics: 1) contacting key legislators, namely Representative Jim Saxton (3rd-NJ) and Representative Wayne Gilchrist (1st-MD), Chairman of the House Fisheries and Oceans Subcommittee, in mass asking them to recognize the need for flexibility in the Magnuson Act and 2) funding an independent science program to investigate the validity of the current rebuilding targets for summer flounder.

 

Now is the time that recreational anglers need to join RFA and aid the efforts of the tackling this and other important fisheries issues.  The importance of a well written Magnuson Act can not be understated as the future of all federal managed species are at stake.  All recreational anglers need to reach out to their member of congress, Representative Saxton, and Chairman Gilchrist.  Form letters are posted on the RFA website, www.joinrfa.org, and can be printed, signed and mailed.  RFA will remain at the forefront working for a solution to the summer flounder mess and working to include flexibility in the Magnuson reauthorization, but we need your help.  The recreational fishing community must unite on this critical issue.

 

JOIN NOW TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHT TO FISH TOMORROW

If you would no longer like to receive this press release, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

 

Press Release: RFA TELLS CONGRESS TO KEEP THE EEZ CLOSED TO STRIPED BASS FISHING

RFA Newsletter Header
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 29, 2006
CONTACT: James Donofrio

RFA TELLS CONGRESS TO KEEP THE EEZ CLOSED TO STRIPED BASS FISHING

Washington, D.C. – July 27, 2006, Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), testified before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Resources, on the conservation and management of Atlantic striped bass.

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is considering a proposal to lift the harvest moratorium for striped bass harvest in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).  Mr. Donofrio urged Congress to keep the EEZ closed to striped bass harvest.  The RFA believes that the closure of the EEZ is important for the long-term sustainability of the striped bass fishery and will protect the larger age structure of reproductive, female striped bass that inhabit the deeper waters of the EEZ.  By lifting the harvest moratorium, both commercial and recreational fishing could quickly remove these larger fish, leading to a situation that initiated the near collapse in the 1980s. 

Mr. Donofrio testified that the Atlantic striped bass fishery supports a vast and diverse economic infrastructure including party and charter boats, guide services, bait and tackle shops, sporting goods stores, boat sales and repairs, marine supply houses, gas docks, marinas, retail food stores, restaurants and hotels, as well as local manufacturers of fishing boats, tackle and gear.

“It is clear to me that Congressman Frank Pallone and Congressman Jim Saxton are strongly opposed to opening the EEZ for striped bass harvest.  Furthermore, the importance of the relationship between healthy menhaden stocks and the striped bass nursery were also discussed and is apparent that the protection of menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay is critical for the long-term sustainability and health of the striped bass resource. Menhaden play a vital ecological role in the health of the Chesapeake Bay as they serve as the primary forage food for striped bass in the bay,” states Donofrio.

Mr. Donofrio adds, “I applaud the House Committee for addressing this issue and commend Congressman Frank Pallone for requesting this hearing.  I also appreciate the interest of Resources Subcommittee Chairman Wayne Gilchrist, Congressman Jim Saxton and other committee members who have been engaged in this issue.”

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!
RFA Newsletter Footer

Thursday, June 29, 2006

 

RFA News - 36th Edition

RFA Newsletter Header
June 29, 2006 Edition 36

Visit http://www.joinrfa.org/ to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting the Rights of Sportfishermen Coast to Coast


SENATE APPROVES MAGNUSON REAUTHORIZATION BILL

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) has been working diligently with members of Congress to improve the nation's primary fisheries law, the Magnuson-Stevens Act. After several years of inactivity, the process has gained significant momentum since last summer. On Monday, June 19, 2006, the Senate passed the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006. The Senate bill went forward with strong bipartisan support.

"The reauthorization of Magnuson will set the stage for management of our nation's fisheries for many years to come," said RFA Executive Director," Jim Donofrio, "and RFA has been making every effort to work with members of Congress in both Houses to improve this important legislation and wishes to thank members and their staff for listening to our concerns."

The Senate bill, sponsored by Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK), contains some provisions that RFA finds troubling and in need of reconsideration. However, the most important part of this process is that Congress is acting on this important legislation, which had taken a back seat to other issues in recent years.

The RFA will continue to work closely with members of the House and Senate as they begin working in conference to craft a finished bill that will eventually be sent to the President's desk for signing. RFA is working with House and Senate staff members to address concerns for the completed bill. The process could be completed in time for implementation in 2007.

RFA WORKING HARD TO PREVENT DELAWARE SALTWATER FISHING TAX

RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio and Jessica Knox, Deputy Director of Government Affairs and Marine Policy, met with key state legislators on June 6 to discuss the aspects of the proposed saltwater fishing license in Delaware.  Earlier this year, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) released a controversial funding fact sheet outlining new fees or taxes on recreational saltwater fishing as a means of supplementing their budget for administration and operational costs. 

The means for administering the marine resources in Delaware, as in every other coastal state, are extremely limited.  Inadequate funding from Wallop-Breaux and a failure in part of the state of Delaware to recognize the social and economic importance of recreational fishing, are to blame for these funding deficiencies.  Saltwater anglers already pay a 10 percent excise tax on all fishing-related equipment and marine fuel sales, which funds these programs as mandated by the Sportfish Restoration and Aquatic Resources Fund (Wallop-Breaux) legislation.  "It should not be the responsibility of the recreational fishing community to shoulder the entire fiscal burden," states Jessica Knox.  In recent years, taxes from Delaware anglers have generated over $17 million annually.  John DePersenaire, Director of Government Affairs and Marine Policy adds, "A saltwater fishing tax would only make the state less inclined to invest in this important industry and make DNREC completely dependant upon money generated from a saltwater fishing license."

RFA polled its Delaware membership and found the majority of respondents were against the proposed license.  RFA Delaware members responded in a letter writing campaign expressing their strong opposition to the saltwater fishing license, which had a great impact on legislators and slowed the process to allow more opportunities for the public to consider and comment on the proposal. "Our meetings in Dover were effective by getting the voices of Delaware anglers heard and the momentum of DNREC slowed," states Jim Donofrio.

Despite our efforts, the state was moving quickly with their proposal.  A saltwater fishing license bill was introduced on Wednesday, June 21 as House Bill 520.  The sponsors of the bill are Representative Joseph Booth and Senator Robert Venables.  The Natural Resources and Environmental Management Committee held a meeting on Tuesday, June 27 to discuss the bill.  RFA's John DePersenaire and Jessica Knox were invited to testify at the committee meeting.  DNREC stated their reasons for supporting the bill due to their financial needs.  In DNRECs testimony, they referenced a survey sampling 31 individuals in support of the legislation taken by www.saltfish.net.  However, Representative Pamela Thornburg said that based on the number of anglers in the state, surveying 31 people is a very small representation of the total population.  Chairman Booth stated he had received hundreds of letters in opposition of the bill from RFA-DE members.  Once again, RFA succeeded in getting their voices heard.  As the meeting concluded, the bill was tabled and no further action will be taken during this session.

While there is concern about the financial situation DNREC is currently facing, a proposed tax simply demonstrates the institutional disregard, on state and federal levels, given to the recreational saltwater fishing community.  Recreational anglers can no longer be the sole fallback when conservation and money are the issue. 

STRIPED BASS EEZ COMMENT PERIOD CLOSED

Thank you to those who submitted comments on the proposal by National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to open federal waters (EEZ) to commercial and recreational harvest of striped bass.  RFA has requested NMFS select option 4 (status quo), which would keep the 16-year harvest moratorium in place.

The Atlantic striped bass population has been successfully recovered to record highs after they were at a near collapse in the 1980's. Recreational anglers, along with significant protection afforded from the EEZ closure, played major roles in this fisheries management success.  By providing a reprieve for older, mostly female striped bass, the EEZ closure ensured that the portion of the striped bass population with the highest reproductive value was protected, thus allowing their tremendous comeback.  Allowing commercial and recreational fishermen to harvest striped bass in federal waters would severely impact this important portion of the stock therefore initiating more restrictive regulations due to mandates to protect older fish approved in Amendment 6 of the striped bass fishery management plan.

The consequences of lifting the EEZ striped bass harvest moratorium will negatively impact recreational anglers, recreational fishing business, party and charter boat operations, bait and tackle shops, boat manufactures, marinas, and the overall striped bass population.  Your comments on this proposed plan were very much appreciated.

NEW TIDAL POWER PROPOSAL RESURFACES

In 2005, Verdant Power LLC submitted an application to the Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for construction for up to six underwater turbines, which will drive the tidal flow of the East River to generate electrical power.  Construction of the turbines would take place on the East Channel of the East River alongside of Roosevelt Island.  Additionally, another proposal submitted by New York Tidal Energy Company outlines a similar plan also slated for the East River.  RFA believes there are a lot of unanswered questions concerning these proposals that must be addressed before approval is granted.

"This would not be the first facility of its kind. Location, as with fishing, will play a huge role in terms of their impact on marine fish and larvae," states Jim Donofrio. "Each site is unique and must be treated as such."
The proposed underwater electrical turbines are 16.4 feet in diameter with three blades turning at 32 revolutions per minute, or 1.6 blades per second (3 blades x 32 rpm's = 96 blades/60 seconds = 1.6 blades per seconds).  Fish traveling in large schools through this area will be injured or killed as they pass these turbines migrating to and from Long Island Sound.  The potential impacts on the marine environment, recreational fishermen, and associated businesses in New York are significant.

"Considering the highly restrictive measures recreational anglers are required to comply with, such as the summer flounder fishery, we have to question if the potential benefits of the turbines are worth the increased mortality on these important stocks," continues Donofrio.

RFA believes that an exhaustive analysis must be done on all the potential impacts that this technology may have on marine fish prior to construction, if even on a temporary basis.  Input from the recreational fishing community, the scientific community, commercial vessel operators, and others affected by underwater turbines must be also be taken into consideration.

RFA TEXAS SCORED BIG WIN FOR RED SNAPPER

RFA Texas Chairman Jim Smarr attended the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) meeting on June 5-8 in Tampa, Florida and testified against the passage of commercial red snapper individual fishing quotas (IFQs) and fought for increasing the overall red snapper total allowable catch (TAC).

"This Council has forwarded IFQ's to the Secretary for his approval and ignored the catastrophic illegal overfishing in the commercial red snapper fishery," states Jim Smarr.  "This action is an open indictment of this governing body's inability to properly function in a fair and equitable manner as stated in National Standard 4 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act."

The illegal fishing of red snapper is a reoccurring issue in Texas, where Parks and Wildlife Department game wardens just recently apprehended seven individuals with more than 2,000 pounds of illegally caught red snapper.  A maximum of 28 red snapper can be kept with a commercial finfish license.  However, the violators had over 800 fish (
www.tpwd.state.tx.us).

At the GMFMC meeting, Jim Smarr pointed out gross oversights in the current red snapper stock assessment, including a failure to adjust the assessment model for removal of longlines shallower than 50 fathoms, failure to adjust model for the significant reduction of domestic shrimp effort and subsequent reduction of red snapper bycatch due to the 2005 hurricane season, and failure to fully include juvenile red snapper found around oil production platforms.  Collectively, these factors have produced an assessment that indicates that stock is in much worse shape than it actually is, promoting the Council to set an artificially low TAC.  The TAC was predicted on a 25 percent reduction of effort in the Gulf to maintain a 7-million pound TAC.  The inaccuracies in the assessment and the overall artificially lowered TAC have had severe economic and social impacts on the fishing communities.  Recreational anglers are often the ones demanding restrictive management measures when a true conservation problem exists and regulations are required.  However, all indications suggest that the stock is in much better condition than NMFS and the GMFMC currently estimate.

"We feel that the only solution is to split the Gulf of Mexico and give Texas a separate zone to fish in.  We have only one fishery to fish for during the long winter months.  NMFS and the Gulf Council have ignored this request," continues Smarr.   "In addition, we feel taking the first four or five fish would be a true conservation move due to the discard mortality being much higher in Texas than the East Gulf." 

The Council will review this along with other information and approve a red snapper TAC during the August 14-18 Council meeting in Baton Rouge, LA.

PACIFIC FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (PFMC) MEETING IN FOSTER CITY

The PFMC met last week in Foster City, CA. The Groundfish Advisory Sub-panel (GAP) worked on several issues. The issue taking the bulk of the work was '07-'08 management specifications and measures. The GAP was given the task of choosing a final preferred alternative from three options of optimum yields (OY's). This was needed for each of the overfished species managed in the fishery management plan (FMP).  The council adopted the recommendations of the panel nearly verbatim.

John Holloway, RFA-OR Chairman states, "The good news is that it looks very likely that Oregon will have a nearly status quo groundfish season for '07 and '08. This exceeds our expectations of the best case, being a closed outside of 40 fathoms all year season. Through some massaging of the interstate allocations of canary and yelloweye, we were able to come up with 3.3 mt (metric tons) of yelloweye instead of 2.9. The minimum length for lingcod was reduced to 22 inches."

The environmental groups were on hand to push for the low harvest and constraining options. They lobbied and testified, but were unable to sway the council.  There were three NMFS lawyers on hand to help with building a record of economic losses that would result from serious fisheries constraints at the lower OY's. This is being done to help defend against environmental lawsuits that will probably come as a result of the council's action.

MARINE LIFE PROTECTION ACT UPDATE

California's Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) takes center stage in the Governor's election cycle. Governor Schwarzenegger seeks to implement a new network of marine protected areas before the election, while challenger Phil Angelides has made full funding of the program a plank in his "Coast Guard" platform on ocean policy. The RFA has been working for many years to support a plan that would limit impacts of the new closures on fishermen. We have been active in the California Fisheries Coalition (CFC) (http://www.cafisheriescoalition.org) and helped to develop "Package #1" also known as the Fishermen's Alternative, and the Fish & Game Commission will be taking public testimony on August 2 in Sacramento. RFA members are encouraged to attend this meeting to show our support for our team on the stakeholders panel. The CFC has commissioned a peer review of the "science" guidelines provided during the MLPA process and has also contracted with a public relations firm to get our side of the story out in the mainstream press. The Commission may adopt regulations for Central California as early as September.

The good news is that the Commission acted on our proposal asking for time on the agenda to present our peer review of the science advice given to the Blue Ribbon Task Force (BRTF). Carl Walters, one of the top fishery managers on the west coast, will be our presenter. The Commission gave us at least an hour to give our side of the story, leaving some time for the Science Advisory Team scientists to respond.

We need to make a strong presence at the August 2 Commission meeting in Sacramento. At least an hour will be given over to public comment. So what's the plan? We need to show up at the Commission meeting to support our guys who worked so hard on this MLPA process so far. We are backing their alternative, "Package #1."

REPRESENTATIVE RICHARD POMBO WINS PRIMARY ELECTION

Representative Richard Pombo won the California 11th district primary 62 percent to 32 percent over former Representative Pete McCloskey.  Currently in his 7th term and Chairman of the House Resources Committee, Rep. Pombo has taken active roles in legislation that has direct impacts on marine resources, such as the Endangered Species Act and the Magnuson Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act, the key piece of legislation that mandates how our nations marine fisheries are managed.

Chairman Pombo has taken a practical approach to the Magnuson reauthorization (HR 5018).  His strong understanding of the dynamic nature of the marine resources is apparent by including language that would give fisheries managers flexibility with rebuilding recovering stocks and calling for improvements to the recreational data collection programs.  He exhibits a strong sense of stewardship and understanding of the traditional, social, and economic importance of marine resources and their user groups.

RFA will be working closely with Chairman Pombo and his staff during the final stages of Magnuson, as the House and Senate versions are reconciled in conference.  Magnuson passed through the Senate Monday, June 19 and is expected to be passed through the House by summer recess.

PACIFIC FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL PFMC REPORT

The Pacific Fisheries Management Council is set to adopt rockfishing regulations on the west coast for the 2007-2008 management cycle. California's Department of Fish & Game is supporting an in season change for 2006, with an opening of waters out to 30 fathoms starting July 1 in north-central California and increased depth to the south as well. The expansion of rockfishing opportunities are based on new data from 2005, which demonstrates that recreational fishing impacts are much lower than previously estimated. 

The new recreational data collection system has shown that, in many cases, the recreational fishery in California is far below its allowed catch. For example, 2.3 metric tons of canary rockfish were caught out of an allowed 9 metric tons. "Anglers have done their part to avoid canary rockfish and other depleted species, and we are urging the Department and the Council to do its part and expand fishing opportunities so that we get our fair share with respect to other states and sectors," said Jim Martin, RFA's West Coast Regional Director. The Council voted to accept the recommendations of the Groundfish Advisory Sub-panel, or GAP, against the votes of the states' representatives who sought more restrictive measures. In related news, Gordon Zumach of Washington was appointed to the GAP to replace Jim Lone as a recreational fishing representative. For updates on the PFMC decisions please visit www.fishpolitics.com.

RFA-OREGON CHAPTER

RFA-OR Chairman John Holloway was appointed to Oregon's Nearshore Advisory Committee, a ten-member panel formed to recommend long-term management policies for state waters. He will also be attending the Governor's Ocean Policy Advisory Council (OPAC) next week to advocate for the interests of sportfishermen in Oregon.

 

 

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!
RFA Newsletter Footer

Thursday, June 01, 2006

 

RFA News - 35th Edition

RFA Newsletter Header
June 1, 2006 Edition 35

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast


FISHERIES CONSERVATION TRUST WORKING TO ADDRESS SUMMER FLOUNDER PROBLEMS
The Fisheries Conservation Trust and United Boatman of New York and New Jersey, in conjunction with Rutgers University, are conducting a summer flounder research study to evaluate size and bag limits on party boat trips in New York and New Jersey.  The project will test four different size and bag limits and how they influence harvest rates and angler satisfaction.  The overall objective of this project is to gather critical information about recreational summer flounder catch rates, discard rates, and angler preference necessary to revise current size and bag limits, which continue to become more restrictive. 

As summer flounder fishermen already well know, the number of caught sub-legal fluke has increased dramatically in the past 10 years as minimum size limits in most states have increased.  Coupled with the summer flounder stock having been rebuilt to record levels of abundance, reports of 50 throw backs for every 1 keeper are not uncommon.  Not only does this level of discarding represent inefficient management, but it is also extremely wasteful as a 10 percent mortality rate is applied to all those fluke thrown back.  Data generated from this study will assist fisheries managers in improving the development of summer flounder size and bag limits that have the potential to reduce mortality due to discarding. 

Anglers fishing from party boats in New York and New Jersey this summer may have the opportunity to participate in this project.  If they happen to be on a vessel that is scheduled to be fishing under experimental conditions for that day, they will be asked to fish under size and bag limits set for that particular trip, complete a survey at the end of the fishing trip, and allow the scientists to measure all of your kept summer flounder.  Scientists will also be collecting length data from discarded summer flounder from some anglers. The project will run from the beginning of June through September.

Please contact John DePersenaire, RFA's Director for Government Affairs and Marine Policy, at 609-404-1060 or JDePersenaire@joinrfa.org for more information.

BLUEFIN TUNA IN MEDITERRANEAN IN TROUBLE
World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) has reported that bluefin tuna catch by tuna-trap fishermen in the Mediterranean is down 80 percent from previous years. This ancient and traditional fishery located along Southern Spain has operated sustainably for thousands of years.

"The situation in the Mediterranean reflects the absolute disregard the contracting parties of ICCAT have for sustainable fishing," states Jim Donofrio, Executive Director and member of the US ICCAT Advisory Committee. "The US is constantly imposing more restrictive management measures on itself in the name of conservation, only to have these efforts completely negated by blatant overfishing in other countries."

This drastic decline in landings comes on the heels of increased tuna farming in the region which involves holding wild caught bluefin until they fatten up and obtain a higher market value.  Driven mainly by the Japanese demand for sushi quality fish, this sector of the bluefin tuna fishery has exploded in terms of capacity and overall impact on the stock in a very short time.  The rapid expansion of the fishery is having devastating impacts on the Eastern Atlantic stock, which are only beginning to be felt.

"With a bluefin tuna farming capacity of 51,012 metric tones and a total allowable catch of 32,000 metric tones, the situation is ripe for illegal unreported fishing," continues Donofrio.

RFA will continue to press the US State Department to make a strong stand on illegal fishing at future ICCAT meetings and work for better allocation for our domestic fisheries.

RFA CALLS FOR CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY FOR SOUTH JERSEY COAL FIRED POWER PLANT
In an editorial to the Press of Atlantic City, RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio and Assemblyman Jeff Van Drew (NJ-1st) call for clean power technology to be implemented in the B.L. England power plant in Cape May County, NJ.  The coal-fired plant in Beasley's Point is an antiquated facility that has long been a source for soot and smog in the area.  Worse yet, the plant is water cooled, primarily using a once-through cooling process that kills fish and shellfish in the ecologically sensitive waters of the Great Egg Harbor Bay.  Environmental concerns about the facility have prompted the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to require Atlantic City Electric, the B.L. England plant operator, to modernize the plant or shut it down by 2007. 

"The need for energy is apparent in light of the rapid development along our coast," state Jim Donofrio.  "Yet the impacts from the B.L. England plant in terms of ecosystem health and quality of life in the region are too great to be ignored."

Technology currently exists that could convert the B.L. England station to an Integrated Gasification Combine Cycle (IGCC) power plant.  IGCC is a state of the art technology that uses heat and pressure to convert coal to synthetic natural gas. Pollutants are then removed from the gas before combustion, rather than after burning in the smokestack.  An IGCC plant could also be air-cooled, which would stop the millions of fish and larvae killed with the once-through water cooled system currently used at the site. This technology makes the plant extraordinarily efficient and in terms of the long-term health of our coastline, our fisheries, and our planet, IGCC is the most climate-friendly technology currently available for producing electricity from fossil fuels.

"The B.L. England site has great potential for an IGCC power plant.  The environmental and efficiency benefits would be a great asset for the region and well worth the investment to upgrade," says Donofrio.

Atlantic City Electric is deciding the fate of the B.L. England plant which will need approval from the Board of Public Utilities. RFA will continue to urge Governor Jon Corzine, as well as the Board of Public Utilities, to require an air-cooled IGCC plant for the site.

CHANNEL ISLANDS SANCTUARY DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN RELEASED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
NOAA has released the Channel Islands Marine Sanctuary Draft Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for public comment.  The draft plan represents a major revision from the sanctuary's goal 1983 management plan and focuses on public awareness and public involvement.  The impact statement analyzes a range of alternatives for modifications and new regulations, which are intended to clarify and strengthen protections for marine habitats, sensitive species, water quality, and submerged cultural and historic resources.  Although the draft plan does not propose the establishment of marine reserves or marine conservation areas within the sanctuary, the recreational fishing community should be aware and familiar with this document. 

Copies of the draft management plan are available at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary office or by calling (805) 884-1464.  The plan can also be reviewed at www.channelislands.noaa.gov. &n bsp; Comments can be submitted to the sanctuary office at 113 Harbor Way, Suite 150, Santa Barbara, CA.  93109., by email at cinms.mgtplan@noaa.gov, or by fax at (805) 568-1582.  All comments must be received by July 21, 2006.  Public hearings will be held at the following dates and times:

Tuesday June 27, 2006 from 6:15-9:00 pm at the Sheraton Four Points Hotel, San Buenavetura Ballroom at 1050 Schooner Drive, Ventura, CA.

Thursday, June 29, 2006 from  6:15-9:00 pm at the Earl Warren Showgrounds, Warren Hall  at 3400 Calle Real, Santa Barbara, CA.
 

 

If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please email rfanewsalert@aol.com to be removed from the list!
RFA Newsletter Footer

Thursday, May 18, 2006

 

House Committee approves bill to keep anglers fishing!

 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
May 18, 2006
Contact: Jim Donofrio
Email:
JimDRFA@aol.com

House Committee approves bill to keep anglers fishing!
 
(Washington, D.C.) - The House Resources Committee passed the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Enhancement Act (HR 5018). This legislation will protect anglers and the jobs that depend on them. The House of Representatives will consider voting on this bill over the summer.  The changes to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the nation's primary fisheries law, will promote conservation and recreational fishing.
 
On May 3rd, Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), testified before the House Resources Committee and made recommendations which would help to keep anglers fishing. The RFA was pleased that the House Committee accepted a number of RFA recommendations that will benefit the recreational fishing sector, including amendments which will: prohibit new fees from being imposed on anglers and boaters; recognize, for the first time, the recreational fishing industry as part of the "fishing community" as defined under the Act; and require the federal government to specifically consider the economic impact of regulations on the recreational industry.
 
"We are pleased that Chairman Pombo and other Members of the Committee recognize the importance of the recreational fishing industry and its contribution to our nation's economy.  I applaud the efforts of the Committee for finally including us under this important legislation," said Bob Healey, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Recreational Fishing Alliance.
 
"This bill allows for flexibility in management and relief to recreational anglers who have made considerable sacrifices to help rebuild certain species.  The balance of conservation and flexibility allows for far more responsive and adaptive fishery management," said Raymond Bogan, General Counsel for the Recreational Fishing Alliance.
 
In addition, RFA was pleased to see language in the bill that will:
 Require catch levels to be set at or below the level recommended by established science and statistical committees.
 Provide flexibility to rebuild fisheries.
 Streamline overlapping environmental laws.
 Increase the role of peer review in conservation-based decisions.
 Establish a cooperative research program to improve information flow between fishermen, scientists, and fisheries managers.

 
The RFA commends Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) for promoting conservation and protecting anglers.  The RFA is also appreciative of the efforts of other members of the Committee, including Congressman Jim Saxton (R-NJ), Congressman Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Congressman Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), Congressman Walter Jones (R-NC) and Congressman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD).

###      

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries.


If you would no longer like to recieve electronic literature from the RFA, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list.

 
 

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

 

(CORRECTED EDITION) STATE OF VIRGINIA THUMBS NOSE AT MENHADEN COMPLIANCE

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               
May 10, 2006
CONTACT: Jim Donofrio
 

STATE OF VIRGINIA THUMBS NOSE AT MENHADEN COMPLIANCE

 

Crystal City, MD--At a meeting of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) menhaden management board in Crystal City, MD, Jack Travelstead, Chief of Fisheries Management for the Virginia Marine Resources Commission & Chair of the ASMFC's menhaden management board, announced that Virginia has made no further efforts to come into compliance with the menhaden management plan.

Travelstead indicated there would possibly be another window of opportunity for the Governor of Virginia, Tim Kaine, to intervene and place a cap on the menhaden reduction fishery in Chesapeake Bay waters. Travelstead said that there was some positive indication that this might happen.

Howard King, Commissioner from Maryland, stated, "I had hoped to move the process forward at today's meeting." While disappointed, King was encouraged by Travelstead's comments.

Bill Windley, President of Maryland Saltwater Sportfishermen's Association (MSSA) and Advisor of Interstate Fisheries for RFA, said, "While the process seems to be moving forward, the fact remains that RFA and MSSA will continue to support a moratorium on menhaden reduction fishing in the Chesapeake Bay as the only real solution to the lack of forage plaguing our sport species up and down the coast."

Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of RFA, said, "RFA will not rest until this valuable resource is put to its best use for the common good. A healthy menhaden population in the Chesapeake striped bass nursery is necessary for the striped bass fishery to thrive. Furthermore, menhaden serve as a beneficial filter feeder for the overall health of the Chesapeake ecosystem."

 

###

 

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries.

 

   
 

 

RFA News- 34th Edition

 
 
May 10, 2006 Edition 34

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast  

STRIPED BASS HEADED FOR TROUBLE?

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) released an advance notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the possible lifting of the current harvest moratorium for Atlantic striped bass in federal waters (EEZ). This announcement is the second round of comments gathered by NMFS since the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) sent a recommendation to the Secretary of Commerce to lift the moratorium in Amendment 6 of the striped bass fishery management plan. 

 

RFA has taken a strong stance supporting the EEZ moratorium since it was implemented as a conservation measure in the early 1990’s. In fact, on May 8th, the RFA Executive Board of Directors voted in full support of protecting the EEZ from reopening. Even with the striped bass population fully recovered, the moratorium continues to provide a protected area for large female striped bass with high reproductive value when they are most vulnerable during coastal migrations and when on winter feeding grounds.  The apparent lack of larger fish in the striped bass population was a driven force behind the development of Amendment 6.  Goals and objectives adopted under this plan aim to increase the older, larger age structure of the striped bass stock. 

 

 “The irony of this proposed action is that mortality will increase on age 15+ fish which are the exact fish that Amendment 6 intended to protect,” said James Donofrio, Executive Director. “This would be reckless fisheries management.” 

 

 “Opening the EEZ to commercial and recreational striped bass harvest flies in the face of sound conservation," says Donofrio.  “Not only does this action stand to have catastrophic consequences to the stock but also does an injustice to all the sacrifices made by the recreational fishing community during the rebuilding period.”  


CA LEGISLATION ADVANCES ON FISHERIES

Several pending bills in the California State Legislature would impact recreational fishing – some for the better, some for the worse. RFA has been working with California outdoors organizations to improve the state laws on fishing. We supported the bill, AB 2146 (Canciamilla) sponsored by the California Waterfowl Association to limit the ability of local agencies and municipalities to set their own hunting and fishing regulations, and we are pleased to know this bill passed out of committee last week. Other pieces of state legislation the RFA supports include:

AB 2268 (Saldana), which would provide free fishing licenses for disabled veterans.
AB 2497 (Laird), which would require that fishing and hunting license fees be dedicated to programs benefiting user groups, while providing more general fund money to programs that benefit the whole public.
AB 2774 (Berg) Allows the DFG to use funds from the Steelhead Punchcards more effectively.

At this time, the RFA is not opposing any legislation currently under consideration by the California legislature, but we are closely watching two major bills to make sure recreational fishing interests are protected. SB 1125 (Chesbro) provides money for coho restoration and marine life management, which we support, and also calls for money to be provided through the Tidelands Oil Fund to the Marine Life Protection Act. The RFA is asking for clarification about how this new MLPA funding will be spent.

Another bill to watch is SB 1535 (Kuehl). This bill deals with funding for the Department of Fish & Game and has similar aspects to Laird's assembly bill, AB 2497. The RFA is concerned that the Senate version, SB 1535, endorses a Wildlife Conservation Plan that was developed without public input, and requires the DFG to focus on no-take marine reserves, rather than a comprehensive plan for all types of conservation areas that allow for fishing.

A full report on the legislative action will be posted at www.fishpolitics.com.

HAVE YOU BOOKED YOUR TICKET YET?  TIME IS WASTING
18th Annual Crouch/Roberts
NO KILL BILLFISH Tournament
June 3rd thru the 7th, 2006


June 3rd:  Arrive/sign up/Captains Meeting/Rules
June 4th, 5th & 6th: Fishing
June 6th:  Awards Banquet after dinner
June 7th:  Check-out
Rancho Buena Vista Hotel
info@ranchobuenavista.com
 
Sponsored by:
OKUMA, RFA, the Billfish Foundation, Jaslures, Western Outdoor News, IGFA, Pacifico, Pacific Coast Sportfishing, Alaskan Airlines, Artesa Winery, Rancho Buena Vista Hotel, Newport Blue, Rod & Reel Radio and many many more. 
 
Make all arrangements with Tami at (800) 258 8200 or email her at
tamara.mouyeos@pescaderotravel.com
 
Entry Fee:  $250
Send to:
Tournament Director Steve Crouch
1920 Shadowridge Dr. #109
Vista, Ca. 92081
or call at (800) 355 6441
or email at
tagandbrag@sbcglobal.net
 
The 1st Annual Crouch/Roberts "NO KILL" Billfish Tournament was formed in 1988. The only way you can win the tournament is by releasing your marlin. The best news of all is that all the "new" fishermen think that releasing is a part of the "program" anytime you catch a billfish. 

Over the past 17 years, the tournament has released over 200 plus marlin.  We have only had to bring in about 6 that sounded and died on us over the past 17 years. Those 6 did become table fare and were smoked.
 
There is a kill division in the tournament for tuna, wahoo and dorado for those guys who want to take home some fresh fish. The minimum weight is 25lbs to qualify for the tournament's cash prizes. Two years ago only one Wahoo was caught that qualified and the angler took home over $3000 in cash for that one fish!

Don't forget to sign up soon! 
 
 

ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION STILL A PRIORITY FOR RFA
John DePersenaire, Director of Government Affairs and Marine Policy for the RFA, attended the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistical Program (ACCSP) advisory committee meeting in Jacksonville, FL May 3-4 to discuss aspects of recreational data collection programs. The focus of the meeting was dedicated to discussions of recreational fishing data collection programs and findings of the National Research Council (NRC).  Issues addressed in the NRC report specific to the Marine Recreational Fishing Statistic Survey (MRFSS), Large Pelagic Survey, For-Hire Survey, and other aspects of recreational data collection were consistent with those raised by the recreational fishing community as well ACCSP for the last 15 years. 

 “We cannot let the findings of the NRC report be dismissed,” states John DePersenaire. “It is up to the recreational fishing community to demand that improvements outlined by NRC and ACCSP are implemented.” 

 The current system for gathering effort and participation information comes from a random digit dialing program which has proven to be inadequate for producing accurate estimates.  Inaccurate estimates are often to blame when inflated estimates prompt unnecessary regulatory actions.  The RFA along with the NRC has recommended an angler registration program to help get a better understanding of the recreational fishing universe, which would improve effort and participation.  Electronic reporting, particularly with for-hire vessel trip reports, is also a priority for improving the timeliness of data and reducing the burden of data submission. 

 Also of interest was the announcement of a new program, ORACLE Discoverer, for querying the recreational catch and effort data warehouse.  The current system used for MRFSS queries is somewhat limited in its capabilities and time-consuming to use. ORACLE Discoverer will make significant improvements such as better data labeling, flagging data with a high percentage of error, in addition to performing calculations on “the fly” without having to initiate a completely new query.  Furthermore, bag limit analysis and directed trip search functions are also expected with the new program. These are huge improvements for managers and stakeholders who frequently use recreational catch and effort data. 

 With the recent release of the NRC report, now is the opportunity to again point out problems with the current recreational data collection programs and demand changes.  The recreational fishing community needs to keep the pressure on state and federal agencies to carry out recommendations included in the NRC report.  For years recreational fishermen have been pointing out the shortcomings of the MRFSS and similar programs only to be put off by fisheries managers as only looking out for their personal interest.  We finally have proof that our concerns are legitimate.

 “I think everyone realizes that better data will only improve management,” said Jim Donofrio.  “National Marine Fisheries Service can’t expect sound management for what they don’t fully understand or can’t accurately measure.”

OREGON SANCTUARY PROPOSAL LOSES STEAM:
Thanks to the tireless efforts of RFA-OR to inform the public about the true nature of the proposal  to create a new National Marine Sanctuary along the entire coast of Oregon. Enough questions have been asked by local coastal political leaders to slow down the railroad train. We will continue to watch and participate in this process because we have learned we cannot  drop our guard.

ABALONE FOR SALE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA?
RFA Advisory Board member Milo Vukovich testified at the CA Fish & Game Commission meeting, along with Jim Martin, on the proposal to re-open San Miguel Island off Santa Barbara to commercial and recreational abalone diving. The entire region south of San Francisco has been closed to all abalone diving since 1998 because of the depletion by scuba divers, commercial divers and, in many areas, sea otters. The RFA, along with the Sonoma County Abalone Network, the Golden Gate Fishermen's Association, CENCAL divers, NorCal Skindivers, San Diego Council of Divers and the Greater Los Angeles Council of Divers notified the Commission of their opposition to re-opening the fishery before there is a wider recovery of the stocks.

MORE AREA CLOSURES PROPOSED IN CALIFORNIA: MLPA UPDATE
The August 3rd meeting of the California Fish & Game Commission will provide the first real opportunity for recreational fishermen to give testimony about the various proposals for marine protected areas in central California. The RFA is calling for our members to show up in force to support the Fishermen's Alternative, or "Package One" alternative for the implementation of the Marine Life Protection Act. By law, the Department of Fish & Game is required to choose a preferred alternative for a coherent network of MPAs. The CA Fish & Game Commission is required to choose one but it may also decide to shelve the proposal until such time as adequate funding is provided for the enforcement and monitoring of the MPAs. Estimates for the money needed to fulfill even the most modest proposals exceed $30 million over five years.

Save the date on August 3rd and plan on being in Sacramento to let the Commssion know that you support our representatives on the MLPA stakeholder team.

KIDS FISHING DAY:
RFA volunteers Red Bartley, Henry Maze and his friend Susan helped out in Stanislaus County at a free kid's fishing day organized by Army Corps of Engineers, the Stanislaus County Fish & Game Advisory Committee, and the local Police Athletic League. They had a great time and so did the kids.

YELLOWEYE ROCKFISH: THE NEW SPOTTED OWL OF THE OCEAN? Oregon Anglers board member and RFA-OR Chair John Holloway reports from the last  Pacific Council meeting on the new limits being proposed for 
yelloweye rockfish, which has been declared "overfished" even though 
the American population has never been very large, and the stock is 
healthy in the center of its range in the North Pacific. If the House 
version of Magnuson-Stevens is not passed with flexible rebuilding 
schedules, bottomfishing could be a memory in the Pacific Northwest. 
For the full story go to: http://www.fishpolitics.com/forum/
showthread.php?t=927

CONGRESSMAN PALLONE TAKES A STAND AGAINST SALTWATER FISHING LICENSE
The National Marine Fisheries Service made a strong pitch for a saltwater fishing license at a House Resources Committee hearing on Wednesday, May 3rd, and got strenuous opposition from Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J. William Hogarth, director of NMFS, told the committee that the license would allow the government to count anglers. Pallone, a senior member of the committee, questioned the value of this knowledge.

Pallone has long pointed out that accurate data on landings is the vital need of fisheries management, not the names of the participants compiled through an unnecessary tax.

Hogarth admitted, when pressed by Pallone, that a mandatory registration system with a charge of $20 to $25 annually would not produce a lot of landings information or solid basis for a total allowable catch.

"I want to emphasize that recreational anglers in my district and across New Jersey are strongly opposed to a saltwater license that includes a fee," Pallone said. Hogarth also admitted that the current Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey system of recreational data collection was designed to observe long-term trends and was not intended for use in making stock allocation decisions.

This may be so, but it does not restrain either the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council or the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, or, for that matter, NMFS itself, from using the numbers as hard data.

A recent report by the National Research Council found that "users" concerns about the use of MRFSS in fishery management are justified," and that MRFSS "should be completely redesigned."

Pallone pressed Hogarth further on the use of mandatory total allowable catch (TAC) limits for the recreational sector. He asked about the use of MRFSS data, if Congress were to legislate the use of such TAC limits.

"Without more accurate recreational catch data than what we get from MRFSS, how can you justify requiring a hard TAC for recreational fishermen?" Pallone asked.

"It would be difficult," Hogarth replied. He also told Pallone that NMFS is committed to developing a new recreational data collection system to replace MRFSS.

Pallone's questions came during a hearing in the House Resources Committee on reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management Act, which regulates fishing in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) from three to 200 miles offshore.

James A. Donofrio, executive director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance, said he has been in Washington talking to congressmen about the problems with a national saltwater fishing license.

"I'm getting good response," he said. "Even congressmen from states that already have a saltwater fishing license appreciate the concerns anglers have with a license to fish in saltwater."

Donofrio is surprised that the current Bush adminstration is not anti-saltwater fishing license, as his father, President George H. Bush, was.

"I remember when the first President Bush came to New Jersey — to Belmar — and expressed his opposition to a saltwater license," Donofrio said.

CA FISH & GAME COMMISSION APPROVES SALMON SEASON
RFA testified before the Fish & Game Commission in Kings Beach on May 4th, asking for the Commissions support for the salmon season approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service on April 28th. One of the Commissioners supported changing the deal by allowing for a targeted, in-river recreational fishery on Labor Day on the Klamath River. This would have thrown the entire deal out the window. Fortunately, the other Commissioners voted to keep the season as scheduled.

RESOURCES COMMITTEE TAKES UP 
REAUTHORIZATION OF 
LANDMARK FISHERIES MANAGEMENT LAW
The House Resources Committee held a hearing on May 3rd on H.R. 5018, the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Enhancement Act, sponsored by Resources Chairman Richard W. Pombo (R-Calif.), Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska). The Committee also looked at H.R. 1431, the Fisheries Science and Management Enhancement Act, sponsored by Resources Ranking Member Nick Rahall (D-W.V.).

"The hearing will be the sixth one we've had on Magnuson-Stevens. By the time it wraps up, we will have heard from 56 witnesses in the 109th Congress on the need to update and reauthorize this important legislation," Chairman Pombo said. "It's critical for the Resources Committee to pass flexible legislation that emphasizes science as the basis to manage our nation's fisheries, and we will continue to drive this process forward."

Both bills would reauthorize the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, initially passed in 1976, which oversees fisheries resources and fishing activities in Federal waters and established the eight Regional Fishery Management Councils responsible for the conservation and management of U.S. Fishery resources.

"I look forward to working with Chairman Pombo and the other committee Members to ensure that the goals of the Magnuson Act are not only retained, but enhanced, during the reauthorization process," Ranking Member Rahall said.

RFA's Jim Donofrio was the only recreational representative asked to testify at this important hearing.

 If you would no longer like to receive this email, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list!
 

 

STATE OF VIRGINIA THUMBS NOSE AT MEHADEN COMPLIANCE

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               
May 10, 2006
CONTACT: Jim Donofrio
 

STATE OF VIRGINIA THUMBS NOSE AT MEHADEN COMPLIANCE

 

Crystal City, MD--At a meeting of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) menhaden management board in Crystal City, MD, Jack Travelstead, Chief of Fisheries Management for the Virginia Marine Resources Commission & Chair of the ASMFC's menhaden management board, announced that Virginia has made no further efforts to come into compliance with the menhaden management plan.

 

Travelstead indicated there would possibly be another window of opportunity for the Governor of Virginia, Tim Kaine, to intervene and place a cap on the menhaden reduction fishery in Chesapeake Bay waters. Travelstead said that there was some positive indication that this might happen.

 

Howard King, Commissioner from Maryland, stated, "I had hoped to move the process forward at today's meeting." While disappointed, King was encouraged by Travelstead's comments.

 

Bill Windley, President of Maryland Saltwater Sportfishermen's Association (MSSA) and Advisor of Interstate Fisheries for RFA, said, "While the process seems to be moving forward, the fact remains that RFA and MSSA will continue to support a moratorium on menhaden reduction fishing in the Chesapeake Bay as the only real solution to the lack of forage plaguing our sport species up and down the coast."

 

Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of RFA, said, "RFA will not rest until this valuable resource is put to its best use for the common good. A healthy menhaden population in the Chesapeake striped bass nursery is necessary for the striped bass fishery to thrive. Furthermore, menhaden serve as a beneficial filter feeder for the overall health of the Chesapeake ecosystem."

 

###

 

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries.

 

   
 

Monday, May 08, 2006

 

CAPITOL HILL UPDATE

 
 

CAPITOL HILL UPDATE

 

RFA MET WITH THESE CONGRESSSIONAL LEADERS

On May 3, 2006, Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance[1] (RFA), testified before the U.S. House of Representatives on legislation to reauthorize the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act - the most important federal fisheries law.  The Recreational Fishing Alliance was the only recreational fishing organization invited to testify on the legislation.  Appearing before Members of the House Committee on Resources, RFA's testimony focused on changes in the law that are needed to continue conservation, keep anglers fishing and our industry strong.  The RFA supported legislative language that would improve recreational data collection, allow flexibility to rebuild fisheries, streamline overlapping and burdensome environmental reviews, and restore balance between the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.  The RFA also opposed language that would assess a new unfair and unnecessary fee on anglers which has been proposed by the Administration.  RFA's testimony was well-received by both Republican and Democratic Members of the House of Representatives.

In the month before the hearing, RFA was on Capitol Hill on a regular basis in support of anglers nationwide.  In the House, RFA met with:
Congressman Richard Pombo (R-CA), Chairman of the House Resources Committee;
Congressman Jim Saxton (R-NJ), former Chairman of the House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries;
Congressman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD), Chairman of the House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries;
Congressman Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Ranking Member of the House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries;
Congressman Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), House Resources Committee;
Congressman Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation;
and staff of the House Resources Committee and other congressional staff.

In the U.S. Senate, RFA met with:

Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL);
Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ);
Senator Tom Carper (D-DE);
Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC);
Senator Richard Burr (R-NC);
and staff from the offices of Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK); Senator Dan Inouye (D-HI);
Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME); Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ);
and staff from the Senate Committee on Commerce.



[1] The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries.  

 

 

   
 

Thursday, May 04, 2006

 

Feds Threaten Future of Striped Bass Fishery

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               
May 4, 2006
CONTACT: Jim Donofrio
 

 

                                               Feds Threaten Future of Striped Bass Fishery


For the past fifteen years there has been a moratorium on the harvest of striped bass in federal waters - the exclusive economic zone (EEZ).  Now, federal fishery managers are considering lifting the ban.  According to many experts, such action could prove devastating to the entire East Coast striped bass population and would effectively set fisheries management back more than a quarter-century. 

 

In the early 1980's, the Atlantic striped bass fishery collapsed from commercial overfishing.  Pressure from coastal members of Congress and the U.S. Commerce Department helped give fishery managers the push they needed to restore the fishery to levels not seen since colonial times.  Currently, the Atlantic striped bass fishery generates $6.625 billion and supports 63,278 jobs for the recreational marine industry and is one of the most popular and significant East Coast fisheries.

 

"When you look at fisheries management over the past 30 years, the striped bass is without a doubt the biggest success story," said Jim Hutchinson, Jr. of The Fisherman Magazine.  "Such a proposal just defies logic, and threatens to undo all that great success," he added.

 

"This is typical of federal fisheries management; doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result," said Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA).

 

"Opening the EEZ to striped bass harvest would surely collapse the fishery again.  This time, striped bass must compete with an over-protected spiny dogfish population which eats every fish that swims near them.  Add on the problems with menhaden forage in the Chesapeake Bay nursery, and these fish may never recover," said John

DePersenaire, Director of Government Affairs and Marine Policy for RFA.

 

NOAA Fisheries must not be allowed to lift the EEZ moratorium.  RFA is urging all anglers and recreational marine industry individuals to contact their members of Congress and the Secretary of Commerce and let them know that lifting the moratorium is "a reckless proposal at best."

 

To find your member of Congress by state, please visit:  http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt

 

To write or email Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez:
Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez
Office of the Secretary
Room 5516
U.S. Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20230
Email: CGutierrez@doc.gov


The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries.

 

If you want to be removed from our list, please opt out to CHowellRFA@aol.com

 

   
 

 

RFA Weighs In On Magnuson-Stevens Act

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               
May 4, 2006
CONTACT: Jim Donofrio
 

RFA Weighs In On Magnuson-Stevens Act


(Washington, D.C.) - Yesterday, Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance[1], testified before Congress on the Nation's most important fisheries law.  Mr. Donofrio was the only member of the recreational fishing industry invited to testify before the U.S. House of Representatives on the reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.

 

Congressman Richard Pombo (R-CA), Chairman of the House Committee on Resources, has introduced legislation to amend the Nation's primary fisheries law.  RFA testified in favor of Congressman Pombo's bill and focused on issues that would protect anglers and the jobs that depend on them.  

 

RFA testified in opposition to a proposal which would assess new fees on anglers and promoted legislative language that would improve recreational data collection, allow flexibility to rebuild fisheries, streamline overlapping environmental reviews, and restore balance between the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act.

 

"Chairman Pombo's bill will keep anglers fishing and our industry strong while continuing the conservation goals embodied in the Sustainable Fisheries Act.  Fisheries science is not an exact science and the Chairman understands that fisheries managers need flexibility to deal with the nuances of a complex science-based and stakeholder driven decision-making process," said Mr. Donofrio.



[1] The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nations marine fisheries. 

 

 

 

 

   
 

Friday, April 14, 2006

 

Salmon Rally for Lasting Solutions to the Klamath River Salmon Crisis

 
 

Salmon Rally for Lasting Solutions to the Klamath River Salmon Crisis

April 14, 2006

Please help spread the word!

 From Rep. Mike Thompson's Office:


"Next Monday, April 24th, Congressman Mike Thompson will be organizing a rally at Pier 47 in San Francisco to decry the upcoming salmon season, to advocate much needed disaster assistance for the affected communities and industry, and to push for the long-term restoration of the Klamath River basin.The rally will be at 10:00 a.m. and we welcome any and all participation.Thanks for your time and support."


For more information, call Congressman Thompson's office at (202) 225-3311.


This event is endorsed by the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), the Golden Gate Fishermen's Association (GGFA), and the Pacific Coast Fishermen's Federation of Associations (PCFFA), and a growing list of fishing associations.


Everyone who can make the event should show up and support the restoration of the Klamath River, and disaster assistance for the commercial fishermen and charter fleet affected by the closures this year.


"Congressman Mike Thompson (D-Napa) has been a long-time ally of fishermen in Congress. The Klamath River runs through his district," said Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director of the RFA. "He understands this issue from top to bottom. Please support his efforts!"


Thanks!

 

 
If you would no longer like to receive this email, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list!

 

   
 

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

 

National Research Council (NRC) confirms flawed science

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 5, 2006
CONTACT: John DePersenaire
JDePersenaire@joinrfa.org

 

National Research Council (NRC) confirms flawed science

Arlington, Virginia, April 5, 2006-- After years of complaints by recreational anglers to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and other agencies about the flawed recreational fishing data system, the NRC, an independent scientific body from the National Academy of Sciences, verified their concerns.  On Wednesday, March 29, 2006, the NRC confirmed that the main data collection system for recreational anglers, the Marine Recreational Fishing Statistics Survey (MRFSS), has �serious flaws in design or implementation and use[s] inadequate analysis methods that need to be addressed immediately�.  RFA leaders, anglers and heads of other fishing organizations have insisted that the main methodology for sampling the universe of anglers, and determining their catch and effort, was woefully inadequate for management and policy decisions.


The NRC found the design, sampling techniques and collection fatally flawed, failing to use current survey sampling theories or even taking the human dimension of fishing into consideration. These findings prompted a recommendation by the NRC for a complete redesign of the program.


"The recreational fishing community has been saying MRFSS is seriously flawed, and has submitted data to demonstrate that fact," states Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of RFA. "The findings of the NRC report outline ways to improve the current data system that we have been advocating for years. We're hopeful that these findings will lead to a major overhaul. We applaud Dr. Bill Hogarth, Head of NMFS, for tackling this difficult issue. Dr. Hogarth has shown leadership and resolve in solving this persistent problem.�
 
The use of this flawed data collection over the years has caused serious economic hardship in many fishing communities throughout the U.S. Marinas and fishing-dependent businesses have been severely impacted by regulatory decisions based on MRFSS inaccuracies.
 
"These findings belabor the obvious," states Raymond Bogan, RFA counsel.  �Data which plainly demonstrated major errors, and recommendations to help improve the system, have in the past fallen on deaf ears. Hopefully now those fisheries managers who have so staunchly supported this broken system will acknowledge its flaws and work to help fix it.�


The Nation's primary fishing law, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, is up for reauthorization this year. Current versions in the House and Senate have addressed recreational data collection concerns. We will continue to work with the sponsors to help assure this problem is fixed. 
 
"We are hopeful that the final bill will drive these improvements to the finish line," said Donofrio.


                                                                                 ###

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation's marine fisheries. 


If you would no longer like to receive these updates, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from this list.

 

   
 

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

 

RFA News - 32nd Edition

 
 
March 31, 2006 Edition 32

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast  

US FISHERIES FUTURE ON THE TABLE

This week, in the House of Representatives, the debate on fisheries management saw some major developments. House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) introduced H.R. 5018, the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Enhancement Act. Two days later, House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries Oceans and Wildlife Chairman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) introduced H.R. 5051, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Amendments Act of 2006. Both House bills, along with a third bill introduced last year by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Ranking Democrat Daniel Inouye (D-HI), would rewrite the nation�s primary federal fisheries law, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 

The RFA has worked closely with each of these Members of Congress and their staffs and we are pleased that they all heard our concerns.  Chairman Gilchrest understands that new fees imposed on recreational fishermen are unwarranted. Chairman Pombo is addressing concerns about rebuilding requirements and overages.  Senators Stevens and Inouye are improving the way the government collects data on recreational fisheries. 

 

�Each of these proposals would make important improvements to the way our nation�s fisheries are managed,� said Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of RFA. "This is a great starting point for discussion and I believe anyone involved with this process will not view one bill as the winner. The victory will come with the debate and compromise necessary to craft a final bill that will ensure continued conservation improvements, while allowing the fisheries managers to get their job done. RFA has outlined our primary concerns to congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle and in both the House and Senate, on this most important piece of legislation.�

 

RFA SUPPORTS NJ BILL PROHIBITING �FACTORY SHIPS�

The RFA is supporting legislation introduced in the New Jersey Assembly that will prohibit processor/freezer ships over 165 feet from operating in New Jersey waters. Assembly bill A1053 prohibits these vessels from harvesting fish in state waters. These proposed factory ship operations could have negative impacts on fish populations since these ships are designed to clean and freeze mass amounts of fish.

"Recreational fishermen and traditional small boat commercial fishermen are already debating allocation for many species, which are under very restrictive measures for harvest. There is no need to exasperate this situation with full scale industrial operations,"
 said Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director.

 

 

JIM KELLOGG REAPPOINTED TO CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME COMMISSION
RFA members have been actively writing to Gov. Schwarzenegger to support the renomination of Jim Kellogg to the California Fish & Game Commission. A coalition of environmental groups has been lobbying to knock Kellogg out of the box before some crucial votes on the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative in Central California. As they did with a previous Schwarzenegger nominee, Marilyn Hendrickson, they attempted to smear Kellogg, a lifelong hunter and fisherman, with an "anti-conservationist" tar brush. Being labeled as such in California is like being labeled a draft-dodger in many other states.


"We were pleased to hear the news that the Governor was not swayed by this pressure, and we congratulate Jim on his reappointment," said Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director. "We look forward to testifying for him at his confirmation hearing in the Senate Rules Committee. I particularly thank RFA member Bob Humphrey for taking his personal outrage at the bullying tactics being employed against Kellogg, and channeling it into a one-man crusade to turn out the troops and send letters and emails to the Governor's office. Bravo, Bob!"

RFA URGES MASSACHUSETTS MEMBERS TO CONTACT THEIR 
STATE LEGISLATORS

RFA is urging anglers from Massachusetts to contact their state legislators to express opposition to S2308, the �Massachusetts' Oceans Act�. S2308, in its current form, will lead to the establishment of arbitrary No-Fishing Marine Protected Areas (AKA marine reserves) in Massachusetts� waters. RFA and allied organizations continue to remain adamantly opposed to the bill as written, and will continue to seek changes that remove language intended to establish the arbitrary MPAs in the waters of the Commonwealth. RFA staff and volunteers have worked hard to hold this bill up until our concerns are addressed.  

"
We have had some very productive meetings with key legislators recently and we thank everyone who has weighed in on this issue�, said Barry Gibson, RFA New England Regional Director.

RFA members can find their legislators contact information at www.mass.gov . �Proponents of arbitrary MPAs and their allies in the legislature are pushing hard for their agenda. Recreational anglers need to continue to weigh in on this issue. If you have not called or written your State Representative or Senator yet, now is the time to do it. We cannot allow out-of state special interests to determine where we will be able to fish in Massachusetts waters in the future,� said Gibson.

 

Please call the Senate sponsor of this bill, Senator Robert O'Leary at 617-722-1570, and tell him that you are opposed to the creation of arbitrary no-fishing zone language in this bill.

 

RFA REMINDS ANGLERS TO CHECK FOR NEW SUMMER FLOUNDER REGULATIONS

RFA urges East Coast anglers to check their state�s summer flounder regulations for the 2006 season.  Several states have modified seasons, bag limits, and size limits or a combination of all three. �With summer flounder expected to return to near-shore waters and bays in the near future, all anglers should make themselves aware of any changes in the regulations,� said John Depersenaire, Fisheries Researcher for the RFA.

 

SHOW SEASON COMING TO AN END
The RFA would like to thank all of its hardworking volunteers that put in time and effort at our booth this show season.
While we are in the middle of the New England Saltwater Fishing Expo this weekend (March 31-April 2), our final show is the Canyon Runner Seminar next Saturday in Newport, RI until show season starts again in September. Please make sure to look for us at tournaments all around the country now.


"This has been another successful, busy show season and we appreciate everyone's teamwork in making that happen," said Courtney Thompson, Marketing/PR Coordinator. "Our volunteers are extremely dedicated to helping spread the RFA's mission and contributing to our growth. We cannot be successful without you, as you are the RFA!"

 

RFA BATTLES AGAINST OCEAN SALMON CLOSURES

Last year, in November 2005, RFA reported on the outlook for the ocean salmon season: "It�s never too early to start worrying about the outlook of next year�s salmon season, considering the continuing problems with the Klamath River. The early returns to the river are tracking poorly� According to Department of Fish and Game (DFG) biologist Alan Grover, there is a possibility of a near-total commercial and recreational fishing closure, especially in June and July of 2006, unless the numbers change dramatically in the final analysis."


These predictions turned into an ugly reality when we attended the February 28th meeting held by the California Department of Fish and Game in Santa Rosa. DFG personnel reported that they would not be able to support salmon fishing opportunities � for recreational and commercial fisheries � in a vast area from Pt. Sur to the Oregon border. At the March meeting of the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC), the most likely option for salmon fishing this year appeared to be "no fishing".

RFA's Jim Martin worked with local communities and businesses affected by the potential closure. They provided letters documenting the economic losses they face. Under federal law, conservation-based fishing restrictions must be balanced against socio-economic considerations. "We had letters from city councils, chambers of commerce, and from businesses in the briefing book for Council members at the March meeting. We began to build a record for the federal regulators to defend against a potential lawsuit," said Jim Martin.


NOAA Fisheries, the federal agency that must approve the decision on salmon fishing, issued a late-inning guidance letter that offered little support for any salmon fishing. Fishing representatives at the meeting were left to guess at how to craft a season with no targets for harvest. The council finally approved three options for the 2006 season ranging from a return to last year's season (option 1) to "no fishing" (option 3). A middle option (option 2) called for a 50 percent reduction in harvest. In the interim, the council voted to cancel the April 1st salmon opener south of Pt. Arena. In a quick press release, however, the Department of Fish & Game announced that salmon fishing would indeed open inside state waters, out to three miles, because there was no time to get the Fish and Game Commission's approval for the closure. A final decision will be made on April 6th or 7th at the PFMC meeting in Sacramento.


RFA asked members to write to Commerce Secretary Gutierez asking for his support for fishing opportunities this year. We also wrote to Governor Schwarzenneger for his support. RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio worked the halls of Congress in Washington DC, speaking to top NOAA officials and congressional leadership about this issue. Rep. Richard Pombo, Chairman of the Resources Committee, was one of the first political leaders to write to the Secretary of Commerce and support the fishermen. "I hope the department gives higher priority to the economic impact of a potential shut-down than it does to the threat of litigation. After all, these decisions should not be based on how to defend against a potential lawsuit," Pombo wrote.


"The issue is so critical for north coast fishermen that I've asked RFA So-Cal Chair Joel Greenberg to fill in for me on the Groundfish Advisory Panel at the April Council meeting, while I focus on the salmon season," Martin reported. "We've been getting great support from the north coast business community and from California-elected officials. Howard Egan met with Rep. Sam Farr, along with other fisheries advocates, and found Farr to be very supportive of our short-term efforts to provide fishing opportunities, and also on long-term solutions for the root causes on the Klamath River. Maybe this year will mark a new, bipartisan effort to resolve the declines in our fisheries."


All fisheries groups are supporting "Option 1."

 

RFA TEXAS LAUNCHES "GREAT BARRIER REEF PROJECT"
RFA-TX has launched  "The Texas Great Barrier Reef Project" with the assistance of Richard Stone. Mr. Stone headed up the National Marine Fisheries Service artificial reef program, and serves as a consultant to RFA and National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA). This project will span the entire Texas Coast from Orange to Port Isabel. These reefs will be placed approximately eight and a half miles offshore in Texas waters. The reefs will be in reach for most of Texas anglers.

RFA-TX is working with Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas General Land Office and Commissioner Jerry Patterson on the implementation of the project. RFA-TX has also invited members of the Governor's staff to participate in the task force in order to assist with expediting the permitting process.

The artificial reefs will provide long-term benefits for Texas coastal fishing communities. "Many species will colonize the reefs leading to greater recreational fishing opportunities. We feel this reef project will be the most important project of this century along the Texas coast," said Jim Smarr, Chairman of RFA-TX.

 

FISHERMEN'S MPA PROPOSAL PASSES THE GRADE
California's onslaught against fishermen seems to be limitless. As if the looming salmon closure wasn't enough to worry about, the Governor's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative sped along its twisted course in central California. The Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) was passed in 1999 and called for "an improved network of marine protected areas" along the state's 1,100 mile coastline.


RFA has been active from the beginning, and was a founding member of the California Fisheries Coalition, a broad array of recreational and commercial fishing associations that seeks a fair and balanced outcome to this process. We understood that everyone who fishes in state waters has a lot to lose here, and worked together to craft a proposal that would satisfy the "scientific guidelines" while reducing the impact to fishermen. Four RFA members served as voting members of the stakeholder's panel. Against them was a battery of paid environmental lobbyists, agencies such as the National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council, and scientists who receive direct funding from pro-MPA foundations. Howard Egan, RFA-NorCal's Marine Sanctuary Coordinator, took a lead role in designing the "fishermen's proposal". As a software engineer, he is probably the only panel member who knew how to use the "decision support tool", a program that takes Graphic Information Systems (GIS) data and relates it to habitat.


After a long, hard battle, the Fishermen's Proposal was forwarded to the California Fish & Game Commission with a passing grade from the scientists. It calls for a modest increase in marine reserves (about 5 percent) in the region, with other MPAs designed to protect rockfish while allowing fishing for more migratory species such as salmon. The proposal received widespread support from the fishing community. Now it is up to the Fish & Game Commission to make a final decision. They have indicated that they will not endorse any proposals without adequate funding. So far, there is no funding available.

Commissioners have also stated that they are unsatisfied with the monitoring and evaluation of existing MPAs in the Channel Islands. So, seven years after the passage of the Marine Life Protection Act, no new MPAs have been approved.

 

 

 

RFA TEXAS WANTS ILLEGAL RED SNAPPER FISHERY ADDRESSED 
The Recreational Fishing Alliance is urging the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council to address the reportedly rampant illegal sale of red snapper. Eyewitness accounts, discussions at law enforcement advisory panel meetings, and direct conversations with federal and state wildlife agents have substantiated the existence of a substantial illegal red snapper fishery. �There is simply too much anecdotal evidence to ignore the existence of a wide-spread black market fishery that is having a negative impact on red snapper stock and quota shares for the recreational fishing community,� said Jim Smarr, Chairman of RFA-TX.

 

To address the illegal fishery, RFA is seeking the establishment of a law enforcement task force. This task force should contain elements of coastal community sheriffs, Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife, NOAA enforcement, the Internal Revenue Service and interested citizens. The intent of the task force is to share information on illegal fishing activities and to coordinate enforcement activities. RFA is also seeking a line-item appropriation in the federal budget to increase NOAA enforcement activities throughout the Gulf of Mexico region.

 

RFA also contended that stock assessments for red snapper are faulty, because the assessments are missing red snapper mortality associated with the reported illegal and unreported fishery. The problematic nature of this fishery is that red snapper sales bypass dealer and landing reporting requirements, which then further skew fishery dependent data used in the stock assessment by falsely reducing catch per unit of effort estimates. This very likely causes underestimates of the true size of the red snapper stock. �If the reported illegal fishery had been addressed by now, we might very well have seen an even greater increase in the stock size than the current moderate increases we are currently seeing,� said Smarr.

 

RFA believes that by addressing the illegal fishery, in combination with greatly reduced shrimping effort over the past ten years, red snapper regulations for recreational anglers should be relaxed. �Our goal is to have a year-round recreational fishery, possibly allowing for a �first five fish you catch-you keep� rule instead of the current size and bag limits. This would be a true conservation move,� said Smarr.

 

RFA EXPRESSES DEEP APPRECIATION TO OUR MLPA VOLUNTEERS

On Wednesday, April 5th, at the Marin Rod & Gun Club in San Rafael, the RFA will present the first annual "Randy Fry Awards" to Howard Egan, Tom Mattusch, Dave Edlund and Eric Endersby for their outstanding volunteer efforts on the MLPA. $65 per person, includes a catered buffet dinner, with silent auction, raffle and annual RFA dues. Cocktails at 6pm, dinner at 7pm. Call 707-357-3422 for more info.

 

HAWAIIAN SWORDFISH FISHERY TO CLOSE OVER HIGH SEA TURTLE CATCH
New "Hooks" Fail to Reduce Turtle Catch
In an unprecedented but legally mandated action, the Western Pacific Fisheries Management Council requested the Secretary of Commerce to shut down the pelagic drift longline swordfish fishery before it exceeds its allowable "take" of critically endangered loggerhead sea turtles.

The fishery reopened in 2004, after a federal Court mandated a four-year closure, but with a requirement to use a new hook technology that the government claimed would drastically reduce the injury and mortality of sea turtles. Environmentalists opposed the re-opening due to questions about the scientific integrity of the study that led to their required use, and the fact that the technology was never tested in the Pacific.

"Closures are the only proven technology that works to reduce sea turtle deaths from longlining," said Robert Ovetz, Ph.D., Save the Leatherback Campaign Coordinator with the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "Using suspect schemes such as circle hooks to skirt our environmental laws to protect endangered species have become the norm under the current Bush administration."

RFA clearly supports further restricting pelagic drift longlining. This commercial fishing gear is responsible for the decline of marlin, tuna and tuna-like species in all oceans around the world," said Jim Donofrio. "The international community needs to take a serious look at what drift longlines are doing to large ocean predators."

STUDY POINTS OUT PROBLEMS WITH MRFSS

The National Research Council (NRC) presented their preliminary findings of a study to improve recreational data collection to fisheries managers and members of the recreational fishing community in Arlington, Virginia this past week.  The major findings of the report were that the main recreational data collection tool, the Marine Recreational Fishing Statistics Survey (MRFSS), for sampling the universe of anglers and determining their catch and effort is inadequate for management and policy decisions.  They found the design, sampling techniques and collection fatally flawed, failing to use current survey sampling theory or taking the human dimension of fishing into consideration. These findings promoted a recommendation for a complete redesign of the program on behalf of the NRC.

 

�The recreational fishing community has been saying MRFSS is broken for over a decade,� states Jim Donofrio. �The findings of the NRC report outline ways to improve the current system that we have been advocating for years.�

 

This is not the first time that MRFSS has been critically reviewed. In fact, a minimum of 4 studies have evaluated recreational data collection programs in recent years, including two NRC reports issued in 2000 and 2002, both of which include ways to make improvements. Since that time, nothing has been done to significantly improve MRFSS or the estimates it produces. Even with the erroneous 2003 New York summer flounder estimates and the 2005 NY and NJ weakfish numbers, NMFS defended MRFSS and the status quo in favor of listening to anglers and industry members who testified that these numbers simply can�t be true. 

 

�Fishermen have been spending their own time and money attending meetings to testify against estimates they know to be counter to what actually happened on the water only to have managers dismiss them. This report validates their statements.

 

The RFA is encouraged by the NRC findings and will hold NMFS feet to the fire to see these changes carried out.  During the two years this study was being conducted, RFA among other fishing groups gave testimony and suggestions of which much is included in the final report. The final report is due out the first week in April but a summary of this report can be viewed at http://fermat.nap.edu/execsumm
_pdf/11616.pdf
 .

 If you would no longer like to receive this email, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list!
 

Friday, March 31, 2006

 

RFA News - 32nd Edition

 
 
March 31, 2006 Edition 32

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast  

US FISHERIES FUTURE ON THE TABLE

This week, in the House of Representatives, the debate on fisheries management saw some major developments. House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) introduced H.R. 5018, the American Fisheries Management and Marine Life Enhancement Act. Two days later, House Resources Subcommittee on Fisheries Oceans and Wildlife Chairman Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD) introduced H.R. 5051, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Amendments Act of 2006. Both House bills, along with a third bill introduced last year by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Ranking Democrat Daniel Inouye (D-HI), would rewrite the nation�s primary federal fisheries law, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 

The RFA has worked closely with each of these Members of Congress and their staffs and we are pleased that they all heard our concerns.  Chairman Gilchrest understands that new fees imposed on recreational fishermen are unwarranted. Chairman Pombo is addressing concerns about rebuilding requirements and overages.  Senators Stevens and Inouye are improving the way the government collects data on recreational fisheries. 

 

�Each of these proposals would make important improvements to the way our nation�s fisheries are managed,� said Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of RFA. "This is a great starting point for discussion and I believe anyone involved with this process will not view one bill as the winner. The victory will come with the debate and compromise necessary to craft a final bill that will ensure continued conservation improvements, while allowing the fisheries managers to get their job done. RFA has outlined our primary concerns to congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle and in both the House and Senate, on this most important piece of legislation.�

 

RFA SUPPORTS NJ BILL PROHIBITING �FACTORY SHIPS�

The RFA is supporting legislation introduced in the New Jersey Assembly that will prohibit processor/freezer ships over 165 feet from operating in New Jersey waters. Assembly bill A1053 prohibits these vessels from harvesting fish in state waters. These proposed factory ship operations could have negative impacts on fish populations since these ships are designed to clean and freeze mass amounts of fish.

"Recreational fishermen and traditional small boat commercial fishermen are already debating allocation for many species, which are under very restrictive measures for harvest. There is no need to exasperate this situation with full scale industrial operations,"
 said Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director.

 

 

JIM KELLOGG REAPPOINTED TO CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME COMMISSION
RFA members have been actively writing to Gov. Schwarzenegger to support the renomination of Jim Kellogg to the California Fish & Game Commission. A coalition of environmental groups has been lobbying to knock Kellogg out of the box before some crucial votes on the Marine Life Protection Act Initiative in Central California. As they did with a previous Schwarzenegger nominee, Marilyn Hendrickson, they attempted to smear Kellogg, a lifelong hunter and fisherman, with an "anti-conservationist" tar brush. Being labeled as such in California is like being labeled a draft-dodger in many other states.


"We were pleased to hear the news that the Governor was not swayed by this pressure, and we congratulate Jim on his reappointment," said Jim Martin, West Coast Regional Director. "We look forward to testifying for him at his confirmation hearing in the Senate Rules Committee. I particularly thank RFA member Bob Humphrey for taking his personal outrage at the bullying tactics being employed against Kellogg, and channeling it into a one-man crusade to turn out the troops and send letters and emails to the Governor's office. Bravo, Bob!"

RFA URGES MASSACHUSETTS MEMBERS TO CONTACT THEIR 
STATE LEGISLATORS

RFA is urging anglers from Massachusetts to contact their state legislators to express opposition to S2308, the �Massachusetts' Oceans Act�. S2308, in its current form, will lead to the establishment of arbitrary No-Fishing Marine Protected Areas (AKA marine reserves) in Massachusetts� waters. RFA and allied organizations continue to remain adamantly opposed to the bill as written, and will continue to seek changes that remove language intended to establish the arbitrary MPAs in the waters of the Commonwealth. RFA staff and volunteers have worked hard to hold this bill up until our concerns are addressed.  

"
We have had some very productive meetings with key legislators recently and we thank everyone who has weighed in on this issue�, said Barry Gibson, RFA New England Regional Director.

RFA members can find their legislators contact information at www.mass.gov . �Proponents of arbitrary MPAs and their allies in the legislature are pushing hard for their agenda. Recreational anglers need to continue to weigh in on this issue. If you have not called or written your State Representative or Senator yet, now is the time to do it. We cannot allow out-of state special interests to determine where we will be able to fish in Massachusetts waters in the future,� said Gibson.

 

Please call the Senate sponsor of this bill, Senator Robert O'Leary at 617-722-1570, and tell him that you are opposed to the creation of arbitrary no-fishing zone language in this bill.

 

RFA REMINDS ANGLERS TO CHECK FOR NEW SUMMER FLOUNDER REGULATIONS

RFA urges East Coast anglers to check their state�s summer flounder regulations for the 2006 season.  Several states have modified seasons, bag limits, and size limits or a combination of all three. �With summer flounder expected to return to near-shore waters and bays in the near future, all anglers should make themselves aware of any changes in the regulations,� said John Depersenaire, Fisheries Researcher for the RFA.

 

SHOW SEASON COMING TO AN END
The RFA would like to thank all of its hardworking volunteers that put in time and effort at our booth this show season.
While we are in the middle of the New England Saltwater Fishing Expo this weekend (March 31-April 2), our final show is the Canyon Runner Seminar next Saturday in Newport, RI until show season starts again in September. Please make sure to look for us at tournaments all around the country now.


"This has been another successful, busy show season and we appreciate everyone's teamwork in making that happen," said Courtney Thompson, Marketing/PR Coordinator. "Our volunteers are extremely dedicated to helping spread the RFA's mission and contributing to our growth. We cannot be successful without you, as you are the RFA!"

 

RFA BATTLES AGAINST OCEAN SALMON CLOSURES

Last year, in November 2005, RFA reported on the outlook for the ocean salmon season: "It�s never too early to start worrying about the outlook of next year�s salmon season, considering the continuing problems with the Klamath River. The early returns to the river are tracking poorly� According to Department of Fish and Game (DFG) biologist Alan Grover, there is a possibility of a near-total commercial and recreational fishing closure, especially in June and July of 2006, unless the numbers change dramatically in the final analysis."


These predictions turned into an ugly reality when we attended the February 28th meeting held by the California Department of Fish and Game in Santa Rosa. DFG personnel reported that they would not be able to support salmon fishing opportunities � for recreational and commercial fisheries � in a vast area from Pt. Sur to the Oregon border. At the March meeting of the Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC), the most likely option for salmon fishing this year appeared to be "no fishing".

RFA's Jim Martin worked with local communities and businesses affected by the potential closure. They provided letters documenting the economic losses they face. Under federal law, conservation-based fishing restrictions must be balanced against socio-economic considerations. "We had letters from city councils, chambers of commerce, and from businesses in the briefing book for Council members at the March meeting. We began to build a record for the federal regulators to defend against a potential lawsuit," said Jim Martin.


NOAA Fisheries, the federal agency that must approve the decision on salmon fishing, issued a late-inning guidance letter that offered little support for any salmon fishing. Fishing representatives at the meeting were left to guess at how to craft a season with no targets for harvest. The council finally approved three options for the 2006 season ranging from a return to last year's season (option 1) to "no fishing" (option 3). A middle option (option 2) called for a 50 percent reduction in harvest. In the interim, the council voted to cancel the April 1st salmon opener south of Pt. Arena. In a quick press release, however, the Department of Fish & Game announced that salmon fishing would indeed open inside state waters, out to three miles, because there was no time to get the Fish and Game Commission's approval for the closure. A final decision will be made on April 6th or 7th at the PFMC meeting in Sacramento.


RFA asked members to write to Commerce Secretary Gutierez asking for his support for fishing opportunities this year. We also wrote to Governor Schwarzenneger for his support. RFA Executive Director Jim Donofrio worked the halls of Congress in Washington DC, speaking to top NOAA officials and congressional leadership about this issue. Rep. Richard Pombo, Chairman of the Resources Committee, was one of the first political leaders to write to the Secretary of Commerce and support the fishermen. "I hope the department gives higher priority to the economic impact of a potential shut-down than it does to the threat of litigation. After all, these decisions should not be based on how to defend against a potential lawsuit," Pombo wrote.


"The issue is so critical for north coast fishermen that I've asked RFA So-Cal Chair Joel Greenberg to fill in for me on the Groundfish Advisory Panel at the April Council meeting, while I focus on the salmon season," Martin reported. "We've been getting great support from the north coast business community and from California-elected officials. Howard Egan met with Rep. Sam Farr, along with other fisheries advocates, and found Farr to be very supportive of our short-term efforts to provide fishing opportunities, and also on long-term solutions for the root causes on the Klamath River. Maybe this year will mark a new, bipartisan effort to resolve the declines in our fisheries."


All fisheries groups are supporting "Option 1."

 

RFA TEXAS LAUNCHES "GREAT BARRIER REEF PROJECT"
RFA-TX has launched  "The Texas Great Barrier Reef Project" with the assistance of Richard Stone. Mr. Stone headed up the National Marine Fisheries Service artificial reef program, and serves as a consultant to RFA and National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA). This project will span the entire Texas Coast from Orange to Port Isabel. These reefs will be placed approximately eight and a half miles offshore in Texas waters. The reefs will be in reach for most of Texas anglers.

RFA-TX is working with Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas General Land Office and Commissioner Jerry Patterson on the implementation of the project. RFA-TX has also invited members of the Governor's staff to participate in the task force in order to assist with expediting the permitting process.

The artificial reefs will provide long-term benefits for Texas coastal fishing communities. "Many species will colonize the reefs leading to greater recreational fishing opportunities. We feel this reef project will be the most important project of this century along the Texas coast," said Jim Smarr, Chairman of RFA-TX.

 

FISHERMEN'S MPA PROPOSAL PASSES THE GRADE
California's onslaught against fishermen seems to be limitless. As if the looming salmon closure wasn't enough to worry about, the Governor's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative sped along its twisted course in central California. The Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) was passed in 1999 and called for "an improved network of marine protected areas" along the state's 1,100 mile coastline.


RFA has been active from the beginning, and was a founding member of the California Fisheries Coalition, a broad array of recreational and commercial fishing associations that seeks a fair and balanced outcome to this process. We understood that everyone who fishes in state waters has a lot to lose here, and worked together to craft a proposal that would satisfy the "scientific guidelines" while reducing the impact to fishermen. Four RFA members served as voting members of the stakeholder's panel. Against them was a battery of paid environmental lobbyists, agencies such as the National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council, and scientists who receive direct funding from pro-MPA foundations. Howard Egan, RFA-NorCal's Marine Sanctuary Coordinator, took a lead role in designing the "fishermen's proposal". As a software engineer, he is probably the only panel member who knew how to use the "decision support tool", a program that takes Graphic Information Systems (GIS) data and relates it to habitat.


After a long, hard battle, the Fishermen's Proposal was forwarded to the California Fish & Game Commission with a passing grade from the scientists. It calls for a modest increase in marine reserves (about 5 percent) in the region, with other MPAs designed to protect rockfish while allowing fishing for more migratory species such as salmon. The proposal received widespread support from the fishing community. Now it is up to the Fish & Game Commission to make a final decision. They have indicated that they will not endorse any proposals without adequate funding. So far, there is no funding available.

Commissioners have also stated that they are unsatisfied with the monitoring and evaluation of existing MPAs in the Channel Islands. So, seven years after the passage of the Marine Life Protection Act, no new MPAs have been approved.

 

 

 

RFA TEXAS WANTS ILLEGAL RED SNAPPER FISHERY ADDRESSED 
The Recreational Fishing Alliance is urging the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council to address the reportedly rampant illegal sale of red snapper. Eyewitness accounts, discussions at law enforcement advisory panel meetings, and direct conversations with federal and state wildlife agents have substantiated the existence of a substantial illegal red snapper fishery. �There is simply too much anecdotal evidence to ignore the existence of a wide-spread black market fishery that is having a negative impact on red snapper stock and quota shares for the recreational fishing community,� said Jim Smarr, Chairman of RFA-TX.

 

To address the illegal fishery, RFA is seeking the establishment of a law enforcement task force. This task force should contain elements of coastal community sheriffs, Texas Department of Parks and Wildlife, NOAA enforcement, the Internal Revenue Service and interested citizens. The intent of the task force is to share information on illegal fishing activities and to coordinate enforcement activities. RFA is also seeking a line-item appropriation in the federal budget to increase NOAA enforcement activities throughout the Gulf of Mexico region.

 

RFA also contended that stock assessments for red snapper are faulty, because the assessments are missing red snapper mortality associated with the reported illegal and unreported fishery. The problematic nature of this fishery is that red snapper sales bypass dealer and landing reporting requirements, which then further skew fishery dependent data used in the stock assessment by falsely reducing catch per unit of effort estimates. This very likely causes underestimates of the true size of the red snapper stock. �If the reported illegal fishery had been addressed by now, we might very well have seen an even greater increase in the stock size than the current moderate increases we are currently seeing,� said Smarr.

 

RFA believes that by addressing the illegal fishery, in combination with greatly reduced shrimping effort over the past ten years, red snapper regulations for recreational anglers should be relaxed. �Our goal is to have a year-round recreational fishery, possibly allowing for a �first five fish you catch-you keep� rule instead of the current size and bag limits. This would be a true conservation move,� said Smarr.

 

RFA EXPRESSES DEEP APPRECIATION TO OUR MLPA VOLUNTEERS

On Wednesday, April 5th, at the Marin Rod & Gun Club in San Rafael, the RFA will present the first annual "Randy Fry Awards" to Howard Egan, Tom Mattusch, Dave Edlund and Eric Endersby for their outstanding volunteer efforts on the MLPA. $65 per person, includes a catered buffet dinner, with silent auction, raffle and annual RFA dues. Cocktails at 6pm, dinner at 7pm. Call 707-357-3422 for more info.

 

HAWAIIAN SWORDFISH FISHERY TO CLOSE OVER HIGH SEA TURTLE CATCH
New "Hooks" Fail to Reduce Turtle Catch
In an unprecedented but legally mandated action, the Western Pacific Fisheries Management Council requested the Secretary of Commerce to shut down the pelagic drift longline swordfish fishery before it exceeds its allowable "take" of critically endangered loggerhead sea turtles.

The fishery reopened in 2004, after a federal Court mandated a four-year closure, but with a requirement to use a new hook technology that the government claimed would drastically reduce the injury and mortality of sea turtles. Environmentalists opposed the re-opening due to questions about the scientific integrity of the study that led to their required use, and the fact that the technology was never tested in the Pacific.

"Closures are the only proven technology that works to reduce sea turtle deaths from longlining," said Robert Ovetz, Ph.D., Save the Leatherback Campaign Coordinator with the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "Using suspect schemes such as circle hooks to skirt our environmental laws to protect endangered species have become the norm under the current Bush administration."

RFA clearly supports further restricting pelagic drift longlining. This commercial fishing gear is responsible for the decline of marlin, tuna and tuna-like species in all oceans around the world," said Jim Donofrio. "The international community needs to take a serious look at what drift longlines are doing to large ocean predators."

STUDY POINTS OUT PROBLEMS WITH MRFSS

The National Research Council (NRC) presented their preliminary findings of a study to improve recreational data collection to fisheries managers and members of the recreational fishing community in Arlington, Virginia this past week.  The major findings of the report were that the main recreational data collection tool, the Marine Recreational Fishing Statistics Survey (MRFSS), for sampling the universe of anglers and determining their catch and effort is inadequate for management and policy decisions.  They found the design, sampling techniques and collection fatally flawed, failing to use current survey sampling theory or taking the human dimension of fishing into consideration. These findings promoted a recommendation for a complete redesign of the program on behalf of the NRC.

 

�The recreational fishing community has been saying MRFSS is broken for over a decade,� states Jim Donofrio. �The findings of the NRC report outline ways to improve the current system that we have been advocating for years.�

 

This is not the first time that MRFSS has been critically reviewed. In fact, a minimum of 4 studies have evaluated recreational data collection programs in recent years, including two NRC reports issued in 2000 and 2002, both of which include ways to make improvements. Since that time, nothing has been done to significantly improve MRFSS or the estimates it produces. Even with the erroneous 2003 New York summer flounder estimates and the 2005 NY and NJ weakfish numbers, NMFS defended MRFSS and the status quo in favor of listening to anglers and industry members who testified that these numbers simply can�t be true. 

 

�Fishermen have been spending their own time and money attending meetings to testify against estimates they know to be counter to what actually happened on the water only to have managers dismiss them. This report validates their statements.

 

The RFA is encouraged by the NRC findings and will hold NMFS feet to the fire to see these changes carried out.  During the two years this study was being conducted, RFA among other fishing groups gave testimony and suggestions of which much is included in the final report. The final report is due out the first week in April but a summary of this report can be viewed at http://fermat.nap.edu/execsumm
_pdf/11616.pdf
 .

 If you would no longer like to receive this email, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list!
 

Monday, March 13, 2006

 

RFA News - 31st Edition

 
 
March 13, 2006 Edition 31

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast  

BILLFISH REQUIRE SPECIAL MANAGEMENT

NMFS is proposing to lump the management of tunas, sharks and swordfish in with billfish (including blue marlin, white marlin and sailfish), which is completely unsuitable.The RFA submitted comments in opposition to the consolidation of the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) and Billfish Fishery Management Plan in the final open comment period. For over two years, RFA has maintained that the management objectives for billfish are incompatible with those established for other HMS, and the entire recreational fishing community is united in its opposition to this proposal. 

�Public comment, which included over 3,000 letters supporting the RFA�s position, make opposition to this poorly conceived proposal crystal clear,� stated Jim Donofrio, RFA Executive Director. �Moving forward with a consolidated plan would show a complete disregard for the resource, its constituents and the public input process.�

In addition, RFA believes the preferred alternatives in the draft plan illustrate a failure by NMFS to address the urgent need to reduce marlin bycatch mortality in the pelagic drift longline fishery
. By failing to propose any new closed areas designated specifically to reduce marlin bycatch, NMFS is making no meaningful effort to avoid a possible 2007 Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing for white marlin. 

�The preferred alternatives in this draft plan represent a missed opportunity for NMFS to finally reign in pelagic drift longline bycatch,� stated Donofrio. �What makes this more troubling is NMFS favors restricting the recreational sector, knowing full well it will have no conservation benefit nor will it mitigate an ESA listing for white marlin.� 

Landings for the recreational sector, which includes nearly 26,000 anglers, is capped at 250 marlin; the most restrictive management measure imposed on any marine fishery.  Coupled with a 99.98 percent voluntary release rate, there is absolutely no benefit gained from imposing further restrictions on the recreational sector. The only answer to rebuilding marlin biomass is an immediate and significant reduction in longline bycatch. Dr. Hogarth, Director of NMFS, made it clear in a recent letter to Commercial Fishing News that NOAA support for the pelagic longliners is resolute, which explains the capricious nature of this action. The final FMP and final rule is expected by summer. 

U.K.�s ENVIRONMENT AGENCY

REPORTS GOOD NEWS

The RFA is pleased to see that our fellow anglers across the pond are starting to get the recognition they deserve.

�Healthier fisheries mean healthier local communities and economies.That was the message from the UK Environment Agency in a recent release on the socio-economic benefits gained by improving recreational fisheries.


�Fisheries is about more than just fishing and recent work has been beneficial to local economies throughout England and Wales,� said Dafydd Evans, Head of Fisheries. �Angling creates jobs and prosperity, extends visitor seasons and creates more business for restaurants, pubs, shops and hotels.
Our figures show that nearly four million people went angling last year leading to 20,000 jobs and expenditures of �3 billion annually on the sport and one project in Wales generated almost �30 million through angling tourism.�


The Environment Agency�s �Fishing in Wales Project� resulted in:

*Over 400 kilometers of improved rivers through habitat improvements and building fish passes.

*A �2 million investment creating 1,000 jobs in angling clubs, tackle shops, hotels and restaurants.

*�27million generated in one year by angling tourists and their families.

*Over 450 people attending sustainable fishery management training courses, helping to deliver 86 partnership projects with angling clubs and fishery owners, improving fishing facilities for all.

The Environment Agency, responsible for fisheries in England and Wales, hopes to build on the successes of its �Fishing in Wales Project� in other areas by 2011. The key steps in the process include:

*Increasing the number of fish in our rivers. Currently only 21 rivers met salmon conservation targets in 1999.

*Providing more chances for more people to fish and doubling the number of active anglers from black, minority and ethnic backgrounds.

*Using sustainable fisheries to boost the local economies, with greater investment in fisheries.


�Our strategy outlines how we will meet new challenges such as climate change and invasive species while increasing tourism, encouraging greater participation in fishing and continuing to create a better quality of life for local communities,� Evans said. �One such program was the award winning �Get Hooked on Fishing Project�. Working together with the Bournville Village Trust, we were successful in tackling youth crime, anti-social behavior and school truancy. Over 250 children took part in 2005 and the three-year-old scheme won the Big Lottery People�s Choice Award.�


�We are determined to create a better, healthier environment for fisheries and for people,� Evans concluded.

SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE: Options for the 2006 Salmon Season
The Pacific Fisheries Management Council (PFMC) met in Seattle, Washington between March 7-10th to set out options for the 2006 West Coast salmon seasons. "It was the most brutal council session I have ever witnessed," reported West Coast Regional Director, Jim Martin.

Fisheries biologists estimate that only 29,200 Klamath Chinook "natural spawners" will be returning to the impaired river in northern California. Natural spawners aren't wild. They are the progeny of hatchery fish mixed with wild fish.

This would be the third year in a row that Klamath River salmon would not meet their escapement goal of 35,000 fish to spawn in the river. If that happens, it triggers a rebuilding plan and a review of the salmon fishery management plan. "I've had some experience with rebuilding plans on canary and yelloweye rockfish as a Groundfish Advisor to the PFMC," Martin said. "I don't like them. This could impact our salmon seasons, especially in the far-northern part of the state, for years to come."

Throughout the week, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) withheld a key memo detailing its guidance on setting harvest goals, leaving the Salmon Advisory Subpanel to guess how to craft a meaningful season for 2006. The RFA contacted top officials at NOAA Fisheries in Washington, D.C. by phone to try and shake the letter loose. Martin told the NOAA administrator: "It's like sitting here with a hacksaw wondering how far up your arm you have to cut." The letter was finally delivered to the council on the last day of the week-long session, when council members were about to discuss a range of options.

"We all know that this is not an overfishing problem, it�s a water-politics problem," Martin told the council, "but we are here to address the severe restrictions on salmon fishing. The council has no authority over river flows." The RFA supported an emergency rule to allow limited fishing opportunities while avoiding the Klamath salmon along their migration routes along the coast and up the river.

The options, ranging from a "nuke" option of no-fishing between Point Sur and Cape Falcon starting April 1, to a return to 2005 recreational seasons, except for the lost month of April. The only commercial fishing options would not sustain the smaller commercial ports along the coast. The federal government is planning disaster relief for the displaced commercial fishermen. The final word will be posted at www.pcouncil.org on Tuesday, March 14th at 5 pm PST.

The council took action on three major salmon season issues: they closed the April 1st opener for the area south of Pt. Arena but held open an option to reopen May 1; in the area off Fort Bragg the council maintained the season which opened February 18th at least through April 30th. Historically, the overall effort is low in April off Fort Bragg and then no more than four Klamath fish contacts have been recorded in this month.

While media reports focused on the "dwindling stocks" and "overfishing", recreational fishermen were outraged at long-standing federal and state water policies that have favored development and agriculture over sustainable fisheries. The public believes there are no fish out there, but we know there are millions of them.

The RFA continues its lobbying campaign on the federal level to find a bipartisan solution to the decline of northern California's fish habitat. Fishermen can no longer support a water policy offering low-ball water rates to special interests.

"We thank Chairman Richard Pombo (R-CA) and members of the House Resources Committee for their recent hearing in Stockton on the collapse of the Sacramento Delta ecosystem, including forage species important to the survival of game fish," said Martin, who listened to the testimony of agency scientists at that hearing. "This was a good first step, and our members will remain engaged in this effort." The RFA thanks the many members of the California Striped Bass Association who turned out for that hearing.

Mark Twain once wrote, "In California, whiskey's for drinkin' and water's for fightin."

When the federal government cancels the traditional "Moss Salmon Opener" that was scheduled for April Fool's Day, you can bet there are some fishermen ready to fight.

Recreational salmon fishing is no joke. It's a serious multi-million dollar business.

One day all American recreational fishermen will find a dollar apiece to throw into a national Political Action Committee called the Recreational Fishing Alliance. Only then will the fight be over.

Show your support: Checks to: RFA PAC, P.O. Box 171, New Gretna, NJ, 08224

 

RFA-DELAWARE MEMBERS REJECT LICENSE PROPOSAL

Members of RFA-DE were recently polled regarding their views on a proposed state saltwater fishing license. It was pretty clear from the returns received at RFA headquarters, that Delaware members are opposed to any saltwater license. The results broken down are: 57 percent opposed, 33 percent would support a license if certain conditions were met, and 10 percent unconditionally supported a license.


Those who are against the license and offered comments gave several reasons for their opposition, including the view that the license was yet another tax on saltwater anglers and mismanagement of the fishery at the federal level. �The responses we received are typical of all the reasons why anglers throughout the Mid-Atlantic and New England regions oppose a saltwater fishing license,� said Michael Doebley, Director of Government Affairs.


A new law will be necessary for a license to be implemented and, historically, the Delaware legislature has been opposed to a saltwater license. RFA members in Delaware will receive action alerts to send to key legislators informing them of RFA�s position as a result of the poll. RFA volunteers and staff will also begin meeting with legislators explaining our position and asking them to oppose the license proposal.


NEW MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR GULF OF MAINE COD

The New England Fishery Management Council recently approved Framework 42, which is intended to reduce mortality on Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod by 35 percent. The measures will not be implemented until sometime in early summer.  However, in order to have the new measures start with the beginning of the upcoming fishing year, which begins May 1st, NMFS came out with emergency rule to accomodate that opening.


For the private recreational and the party/charter boat sectors, the new regulations are an increase in the minimum size for GOM cod from 22" to 24" and a prohibition on the retention of GOM cod from November 1st through March 30th. Fishing for and retention of other groundfish species will be allowed.
 
Recreational catches of Gulf of Maine cod have been trending downward for the past five years. Even though the recreational sector should not have been included, RFA endorsed and helped develop these conservation measures. �The original recreational measures proposed by the Council's Plan Development Team included bag limits and area closures so restrictive that the party/charter boat sector would likely not have survived, and the private recreational sector would have had little incentive to fish for groundfish,� said Barry Gibson, RFA New England Regional Director.

 

SEE THE RFA AT THESE SHOWS!
The RFA will have its display and personnel at these upcoming shows. Please stop by the booth to renew your membership, sign up if you are not a member yet, grab some literature or maybe even get a new hat or shirt.


March 17-19: The Saltwater Fishing Expo at the Garden State Exhibit Center in Somerset, NJ. RFA booth 116/117. The fishing simulator will be there! www.sportshows.com for more information.


March 18-19: L.L. Bean Spring Fishing Expo at their flagship store in FreeportMaine. www.llbean.com for more information.


March 23-26: Philadelphia Boat Show at the Philadelphia Convention Center, PA. www.macevents.com for more information.


March 25-26: Massachusetts Striped Bass Association's 2006 Sport Fishing Expo at the Independence Mall in Kingston, MA.

www.msba.net for more information.


March 31-April 2: The New England Saltwater Fishing Show at the Rhode Island Convention Center in Providence, RI. www.nesaltwatershow.com for more information.


April 8: Canyon Runner Seminar at the Newport Hyatt in Newport, RI.

www.canyonrunner.com for more information.

 


RFA AWARDS DINNER HONORS VOLUNTEERS ON APRIL 5! 
The Recreational Fishing Alliance gives special thanks to our volunteers serving on the Central California Regional Stakeholder Group of the Governor�s Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative.


Honored Guests:
RFA members and volunteer stakeholders in the Governor's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative (MLPA) are winners of the 2006 "Randy Fry Award": Howard Egan, Eric Endersby, Dave Edlund and Tom Mattusch. The RFA's National Executive Director Jim Donofrio will be on hand for the event.

When & Where: Wednesday April 5th, 2006 at the Marin Rod & Gun Club in San Rafael. No-host bar opens at 6pm, Dinner at 7pm; $65 per person, $100 per couple.

Includes RFA membership dues for one year, a delicious catered dinner, raffle and silent auction. Special guest speaker: Jim Donofrio, Executive Director of the Recreational Fishing Alliance.

RFA members have put many hours of sweat and blood into making sure the results of the MLPA process will be fair and equitable. The RFA supports the "Fishermen's Package" � alternative #1.

To help with donations for the raffle/auction or volunteer, call (209) 988-9045. RSVP by email at flatland@mcn.org or call (707) 357-3422. Visit us on the web: www.fishpolitics.com.

 

 If you would no longer like to receive this email, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from the list!
 

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

 

MASSACHUSETTS MARINE FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMISSION SUPPORTS RFA POSITION CONCERNING S2308, THE "OCEANS ACT"

 
 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                               
MARCH 1, 2006
CONTACT: Michael Doebley, MichaelRFA@cs.com
Barry Gibson, BarryGibson6@aol.com
1-888-JOIN-RFA
 

MASSACHUSETTS MARINE FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMISSION SUPPORTS RFA POSITION CONCERNING S2308, THE "OCEANS ACT"

The Massachusetts Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission (MFAC) supports anglers in their concerns with S2308, otherwise known as the �Oceans Act�. In a letter submitted to the Massachusetts Legislature�s Coastal Caucus, MFAC expressed profound concerns with S2308 that mirrored RFA�s objections. The letter asks legislators to address numerous concerns, including that S2308 will lead to the establishment of arbitrary No-Fishing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Massachusetts� waters if the bill were to become law in its current form.

�We appreciate that the MFAC recognized the same problems with S2308 that RFA has touted since the legislation was introduced last summer,� said Barry Gibson, New England Regional Director.

The MFAC also raised concerns regarding the establishment of a new regulatory process that puts too much unilateral power in the hands of the Secretary of the Environment.
�Good government requires a system of checks and balances. The MFAC is correct in its opinion that no single political appointee should be vested with the power to develop, adopt, and implement something as critical as a Massachusetts ocean-use plan,� said Gibson.

Additionally, the MFAC also noted that S2308 appears to be ambiguous and does not offer sufficient new protection from emerging threats, while creating ambiguity concerning which agency and administrative process is responsible for the management and regulation of fisheries. 
 
�Considering all of the shortcomings of the bill, the opinion of the MFAC reinforces our position that from the first day the real target of the S2308 bill was fishermen, and not improving overall ocean management. We will continue to work with key legislators to assure the bill addresses emerging development threats and that S2308 cannot be used to satisfy the whims of environmental groups who seek the establishment of arbitrary MPAs,� said Gibson.           
                                                                                    ###

The Recreational Fishing Alliance is a national, grassroots political action organization representing recreational fishermen and the recreational fishing industry on marine fisheries issues. The RFA Mission is to safeguard the rights of saltwater anglers, protect marine, boat and tackle industry jobs, and ensure the long-term sustainability of our Nation's saltwater fisheries. For more information, call 1-888-JOIN-RFA.


If you would no longer like to receive these updates, please email CHowellRFA@aol.com to be removed from this list.

 

   
 

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

 

RFA News - 30th Edition

 
 
February 22, 2006 Edition 30

Visit www.JOINRFA.org to learn more about the RFA or how to become a member today!

Protecting The Rights Of Sport Fishermen Coast To Coast  

DELAWARE HOLDS PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED SALTWATER FISHING LICENSE
Delaware state officials held three public hearings around the state on the proposed saltwater fishing license and RFA representatives were present at all to voice member concerns. At the meetings state officials presented reasons why they favor a license, proposed uses of the monies generated, and then accepted public comment.

"The state mostly talked about how much money could be raised and what they intend to spend it on," said Marvin Kahl, Acting Chairman of RFA-DE. "This was not what we had hoped would be discussed. We want to know the details of how a license would be implemented and the sort of oversight and controls that will be in place to assure that there are no problems created by a poorly implemented program," said Kahl.

Reaction to the proposal from members of the RFA, and the general public who attended, were decidedly mixed. "At the first meeting, approximately 50 percent of the people who spoke were either opposed or had reservations about the program," said Michael Doebley, RFA Director of Government Affairs.

RFA-DE members should have received our license questionnaire by now and we anticipate compiling the results before proceeding to work with the state on your behalf. We encourage all members to return the completed poll as soon as possible.

MSSA BACKS BILLS THAT REDUCES POLLUTION AND IMPROVES FISHERIES
To improve Chesapeake fisheries and restore water quality, the RFA affiliated Maryland Saltwater Sportfisherman�s Association (MSSA) is strongly supporting several bills before Maryland�s General Assembly including the Agricultural Stewardship Act of 2006 and the Healthy Air Act.

The agriculture legislation addresses nitrogen runoff, which remains the largest factor degrading the bay's water quality. More than 25% of Maryland is agricultural land, and much of this land borders bay tributaries. Excess nitrogen from fertilizers and farm animal waste fuels algae blooms that block sunlight to sea grasses�crucial crab and fish habitat�and deplete dissolved oxygen from the water.

As a result, each summer the bay and its tributaries suffer major �dead zones� that harm or kill striped bass, croaker, white perch, menhaden and crabs. In August 2005, a pollution-fed dead zone encompassed more than 40% of the bay�s main stem, one of the largest ever recorded in the Chesapeake, and the problem continues to escalate.

The air legislation, considered long overdue by many sportsmen, would require upgrading grossly outdated coal-fired power plants, the largest source of mercury and carbon pollution in Maryland. Mercury levels in parts of the Chesapeake are so high that the Department of Environment has issued advisories warning people�especially women and children�to avoid and/or drastically limit their consumption of locally caught fish.

Maryland�s recreational fishing community is pivotal to the state�s historic and cultural landscape, and generates roughly $1.2 billion annually for the state�s economy,� said MSSA Executive Director Rich Novotny. �The linchpins of a strong recreational fishery are clean water and sound fishery management, and these measures would help improve water quality.�

Each year, more than 700,000 licensed recreational fishermen take to the Chesapeake and its rivers and streams to enjoy recreational angling. Without clean water and healthy habitats, these opportunities will diminish significantly.

MSSA is also vigorously opposing three bills that would allow individuals and counties to opt out of paying into the landmark Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund, passed in 2004 to fund upgrades to major wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, and provide funding for cover crops.

RFA CONTINUES WORK ON MITCHELL ACT FUNDING
The Mitchell Act coalition continues to seek salmon habitat and stock enhancements. The RFA, working in conjunction with the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Puget Sound Anglers, Northwest Marine Technologies and other organizations, continues to seek more funding for hatcheries funded by this important legislation.

In 1938, Congress passed the Mitchell Act granting federal agencies authority to work with the states to set up and operate hatcheries and passage facilities (fish ladders) to counter declining salmon runs in the Columbia River.

Mitchell Act funding has remained flat over the past 10 years negatively impacting hatchery programs. In 1993, the Act funded 23 hatcheries and two large rearing ponds in the Columbia River Basin that produced over 110 million fish per year. Starting in 1996, production from five hatcheries (one federal and four state) and two rearing ponds was discontinued due to funding shortfalls. This resulted is a 40% reduction in annual production down to 65 million fish per year.

Fishing for salmon and steelhead produced by these hatcheries makes a significant contribution to the Columbia River basin. "The direct and equipment expenditures from angler trips are estimated to be about $2 billion total for the Pacific Northwest. The Columbia River Basin's share is about 46% of these expenditures or $883 million annually. In addition, fish produced in the Columbia River Basin are also an important component of the Canadian and Alaska ocean fisheries," said Mike Gilchrist, chairman of RFA-WA. 

Increased Mitchell Act funds will be used for a variety of purposes including increasing fish production, improving hatcheries, and improving research programs. Mitchell Act funded hatcheries are also supporting programs aiding salmon and steelhead stocks protected under the Endangered Species Act. For example, Mitchell Act funds contributed to the reintroduction of an extirpated stock of coho salmon in the Wenatchee River, Washington.

RFA-TEXAS PRESENCE FELT AT PUBLIC HEARINGS IN GULF
RFA-TX made a strong statement by rallying a huge turnout for the 22 scoping meetings on the Reef Fish Amendment held throughout the Gulf States. Nearly 400 anglers were present between the Brownsville, Port Aransas and Lake Jackson hearings. Normal attendance is small at such meetings, but most anglers have grown frustrated with the GMFMC�s handling of reef fish in the Gulf. The turnout in Texas overwhelmed the council staff, which was unprepared for hundreds of anglers attending each meeting.

Jim Smarr, RFA Texas Chairman, went on the record indicating that the recreational red snapper fishery is currently managed in an inefficient and wasteful manner. The current regulations have the undesirable effect of increasing discard mortality as anglers throw back dead more sub-legal fish than the number allowed through actual harvest. The current amendment process is the best opportunity to address this wasteful practice.

�There is a 70% to 80% mortality in fish released off Texas in our deep water fishery," stated Smarr. �Going to a �first five fish� bag limit would save millions of pounds of dead discards that are being driven by the current regulations.�

Further, Smarr went on to illustrate the economic consequences currently being felt throughout the coastal communities due to the existing six-month closure during the winter months. By reducing regulatory discards, fish thrown back can be converted to landings, possibly creating a 12-month recreational red snapper fishery.

Texas anglers have minimal access to other species during the winter. Having a year-round red snapper fishery would be extremely beneficial to the fishing communities in Texas," said Smarr.