|
AP English at Another Course to College |
| Course Overview | 2009-10 Book List | Year Overview | Schedule of Major Papers | Schedule of Major Exams |
AP English - World Literature with Mr. Robert Comeau
at Another Course to College, a Boston Public School
|
We can do it: In senior year, all ACC students will take AP English. Together we’ll undertake reading, writing and discussions at a level that’s usually reserved for students in elite private high schools and affluent suburbs. It will be hard, and we can do hard work. One of our tasks this year will be to examine the discourse in our culture around high level academics – who it is “for,” who is capable of it and who, supposedly, is not. We’ll analyze the dynamics of knowledge and power, in terms of race, class, culture, gender, and the way language works in our texts, and in our understanding of ourselves and others. We will read Plato and Dante, Shakespeare and Cervantes, Woolf and Joyce, Dostoyevsky and Camus, Borges and Marquez, Nietzsche and Foucault, Memmi and Fanon. We’ll read 5,000 pages, write 7 long papers, and discuss books every day at a college level. Students might need a bit of extra help at first, and that’s okay. I’m here to help during and after school. In my 10 years of teaching, I’ve seen students of all skill levels grow dramatically, and go on to succeed in college. Our graduates are succeeding in schools such as Harvard, Brown, Williams, Wesleyan, Tufts, Brandeis, Smith, Bryn Mawr, and Wellesley. Many more have started out at local community colleges. No matter where a student started from, no matter where that student is heading next, together we will get ready for college by doing college level work. In Senior English, you’ll do it every night until their final exam. At the end of the year, you’ll know they’re ready for higher education. I will give you a lot of demanding reading, difficult papers, challenging conversations, and a leg up here and there into higher level vocabulary, concepts, and skills. The real work is done by each of you, and it will become a source of real pride. Students will learn to show that pride in their current assignments, in their coming achievements, in their nightly homework, in their daily presence, and on the stage at graduation in June.
Course philosophy: This class is based on an educational philosophy known as constructivism, in which students actively construct their understanding of the subject at hand, rather than passively receiving knowledge imparted from the instructor. In a constructivist classroom, students play an active role as learners, which should prove both engaging and demanding. To make this strategy succeed, they must come to class prepared to actively engage in discussions. While class discussions are at the heart of the course, I will deliver a good deal of background and analysis on the texts we read, which I’ll mix into our conversations as “mini-lectures.” However, students must do original thinking in their comments and papers, rather than repeat what they’ve heard from me. All discussions will grow from your ideas on the readings we’ve done together, which I’ll work to deepen and expand. We will make our conversations more meaningful by going through our readings into new understandings of our lives, and the broader world.
Skills: Analytical thinking and writing are the most essential skills for college success, and receive the primary focus in Senior English. Students will read expert literary analysis and write their own in papers that demand original thinking, careful argument, and thorough grounding in textual evidence. When writing essays or speaking in class, we’ll learn to structure our communication for clarity and effective organization. Each night we’ll practice “active reading” by making notes on our ideas, in preparation for the next day’s discussion. We’ll learn to do “close readings” that look carefully at the small details of short passages, working to understand how a work’s local style, thematics and structure shape its broader meanings. Of course, these sophisticated skills will amount to little if students don’t develop the self discipline to read every night, and write their papers on time. We’ll work on “accountable behavior” as a skill, discussing together the positive and negative habits of mind that lead toward or away from reaching our academic goals. We’ll practice metacognition, to observe and control the thinking that leads to our behaviors around school work. One of the most basic goals for accountability will be the development of reading and writing stamina. We’ll do lots of work, because students who can keep up with the higher pace of reading and writing in college have a better chance of graduating from college. In our written work, we’ll practice the self discipline of careful proofing, and on an individual basis, students who need help will work to write in standard English.
Critical Consciousness: As we develop our analytical skills, we’ll work to transfer them to our understanding of media, culture, power, justice, identity, and equality, in the concrete situations of our daily lives. Just as we can get better at reading the deep structures and meanings of books, we can get better at “reading” ourselves, our positions in the dynamics of knowledge and power, the historical forces that have brought us to this place together, and the culture’s narratives about who we are and where we belong. Together, we’ll discuss forces of oppression and of liberation within contemporary Boston and the wider world, by connecting what we’re reading in class to what we know about the story of our own lives, and of situations across the globe. We’ll dig deeper, and work at many angles to come to know ourselves and our communities in new ways, always struggling toward understandings that can help us improve our lives together.
Readings: In the 11th grade, students read important works by U.S. authors, when they take the American Literature pre-requisite to the World Literature AP course in 12th grade. In AP English, students will build upon and expand beyond their knowledge of American literature, by reading a broad selection of international texts. We’ll take an eclectic approach to our studies of world literature by reading a range of works, from sacred literature to epic and lyric poetry, drama, philosophy, fiction, and even a little economics and history. Often, we’ll look at theory to help gain analytical perspectives on the development of world literature – from the fields of psychology, comparative religion, sociology, art history, economics, literary and cultural studies, political philosophy, education, feminism, and Marxism, as well as postmodern and postcolonial theory. Through these diverse readings and analytical approaches, I hope the course will break down any narrow understanding students might have of “studying English,” and broaden the possibilities of cross-disciplinary scholarship in their futures. I will also work so that our reading about literature will not walk over the experience central to the course: each student’s personal encounter with the primary text.
Writing: Every student takes two hours of English each day, the first hour focused on literature, and the second on writing. In senior year, students will work to develop their analytical and creative writing, through prewriting exercises, group discussions, vocabulary enrichment, exemplar analysis, teacher coaching, and peer feedback. Students will receive instruction and feedback before and after their assignments. Students will revise their writing, working toward flawless standard English, a wide-ranging and expressive vocabulary, and a variety of sentence structures crafted to develop flow and rhythm in their prose. We’ll work on rhetorical skills, including tone and voice. Students will reflect on the intended audience of their writing, and fit their style to the purpose of each piece. As we analyze the connections between form and content in our nightly readings, students will work to incorporate these stylistic devices in their own writing, in creative and analytical work, to become self-conscious craftsmen of prose and poetics.
History: The course will move in chronological order, and we’ll constantly ask ourselves how literature and ideas connect and transform over time. Throughout the year, we’ll examine the “history of ideas,” to trace out how humans have thought about themselves and their world over time – and how historical, political, cultural and economic developments have given shape to the literature we read. For example, we’ll examine the development of the modern notion of self, where the idea of unique personality and personal agency arises in contest with ancient fatalism and medieval anonymity – so that in the Renaissance we find complex notions of interiority and depth of character in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. We’ll discover that many of our fundamental notions about life have historical roots beneath which lie very different constructions of the universe, and our place within it.
The AP Exam: Seniors who have demonstrated sufficient skills will be encouraged to take the AP Exam in English Literature and Composition, and fee wavers will be offered to qualifying students, based on both financial need and preparedness. Regular vocabulary tests, as well as timed essays in term 1 and at midyear, will simulate AP test conditions and demands. However, exam preparation is not at all the focus of the course. Our focus will be on readiness for the rigors of college, where, generally, careful and critical thinking, open ended questions, long papers, and class discussions will be the rule.
A fresh start: No matter how well or poorly students have done in school before, I hope they’ll look at their senior year as a chance to begin anew, to reinvent themselves as students, to discover passions in their learning that they might pursue through college, and career. If they stay open for new ideas and ways of being, I believe they’ll get more from the course, and their lives outside it. Learning in Senior English is about learning to see differently, to see with fresh eyes our selves, and our work together.
Scaffolding: By the year’s end, students will read 40 pages each night, write a 2000 word paper integrating analysis of form and content with outside research, deliver well organized and deep contributions during class discussion, and range a penetrating vision through literature, culture, history, philosophy, identity, race, gender, class, and the webs of power/knowledge that structures our daily discourse, in the very ways we know ourselves and others.To get there, I’ll increase the demands of the course over time. It is therefore essential for students to maintain solid effort and attendance each term. Students who miss too much class, or disengage for too long, will find their work even more difficult when they return. Scaffolding the work load, so students can gradually build the skills they’ll need for college, will benefit those who maintain consistent attendance and effort. |
| Reading |
Term 1 |
Term 2 |
Term 3 |
Term 4 |
|
Average pages / night |
25.1 |
23.6 |
37.6 |
41.9 |
|
Historical Periods |
Ancient |
Medieval-Early Mod. |
19th-20th centuries |
20th century |
Class discussion |
Term 1 |
Term 2 |
Term 3 |
Term 4 |
Facilitation |
Guiding questions for organization and better analysis, while I record comments on the projector screen for more careful structure and clarity. |
Guiding questions for deeper analysis, with less use of the projector. Some group work. |
Guiding questions for integrating analysis of form and content, with little use of the projector. More group work. |
Fewer guiding questions, and no use of the projector. Much group work. |
Papers |
Term 1 |
Term 2 |
Term 3 |
Term 4 |
Length |
1250 words |
1500 words |
1750 words |
2000 words |
Analysis |
Content, some form |
Content, more form |
Form and content |
Form, content, research |
Topical focus |
Ancient myth
Ancient philosophy |
Medieval/Modern ethics and values
Modern identity |
Enlightenment rationalism
Modernity and its discontents |
Postmodern theory
Postcolonial literature, theory, and race
|
Multiple Intelligences, Multimedia, MultisensoryThough we focus in class on oral and written analysis, I work to incorporate other sensory modes to help all learners access the curriculum. During the first semester, I type comments on a computer projector so we can slow down the conversation, and structure analysis visually, to model feedback and coaching in a way that’s accessible for students who learn more visually. When possible, I perform physical analogies for abstract concepts, and try to get students in on the movement, too. For example, when teaching the concept of a close reading, we go into the hallway, using it as a metaphor for a text, and “read” the small details of its style, structure, and meaning. Kinesthetic modeling helps some learners grasp a concept that’s otherwise elusive. To learn the skill of formal analysis, we’ll look at art history slideshows, and do close readings of film. I’ll even include some culinary experiences as we read a Mexican novel with a kitchen as the central setting. I’ll work to engage learners on many levels, to bring ideas to fuller life.
Vocabulary development for the analysis of formTo help prepare you for the analysis of form in class discussions, papers, the AP exam, and eventually college, you’ll need to learn the specialized vocabulary of that discipline. During each unit, I’ll introduce key terms to help build your understanding of formal analysis, and you’ll be tested occasionally for your understanding of these terms. The tests will simulate AP exam conditions, with multiple choice questions in which you’ll apply your knowledge of formal analysis on passages of literature I select for you. Below, you’ll see the terms we’ll cover over the course of the year. Definitions for the terms follow each unit in the overview section. |
|
Unit |
Vocabulary for the analysis of form |
||||||
|
Creation Stories: Enuma Elish, Hesiod’s Theogony, Genesis, Nihongi, Popol Vuh, Creation Stories from the Yoruba, and selected theory from Frazer, Freud, Durkheim, Jung, and Tillich
|
Antagonist Archetype Euphemism Imagery
|
Metaphor Personification Protagonist Setting |
Style Symbolism |
||||
|
Ancient Egypt: Ancient Egyptian Literature
|
Genre
|
Message |
Theme |
||||
|
Ancient Mesopotamia: Gilgamesh
|
Plot Rising action Turning point Falling action Fallacy Appeal to authority Two wrongs make a right Appeal to force
|
Genetic fallacy Red herring Straw man Quoting out of context Bandwagon fallacy One-sidedness
|
Appeal to ignorance Hasty generalization Appeal to consequences False dilemma Affective fallacy Intentional fallacy |
||||
|
Ancient Greece: Sappho, Pre-Socratics, Plato’s Republic
|
Alliteration Anecdote |
Chiasmus Paradox
|
Speaker Tone |
||||
Ancient China:Tao Te Ching, Li Po, Confucius, Tu Fu
|
Aphorism Cacaphony/Euphony Conceit
|
Extended metaphor Figurative language
|
Figure of speech Persona |
||||
Ancient Rome:The Aeneid, Virgil, Books I-VI |
Characterization Epic Anaphora Apostrophe
|
Metonymy Onomatopoeia Oxymoron
|
Parallel structure Rhetorical question Synecdoche |
||||
Abrahamic Religions:Abraham in Genesis, Exodus, the Gospel of Matthew, Approaching the Qur’an
|
Parable
|
Point of view |
Voice |
||||
Medieval:Dante’s Inferno |
Allegory Allusion Bathos
|
Informal diction Narrator Narrative structure |
Terza rima Simile |
||||
|
Early Modernity, the Renaissance:Don Quixote, Hamlet, Shakespeare’s Sonnets
|
Don Quixote Attitude Ballad Diction Elegy Fable Novel
|
Omniscient point of view Parody Pastoral Realism Reflexivity Romance |
Hamlet Ambiguity Antithesis Aside Dramatic monologue Exposition Foil |
Foreshadowing Formal diction In medias res Juxtaposition Soliloquy Tragedy
|
|||
|
Rhyme’s Reason Anapest Blank Verse Caesura Couplet Dactyl Dimeter
|
& Shakespeare’s End-Stopped Enjambment Feminine Rhyme Heroic Couplets Iambic Internal Rhymes |
Sonnets Masculine Rhyme Meter Monostich Pentameter Rhythm Rhyme Scansion
|
Sestina Sonnet Spondees Stanza Tetrameter Trimeter Trochees Villanelle |
||||
Early Modernity, the Enlightenment:Voltaire, Rousseau, Bentham, Equiano, Wollstonecraft, Swift, Burke |
Caricature Ethos Farce Hyperbole Irony
|
Litotes Logos Pathos Rhetoric
|
Sarcasm Satire Sentence Structure Syntax |
||||
|
Modernity and its Discontents, Romanticism:Blake and Wordsworth |
Assonance Consonance Eye rhyme
|
Free verse Lyric Ode |
Quatrain Refrain
|
||||
|
Modernity and its Discontents, Modernism:Joyce and Woolf
|
Cohesion Limited point of view |
Mood
|
Structure |
||||
|
Modernity and its Discontents, Existentialism:Doestoyevsky and Camus
|
Colloquial Connotation Denotation |
Flashback Irony
|
Loose Sentence Periodic sentence |
||||
|
Modernity and its Discontents, Spirit Quest:Hesse’s Siddhartha
|
Motif |
||||||
|
Modernity and its Discontents, Magical Realism and McOndo: Borges, Marquez, Esquivel, Fuguet, Gutiérrez
|
Magical realism
|
Stereotype |
Stock character
|
||||
Postmodern:Nietzsche, Barthes, Foucault, Said, Deleuze & Guattari, Baudrillard
|
Jargon
|
||||||
Postcolonial:Conrad, Achebe, Salih, Memmi, Fanon, Macauley, Freire, Dangarembga, Dabydeen, Kincaid |
Dialect
|
||||||
|
Unit |
Culture |
Date |
Books |
Reading Challenge |
Pgs |
|
Creation Stories and Modern Theory |
Mesopotamia Greece Judeo-Christian Japan Quiché Mayan Yoruba/Cuban Theories |
1900-1000 BCE 725 BCE 950-450 BCE 800-400 BCE 1550 Unknown-1989 1890-1957 |
Enuma ElishHesiod’s Theogony The Book of Genesis, sel. Nihongi Popol Vuh, sel. Creation Stories Selected Frazer, Freud, Durkheim, Jung, Tillich |
Somewhat DifficultSomewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Difficult |
16 22 14 16 17 22 53 |
|
Ancient Egypt |
Egypt |
2450 BCE-50 CE |
Ancient Egyptian Literature, selections
|
Somewhat Difficult |
110 |
|
Ancient Mesopot. |
Mesopotamian |
2000-1000 BCE |
Gilgamesh
|
Accessible |
80 |
|
Ancient Greece |
Hellenic |
550 BCE 520-420 BCE 390 BCE |
Sappho, selected poems Pre-Socratic philosophers, selections Republic, Plato
|
Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Very Difficult |
8 22 277 |
AncientChina
|
Chinese |
600 BCE 730 CE 500 BCE 740 CE |
Philosophy - Tao Te Ching, , sel.Poetry - Li Po, selected poems Philosophy - Analects of Confucius, sel.Poetry - Tu Fu, selected poems
|
Somewhat DifficultSomewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult |
12 12 8 12 |
Ancient Rome |
Roman |
19 BCE |
The Aeneid, Virgil, Books I-VI
|
Somewhat Difficult |
188 |
|
Abrahamic Religions
|
Jewish/Christian Christian Muslim |
950-450 BCE 60 CE 610 CE |
Abraham in Genesis / Exodus The Gospel according to Matthew Approaching the Qur’an, Sells, selection
|
Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult |
80 45 140 |
|
Medieval |
Italian |
1310 |
Inferno, Dante
|
Somewhat Difficult |
260 |
|
Early Modernity: the Renaissance
|
Spanish English English
|
1605 1602 1609 |
Don Quixote, Cervantes, selectionHamlet, Shakespeare sel. Shakespeare’s Sonnets & sel. Rhyme’s Reason
|
Accessible Difficult Difficult |
155 140 61 |
|
Early Modernity: the Enlightenment |
French French English Afro-Anglo English English |
1759 1755 / 1762 1780 / 1787 1789 1792 1729 / 1783 |
Candide, Voltaire
|
Accessible Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult |
103 27 25 28 22 24 |
|
Modern Economics |
Scottish Mexican Germ./English |
1776 1975 1888 |
The Wealth of Nations, Smith, selectionMarx for Beginners, Rius The Communist Manifesto, Marx/Engels
|
Difficult Fairly Accessible Somewhat Difficult |
84 105 24
|
|
Modernity and its Discontents: Romanticism |
English English |
1789 / 1794 1800 |
Songs of Innocence & ... of Experience, Blake Favorite Poems, selection, Wordsworth
|
Deceptively Simple Difficult |
45 20 |
|
Modernity and its Discontents: Modernism |
Irish English |
1914 1929 |
The Dubliners, Joyce, selection A Room of One’s Own, Woolf
|
Somewhat Difficult Difficult |
152 110 |
|
Modernity and its Discontents: Existentialism |
RussianFrench |
18641942 |
Notes from the Underground, DoestoyevskyThe Stranger, Camus
|
Somewhat DifficultAccessible |
91 120 |
|
Modernity and its Discontents: Individualism and the Spiritual Quest |
German | 1910 |
Siddhartha, Hesse
|
Accessible | 152 |
|
Modernity and its Discontents: Magical Realism, and McOndo
|
ArgentinaColombian Mexico Chile, Cuba, and Puerto Rico
|
1935-19671967 1989 1997-2005
|
Selected short stories, Borges100 Years of Solitude, Marquez Like Water for Chocolate, Esquivel Short Stories from Alberto Fuguet, Pedro Juan Gutiérrez, and Mayra Santos-Febres
|
DifficultSomewhat Difficult Accessible Accessible
|
73 448 185 91
|
Postmodern |
GermanFrenchFrenchPalestin.-Amer. French French |
18731968 1975 1978 1980 1981 |
“On Truth and Lying…,” Nietzsche“The Death of the Author,” Barthes Discipline & Punish, sel., Foucault Orientalism, sel., Said A Thousand Plateaus, selection, Deleuze/Guattari Simulacra and Simulation, sel., Baudrillard
|
Very DifficultVery DifficultVery Difficult Very Difficult Promiscuous of Category Very Difficult |
16 6 40 24 26 24 |
Postcolonial |
Eng. / NigerianSudan Tunisian Algerian English Brazilian Zimbabwean English/Guyan N.Y./Antig. |
1902 / 19771966 1957 1963 1833 / 1835 1968 1985 1991 1990 |
Heart of Darkness, Conrad / Racism in …, AchebeSeason of Migration to the North, Salih The Colonizer and the Colonized, Memmi Wretched of the Earth, selection, Fanon“Minutes on Indian Education,” Macauley Pedagogy of Oppressed, sel., Freire Nervous Conditions, DangarembgaThe Intended, Dabydeen Lucy, Kincaid
|
Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Difficult Difficult Accessible Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult Somewhat Difficult |
90 169 162 36 4 16 250 240 170 |
|
Apprx Total Pages: 5,000 (about 30 pages per day, for 160 days) |
AP English – Year Overview – 2009-10
|
September 2009 |
October 2009 |
November 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
|
6 |
Mythic/Modern |
12 |
4 |
Plato’s Republic |
10 |
1 |
Virgil / Exodus |
7 |
||||||||||||
|
13 |
Mythic/Modern |
19 |
11 |
Plato’s Republic |
17 |
8 |
Gospels / Qur’an |
14 |
||||||||||||
|
20 |
Ancient Egypt |
26 |
18 |
Ancient China |
24 |
15 |
Medieval - Inferno |
21 |
||||||||||||
|
27 |
Mesopotamia |
10/3 |
25 |
Rome: Aeneid |
31 |
22 |
Medieval - Inferno |
28 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 2009 |
January 2010 |
February 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
|
|
Medieval - Inferno |
5 |
3 |
Candide |
9 |
1/31 |
Marx / Romantics |
6 |
||||||||||||
|
6 |
Don Quixote |
12 |
10 |
Enlighten. Philosophy |
16 |
7 |
Modernists |
13 |
||||||||||||
|
13 |
|
19 |
17 |
Enlighten. Econ - Smith |
23 |
14 |
February Break |
20 |
||||||||||||
|
20 |
|
26 |
24 |
Midterms |
30 |
21 |
Existentialists |
27 |
||||||||||||
|
27 |
Winter Break |
1/2 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 2010 |
April 2010 |
May 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
H |
F |
S
|
|
2/28 |
Siddhartha |
6 |
4 |
Postmodern Theory |
10 |
2 |
Postcol - Memmi/Fanon |
8 |
||||||||||||
|
7 |
Borges / Marquez |
13 |
11 |
Postcol. - Conrad v Achebe |
17 |
9 |
Postcol. - Dangarembga |
15 |
||||||||||||
|
14 |
Magical Realism: Marquez |
20 |
18 |
Spring Break |
24 |
16 |
Postcolonial - Dabydeen |
22 |
||||||||||||
|
|
Marquez / Esquivel |
27 |
25 |
Postcolonial - Salih |
5/1 |
23 |
Postcolonial - Kincaid |
29 |
||||||||||||
|
28 |
Esquivel / McOndo |
4/3 |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Week of June 1 – Final Exams for Seniors |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tentative Schedule - Major Papers
(must meet minimum word count, worth 25% of each term,
except for the final paper, 2,000 words or more, worth 50% of term 4.)
|
Topic |
Due Date |
Min. Length |
|
1 - Myth/Modern |
Sept. 21 |
1,250 words |
|
2 - Republic |
Oct. 19 |
1,250 words |
|
3 - Inferno |
Dec. 7 |
1,500 words |
|
4 - Hamlet |
Jan. 4 |
1,500 words |
|
5 - Enlightenment |
Feb. 8 |
1,750 words |
|
6 - Modernity |
April 5 |
1,750 words |
|
7 - Postcolonial |
May 17 |
2,000 words |
Tentative Schedule - Major Exams
Fallacies Exam October 1 50 min. test
Don Quixote Exam December 14 50 min. test
Midyear Exam Week of Jan. 26 2 hour timed exam worth 10% of the year’s grade
Romantics Exam Term 3 50 min. test
Postcolonial Exam Term 4 50 min. test
Final Exam Week of June 1 2 hour timed exam worth 10% of the year’s grade
| Course Overview | 2009-10 Book List | Year Overview | Schedule of Major Papers | Schedule of Major Exams |