Alternative Transportation in Parks &
Public Lands Study
Stakeholders’ Questions
August 6, 2008
1.
How
familiar are you with this project?
SBC
is quite familiar with the project. Our
group is very interested in alternative transportation on Sanibel in a general
sense, and we are also frequent users of the Refuge. As a result, the Alt. Transportation Study
has been on our radar screen as a potentially positive development for Sanibel.
2.
How
would you describe this project?
We
believe the Study project is well designed in that it seems to have an
objective, professional protocol and it seems like it is engaging a broad,
multi-faceted swath of the community in gathering information. It is also timely, given events that are happening that influence travel to the island……., for
example: the recent completion of the
new causeway/bridge, and the recent run-up in the cost of gasoline.
3.
How
much support and awareness of the refuge is in the community? In your group? Is
it viewed as a vital element of
Sanibel
residents are highly aware of the Refuge and view it as one of the community’s
“crown jewels”. Members of Sanibel
Bicycle Club share that view, and may be even more appreciative of the Refuge,
as we often bike along
4.
Is
transportation to and from the island as well as to, from and within the refuge
a significant item of concern in the community? With your group? If so, how
significant?
Our
observation is the residents of Sanibel seems to be
concerned about transportation on and off the island, mostly from the
standpoint of “too much traffic congestion” and inconvenience from traffic jams
during season. Not much concern about
travel in and through the Refuge, per se.
The community’s solution seems to be to somehow reduce the number of
cars coming onto the island by making Sanibel “less of an attraction”. There is a feeling that things would be just
fine if we could just stop “those outsiders” from coming here……even though most
folks realize that tourism and visitors feed the
Many
of SBC’s members view things a bit differently.
Our view of Sanibel’s transportation infrastructure is a bit broader and
includes the
5.
How
do you and your group perceive the local balance of the environment, human
activity and transportation? How do you think the community perceives the local
balance of the environment, human activity and transportation?
The
community of Sanibel has a very heightened sensitivity
about the balance of development versus the environment. However, the community’s focus is mostly on
“development” as defined by buildings and roads and motor vehicle traffic, and
to some extent on human carrying capacity of beaches, etc. There is not as much focus on how “human
powered transportation” can help the mix.
Because
of its preoccupation with cycling, SBC tends to see that having more people on
bikes and having a more bike friendly environment and infrastructure,
would be an improvement.
6.
How
do we protect the natural environment with the increase of human activity?
We
should do everything we can to steer the human activity into avenues that are
less harmful to the environment. Use
bikes instead of cars for daily commuting and errands. Encourage visitors to get out of cars and on
bikes or on foot to experience Sanibel and the Refuge “up close and personal”.
7.
What
should be the transportation goals of the refuge and the city?
Discourage
use of fossil fuel and encourage human powered transportation. Make sure the infrastructure and rules entice
this behavior rather than discourage it.
Make sure the island’s infrastructure (e.g. the path system) allows
maximum connectivity between the places people live/stay and the places they
want to go.
8.
Is
there a need for alternatives to the way residents and visitors travel within
the refuge and the city?
SBC
would say yes….there is a need for new alternatives and new ideas. We would make two points:
·
Sanibel is already blessed with a terrific
resource in its existing path system, which was groundbreaking and state of the
art when it was originally built in the ‘60’s & ‘70’s. However, like other forms of infrastructure,
the path system needs to be maintained and updated to remain functional and to meet
the changing needs of the community and their increasingly active lifestyles.
The City is working on a new Shared-Use Path
Master Plan that will be a guide for future maintenance and development. However, the big question will be how do we fund that work in a world of tight budgets and other
pressing needs.
·
There are other ideas that could advance the
cause of easing the burden of traffic on Sanibel and also enabling Refuge
visitors to maximize enjoyment of their visit.
We have outlined our thoughts on these ideas in a separate talk sheet
that has been sent to you.
9.
Are
you and your group open to all transportation options (alternatives) in the
refuge and on the island? Do you think the community is open to all
transportation options (alternatives) in the refuge and on the island?
SBC
is definitely open to all ideas and options.
However, our group would judge new ideas against the standard: how will new ideas & options impact the
safety and functionality of the shared-use path system. The greater community has shown in the past
that certain ideas are not well received, especially those that are viewed as
creating an increased attraction that will drawn new/more visitors and create
more congestion.
10.
Is
there a transportation option (alternative) that you or your group perceives to
not be palatable? Is there a transportation option (alternative) that the
community perceives to not be palatable? What is the greatest challenge to
transportation solutions at the refuge and on the island?
In
the past, there has been major controversy about allowing Segways
to use the shared-use paths. Some people
love them and some people have great concerns. There is no evidence that this
issue is going away.
SBC
has taken a position neither for nor against Segways
per se, but we feel that in its current state the shared-use path system cannot
safely handle adding Segways to the list of approve
uses. (The biggest problem is path
width. Many sections of the path system
are simply too narrow.)
Given
the controversy over Segways, it is conceivable that
other types of motorized applications for the path system would be rejected by
the community. In addition, we would
expect expanded use of motor scooters and electric mini-cars on the island’s
streets to be resisted by the community.
Finally,
some people might also object to mass transit solutions if they perceive them
as adding to the congestion or increasing visitor counts.
11.
What
would encourage people to use other modes than automobiles?
Safer
paths, or perceived safer paths. Better, more direct connectivity between
origin and destination points. Clear
directional signage along the path system.
12.
Are
you involved in any statewide, county, city, etc. planning efforts that might
impact this planning effort?
SBC
is very active within Sanibel, communicating closely with the City Council,
City Manager, Director of Public Works and Planning Director regarding path
system needs as we see them. At present,
we are providing input to the Planning Director on the City’s new Shared Use
Path Master Plan.
SBC
also advocates with
13.
How
has energy costs influenced the need for alternative transportation options?
Frankly,
the price of gasoline does not seem to be much of factor on a local level, due
to the relatively small distances involved in intra-island trips and the
affluence of many residents and visitors.
We see more pressure for alternative transportation options coming from
concerns about air pollution, noise and traffic congestion.
14.
What
do you think it will take for this project to be successful?
Success
will require getting the local citizenry to get past their parochial
perspective and see the big picture on a number of things. It will take creating a holistic
understanding of the needs and how solutions can address them.
15.
Have
you been involved in any past transportation or planning efforts on Sanibel?
SBC has been actively involved with the City for
years, as outlined above, advocating for the path system.
16.
Do
you have any questions?
Two questions: