INDEX OF SELECTED SCHOLARLY AND PROFESSIONAL
PUBLICATIONS
(Hyperlinks to articles and chapters
available on this web-site/ others available in libraries;)
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Materials made available here
are for the sole benefit of students and colleagues who would otherwise write
or email a request for a copy. If published they are subject to copyright law,
which permits single copies of published materials to be made, either in
electronic or hard copy form, for personal use. It does not permit making
multiple copies, reposting these materials in published form on another
electronic site, mass electronic distribution, or other forms of commercial
use. As the author, I agree to allow you to make single copies, as permitted by
copyright law, for your own use. If you reference these materials
electronically on another site, you should follow standard APA conventions, and
hyperlink to this site; do not include and reproduce the full article on
another site, as this would violate the publishers copyright. As author, I
consider the reproduction of these materials on my own website to be nothing
more, given this notice, than the electronic equivalent of providing you with a
copy upon request.
Golding,
S. L., & Roesch, R. (1987). The assessment and conceptualization of
criminal responsibility. In A. Hess and I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of forensic
psychology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Pp. 378-394.
Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1987). Determining
competency to stand trial. In A. Hess and I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of
forensic psychology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Pp. 395-436.
Roberts, C. F.,
Golding, S. L., & Fincham, F. D. (1987). Implicit theories of
responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense. Law and Human
Behavior, 11, 207-232.
Golding, S. L., & Roesch, R. (1988). Competency
for adjudication: An international analysis. In D. Weisstub (Ed.), Law and
mental health: International perspectives, Vol 4. (pp. 73-109).
Golding, S. L., Eaves, D., & Kowaz, A. (1989). The
assessment, treatment and community outcome of insanity acquittees: Forensic
history and response to treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,
12, 149-179. Ascii text
Golding, S. L. (1990). Mental health professionals and
the courts: The ethics of expertise. International Journal of Law and
Psychiatry, 13, 261-307.
Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic
Psychologists. (1991). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. Law and
Human Behavior, 15, 655-665. [S.L. Golding & T. Grisso, Co-chairs].
Roesch, R., Golding, S. L., Hans, V. P., & Reppucci,
N. D. (1991). Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs.
Law and Human Behavior, 15, 1-11.
Roberts, C. F.,
& Golding, S. L. (1991). The social construction of criminal responsibility
and insanity. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 349-376.
Golding,
S. L. (1991). Increasing the coherence of forensic mental health services: An
introduction. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 18, 175-177.
Golding, S. L. (1992). The adjudication of criminal
responsibility: A review of theory and research. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S.
Laufer (Eds.) Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York: Springer-Verlag, Pp. 230-250.
Golding,
S. L. (1992). Studies of incompetent defendants: Research and social policy
implications. Forensic Reports, 5, 77-82.
Golding, S. L. (1992). Increasing the reliability,
validity and relevance of expert psychological evidence: An introduction to the
Special Section on Expert Evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 253-256.
Anson, D. A.,
Golding, S. L., & Gully, K. (1993). Child sexual abuse allegations:
Reliability of criteria-based content analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 17,
331-341.
Golding, S. L. (1993). Interdisciplinary Fitness
Interview - Revised (Training Manual and Interview Procedure). Unpublished
monograph, State of Utah Division of Mental Health . (Please remit a check for $15 if you
download and use this manual. Also, contact me directly, as a new manual is in
progress)
Roesch, R., Ogloff, J.R.P. & Golding, S. L.
(1993). Competency to stand trial: Assessment and treatment issues. Journal of
Applied and Preventative Psychology, 2, 43-51.
Borum, R.,
Otto, R., & Golding, S. L. (1993). Improving clinical judgement and decision
making in forensic evaluations. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,
21, 35-76.
Golding, S. L. (1994, Spring). Expert opinion -
commentary. American Psychology-Law Newsletter, 14(2), 5.
Golding, S. L. (1995). The limits of change in mental
health law. Review of P. Appelbaum, " Almost a Revolution: Mental Health
Law and the Limits of Change. Contemporary Psychology.
Skeem, J., Golding, S.L., Cohn, N., & Berge, G.
(1998). The logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial.
Law and Human Behavior, 22, 519-548.
Skeem, J., & Golding, S.L. (1998). Community
examiners' evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and
suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,
29, 357-367 .
Roesch, R., Zapf, P.A., Golding, S.L., & Skeem, J.
(1999). Defining and assessing competency to stand trial. In A. Hess & I.
Weiner (Eds.) Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Second Edition. New York: Wiley
Golding, S.L., Skeem, J., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P.A.
(1999). The assessment of criminal responsibility: Current controversies. In A.
Hess & I. Weiner (Eds.) Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Second Edition.
New York: Wiley
Golding,
S. L. (1999). Commentary on In re Gay 968 P. 2d 476 [Sup. Ct. CA, 1998].
Forensic Echo, 3(5), 5-6.
Golding, S. L. (1999). The Voir Dire of Forensic
Experts: Issues of qualification and training [Subtitle: "Sheepskins for
sale: Shortcut to Slaughter?]. Paper presented at the American Psychological
Association, Boston, MA, August, 1999. N.B. In the ensuring years,
both the American Board of Forensic Psychology and the American College of Forensic Examiners have changed significant aspects of their
diplomating procedures. Thus, this paper
is “dated,” though the issues it raises are not. Readers are thereby cautioned to make
specific inquiries of a psychologist who claims either diplomate in order to
clarify which requirements s/he had to meet.
Golding, S. L. (1999, October). Problems in
conceptualizing and implementing reforms in expert witness testimony. Panel on
"Bringing psychological expertise to the law," Paper presented at the
meeting of the American Psychological Association and the Criminal Justice
Section of the American Bar Association, Washington, DC.
Skeem, J., & Golding, S. (1999, October). Jurors'
intuitive conceptions of insanity and their relationship to verdict selection
in insanity defense cases. Paper presented at the meeting of the American
Psychological Association and the Criminal Justice Section of the American Bar
Association, Washington, DC.
Golding, S. L. Comparing the new/old EPPCC
Skeem, J., Golding, S..L. & Emke-Francis,P.
(2004), Assessing adjudicative competency: Using legal and empirical principles
to inform practice. In Donohue, W. T. & Levensky, E. R. (Eds.). Forensic
psychology: A handbook for mental health and legal professionals. Pp. 175-211.
New York: Academic Press
Connell, M., Golding, S., Morgan,
L., & Niland, J. [authors listed alphabetically] (Fall, 2004). Expert Opinion – Does mandatory reporting
trump attorney-client opinion?. American Psychology-Law Society News, 24(3),
Pp. 10-13,15.
Golding, S. L. (2005). Education, training and
certification in forensic psychology. Encyclopedia of Legal and Forensic
Medicine. Pp. 346-350. Academic Press:UK
Golding,
S. L. (10/15/2004).Presentation to TOPSS on Psychology and Law: An Introduction
[In PowerPoint format]
Zapf, P.A., Skeem, J. & Golding,
S.L. (2005). Factor structure and
validity of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool - Adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 433-445.
Zapf, P.A.,
Golding, S.L., Roesch, R. (2006). Legal, empirical and clinical aspects of the
conceptualization and assessment of criminal responsibility and the insanity
defense. In A. Hess & I. Weiner
(Eds.) Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Third Edition. Pp. 332-365. New York:
Wiley
Golding, S. L. (In
press). Learning forensic examinations
of adjudicative competency. In R.L.
Jackson (ed). Learning forensic assessment.
Workshops
Competency in the
elderly
Issues and Developments in Forensic
Evaluations and Testimony
Forensic Issues
in Defending Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse
Issues and Developments in
Assessing Adjudicative Competence
Keynote address:Competency Training
Workshop, Arizona Supreme Court Continuing Education, Tucson May 2-4 2007