Psychology 5480

Bartol, C.R. & Bartol, A. M. (2006). History of forensic psychology. In A. Hess and I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Second Edition. New York: Wiley. Pp. 3-27.

Grisso, T. (1987). The economic and scientific future of forensic psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 42, 831-839.

Hess, A. K. (2006). Defining forensic psychology. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), (2006). The handbook of forensic psychology (3rd ed.). (pp. 28-58). New York, NY, Wiley

II: Research and Scholarship Issues

http://isi6.newisiknowledge.com/portal.cgi

An absolutely amazing resource from Web of Science to locate articles, Ashepardize@ articles and authors, etc. Also available at: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/biomed/quickguides/wos_topic.html

http://www.law2.byu.edu/Law_Library/Digital_Collections/dig-Research_Guides.htm [A very useful collection of specific legal research guides, e.g. to federal cases, state statutes, etc.]

Knapp, S. J., Vandecreek, L., & Zirkel, P.A. (1985). Legal research techniques: What the psychologist needs to know. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 363-372.

III: Pop Forensics and Science: Criminal Profiling

Alison, L, Smith, M. D, & Morgan, K. (2003, Jun). Interpreting the accuracy of offender profilers. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(2), 185-195.

Davis, J. A. (1998, Jan-Feb). Profile of a sexual predator: A psychological autopsy of an American serial killer. Forensic Examiner, 7(1-2), 28-33.

Davis, D, & Follette, W. C. (2002, Apr). Rethinking the probative value of evidence: Base rates, intuitive profiling, and the "postdiction" of behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 133-158.

Douglas, J. E, Burgess, A. W, Burgess, A. G, & Ressler, R. K. (1992). Crime classification manual: A standard system for investigating and classifying violent crime. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Froyland, I, & O'Callaghan, K. (1999). Offender profiling and criminal differentiation. Expert Evidence, 7(3), 217-220.

Godwin, G. M. (2000). Hunting serial predators: A multivariate classification approach to profiling violent behavior. Boca Raton, FL, US: CRC Press.

Homant, R. J, & Kennedy, D. B. (1998, Sep). Psychological aspects of crime scene profiling: Validity research. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(3), 319-343.

http://www.corpus-delicti.com/prof_archives_profiles.html [A compilation of various profiles published in the media and in court records]

In Re Gina D, 138 N.H. 697 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire 22/July, 1994)

Jackson, J. L, van den-Eshof, P, & de Kleuver, E. E. (1997). A research approach to offender profiling. In Jackson, Janet L. (Ed); Bekerian, Debra A. (Ed). (1997). Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice. Wiley series in the psychology of crime, policing and law. (pp. 107-132). New York:Wiley

Jackson, J. L, & Bekerian, D. A. (1997). Offender profiling: Theory, research and practice. New York:Wiley.

Kocsis, R. N. (2003, Feb). An empirical assessment of content in criminal psychological profiles. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(1), 37-46.

Kocsis, R. N. (2003, Apr). Criminal psychological profiling: Validities and abilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47(2), 126-144.

Kocsis, R. N, Irwin, H. J, Hayes, A. F, & Nunn, R. (2000, Mar). Expertise in psychological profiling: A comparative assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(3), 311-331.

Kocsis, R. N, & Cooksey, R. W. (2002, Dec). Criminal psychological profiling of serial arson crimes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(6), 631-656.

Meloy, R. (2000). The nature and dynamics of sexual homicide: An integrative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(1), 1-22.

Nenno v. Texas, 970 S.W. 2d 549 (1998), Tex. Crim. App.

Otto, R. K, Poythress, N, Starr, L, & Darkes, J. (1993, Dec). An empirical study of the reports of APA's peer review panel in the congressional review of the U.S.S. IOWA incident. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61(3), 425-442.

Palarea, R. E, Zona, M. A, Lane, J. C, & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: Threats, violence, and associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17(3), 269-283.

Palermo, G. B. (2002, Aug). Criminal profiling: The uniqueness of the killer. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 383-385.

Risinger, D., & Loop, J. (2002). Three card monte, Monty Hall, Modus operandi and "offender profiling;" Some lessons of modern cognitive science for the law of evidence. Cardozo Law Review, 24, 193-273.

Turvey, B. E. (1999). Criminal profiling: An introduction to behavioral evidence analysis. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.

United States v. Bighead, 128 F. 3d 1329 (1997), 9th Cir.

United States v Robinson, 94 F. Supp. 2d 751 (W.D. Louisiana 2000)

United States v Fitzgerald, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23326 (4th Cir. 2003). [finding that the proferred profiling evidence to help establish intent based upon patterns of child molesters did not satisfy Duabert or Joiner]

Wilson, P, Lincoln, R, & Kocsis, R. (1997, Apr). Validity, utility and ethics of profiling for serial violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 4(1), 1-11.

Woodworth, M, & Porter, S. (2000). Historical foundations and current applications of criminal profiling in violent crime investigations. Expert Evidence, 7(4), 241-264.

IV: Malingering and Lie Detection

Butcher, J, & Miller, K. (1999). Personality assessment in personal injury litigation. In A.K. Hess & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology 2nd. Edition (pp. 104-126). New York: Wiley.

Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. The polygraph and lie detection. Washinton:D.C.: National Academy Press.

Fairbank, J. A, McCaffrey, R. J, & Keane, T. M. (1985). Psychometric detection of fabricated symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 501-503.

Faust, D, Hart, K, Guilmette, T. J, & Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 508-515.

http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/rorschach.htm [how to fake a custody examination!!]

Iacono, W, & Patrick, C. (1999). Polygraph ("lie detector") testing: The state of the art. In A. Hess & I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology (pp. 440-473). New York: Wiley.

Jackson, R, Rogers, R, & Sewell, K. (2005). Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): Screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 199-210.

Kucharski, L. T, Ryan, W, Vogt, J, & Goodloe, E. (1998). Clinical symptom presentation in suspected malingerers: An empirical investigation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26(4), 579-585.

Mann, S, Vrij, A, & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 365-376.

Masip, J, Sporer, S, & et al. (2005). The Detection of deception the with reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime and Law, 11(1), 99-122.

McKinzey, R. (1999). The cross-examination of neuropsychologists: Countering the claim of brain damage. Prosecutor's Brief, 19(2), 13-19.

Mittenberg, W, Patton, C, Conyock, E, & Condit. D. (2002/11/25). Base-rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094-1103.

Nichols v. American National Insurance, No. 97-2032 (8th Cir. September 8, 1998) [defendant’s expert not permitted to testify as to “specific character” for truthfulness]

Resnick, P. (1997). Malingered psychosis. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception (pp. 47-67). New York: Guilford.

Resnick, P. J, & Harris, M. R. (2002). Retrospective assessment of malingering in insanity defense cases. In R. I. Simon & D. W. Shuman (Eds.), Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past. (pp. 101-134) [Chapter]. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Resnick, P. (1997). Malingering of post-traumatic stress disorders. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception (pp. 130-152). New York: Guilford.

Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Rogers, R, Harrell, E, & Liff, C. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 255-274.

Rogers, R, Sewell, K, Martin, M, & Vitacco, M. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10(2), 160-177.

Ruiz, M, Drake, E, Glass, A, & et al. (2002). Trying to beat the system: Misuse of the internet to assist in avoiding the detection of psychological symptom dissimulation. Professional Psychology, 33(3), 294-299.

Slovenko, R. (2004). Testimony on credibility: A case analysis. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 32(2), 243-268.

Sreenivasan, S., Eth, S., Kirkish, P., & Garrick, T. (2003). A Practical Method for the Evaluation of Symptom Exaggeration in Minor Head Trauma Among Civil Litigants. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(2), 220-231.

Vrij, A, & Mann, S. (2000). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer.

Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. West Sussex:England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Wetter, M. W, & Corrigan, S. K. (1995). Providing information to clients about psychological tests: A survey of attorneys' and law students' attitudes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 474-477.

Williams, C, Lees-Haley, P, & Djanogly, S. E. (1999). Clinical scrutiny of litigants' self-reports. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30(4), 361-367.

Wynkoop, T, & Denny, R. (1999). Exaggeration of neuropsychological deficit in competency to stand trial. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1(2), 29-53.

V: Police Interrogations and Confessions

Ainsworth, J. (1993). In a different register: The pragmatics of powerlessness in police interrogation. Yale Law Journal, 103, 259-.

Anonymous. Coerced confessions. Harvard Law Review, 105, 152-175.

Arizona v. Fulminante, 111 S. Ct. 1246 (1991)

Cassell, P. G. (1996). Miranda's social costs: An empirical reassessment. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 387-499.

Cassell, P. G. (1998). Protecting the innocent from false confessions and lost confessions-- and from Miranda. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, ??

Clare, I, & Gudjonsson, G. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 295-301.

Cripes, R. (1966, September). Crimes, confessions, and the Court. Atlantic Monthly.

Grano, J. (1979). Voluntariness, free will, and the law of confessions. Virginia Law Review, 65, 859-945.

Grisso, T. (1998). Instruments for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Gudjonsson, G. (2003). The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook. West Sussex, UK: Wiley. [The definitive guide to the literature].

Gudjonsson, G. (1990). One hundred alleged false confession cases. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 249-257.

Gudjonsson, G. (1992). Interrogation and false confessions:Vulnerability factors. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 47(8), 597-599.

Gudjonsson, G. (1995). Psychological vulnerability: Suspects at risk. In David Morgan & Geoffrey M. Stevenson (Eds.), Suspicion and silence:The right to silence in criminal investigations (pp. 91-106). London, U.K.: Blackstone Press.

Gudjonsson, G. (1997). The Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) and confessions. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 57(9), 445-447.

Gudjonsson, G. (2001, Nov). False confession. Psychologist, 14(11), 588-591.

Gudjonsson, G. H, & Sigurdsson, J. F. (1999, Nov). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R): Factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 953-968.

Gudjonsson, G. H, Hayes, G. D, & Rowlands, P. (2000, Apr). Fitness to be interviewed and psychological vulnerability: The views of doctors, lawyers and police officers. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11(1), 74-92.

Home Office (Research and Statistics Directorate). (2002). P.A.C.E. Ten years on: A review of research. Www.homeoffice.gov.uk/nds/pdfs/r49.pdf.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/forensics/buddhist_temple/index.html?sect=21 [Account of the Temple Buddhist murders by Doody and Garcia]

http://p210.ezboard.com/fwestmemphisthreediscussionfrm32.showMessage?topicID=60.topic [Transcript of Professor Richard Ofshe=s testimony in a false confession case]

Kassin, S. M, & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why People Waive Their Miranda Rights: The Power of Innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 211-221.

Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221-233.

Kassin, S, Goldstein, C, & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room:On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 187-203.

Kassin, S. M, Meissner, C. A, & Norwick, R. J. (2005). 'I'd Know a False Confession if I Saw One': A Comparative Study of College Students and Police Investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 211-227.

Leo, R. (1994). Police interrogation in America: A study of violence, civility and social change (Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Jurisprudence and Social Policy).

Leo, R. A. (1994). Police interrogation and social control. Social and Legal Studies, 3, 93-120.

Leo, R. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 266-303.

Leo, R, & Ofshe, R. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(2), 429-496

Ofshe, R, & Leo, R. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 16, 189-251.

Olio, K, & Cornell, W. (2000). The facade of scientific documentation: A case study of Richard Ofshe's analysis of the Paul Ingram case. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 4(4), 1182-1197.

Pearse, J, & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1999, Sep). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytic approach. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(Part 2), 221-238.

Pritchett v. Virginia, 557 S.E. 2d 205 (Va. Sup. Ct. 2002)

Schulhofer, S. (1981). Confessions and the court: A review of Kamisar's "Police interrogation and confessions: Essays in Law and Policy. Michigan Law Review, 79, 865-893.

Shuy, R. (1998). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sigurdsson, J, & Gudjonsson, G. (2001). False confessions: The relative importance of psychological, criminological and substance abuse variables. Psychology, Crime and Law, 73, 275-289.

Sigurdsson, J. F, & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996, Sep). The relationship between types of claimed false confession made and the reasons why suspects confess to the police according to the Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire (GCQ). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(Part 2), 259-269.

United States v. Hall, No. 94-CR-20036 (Central District of Illinois 8/August, 1996)

Wilgoren, J. (2002, 26/August). Confession had his signature; DNA did not. New York Times.

VI: Competency to Proceed

Akinkunmi, A. A. (2002). The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool--Fitness to plead: A preliminary evaluation of a research instrument for assessing fitness to plead in England and Wales. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(4), 476-482.

American Psychiatric Association. Brief of the APA as amicus curiae, Sell v. United States, #02-5664. U.S. Supreme Court:.

Annas, G. (2004). Forcible medication for courtroom competence-The case of Charles Sell. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(22), 2297-2301.

Arikan, R, & Pinals, D. A. (2004). Competence to stand trial and self-representation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(2), 207-209.

Barnard, G. W, Thompson, J. W, Freeman, W. C, Robbins, L, & et al. (1991). Competency to stand trial: Description and initial evaluation of a new computer-assisted assessment tool (CADCOMP). Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 19(4), 367-381.

Bertman, L. J., Thompson, J. W. J., Waters, W. F., Estupinan-Kane, L., Martin, J. A., & Russell, L. (2003). Effect of an Individualized Treatment Protocol on Restoration of Competency in Pretrial Forensic Inpatients. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(1), 27-35.

Blashfield, R. K, Robbins, L, & Barnard, G. W. (1994). An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22(4), 587-594.

Bonnie, R. J, Hoge, S. K, Monahan, J, Poythress, N. E. M, & Feucht-Haviar, T. (1997). The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: A comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(3), 249-259.

Bonnie, R. (1993). The competence of criminal defendants: Beyond Dusky and Drope. University of Miami Law Review, 47, 539-601.

Borum, R, & Grisso, T. (1996). Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: An empirical analysis. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24(3), 297-317.

Campbell, W. H. (2003). Forced Medication to Render Defendant Competent to Stand Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(1), 136-142.

Carty, S. J. (2004). Examinations of Competency to Stand Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(3), 343-345.

Christy, A, Douglas, K, Otto, R, & Petrila, J. (2004). Juveniles evaluated incompetent to proceed: Characteristics and quality of mental health professionals/ evaluations. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 35(4), 380-388.

Cooper, D, & Grisso, T. (1997). Five year research update (1991-1995): Evaluations for competence to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 15, 347-364.

Cruise, K, & Rogers, R. (1998). An analysis of competency to stand trial: An integration of case law and clinical knowledge. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 35-50.

Frederick, R. I, Carter, M, & Powel, J. (1995). Adapting symptom validity testing to evaluate suspicious complaints of amnesia in medicolegal evaluations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 23(2), 231-237.

Gerbasi, J. B, & Scott, C. L. (2004). Sell v. U.S.: Involuntary Medication to Restore Trial Competency--A Workable Standard. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(1), 83-90.

Golding, S. L. (1993). Training Manual for the Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview Revised. Unpublished manuscript, State of Utah Division of Mental Health.

Grisso, T. (2004). Reply to 'A Critical Review of Published Competency-to-Confess Measures.' Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 719-724.

Grisso, T. (1992). Five-year research update (1986-1990): Evaluations for competency to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 353-369.

Grisso, T, Cocozza, J, Steadman, H, & et al. (1994). The organization of pretrial forensic evaluation services: A national profile. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 377-393.

Halpern, A. L. (2004). "Involuntary medication to restore trial competency-a workable standard?" Comment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(2), 213.

Heilbrun, K. S, & McClaren, H. A. (1988). Assessment of competency for execution? A guide for mental health professionals. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16(3), 205-216.

Heilbrun, K, Rosenfeld, B, Warren, J. I, & Collins, S. (1994). The use of third-party information in forensic assessments: A two-state comparison. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22(3), 399-406.

Jackson, R. L, Rogers, R, & Sewell, K. W. (2005). Forensic Applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): Screening for Feigned Disorders in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 199-210.

Ladds, B, & Convit, A. (1994). Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: A review of empirical studies. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 22(4), 519-532.

Leong, G. B, Silva, J, Weinstock, R, & Ganzini, L. (2000). Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28(4), 427-432.

Mankad, M. V, Brakel, S, & Wilson, R. M. (2002). Commentary: Incorporation of competence instruments into clinical practice. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(4), 483-485

Maxwell v. Roe, 113 Fed. Appx (9th Cir. 2004). [A good case on situational competency argued via Pate].

Miller, R. D. (2003). Hospitalization of criminal defendants for evaluation of competence to stand trial or for restoration of competence: Clinical and legal issues. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(3), 369-391.

Morris, G. H, Haroun, A. M, & Naimark, D. (2004). Assessing Competency Competently: Toward a Rational Standard for Competency to-Stand-Trial Assessments. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32(3), 231-245.

Morse, S. J. (2003). Involuntary competence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(3), 311-328.

Mossman, D. (2000). Interpreting clinical evidence of malingering: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28(3), 293-302.

Nicholson, R. A, & Kugler, K. E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: A quantitative review of comparative research. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 355-370.

O'Connell, M. J, Garmoe, W, & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2005). Miranda Comprehension in Adults with Mental Retardation and the Effects of Feedback Style on Suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 359-369.

Oberlander, L, Goldstein, N, & Ho, C. (2001). Preadolescent adjudicative competence: Methodological considerations and recommendations for practice standards. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 545-563.

Ohio v. Were, 761 N.E. 2d 591 (Ohio Sup. Ct. 2002). [Death penalty conviction overturned; Had refused to cooperate with evaluation, but for paranoid and mentally disordered reasons].

Osinowo, T. O., & Pinals, D. A. (2003). Competence to Stand Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(2), 261-264.

Perlin, M. L. (2003). Beyond Dusky and Godinez: Competency before and after trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(3), 297-310.

Poythress, N, Bonnie, R, Hoge, S, & et al. (1994). Clients abilities to assist counsel and make decisions in criminal cases. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 437-452.

Pritchett v. Virginia, 557 S.E. 2d 205 (Va. Sup. Ct. 2002)

Reisner, R, & Slobogin, C. (1990). Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects. 2^nd Ed. St. Paul, MN: West, Pp. 888-948 [Criminal competency].

Robbins, E, Waters, J, & Herbert, P. (1997). Competency to stand trial evaluations: A study of actual practice in two states. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25(4), 469-483.

Roesch, R, Zapf, P.A, Golding, S.L, & Skeem, J. L. (1999). Defining and assessing competency to stand trial. In A. Hess and I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology: Second Edition. New York: Wiley. Pp. 327-349.

Rogers, R, Jordan, M. J, & Harrison, K. S. (2004). A Critical Review of Published Competency-to-Confess Measures. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 707-718.

Scott, C. L. (2003). Commentary: A Road Map for Research in Restoration of Competency to Stand Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(1), 36-43.

Sell v. United States, No. 02-5664 (U.S. 16/June 2003).

Wall, B. W, Krupp, B. H, & Guilmette, T. (2003). Restoration of Competency to Stand Trial: A Training Program for Persons With Mental Retardation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(2), 189-201.

Zapf, P. A, & Roesch, R. (2005). An Investigation of the Construct of Competence: A Comparison of the FIT, the MacCAT-CA, and the MacCAT-T. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 229-252.

Zapf, P. A, & Viljoen, J. L. (2003). Issues and considerations regarding the use of assessment instruments in the evaluation of competency to stand trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(3), 351-367.

VII: Criminal Responsibility

Abramowitz, J. (1979). The burden of proof for extreme emotional disturbance and insanity: The deterioration of due process. Temple Law Quarterly, 52, 79-101.

Arenella, P. (1975). The diminished capacity and diminished responsibility defenses: Two children of a doomed marriage. Columbia Law Review, 77, 270-308.

Ballantine, H. W. (1919). Criminal responsibility of the insane and feeble-minded. Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 9, 485- 499

Bechera, A, Damasio, A, Damsio, H, & Anderson, S. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.

Berman, M, & Coccaro, E. (1998). Neurobiologic correlates of violence: Relevance to criminal responsibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 303-318.

Bigelow, D, Bloom, J, Williams, M, & McFarland, B. (1999). An administrative model for close monitoring and managing high risk individuals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 227-235.

Bjørkly, S. (2002). Psychotic symptoms and violence towards others -- a literature review and some preliminary findings Part 2. Hallucinations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 617-631.

Bjørkly, S. (2002). Psychotic symptoms and violence towards others -- a literature review and some preliminary findings Part 1: Delusions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 617-631.

Bonnie, R.J. (1983). The Moral Basis of the Insanity Defense, 69 American Bar Association Journal 194.

Bradfield, R. (2002). Understanding the battered woman who kills her violent partner -- The admissibility of expert evidence of domestic violence in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 9(2), 177-100.

Brower, M, & Price, B. (2001, Dec). Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: A critical review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 71(6), 720. England: BMJ Publishing Group.

Callahan, L, & Silver, E. (1998). Factors associated with the conditional release of persons acquitted by reason of insanity: A decision tree approach. Law and Human Behavior, 22(2), 147-164.

Cirincione, C, & Jacobs, C. (1999). Identifying insanity acquittals: Is it any easier? Law and Human Behavior, 23(4), 487-497.

Clark, C. R. (1982). Clinical limits of expert testimony on diminished capacity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 155-170.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Santiago, 662 A. 2d 610 (1995), PA [admission of guilt during first failed insanity trial may be admitted in second non-insanity trial]

Davis v. United States, 160 U. S. 469 469 (1895). [Proof of mens rea and insanity defense issues] see also Davis v. United States, 165 U. S. 373 (1897).

Denney, R, & Wynkoop, T. (2000). Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 15(2), 804-828.

Dix, G. E. (1971). Psychological abnormality as a factor in grading criminal liability:Diminished capacity, diminished responsibility, and the like. Journal of Criminal Law, 62, 313-334.

Drogin, E. (1999). To the brink of insanity:"Extreme emotional disturbance" in Kentucky Law. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 26, 99-132.

Dutton, M, & Goodman, L. (1994). Posttraumatic stress disorder among battered women: Analysis of legal implications. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 12, 215-234.

Faigman, D, Kaye, D, Saks, M, & Sanders, J. (2000). Insanity and diminished capacity. In Science in the law: Social and behavioral science issues (pp. 221-286). St. Paul, MN: West.

Finkel, N. (1995). Achilles fuming,Odysseus stewing, and Hamlet brooding: On the story of the murder/manslughter distinction. Nebraska Law Review, 74, 742-803.

Fischette, C. (2004). Psychopathy and responsibility. Virginia Law Review, 90, 1423.

Fried, C, & Reppucci, N. (2001). Criminal decision making: The development of adolescent judgment, criminal responsibility, and culpability. Law and Human Behavior, 25(1), 45-62.

Giles v. Giles, 3 All E. R. 1141 (1971), Chancery Division [Unlike NGRI, a verdict of not guilty by reason of diminished responsibility, in England, bars profiting from the crime]

Golding, S. L. (1992). The adjudication of criminal responsibility: A review of theory and research. In D.K. Kagehiro & W.S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Law. New York: Springer-Verlag, Pp. 230-250.

Goldstein, R. (1989). New York's "Extreme emotional disturbance" defense. In R. Rosner & R. B. Harmon (Eds.), Criminal court consultation (pp. 119-133). New York: Plenum Press.

H. L. A. Hart, Negligence, Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 29 (A. G. Guest ed, Oxford University Press 1961).

Halleck, S. L. (1992). Clinical assessment of the voluntariness of behavior. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20, 221-.

Hattendorf, J, Ottens, A, & Lomax, R. (1999). Type and severity of abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms reported by women who killed their abusive partners. Violence Against Women, 52(3), 292-312.

Heilbrun, K, & Peters, L. (2000). The efficacy and effectiveness of community treatment programmes in preventing crime and violence among those with severe mental illness in the community. In S. Hodgins (Ed.), Violence among the mentally ill: Effective treatments and management strategies (pp. 341-357). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

Heller, K. (1998). Beyond the reasonable man?: A sympathetic but critical assessment of the use of subjective standards of reasonableness in self-defense and provocation cases. American Journal of Criminal Law, 26(1), 1-120.

Johnson, S. (09/08/1999). U.S. v. Kaczynski: Psychological Evaluation of Theodore Kaczynski by Sally Johnson. Retrieved from www.courttv.com/trials/unabomber/documents/psychological.html.

Kahan, D, & Nussbaum, M. (1996). Two conceptions of emotional disturbance in criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 96(2), 269-374.

Kahan, D, & Nussbaum, M. (1996). Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 96(2), 269-374.

Kucharski, L. T, Ryan, W, Vogt, J, & Goodloe, E. (1998). Clinical symptom presentation in suspected malingerers: An empirical investigation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 26(4), 579-585.

Lewin, T. H. D. (1975). Psychiatric evidence in criminal cases for purposes other than the defense of insanity. Syracuse Law Review, 26, 1051-1115.

Lewis, C. F., & Bunce, S. C. (2003). Filicidal Mothers and the Impact of Psychosis on Maternal Filicide. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(4), 459-470.

Litwack, T. (2003). The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 135-156.

Lunde, D, & Wilson, T. (1977). Brainwashing as a defense to criminal liability:Patty Hearst revisited. Criminal Law Bulletin, 13, 341-382.

Meloy, J. R. (2004). Indirect personality assessment of the violent true believer. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 138-146.

Melton, G. B, Petrila, J, Poythress, N. G, & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers, Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press.

Mison, R. B. (1992). Homophobia in manslaughter: The homosexual advance as insufficient provocation. Caifornia Law Review, 80, 133-178.

Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996) (Scalia). [due process is not denied where State limits the introduction of evidence of voluntary intoxication as a mens rea defense, in spite of case law permitting “all relevant evidence.”

Morissette v. United States, 342 U. S. 246 (1952).[Classic statement on mens rea]

Morris, G.H. (1997). Placed in Purgatory:Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittees, 39 Arizona Law Review 1061.

Morse, S. J. (1980). The great non-murder mystery. Diminished capacity muddies criminal law, but legislature may clear it up. Los Angeles Times, May 28, 1980.

Morse, S. J. (1978). Crazy behavior, morals, and science: An analysis of Mental Health Law. Southern California Law Review, 51, 527-654.

Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684 (Supreme Court of the United States 1975) (No. 74-13).

Nijman, H., Cima, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2003). Nature and antecedents of psychotic patients' crimes. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14(3), 542-553

Nusbaum, D.J. (2002)Note: The Craziest Reform of Them All -- A Critical Analysis of the Constitutional Implications of "Abolishing" the Insanity Defense, 87 Cornell Law Review 1509.

Parry, J, & Drogin, E. (2000). Criminal Law Handbook on Psychiatric and Psychological Evidence and Testimony. Washington,D.C.: American Bar Association.

Patton v. United States, 782 A. 2d 305 (D.C. Ct. App. 2001)[refusing an insanity defense in D.C.]

People v. Protsman, No. D034285 (Cal. App. 4th, Div. 1 2001). [Frontal lobe syndrome evidence re mens rea not admitted under Kelly-Frye]

Poulson, R, Wuensch, K, & Brondino, M. (1998). Factors that discriminate among mock jurors' verdict selections: Impact of the guilty but mentally ill option. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 254, 366-381.

Reider, L. (1998). Toward a New Test for the Insanity Defense: Incorporating the Discoveries of Neuroscience Into Moral and Legal Theories, 46 UCLA Law Review 289.

Reisner, R, & Slobogin, C. (1990). Law and the mental health system: Civil and criminal aspects. 2^nd Ed. St. Paul, MN: West, Pp. 491-572 [Insanity defense]

Rice, M. (1997). Violent offender research and implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52(4), 414-423.

Royal Commission on Capital Punishment. (1953). Royal Commission on Capital Punishment: 1949-1953. London: HSO.

Sayre, F.B. (1931). Mens Rea, 45 Harvard Law Review 974. [A classic on the history and nature of the insanity defense and its underlying logic]

Skeem, J. L, Louden, J. E, & Evans, J. (2004). Venirepersons's Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense: Developing, Refining, and Validating a Scale. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 623-648.

Skeem, J, & Golding, S. (2002). Describing jurors' personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7(3), 561-621.

State of Utah v. Tomas Herrera; State of Utah v. Mikell Sweezey, 359 P. 2d 895 (Utah) [Utah=s restrictive Ainsanity defense@ upheld, if grudgingly]

State v. Korell, 690 P. 2d 992 (Mont. 1984)

Stroud, D.A. (1914). Mens Rea or Imputability Under the Law of England. Sweet & Maxwell.

U.S. v Lofton, 776 F. 2d 918 (10th Cir. 1985)

Vitacco, M. J., & Packer, I. K. (2004). Mania and Insanity: An Analysis of Legal Standards and Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(3), 83-95.

Wales, H.W. (1976). An Analysis of the Proposal to "Abolish" the Insanity Defense in S. 1:Squeezing a Lemon, 124 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 687.

Whitaker, R. (2002). Mad in America:Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Cambridge,MA: Perseus.

VII: Expert Testimony

Allen, L. M, Iverson, G. L, & Green, P. (2002). Computerized Assessment of Response Bias in forensic neuropsychology. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(1-2), 205-225.

Barsky, A, & Gould, J. (2002). Clinicians in court: A guide to subpoenas,depositions, testifying, and everything else you need to know. New York: Guilford.

Bazelon, D. (1982). Veils, values, and social responsibility. American Psychologist, 37, 115-121.

Bazelon, D. L. (1974). The perils of wizardry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1317-1322.

Bazelon, D. L. (1975). A jurist's view of psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry and the Law, 3, 175-190.

Bazelon, D. L. (1978). The role of the psychiatrist in the criminal justice system. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 6, 139-146.

Bazelon, D. L. (1974). Psychiatrists and the adversary process. Scientific American, 230, 18-23.

Ben-Shakhar, G, Bar-Hillel, M, & Kremnitzer, M. (2002, Oct). Trial by polygraph: Reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 527-541.

Biggers, J. R, & Yim, C. I. (2003). Rape trauma syndrome: An examination of standards that determine the admissibility of expert witness testimony. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 3(1), 61-77.

Binder, L. M. (2002). The Portland Digit Recognition Test: A review of validation data and clinical use. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 27-41.

Blanck, P. D, & Berven, H. M. (1999, Mar). Evidence of disability after Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 16-40.

Blinder, M. (1982). Psychiatry and the everyday practice of law: A lawyer's manual for case preparation and trial. Second Editin. San Francisco, CA: Bancroft-Whitney.

Brodsky, S. L. (1999). The expert expert witness: More maxims and guidelines for testifying in court.

Brodsky, S. (2004). Coping with cross-examination and other pathways to effective testimony. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Ceci, S. J, & Hembrooke, H. (1998). Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court. Washington,D.C.: American Psychological Association Press

Champagne, A, Shuman, D, & Whitaker, W. (1991). An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in American courts. Jurimetrics, 31(4), 375-392.

Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993)

Dearington, M. (1999). Commentary on "Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness.". Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(4), 559-562.

Denney, R. L. (2003). Introduction: Criminal Forensic Neuropsychology. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(4), 1-3.

Dixon, L, & Gill, B. (2002, Sep). Changes in the standards for admitting expert evidence in federal civil cases since the Daubert decision. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(3), 251-308.

Dunsieth, N. W. J. (2003). Admissibility of expert testimony. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(4), 516-518.

Dyer, F. J, & McCann, J. T. (2000, Aug). The Millon clinical inventories, research critical of their forensic application and Daubert criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24(4), 487-497.

Faigman, D. Kaye, M. Saks, & J. Sanders, Eds. Science in the law: Social and behavioral science issues. (2000). St. Paul, MN: West.

Faigman, D. (2004). Laboratory of justice: The Supreme Court's 200 year struggle to integrate science and the law. New York: Hold.

Faigman, D, Kaye, D, Saks, M, & Sanders, J. (1997;2000). Rape trauma syndrome. In Science in the law: Social and behavioral science issues (pp. 402-435;108-126). St. Paul, MN: West.

Faigman, D. L. (1995, Dec). The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it "scientific," "technical," or "other" knowledge. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(4), 960-979.

Faust, D, & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31-35.

Frederick, R. I. (2002). Review of the Validity Indicator Profile. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 125-145.

General Electric Co. V. Joiner 522 U.S. 136 (1997). [Is logical linkage between theory and conclusion a Daubert criterion, or can an expert use ipse dixit?]

Giannelli, P. (1993). Forensic science: Frye, Daubert, and the Federal Rules. Criminal Law Bulletin, 29, 428-436.

Goldstein, R. L. (1999). Commentary on "Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness." Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(4), 554-558.

Goodman-Delahunty, J, & Foote, W. E. (1995). Compensation for pain, suffering, and other psychological injuries: The impact of Daubert on employment discrimination claims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13(2), 183-206.

Gordon, J. D. (1998, Dec). Admissibility of repressed memory evidence by therapists in sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(4), 1198-1225.

Grisso, T, & Vincent, G. M. (2005). The Empirical Limits of Forensic Mental Health Assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1-5.

Greenberg, S. A., & Wheeler, J. G. (2004). Forensic Psychological Examinations in Personal Injury Cases: Empirical Haves and Have Nots. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(1), 79-95.

Groscup, J. L. (2004). Judicial Decision Making About Expert Testimony in the Aftermath of Daubert and Kumho. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(2), 57-66.

Grove, W. M, & Barden, R. C. (1999, Mar). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from mental health experts under Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 224-242.

Grove, W. M, Barden, R. C, Garb, H. N, & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002, Jun). Failure of Rorschach-Comprehensive-System-based testimony to be admissible under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho standard. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 216-234.

Gutheil, T. G, & Simon, R. I. (1999). Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness: Early warning signs of endangered honesty, objectivity, and fair compensation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(4), 546-553.

Gutheil, T, & Simon, R. (2002). Mastering forensic psychiatric practice: Advanced strategies for the expert witness. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Gutheil, T. G., & Bursztajn, H. (2003). Avoiding Ipse Dixit Mislabeling: Post-Daubert Approaches to Expert Clinical Opinions. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(2), 205-210.

Gutheil, T. (1998). The psychiatrist as expert witness. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association Press.

Gutheil, T. G, & Sutherland, P. K. (1999). Forensic assessment, witness credibility and the search for truth through expert testimony in the courtroom. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 27(2), 289-312.

Heilbronner, R. L., & Frumkin, I. (2003). Neuropsychology and Forensic Psychology: Working Collaboratively in Criminal Cases. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(4), 5-12.

Heilbrun, K. (1995). Child custody evaluation:Critically assessing mental health experts and psychological tests. Family Law Quarterly, 29(1), 63-78.

Hoge, S. K, & Grisso, T. (1992). Accuracy and expert testimony. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20, 67-76.

Jorgenson, L. M, & Wahl, K. M. (2000, Jun). Psychiatrists as expert witnesses in sexual harassment cases under Daubert and Kumho. Psychiatric Annals, 30(6), 390-396.

Koch, W. J, O'Neill, M, & Douglas, K. S. (2005). Empirical Limits for the Forensic Assessment of PTSD Litigants. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 121-149.

Kovera, M. B, Russano, M. B, & McAuliff, B. D. (2002, Jun). Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 180-200.

Krafka, C, Dunn, M. A, Johnson, M. T, & Cecil, J. S. M. D. (2002, Sep). Judge and attorney experiences, practices, and concerns regarding expert testimony in federal civil trials. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(3), 309-332.

Krauss, D. A, & Sales, B. D. (1999, Mar). The problem of "helpfulness" in applying Daubert to expert testimony Child custody determinations in family law as an exemplar. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 78-99.

Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael 526 U.S. 137 (1999). [Do Daubert criteria apply to “other specialized knowledge” experts?]

Lally, S. J. (2001). Should human figure drawings be admitted into court. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(1), 135-149.

Lees-Haley, P. R, Iverson, G. L, Lange, R. T, Fox, D. D, & Allen Lyle, M. (2002). Malingering in forensic neuropsychology: Daubert and the MMPI-2. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(1-2), 167-203.

MacCarthy, T. (1994). "Killer" cross-examination (National Law Foundation).

Mark, M. M. (1999, Mar). Social science evidence in the courtroom: Daubert and beyond. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 175-193.

McCann, J. T. (1998, Feb). Defending the Rorschach in court: An analysis of admissibility using legal and professional standards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 125-144.

McCough, L. (1998). A legal commentary: The impact of Daubert on 21st-century child sexual abuse prosecutions. In Ceci, Stephen J. (Ed); Hembrooke, Helene (Ed). (1998). Expert witnesses in child abuse case: What can and should be said in court. (pp. 265-281). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

Medoff, D. (2003). The Scientific Basis of Psychological Testing: Considerations Following Daubert, Kumho, and Joiner. Family Court Review, 41(2), 199-213.

Melton, G.B, Petrila, J, Poythress, N.G. & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers: Second Edition. New York: Guilford. Pp. 64-94 (Constitutional, Common-Law, and Ethical Contours of the Evaluation Process: The Mental Health Professional as Double Agent).

Nesson, C. (1999). "The judge's role as gatekeeper:Responsibilities and powers (Daubert Project:Harvard Law School).

Pope, K. S. (1998, Dec). Pseudoscience, cross-examination, and scientific evidence in the recovered memory controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(4), 1160-1181.

Reed, J. (1999). Current status of the admissibility of expert testimony after Daubert and Joiner. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1(1), 49-69.

Reeves, D., Mills, M. J., Billick, S. B., & Brodie, J. D. (2003). Limitations of Brain Imaging in Forensic Psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31(1), 89-96.

Reitan, R. M, & Wolfson, D. (2002). Detection of malingering and invalid test results using the Halstead-Reitan Battery. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(1-2), 275-314.

Resnick, P. J. (1986). Perceptions of psychiatric testimony: A historical perspective on the hysterica invective. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 14, 203-219.

Ritzler, B, Erard, R, & Pettigrew, G. (2002, Jun). Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses: A reply to Grove and Barden (1999) re: The admissibility of testimony under Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 201-215.

Ritzler, B, Erard, R, & Pettigrew, G. (2002, Jun). A final reply to Grove and Barden: The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 235-246.

Rogers, R, Salekin, R. T, & Sewell, K. W. (2000, Aug). The MCMI-III and the Daubert standard: Separating rhetoric from reality. Law and Human Behavior, 24(4), 501-506.

Rogers, R, Bagby, M, & Perera, C. (1993). Can Ziskin withstand his own criticisms: Problems with his model of cross-examination. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 223-233.

Rogers, R, & Shuman, D. W. (2000). The Mental State at the Time of the offense measure: Its validation and admissibility under Daubert. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28(1), 23-28.

Rogers, R, Salekin, R. T, & Sewell, K. W. (1999, Aug). Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: Does it meet the Daubert standard. Law and Human Behavior, 23(4), 425-443.

Rotgers, F. & Barrett, D. (1996). Daubert v. Merrell Dow and expert testimony by clinical psychologists: Implications and recommendations for practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 467-474.

Saxe, L, & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1999, Mar). Admissibility of polygraph tests: The application of scientific standards post- Daubert. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 203-223.

Scheflin, A. W, Brown, D, Firscholz, E. J, & Caploe, J. (2002). Special methodologies in memory retrieval: Chemical, hypnotic, and imagery procedures. In Simon, Robert I. (Ed); Shuman, Daniel W. (Ed). (2002). Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past. (pp. 369 423). Washington, DC, US: American Psychiatric Publishing

Schopp, R. F, Scalora, M. J, & Pearce, M. (1999, Mar). Expert testimony and professional judgment: Psychological expertise and commitment as a sexual predator after Hendricks. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 120-174.

Schuller, R, McKimmie, B, & Janz, T. (2004). The impact of expert testimony in trials of battered women who kill. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(1), 1-12.

Schutte, J. W. (2001). Using the MCMI-III in forensic evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19(2), 5-20.

Shuman, D, Greenberg, S, Heilbrun, K, & Foote, W. (1998). An immodest proposal:Should treating mental health professionals be barred from testifying about their patients? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 509-523.

Shuman, D. W, & Sales, B. D. (1999, Mar). The impact of Daubert and its progeny on the admissibility of behavioral and social science evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 3-15.

Shuman, D. W, & Sales, B. D. (2001). Daubert's Wager. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(3), 69-78.

Shuman, D. (2002). The role of mental health experts in custody decisions:Science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Family Law Quarterly, 36(1), 135-162.

Slobogin, C. (1999, Mar). The admissibility of behavioral science information in criminal trials From primitivism to Daubert to voice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 100-119.

Tardiff, K. (2002). The past as prologue: Assessment of future violence in individuals with a history of past violence. In Simon, Robert I. (Ed); Shuman, Daniel W. (Ed). (2002). Retrospective assessment of mental states in litigation: Predicting the past. (pp. 181 207). Washington, DC, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

Thompson, G. B. (2002). The Victoria Symptom Validity Test: An enhanced test of symptom validity. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 43-67.

Tombaugh, T. N. (2002). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in forensic psychology. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 69-96.

Worthington, D. L, Stallard, M. J, Price, J. M, & Goss, P. J. (2002, Jun). Hindsight bias, Daubert, and the silicone breast implant litigation Making the case for court-appointed experts in complex medical and scientific litigation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8(2), 154-179.

Youngstrom, E, & Busch, C. (2000). Expert testimony in pyschology: Ramifications of the Supreme Court decision in Kumho Tire Co, Ltd. v. Carmichael. Ethics and Behavior, 10(2), 185-193.

IX: Jury Selection/Jury Decision Making

Dumas, B. (2000). Jury Trials: Lay jurors,pattern jury instructions, and comprehension issues. Tennessee Law Review, 67, 701-742.

Eclavea, R. Voir dire examination of prospective jurors under Rule 24(a) of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 28 ALR Fed 26.

Finkel, N. (1995). Commonsense Justice: Juror's notions of the law [Especially, Chapter 14: The maddening changes in insanity law; Chapter 15 How Jurors construe insanity]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gaines, P. (2000). Communicating with juries: Episodic representation structure in cross-examination. Tennessee Law Review, 67, 599-325.

Lecci, L., Snowden, J., & Morris, D. (2004). Using Social Science Research to Inform and Evaluate the Contributions of Trial Consultants in the Voir Dire. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(2), 67-78.

Nations, H. (2001). Overcoming jury bias. Retrieved 25/02/2001, from www.howardnations.com.

Robbennhold, J., Groscup, J., & Penrod, S. (2006). Evaluating and assisting jury competence in civil cases. In I.B. Weiner & A.K. Hess (Eds.), The Handbook of Forensic Psychology, 3rd. ed. (pp. 392-425). New York: Wiley.

Tanford, A. (1990). The law and psychology of jury instructions 69, 71-111. Nebraska Law Review, 69, 71-111.

Tiersma, P. (2001). The rocky road to legal reform: Improving the language of jury instructions. Brooklyn Law Review, 66(4), 1081-1119.

Van Wallendael, L., & Cutler, B. (2004). Limitations to Empirical Approaches to Jury Selection. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4(2), 79-86.

X: Death Penalty and Jury Decision Making

Allen, M, Mabry, E, & McKelton, D. (1998). Impact of juror attitudes about the death penalty on juror evaluations of guilt and punishment: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22(6), 715-731.

Butler, B, & Moran, G. (2002). The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 175-184.

Diamond, S. (1993). Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries and judges. American Psychologist, 48, 423- 434.

Edens, J, Buffington-Vollum, J, Keilen, A, Roskamp, P, & Anthony, C. (2005). Prediction of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: Is it time to 'disinvent the wheel?' Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 55-86.

Eisenberg, T, Garvey, S.P, & Wells, M. But Was He Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Capital Sentencing, 83 Cornell Law Review 1599 (1998).

Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. __ (2004).

Haney, C, Hurtado, A, & Vega, L. (1994). AModern@ death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 619-634.

Hensl, K. (2004). Restored to health to be put to death: Reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris. Villanova Law Review, 49(2), 101-134.

http://www.idoc.state.il.us/ccp/ccp/reports/commission_report/index.html [Report of Ryan Commission of Capital Punishment]

In re Gay, 968 P. 2d 476 (CA 24/Dec 1998).[ineffective assistance, mitigation, and mental illness]

Krauss, D. A, Lieberman, J. D, & Olson, J. (2004). The Effects of Rational and Experiential Information Processing of Expert Testimony in Death Penalty Cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(6), 801-822.

Luginbuhl, J. (1992). Comprehension of judges' instructions in the capital penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances. Law and Human Behavior, 16(2), 203-218.

Monahan, J, & Walker, L. (1994). Social science in law: Cases and materials. Westbury, N.Y.: Foundation Press, Pp. 226-266 [materials on death penalty adjudication].

Reid, W. (2001). Psychiatry and the death penalty. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, May, 216-219.

Sandys, M. (1995). Corss-overs: Capital jurors who change their minds about the punishment: A litmus test for sentencing guidelines. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1183.

Sundby, S. (1998). The capital jury and absolution: The intersection of trial strategy, remorse, and the death penalty. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1557-1598.

Slobogin, C. (2000). Mental illness and the death penalty. California Criminal Law Review, 1, 3.

Tomes, J. (1997). Damned if you do and damned if you don't: The use of mitigation experts in death penalty litigation. American Journal of Criminal Law, 24, 359.

Watt, M. J, & MacLean, W. E. (2003). Competency to be sentenced and executed. Ethics & Behavior, 13(1), 35-41.

XI: Death Penalty, Competency to Plead Guilty, to proceed pro se, to waive appeals, and issues of mental retardation

Ceci, S. J, Scullin, M, & Kanaya, T. (2003). The difficulty of basing death penalty eligibility on IQ cutoff scores for mental retardation. Ethics & Behavior, 13(1), 11-17.

Ebert, B. (2001). Competency to be executed: A proposed instrument to evaluate an inmate's level of competency in light of the Eighth Amendment prohibition against the execution of the presently insane. Law and Psychology Review, 25, 29-57.

Greenspan, S, & Switzky, H. N. (2003). Execution exemption should be based on actual vulnerability, not disability label. Ethics & Behavior, 13(1), 19-26.

Heilbrun, K, Radelet, M, & Dvoskin, J. (1992). The debate on treating individuals incompetent for execution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(5), 596-604.

Watt, M, & MacLean, W. (2003). Competency to be sentenced and executed. Ethics and Behavior, 13(1), 35-41.

Zapf, P. A, Boccaccini, M. T, & Brodsky, S. L. (2003). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21(1), 103-120.

XIIA: Juveniles in the Criminal Justice System

Beckman, N. (2004). Neuroscience, crime, culpability and the adolescent brain. Science, 305, 596-599.

Corrado, R. R, Vincent, G. M, Hart, S. D, & Cohen, I. M. (2004). Predictive validity of the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version for general and violent recidivism. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(1), 5-22.

Gretton, H, McBride, M, Hare, R, O'Shaughnessy, R, & Kumka, G. (2001). Psychopathy and reicidivism in juvenile sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 288, 427-449.

Letourneau, E, & Miner, M. (2005). Juvenile sex offenders: A case against the legal and clinical status quo. Sexual Abuse:A Journal of Research and Treatment, 170(3), 293-312.

Murphy, W, DiLillo, D, Harnes, M, & Steere, E. (2001). An exploration of factors related to deviant sexual arousal among juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse:A Journal of Research and Treatment, 136(2), 91-103.

Skeem, J. L, & Petrila, J. (2004). Juvenile psychopathy: Informing the debate. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(1), 1-4.

Zimring, F. (2004). An American travesty: Legal responses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

XIIb: Issues in Child Sexual Abuse

Aldridge, J, Lamb, M, & Sternberg, K. e. a. (2004). Using a Human Figure Drawing to elicit information from alleged victims of sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 304-316.

Beitchman, J, Zucker, K, Hood, J, & et al. (1991). A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 537-556.

Beitchman, J, Zucker, K, Hood, J, & et al. (1992). A review of the short-term effects of child sexal abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 537-556.

Brooks, C, & Milchman, M. (1991). Child sexual abuse allegations during custody litigation: COnflicts between mental health expert witnesses and the law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 21-32.

Bruck, M, Ceci, S, & Melnyk, L. (1977). External and internal sources of variation in the creation of false reports in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(4), 289-316.

Bruck, M, & Ceci, S. (2004). Forensic developmental psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 229-232.

DePrince, A, & Freyd, J. (2003). Forgetting trauma stimuli. Psychological Science.

Freyd, J, DePrince, A, & Zubriggen, E. (2002). Self-reported memory for abuse depends upon victim-perpetrator relationship. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 2(3), 5-165-16.

Freyd, J. J, & Quina, K. (2000). Feminist ethics in the practice of science: The contested memory controversy as an example. In M. M. Brabeck & et-al. (Eds.), Practicing feminist ethics in psychology. Psychology of women book series. (pp. 101-123). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

Freyd, J. (2003). Memory for abuse:What can we learn from a prosecution sample. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

Freyd, J. (1998). Science in the memory debate. Ethics and Behavior, 8(2), 101-113.

Goodman, G, Ghetti, S, & et al. (2003). A prospective study of memory for child sexual abuse. Psychological Science, 14(2).

Henderson, L. (1998). Suppressing memory: A review of "Recovered Memory and the Law [reviews and comments upon books by Freyd, Loftus, Schachter and Ofshe]. Law and Social Inquiry, 22, 695-732.

Herman, S. (2005). Improving decision making in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 87-120.

Horowitz, S, Lamb, M, Esplin, P. et al. (1997). Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of child witness statements. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 11-21.

http://fmsf.com/legal.shtml [website of opponents of “false memory syndrome]

http://www.fmsfonline.org/[website of proponents of “false memory syndrome]

Kisiel, C, & Lyons, J. (2001). Dissociation as a mediator of psychopathology among sexually abused children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(7), 1034-1039.

Knapp, S, & VandeCreek, L. (1996). Risk management for psychologists: Treating patients who recover memories of childhood abuse. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 452-459.

Koocher, G.P, Goodman, G.S, White, C.S, et al. (1995). Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 199-222.

Lamb, M, Sternberg, K, Orbach, Y, Esplin, P, & Mitchell, S. (2002). Is ongoing feedback necessary to maintain the quality of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 35-41.

Lamb, M, Orbach, Y, Sternberg, K, & et al. (2000). Accuracy of investigator's verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, 24(6), 699-708.

Lamb, M, & Garretson, M. (2003). The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 157-171.

Lamb, M, Sternberg, K, Orbach, Y, & et al. (1999). Forensic interviews of children. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing (pp. 253-277). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Lamb, M, Sternberg, K, Esplin, P, & et al. (1997). Assessing the credibility of children's allegations of sexual abuse: A survey of recent research. Learning and Individual Differences, 9(2), 175-194.

Lamb, M, Sternberg, K, Orbach, Y, & et al. (2000). The effects of intensive training and ongoing supervision on the quality of investigative interviews with alleged sex abuse victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6(3), 114-125.

Lindsay, D.S, & Read, J.D. (1995). AMemory work@ and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional and personal issues. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 846-908.

Loftus, E. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518-537.

London, K, Bruck, M, Ceci, S, & Shuman, D. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 194-226.

Michael Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)

Momon, A, & Higham, P. (2005). A review of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and the Law.

Orbach, Y, & Lamb, M. (2001). The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 323-333.

Orbach, Y, Hershkowitz, I, Lamb, M, Sternberg, K, Esplin, P, & Horowtiz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(6), 733-752.

Pezdek, K, Morrow, A, Blandon-Gitlin, & et al. (2004). Detecting Deception in Children: Event familiarity affects Crterion-Based Content Analysis ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 119-126.

Pipe, M, Lamb, M, Orbach, Y, & Esplin, P. (2004). Recent research on children's testimony about experienced and witnessed events. Developmental Review, 24, 440-468.

Rind, B, Tromovitch, P, & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.

Rind, B, Bauserman, R, & Tromovich, P. (1999). An examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse based upon nonclinical samples. Presented at the Paper presented at Paulus Kerk, Rotterdam, 7/26/1999.

Rosen, G. M, Sageman, M, & Loftus, E. (2004). A Historical Note on False Traumatic Memories. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 137-139.

Schachter, D. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Shuman, D. (1997). Framing the question of the admissibility of expert testimony about recollections of trauma in the United States. In J.D. Read & D.S. Lindsay (Eds.), Recollections of trauma (pp. 495-500). New York: Plenum.

Sivers, H, Schooler, J, & Freyd, J. (2002). Recovered memories. In V.S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Human Brain (pp. 169-184). London,UK: Elsevier.

Sternberg, K, Lamb, M, Esplin, P, & et al. (2002). Using a structured interview protocol to improve the quality of investigative interviews. In M.L. Eisen, J. Quas & G. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and Suggestibility in the Forensic Interview (pp. 409-436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

U.S. Department of Justice (National Institutes of Justice). (1995). Victims of childhood sexual abuse: Later criminal consequences. In NCJ 151525 ( C. S. Widom, Trans.). Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of Justice (National Institutes of Justice). (2001). An update on the "Cycle of violence." In NCJ 184894 ( C. S. Widom & M.G. Maxfield, Trans.). Washington, D.C.

Van der Hart. O, & Nijenhuis, E. (2001). Generalized dissociative amnesia:Episodic, semantic and procedural memories lost and found. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 589-600.

Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3-41.

Widom, C, & Shepard, R. (1996). Accuracy of adult recollections of childhood victimization: Part I. Childhood physical abuse. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 34-46.

Widom, C, & Morris, S. (1997). Accuracy of adult recollections of childhood victimization: Part II. Childhood sexual abuse. Psychological Assessment, 9, 34-46.

Widom, C, Weiler, B, & Cottler, L. (1999). Childhood victimization and drug abuse: A comparison of prospective and retrospective findings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 867-880.

Widom, C, & Ames, M. (1994). Criminal consequences of childhood sexual victimization. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18(4), 303-318.

XIII: Criminal recidivism, risk assessments and sexually violent predator legislation

Appelbaum, P, Robbins, P, & Monahan, J. (2000). Violence and delusions:Data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 566-572.

Barbaree, H, Seto, M, Langton, C, & et al. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 490-521.

Bennett, K. J, Lipman, E, Brown, S, & et al. (1999). Predicting conduct problems: Can high risk children be identified in Kindergarten and Grade 1? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 470-480.

Berman, M, & Coccaro, E. (1998). Neurobiologic correlates of violence: Relevance to criminal responsibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 303-318.

Bigelow, D, Bloom, J, Williams, M, & McFarland, B. (1999). An administrative model for close monitoring and managing high risk individuals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 227-235.

Bjørkly, S. (2002). Psychotic symptoms and violence towards others -- a literature review and some preliminary findings Part 1: Delusions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 617-631.

Bjørkly, S. (2002). Psychotic symptoms and violence towards others -- a literature review and some preliminary findings Part 2. Haluucinations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 617-631.

Bonta, J, Law, M, & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123-142.

Borum, R, & Reddy, M. (2001). Assessing violence risk in Tarasoff situations: A fact-based model of inquiry. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 375-385.

Brinkley, C, Newman, J, Widiger, T, & Lynam, D. (2004). Two approaches to parsing the heterogeneity of psychopathy. Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice, 11(1), 69-94.

Buffington-Vollum, J, J, Johnson, D, & Johnson, J. (2002). Psychopathy as a predictor of institutional misbehavior among sex offenders: A propsective replication. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 497-511.

Butterfield, F. (2000, 11/4). The mentally ill often skirt a landmark Federal gun control law. New York Times (New York).

Campbell, T. W. (2000). Sexual predator evaluations and phrenology: Considering issues of evidentiary reliability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(1), 111-130. US: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Cooke, D, & Michie, C. (2000). Refining the construct of psychopathy:Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment. 2001 Jun; Vol 13(2): 171-188.

Cunningham, M, & Reidy, T. (2002). Violence risk assessment at federal capital sentencing: Individualization, generalization, relevance, and scientific standards. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 512-536.

de Vogel, V, de Ruiter, C, van Beek, D, & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 235-251.

Dolan, M, & Doyle, M. (2000). Violence risk prediction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303-311.

Douglas, K, & Kropp, P. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment:Clinical and research implications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 617-658.

Douglas, K, Ogloff, J, Nicholls, T, & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist:Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 917-930.

Edens, J, Petrila, J, & Buffington-Vollum, J. (2001). Psychopathy and the death penalty: Can the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised identify offenders who represent "a continuing threat to society?" Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 433-481.

Freedman, D. (2001). False prediction of future dangerousness:Error rates and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, March.

Gagliardi, G. J, Lovell, D, Peterson, P. D, & Jemelka, R. (2004). Forecasting Recidivism in Mentally Ill Offenders Released From Prison. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 133-155.

Gardner, W, Lidz, C, Mulvey, E. P, & Shaw, E. C. (1996). Clinical versus actuarial predictions of violence in patients with mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 602-609.

Government of Scotland (Scottish Executive Branch). (2001). Committee on Serious Violent and Sexual Offenders ( David J. Cooke, Trans.). In Current risk assessment instruments.

Grann, M, Belfrage, H, & Tengström, A. (2000). Actuarial assessment of risk for violence: Predictive validity of the VRAG and the historical part of the HCR-20. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 97-114.

Grisso, T, & Tomkins, A. (1996). Communicating violence risk assessments. American Psychologist, 51(9), 928-930.

Grove, W, & Meehl, P. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal(subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical,algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 293-323.

Hanson, K, & Harris, A. (2000). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A Method for Measuring Change in Risk Levels (Soliciter General of Canada: Corrections Research No. 2000-1). Ottawa, Canada.

Hanson, R, & Harris, A. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 6-35.

Hanson, R, & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119-137.

Heilbrun, K, O'Neill, M. L, Stevens, T. N, Strohman, L. K, Bowman, Q, & Lo, Y. W. (2004). Assessing Normative Approaches to Communicating Violence Risk: A National Survey of Psychologists. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(2), 187-196.

Hill, C. D. (1997, Sep). Prediction of aggressive and socially disruptive behavior among forensic patients: A validation of the Psychopathy Checklist-Screening Version. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(3-B), 1533.

Janus, E, & Walbek, N. (2000). Sex offender commitments in Minnesota:A descriptive study of second generation commitments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 343-374.

Janus, E, & Meehl, P. (1997). Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3(1), 33-64.

Junginger, J. (1996). Psychosis and violence:The case for a content analysis of psychotic experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22(1), 91-103.

Kennedy, P, Vandehey, M, & et al. (2003). Recommendations for risk management practices. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34(3), 309-311.

Knapp, S, & VandeCreek, L. (2001). Psychotherapists' legal responsibility to third parties: Does it extend to alleged perpetrators of childhood abuse? Professional Psychologist, 32(5), 479-483.

Kosson, D, CytersjumT, D.Stauerwald, & et al. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Psychopathy Checklist Youth Version (PCL:YV) in nonincarcerated adolescent males. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 97-109.

Kroner, D, & Mills, J. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 471-489.

Kropp, P, & Hart, S. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA): Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 101-118.

Lynam, D. (1996). Early identification of chronic offenders: Who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209-234.

Lynam, D. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: Capturing the fledgling psychopathy in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(3), 425-438.

Lynam, D. (1998). Early identification of the fledgling psychopath: Locating the psychopathic child in the current nomenclature. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(4), 566-575.

Lynam, D, Caspi, A, Moffitt, T, & et al. (2000). The interaction between impulsivity and neighborhood context of offending: The effects of impulsivity are stronger in poorer neighborhoods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109(4), 563-874.

McNiel, D, Lam, J, & Binder, R. (2000). Relevance of interrater agreement to violence risk assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1111-1115.

Menzies, R, & Webster, C. D. (1995). Construction and validation of risk assessments in a six-year follow-up of forensic patients: A tridimensional analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 766-778.

Miller, H. A, Amenta, A. E, & Conroy, M. A. (2005). Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29(1), 29-54.

Miller, M. C, Tabakin, R, & Schimmel, J. (2000, Sep). Managing risk when risk is greatest. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 8(3), 154-159. England: Oxford Univ Press.

Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2001). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R): Development, performance and recommended risk level cut scores (D. Epperson, S. Huot, & J. Kaul, Trans.).

Monahan, J, Steadman, H. J, Appelbaum, P. S, Robbins, P. C. M. E. P, Silver, E, Roth, L. H, et al. (2000, Apr). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312-319. England: Royal Coll of Psychiatrists.

Monahan, J, & Steadman, H. (1996). Violent storms and violent people: How meteorology can inform risk communication in mental health law. American Psychologist, 51(9), 931-938.

Morris, G. (1997). Placed in purgatory:Conditional release of insanity acquittees. Arizona Law Review, 39, 1061.

Morse, S. (2002). Uncontrollable urges and irrational people. Virginia Law Review, 88, 1025.

Mulvey, E, & Cauffman, E. (2001). The inherent limits of predicting school violence. American Psychologist, 56(10), 797-802.

Nenno v. Texas, 970 S.W. 2d 549 (1998), Tex. Crim. App.

Nestor, P. (2002/11/25). Mental disorder and violence:Personality dimensions and clinical features. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(12), 1973-1978.

Otto, R, Borum, R, & Hart, S. (2001). Professional issues concerning the use of actuarial tests in sexually violent predator evaluations. Unpublished manuscript.

Rice, M. (1997). Violent offender research and implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52(4), 414-423.

Rice, M. E, & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.

Roberts, C, Doren, D, & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessment of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 569-589.

Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595-605.

Rosenfeld, B, & Lewis, C. (2005). Assessing Violence Risk in Stalking Cases: A Regression Tree Approach. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 343-357.

Sachsenmaier, S, & Peters, J. (2001). Sexual offender risk assessment methods and admissibility as expert witness evidence. In James M. Peters (Ed.), Prosecuting internet child sexual exploitation crimes. Washington,D.C.: United States Department of Justice.

Salekin, R. T, Rogers, R, & Sewell, K. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.

Schopp, R. (1996). Communicating risk assessments:Accuracy, efficacy, and responsibility. American Psychologist, 51(9), 939-945.

Serin, R. (1996). Violent recidivism in criminal psychopaths. Law and Human Behavior, 20(2), 207-217.

Silver, E, & Chow-Martin, L. (2002). A multiple models approach to assessing recidivism risk: Implications for judicial decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 538-568.

Silver, E, Mulvey, E, & Monahan. (1999). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Towards an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 237-256.

Silver, E, Smith, W, & Banks, S. (2000). COnstructing actuarial devices for predicting recidivism:A comparison of methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(6), 733-764.

Silver, E. (1999, Dec). Violence and mental illness from a social disorganization perspective: An analysis of individual and community risk factors. (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 60(6-A), 2236.

Silver, E, Mulvey, E. P, & Monahan, J. (1999, Apr). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 237-255.

Sjösted, G, & Långström, N. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 629-645.

Skilling, T, Harris, G, Rice, M, & Quinsey, V. (2002). Identifying persistently antisocial offenders using the Hare Psychology Checklist and DSM Antisocial personality disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 27-38.

Slovic, P, Monahan, J, & MacGregor, D. G. (2000, Jun). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271-296.

Stalans, L. J, Yarnold, P. R, Seng, M, Olson, D. E, & Repp, M. (2004). Identifying three types of violent offenders and predicting violent recidivism while on probation: A classification tree analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 253-271.

Steadman, H, Silver, E, Monahan, J, & et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 83-100.

Steadman, H, Silver, E, Monahan, J, Appelbaum, P, & et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 83-100.

Steadman, J, Mulvey, E, Monahan, J, & Robbins, P. e. a. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393-401.

Steinberg, L. (2001). The juvenile psychopath:Fads, fictions, and facts. National Institutes of Justice Perspectives on Crime and Justice: 2001 Lecture Series, 5(NCJ187100).

Stevenson, J, & Goodman, R. (2001). Association between behaviour at age 3 years and adult criminality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 197-202.

Studer, L. H, Clelland, S. R, Aylwin, A. S, Reddon, J. R, & Monro, A. (2000, Jan-Feb). Rethinking risk assessment for incest offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23(1), 15-22. US: William S Hein.

Swanson, J, Borum, R, Swartz, M, & Hiday, V. (1999). Violent behavior preceding hospitalization among persons with severe mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 185-204.

Swanson, J, Swartz, M, Borum, R, & et al. (2000). Involuntary out-patient commitment and reduction of violent behaviour in persons with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 324-331.

Swets, J, Dawes, R, & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1-26.

U.S. Department of Justice (National Institutes of Justice). (2001). An update on the "Cycle of violence." In NCJ 184894 ( C. S. Widom & M.G. Maxfield, Trans.). Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of Justice (National Institutes of Justice). (1995). Victims of childhood sexual abuse: Later criminal consequences. In NCJ 151525 ( C. S. Widom, Trans.). Washington, D.C.

Vossekuil, B, Reddy, M, & Fein, R. (2000). Safe School Initiative (U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center). Washington, D.C.

Walsh, E, Buchanan, A, & Fahy, T. (2002). Violence and schizophrenia: Examining the evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 490-495.

Wang, E, & Diamond, P. (1999). Empirically identifying factors related to violence risk in corrections. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 377-389.

Webster, C, Hucker, S, & Bloom, H. (2002). Transcending the actuarial versus clinical polemic in assessing risk for violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 659-665.

Williams, K. R, & Houghton, A. B. (2004). Assessing the Risk of Domestic Violence Reoffending: A Validation Study. Law and Human Behavior, 28(4), 437-455.

Wilson v. Valley Mental Health, 969 P.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Utah 1999) (No. 970308)

Wolf, R. S. (2000). Elder abuse. In V. B. Van Hasselt, M. Hersen & et-al. (Eds.), Aggression and violence: An introductory text. (pp. 135-151). Boston, MA,: Allyn & Bacon.