USOF AGM
quorum
909 votes
See attachment
- transfers come from operating
fund
- this is the 2006 year ending,
dated
- if any member wants info, e-mail
Robin
- overall total was omitted from
budget - $273,275.70
6a. Report from the auditor – not
present
The full slate, including a floor nominee, was elected by acclamation.
Alt – Stevan Vaughan, OCIN
Southeast – Jim Hall, COK
Alt – Steve Shannonhouse, GAOC
President (2 year term) – Clare Durand, LAOC
Competition VP (2 year term) – Robert Paddock, NTOA
Program Development (2 year term) – Mike Minium, OCIN
Recording Secretary (2 year term)
Nomination from the floor - Valerie Murray, NEOC
At-Large (3 year term) – Linda Ferguson, GAOC
At-Large Competition (3 year term) – Cristina Luis, TSN
We’ve had a very good schedule of meets in the last year. We had a big effort to revise rules for interscholastic
rules. Pleased that we transferred $15,000 to Youth
Development Programs. It’s been a great year and he’s
very pleased at where USOF is now.
None
None
If we want to change the name “Convention” to “Festival” does this need to
be approved by Board? According to
bylaws, AGM = Convention. Robin says convention can be
called anything you
want. Apply for a convention by sending
a proposal to Sara Mae Berman and she will send it to the BOD. The title of the activity can be anything as
long as it includes an AGM.
Rolling Rankings – great improvement, but can we work on
difficulties because of Sprints? What is
status? Clare is expecting a proposal
from the Ranking Committee on this for next year.
None
None
None
None
A. President’s Awards
–
To outgoing Chairman of Endowment Fund, Mike Fritz.
–
To Gary Kraght, Youth Development Fund
–
To Donna Fluegel, for stepping up as VP Marketing and
Secretary for AGM
– To Robin Shannonhouse for just being there to help whenever needed
–
To Linda Ferguson for her support and advice during his presidency from
1999 through 2007.
–
B. Silva Award – Betsy Hawes, HVO
C. Clare accepted official USOF scepter (a jaw breaker) and tiara
|
2006 Treasurer’s Report |
FYE
|
|
|
|
|
College Dev Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, CDF |
$1,265.20 |
|
Contributions,
CDF |
$715.00 |
|
Travel Grant, CDF |
($250.00) |
|
Transfers,
->CDF |
$4,000.00 |
|
Travel, WUOC Team |
($3,518.80) |
|
Fundraising, CDF |
$500.00 |
|
|
$2,711.40 |
|
|
|
|
Comp Awards Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, CAF |
$2,790.33 |
|
Transfers,
->CAF |
$2,000.00 |
|
Competitive
Awards |
($3,652.55) |
|
Comp Awards
shipping to clubs |
($25.75) |
|
TOTAL Comp Awards
Fund |
$1,112.03 |
|
|
|
|
Endowment Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, EnF |
$400.78 |
|
Contributions,
EnF |
$6,710.00 |
|
Endowment
Transfer |
($7,910.00) |
|
Life Membership
Dues |
$1,800.00 |
|
TOTAL Endowment
Fund |
$1,000.78 |
|
|
|
|
E-Punching Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, EPF |
$4,763.35 |
|
E-Punch rental
fees |
$3,195.96 |
|
EP Equipment
purchased |
($4,255.33) |
|
E-Punch Shipping |
($549.20) |
|
TOTAL E-Punching
Fund |
$3,154.78 |
|
|
|
|
Insurance Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, InsFund |
$76,430.67 |
|
Insurance Fees
from Clubs |
$22,049.00 |
|
Insurance
Premiums |
($31,636.00) |
|
TOTAL Insurance
Fund |
$66,843.67 |
|
|
|
|
Jr. Team Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, JTF |
$886.45 |
|
Contributions,
JTF |
$2,830.00 |
|
Fundraising, JTF |
$1,590.00 |
|
Transfers,
->JTF |
$5,000.00 |
|
Travel, JTF |
($7,260.00) |
|
T-shirts, JTF |
($281.63) |
|
TOTAL Jr. Team
Fund |
$2,764.82 |
|
|
|
|
Map Grant Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, MGF |
$4,805.00 |
|
Map Grants |
($1,000.00) |
|
Contributions,
MGF |
$10.00 |
|
TOTAL Map Grant
Fund |
$3,815.00 |
|
|
|
|
Map Loan Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, MLF |
$37,849.00 |
|
Map Loans Repaid |
$5,800.00 |
|
Contributions,
MLF |
$50.00 |
|
TOTAL Map Loan
Fund |
$43,699.00 |
|
|
|
|
O’ in Schools Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, OSF |
$24,444.73 |
|
Books -
Redistribution |
$3,042.65 |
|
Transfers,
OSF-> |
($1,000.00) |
|
Contributions,
OSF |
$765.00 |
|
TOTAL O’ in
Schools Fund |
$27,252.38 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, OF |
$62,841.24 |
|
Office Support |
($10,800.00) |
|
VP Marketing
& Committees: ONA |
($24,253.73) |
|
Postage |
($1,088.00) |
|
Contributions, OF |
$5,373.00 |
|
Club Dues |
$12,220.12 |
|
Membership Dues |
$29,027.00 |
|
Endowment
Proceeds |
$3,014.00 |
|
Telephone |
($1,040.31) |
|
VP Marketing
& Committees: Website |
($1,096.95) |
|
Sanctioning Fees |
$17,018.00 |
|
Transfers,
OF-> |
($13,000.00) |
|
Dues &
Charter |
($2,210.00) |
|
VP Competition
& Committees: |
($490.00) |
|
VP Club Services
& Committees |
($159.91) |
|
Supplies |
($1,552.57) |
|
VP Marketing
& Committees: Marketing Projects |
($109.50) |
|
VP Administration
& Committees-Other |
($101.27) |
|
|
($150.00) |
|
VP Adm &
Committees: Fundraising Expense |
($1,056.97) |
|
VP Program &
Committees |
($237.38) |
|
Transfers,
->OF |
$300.00 |
|
Interest Income |
$9,439.84 |
|
TOTAL Operating
Fund |
$81,886.61 |
|
|
|
|
Program Dev Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, PDF |
$5,680.46 |
|
Contributions,
PDF |
$50.00 |
|
Program Income,
PDF |
$184.34 |
|
Programs, PDF |
($33.94) |
|
TOTAL Program Dev
Fund |
$5,880.86 |
|
|
|
|
Ski-O Team Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, SkiTF |
$5,389.92 |
|
Contributions,
Ski TF |
$860.77 |
|
Travel, Ski TF |
$6,552.50 |
|
Transfers,
->Ski TF |
$1,125.00 |
|
TOTAL Ski-O Team
Fund |
$13,928.19 |
|
|
|
|
Sponsor & Mkt Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, SponMkt Fund |
$8,516.10 |
|
Sponsorships |
$1,500.00 |
|
Transfers,
SMktF-> |
($1,425.00) |
|
TOTAL Sponsor
& Mkt Fund |
$8,591.10 |
|
|
|
|
Team Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, TF |
$9,408.84 |
|
Contributions, TF |
$2,690.00 |
|
Travel, TF |
($12,051.15) |
|
Fundraising, TF |
$9,955.21 |
|
Fundraising
Expenses, |
($2,383.98) |
|
Transfers,
->TF |
$3,000.00 |
|
Travel Grant, TF |
($200.00) |
|
Training, TF |
($600.00) |
|
TOTAL Team Fund |
$9,818.92 |
|
|
|
|
Trail-O Team Fund |
|
|
Beg. Balance, TrTF |
$210.00 |
|
Contributions,
TrTF |
$895.00 |
|
Travel Grant,
TrTF |
($390.00) |
|
Fundraising, TrTF |
$101.16 |
|
TOTAL Trail-O
Team Fund |
$816.16 |
|
|
|
|
OVERALL TOTAL |
$273,275.70 |
Annual General Meeting –
Report from Gary Kraght – Vice President for Club Services
USOF changed its insurance broker and insurance company in 2007. Our new broker is Bollinger Insurance, a leader in sports insurance programs. Club event coordinators have commented on how timely and easy the insurance process now is, with most requests handled the same day by email. For the first time, USOF and member clubs now have participants liability, so we are protected from liability claims brought by participants at events. For any insurance questions, contact Stephen Vaughan, USOF Insurance Coordinator.
In 2007, a Junior Development Grant program was inaugurated. To date, $11965 in grants have been awarded to clubs for a wide variety of junior development proposals. There is still $3000 available in the 2007 budget, and the grant committee will be asking for more in 2008. Committee members are Janet Porter, Caroline Fleming, Chuck Ferguson, Jim Eagleton, and Gary Kraght – chair.
A new USOF Land Use policy emphasizing environmental issues was approved by the USOF Board and added to the Orienteering and Land Use web page on the USOF website. The page also includes pointers to other resources regarding orienteering and land use. Terry Farrah is the USOF Environment and Land Use Coordinator. Over the next year she would like to identify one or more national land management agencies, such as BLM, USFS and/or NPS, and work with them to formulate a policy for orienteering land use.
Usage of our two map funds, the Map Loan Fund and the Map
Grant Fund, was light but not forgotten. City of
In 2007, all USOF charter clubs renewed. A
few clubs are struggling with membership, but it is heartening to see a 100
percent renewal rate. As measured by club starts,
orienteering is continuing to grow in the
Greg Lennon is USOF’s new Mapping Coordinator, while Mike Minium continues to provide New Club Support.
2007
USOF Competition Report
Clare
Durand, Vice President, Competition
First, I’d like to thank all of the committee members in competition for the support they’ve given during my years as Vice-President.
USOF had/will have members this year competing at:
World Ski Orienteering Champs
JWOC
World Trail O Champs
World Masters O Champs
Notable results include Holly Kuestner coming in 9th place for the first leg of the relay at JWOC. Also, our Ski-O team selected almost a year in advance, providing ample training time, and included some new, younger members.
All of the teams are continuing to ramp up fundraising and training efforts, please continue to lend your support. Janet Porter, Junior Team Leader, would particularly like to compartmentalize and delegate more of the Junior support functions. We need people to serve as regional coaches, a national Jr. Fundraising director, and a JWOC travel coordinator.
Cathy Yekenevicz continues to keep our teams in compliance with IOF anti-doping regulations. We have had some athletes tested, with no violations.
The sanctioning committee under Randy Hall continues to do an excellent job of vetting applications and giving useful feedback to sanctioned events to keep as high a standard as possible. Many bids for 2008 will be decided this weekend. We are still in need of a bid for the 2008 Classic Championships.
Once again the most significant rules change affected the
intercollegiates. Scoring changes passed last year
were deemed to create a biased system and a new scoring system was put in
place. If you notice problems or have
questions about the rules, please contact Rules Committeee Chair, Steve
Shannonhouse. Please note that the sooner rules issues
come to our attention, the more likely that they can be refined prior to the
next affected event.
The rogaine committee has recently
changed chairmanship, with Barb Bryant taking over for Brad Hunt. The committee is working on sanctioning a potential bid
for the 2008 US Championships.
RANKINGS
Our rankings committee continues to do a superb job of providing up to the minute rankings and refining the ranking rules to better serve our members.
COACHING
Bob Turbyfill, chair of the coaching certification committee, has now provided his coaching clinic at a number of forums with more scheduled into the future. We are greatly increasing the number of USOF certified Level 1 coaches and expect to have some Level 2 coaches certified very soon.
Bob also instituted the new Navigation Certification program to encourage Juniors and others to strive for specific performance standards. The program is also intended to encourage coaching and coaching certification.
Elis Eberlein resigned as chair of the course consullting committee after many years of dedicated service. Thanks for all of his support. I am currently working on filling this position and welcome any referrals.
Support
our USOF Focus!
Help to increase training and competition opportunities for Juniors.
Jerry Rhodes, Vice President Marketing
First, I would like to apologize for failing to participate in any of the USOF board meetings this year and last. I had hoped to be able to attend two meetings this year, including the AGM, but career and family issues have made it impossible to travel this year. For example, this Saturday (is my daughter’s wedding.
This report is not based on any information generated at a board meeting. Rather, it comes from my own actions, discussions I’ve had with orienteers from around the country (both in person and by e‑mail), observations at the limited number of meets I’ve attended outside my immediate area, my professional experience with marketing communications, and the marketing efforts of my own club.
If observations miss the mark for other clubs, or if other clubs have effective marketing strategies in place already, I’d like to thank you for your efforts. I’d love to hear about them so that we can share your successes with other clubs.
As individual clubs, we are working hard to reach the public, probably harder than we should. There are several reasons why our efforts do not produce as much as we’d like. These reasons are not exclusive to USOF. In fact, many are true for every organization and business, and why there is a career for communicators.
§ Our marketing efforts are piecemeal. We have no overall approach and framework for marketing. We don’t have a basis for making marketing decisions. Our efforts are exclusively dependant on the activities of the individual clubs, with varying degrees of experience and success.
§ We focus primarily on the needs of our members, and less on the marketplace of potential participants. We focus on committed, competitive orienteers, and less on the needs of the newcomers and beginners. Our schedules, the way we run our events, and our language of the orienteering insider, even when we are speaking to non-orienteers.
We need to understand those we are trying to reach, speak to them in their language, and address their interests rather than on our own. We may not need to change anything that we do, but we cannot make that judgment if we do not know our market.
§ Our marketing efforts are primarily focused on the free media. This media is not very effective and is becoming worse. In my own area, for example, the very week that the major daily newspaper wrote a series of articles on the obesity epidemic, it dropped coverage of outdoors activities in its community calendar to free up space for more coverage of video games.
§ We speak to the media and to the public using our own, insiders’ language, rather than language they understand. Reporters don’t have the same degree of excitement about orienteering that we do. We must reach them on their terms and understand the needs of their publications, rather than expect them to come to us on our terms.
We have had some successes at the federation level. However, I must acknowledge that these successes have been sporadic, rare, and typically at the initiative of the media, rather than of USOF.
Recently, for example, we’ve been contacted by Popular Mechanics magazine, which is planning a list of on the things you should know.
Human Kinetics, a publisher of textbooks, has also contacted us. They would like to update and Americanize the Teaching Orienteering book. (I have a full, separate report on that contact: “Human Kinetics proposal.doc.”)
Our initiatives this year include:
§ Donna Fluegel and Cristina Luis have taken the lead to develop a survey of active orienteers. A survey of this nature is necessary to provide potential sponsors with the data they want about how our participants fit into their market. Donna will address this further.
We’ve identified a free resource that can provide some general trend and demographic data about outdoor recreationists. The Outdoor Recreation Participation Study published by the Outdoor Industry Foundation in 2006 can be an effective tool for seeking sponsorships. It can also be helpful in preparing testimony to encourage land managers to be more flexible in their policies toward orienteering.
See http://www.outdoorindustry.org:80/research.php?action=detail&research_id=27
§ We’ve reached out to land managers. USOF members and members of the board have participated in national forums on outdoor recreation, including those sponsored by the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, and American Recreation Coalition. Our members have provided technical expertise to public land managers for recreation‑enhancing programs. (See http://www.funoutdoors.com/files/Troutdale%20Regional%20Report.pdf and “NPS Statement.doc.”)
(One example of individual effort
in
We’ve all experienced the pain of trying to reach the public through the outlet we all can afford: the free media. News media coverage ranges from poor to nonexistent in its orienteering coverage. A one‑line calendar item and a feature story once every couple of years is typical.
Traditional media is even worse in reaching young people who are adept with electronic communications, but may never read a newspaper (much less find the fine print where our events are listed).
We’ve taken some steps to reach young orienteers through Attackpoint.org. But we need to explore alternative forms of communication to reach those young people who are not already committed orienteers.
We are not alone in trying to
feel our way into this medium (or media). Other
outdoor recreation groups and even
Many are aware of the disturbing
trend described in Richard Louv’s book, Last
Child in the Woods. Louv describes a phenomenon
endemic in the youngest generation of Americans: nature deficit disorder. Children growing up secluded from everyday, unregulated
exposure to nature are paying the price with negative effects on physical and
mental health. As Louv describes, the epidemic of
obesity among young people has grown at a time when children have greater
access to organized sports than any previous generation. What
is missing is exposure to and play in nature. (See
also “The Importance of Play in Promoting Healthy Child Development and Maintaining
Strong Parent‑Child Bonds,” American
I attended
the “Reconnecting Youth with the Outdoors” conference in
(These young
people are not confined to a strictly urban environment.
I also spent
time with staff of the
There are steps we can take, as a federation, as clubs, and as individual orienteers.
To improve our marketing, we
should:
§ Make every orienteer a marketer.
o Encourage orienteers to speak to non‑orienteers using the language of hiking, running, and nature, whatever their interest is, rather than orienteer’s language of reentrants and relocation.
o Learn an “elevator speech:” a quickie explanation of what orienteering is you can deliver in one minute, while speaking their language, to their interests, rather than your own.
o Offer a taste of orienteering in different venues. Help local park districts with their special events by offering a mini “treasure hunt” using maps. Offer constructive alternatives to park managers that are dealing with the phenomenon of “social trails” left by geocachers.
o Don’t treat GPS as a naughty word. Do something to attract this group to orienteering events, and maybe some "Real Navigation" will wear off on them.
o
Help with adventure races. Offer
a special navigation class for participants in this growing sport.
§ Utilize the existing free resources about the demographics of outdoor recreation enthusiasts. Find out what people like to do, then build our messages accordingly. For example, if 90 percent of the people like hiking, but few are into hardcore off‑trail running, then most of our general marketing efforts should focus on this aspect of the sport and reserve the messages for woods runners for marketing efforts targeted specifically for them.
§
Find out
more. We
haven’t found a free resource that gives us the information we need to market
effectively or to eliminate the barriers to participation. In
general, we don's know what people look for in an outdoor experience. What makes them want to participate? Where
do they get information? What keeps them from
participating? A survey can find this out. (See example from
§ Systemize publicity. Nationally, we should commit resources to develop a system that could generate press releases regarding top finishers at all sanctioned championships, and make these releases available to the finishers’ home clubs for distribution to appropriate media outlets. If we have the expertise of someone who works with SportIdent and other databases, we could merge this information electronically. We should also consider providing resources to reimburse clubs for the mailing cost of these releases.
§ Continue and expand idea sharing within USOF. This year two e‑mail discussion groups were developed. We have a group for club marketing coordinators and a discussion group and resource database for club newsletter editors. Both groups exist to help club volunteers share best practices and resources for internal and external club communication. Both could be a lot more active than they are.
§ Explore alternative forms of communication. We need to reach young people. Those who understand Attackpoint, MySpace, and YouTube should help us figure out how to get our message into these media.
§ Pursue partnerships. Other organizations face the same challenges and barriers we face: few resources, few volunteers, lack of knowledge how to reach the public at large, and growing challenges reaching youth. At the recreation forum, speakers repeatedly begged for greater cooperation between organizations with similar missions. It is tough, when limited volunteers make it so easy to focus internally. I believe, however, it is worthwhile to keep up the struggle and pursue these partnerships even when they don’t respond as quickly or as wholeheartedly as you’d like.