Achieving Global Development and Peace through

Maslow’s Hierarchical Revolutions

 

Som Karamchetty [1]

 

 

Abstract

As we begin the Twenty first century, we realize that the world’s greatest needs are economic development and enduring peace. Most writers have seen world development in only economic terms. Unless we see needs in a human dimension and bring development at a rapid pace, peace will remain a distant dream. The human dimension can be understood only when we address the needs as described by Abraham Maslow in his Need Ladder or Need Hierarchy. Furthermore, we have to address human needs at a revolutionary pace as people do not have infinite patience in this Internet age.

Maslow defined five types of human needs. Physiological needs come first. For the most part, people in developed countries achieved these needs. Modern agriculture, food processing, storage, transportation, and distribution satisfied this need in developed countries. These countries assumed that their safety and security needs are also mostly satisfied until the terrorism incidents of the eleventh September 2001. Meanwhile developing countries are still struggling to satisfy both physiological and security needs of all people.

Next on Maslow’s Hierarchy is the need for affiliation, association, to love, and to be loved. As we move up higher on Maslow’s Hierarchy, we encounter esteem, and recognition needs. Artists, musicians, writers, sculptors, and, those who excelled in their chosen fields, are recognized by their peers. Great sports persons, athletes, engineers, scientists, economists, belong to this category. Finally, a small number of people push themselves to reach the heights of their profession and satisfy their self-actualization needs. Geniuses, super stars, and statesmen belong in the last category. There are only a few in a million who satisfy needs at the highest level.

            The current pace of economic development in the world is too slow to accomplish human’s movement on the Need Ladder. This situation does not auger well for democracy and peace in the world. How will the society look like, when revolutionary progress occurs at every level of the Maslow’s Need Ladder? In this paper, I sketched the characteristics of these revolutions. I believe that intense application of advanced technology can address these needs and bring peace to the world. Enlightened and committed leadership can launch and accomplish revolutionary goals.  Their first task is to convince people that a vision of Maslow’s hierarchical revolutions is necessary and realizable.  Global partnership and investment of goodwill by common people will allow human ascent on the Maslow’s need ladder.

 

Introduction

            The world is beset with problems of various kinds. It is divided into the developed and developing countries. Millions of people in the world go hungry every day. There is inadequate housing for many more millions. For most people in the developed countries, while hunger and shelter are not major problems, safety and security cause them extreme anxiety. On the whole, life is less of an enjoyment for most people in the world. Are humans condemned to this fate for ever, or can we develop a vision of greater fulfillment and happiness for people on the earth? If it is possible to achieve lasting peace and prosperity on earth, is it the preserve of only a few or can all people attain that state? Do peoples have to continually fight for limited resources or can the world develop new knowledge and means to satisfy the needs of all people?

            Before we attempt to answer these questions, we have to define and describe what human needs are and what a goal state is. In this paper, I will begin with a description of Maslow’s need ladder, provide descriptions of the revolutions, and finally sketch a strategy for applying advanced technology focused on fulfilling all human needs.

 

Description of Maslow’s Need Hierarchy

            Abraham Maslow [2] presents a hierarchy, which describes human needs. According to him, "Human needs arrange themselves in hierarchies of prepotency," and, "No need or drive can be treated as if it were isolated or discrete; every drive is related to the state of satisfaction or dissatisfaction of other drives." Maslow’s Need Hierarchy consists of five types of human needs as shown in Figure 1.

  • Physiological needs
  • Safety and security needs
  • Social or affiliation needs
  • Esteem and recognition needs, and
  • Self actualization.

The physiological needs ¾ the most basic needs essential for survival ¾ include the needs for food, liquid, shelter, sex, sleep, and oxygen.

Safety and security needs emerge once the physiological needs are satisfied.

The belongingness and love needs emerge as an individual hungers for affectionate relations from people in general, for a place in his or her group. In the middle of the ladder is next need for affiliation, association, to love, and to be loved.

The esteem needs fall into two categories, self-respect and esteem from other people. As we reach the higher needs, we encounter esteem, and recognition. Artists, musicians, writers, sculptors, and other people who excel in their chosen fields are recognized by their peers. Great sports persons, athletes, engineers, scientists, and economists fall into this category.

Self-actualization need is the desire to become more and more what one is, to become everything that one is capable of becoming. The desire to know and to understand and the aesthetic needs are at the very top. Finally, a small number of people push themselves to reach the summits of their professions. They may be geniuses, super stars, statesmen, and so on. Depending on one’s inclination and interest in the fine arts, sciences, society, sports, and other fields, one can identify people who achieved the pinnacles on the hierarchy.

Maslow postulates that people yearn for higher level needs as those at lower levels are accomplished. History's lesson to mankind is that no group of people is content with the option of satisfying just the basic needs. Every person and society strives and struggles for opportunities to move up the need ladder.

Notwithstanding the lack of consensus on the hierarchy, Maslow’s Need Hierarchy forms an excellent framework for a discussion of the human needs and how we can achieve economic development, peace, and harmony in the world as such a framework reflects people's needs. [3] Although developed countries have not used this framework explicitly in their development, their results show the relevance of the need ladder.

 

Situation Analysis

The situation in the world can be divided into two broad categories: developed countries and developing countries. Having satisfied their basic needs, large percentages of people in developed countries, such as the US, have moved a little up the Maslow's need hierarchy. Safety and security needs were presumed to be satisfied in the developed countries until terrorism struck the US in 2001. Selected groups of people in developed countries have erected strong fences around themselves for security. Security is an illusion so long as leaders such as the Pope are forced to move under the heavy protection of a Popemobile. [4] Despite the security setbacks, stable democracies are thriving in the developed countries as most people are on the middle rungs of the ladder, namely, belongingness and love needs. Elected leadership in these countries undergoes only marginal changes. Political parties continually launch new development programs to assist the small fraction of people whose basic needs are yet to be fulfilled.

Meanwhile in the developing countries, where the majority of the world population lives, people still struggle to satisfy basic needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter. The availability of a large pool of unskilled labor drives the use of primitive and labor-intensive techniques, in preference to mechanization. This use of unskilled labor sets up a vicious cycle. Low productivity, low wages, and lack of capital for mechanization lead to a scarcity of food, clothing, and housing. As people toil in the fields, lack of spare time to invest in training, and education leaves these people unskilled and uninformed. For most people in this predicament, pursuit of activities at higher echelons of the need ladder is unthinkable and incomprehensible. As economic rewards are barely sufficient to satisfy their current basic necessities of life, no savings are generated to invest in education and training. As a result, generations get caught in oppressive poverty.

Efforts to fulfill safety and security needs fail miserably as class struggles pit one class against another. Historical legacies cause mutual suspicions and stroke the flames of conflict. The majority at the lower levels of the ladder concludes that the few at the top will manipulate the system to hang on to their position of advantage. Those at the top conclude with no real basis that they are born superior and deserve their position for ever. These attitudes continue to grow unabated and lead to endless class struggle and groups feel insecure from one another. Societies stratify and never coalesce.

            While some have no time, other people who lack jobs have no funds to pursue activities needed to move them up the ladder to fulfill their affiliation needs. Lacking employment, some among these have plenty of time to kill. Their affiliation needs draw them into evil clubs and they become gangsters, criminals, and terrorists. This sector of the population is on the historic verge of causing enormous harm to world peace and stability. Many scholars have pointed out that criminal elements have used this need for affiliation among the poor and dispossessed of the world to build their organizations into powerful machines of destruction.

            As we evaluate the upper levels of the need ladder, we see people seeking status. They want to feel valued in their community, at work, and at home. They want respect from themselves and others. Currently, only a miniscule population of both developed and developing countries satisfies this need. Finally, only an infinitesimally small number of people attain self-actualization. Many scholars have contended that this need is not an economic need; if so, perhaps, it may be somewhat beyond the scope of this paper.

 

Impact of economics on Maslow’s Need Hierarchy

Fulfillment of needs is firstly an economic problem because costs and rewards bear a critical relationship to one’s position on the need ladder. A person or a group or a nation is both a producer and a consumer and has certain economic capability and technical skills and performs work, produces goods, and satisfies own and/or others’ needs. People struggling at the bottom of the hierarchy are characterized by hard manual work and lack of skills and education. The goods and services produced by them fetch them meager rewards. On the other hand, the higher one’s position is on the hierarchy, the more empowered they are by education and knowledge. They are rewarded handsomely for their products and services. As a corollary, the products at lower levels cost less and those at higher levels cost considerably. This makes it harder for people at lower levels to acquire the services of those at higher levels. A natural economic barrier to the upwardly movement of people is thus erected.

Needs do not automatically result in demand. For example, poor people need food, but cannot afford it, resulting in no additional demand. If these people get money either by way of earnings, or welfare, or charity, or loans, then additional demand results. Similarly, work does not directly translate into more earnings. When work is augmented by technical skills, knowledge, training, education, and technology infrastructure better rewards ensue. Supply and demand meet at the market and rewards are generated for the producer or worker. Rewards result in economic capability of a person, a group, or a nation. Economic capability can be used to gain or enhance technical skills and technical infrastructure. Therefore, in order for people to move up the ladder, an upward thrust is needed sufficient to cause a take off. Figure 2 depicts a model connecting needs, demands, satisfiers, rewards, technology, and development.

The important criterion is that a person’s, or a society’s, or a nation’s capability should exceed the requirements for the lower level needs. The excess can be used and people begin to move up the ladder. It is also possible to receive a boost from others (people, society, or nation) in moving up the ladder, when one does not have self-sufficient resources. Sacrificing needs at a lower level for a certain time period also helps in moving up at a later time. However, since these lower level needs are life sustaining, there is only so much one can sacrifice.

            The experience of the developed countries shows that technology, knowledge, and skills increase productivity and yields greater rewards to performers. Higher productivity allows people to invest time in gaining knowledge to move up the ladder. Those who cater to the higher level needs and demands get higher rewards. Higher rewards mean greater economic capability, such as manufacturing, trading, and investment infrastructures. Economic capability will, in turn, enable a person, a group, or a nation to gain higher technical skills, leading to further gains in economic capability. Correspondingly, it decreases manual labor inputs into the production system. Ultimately, people can be involved in a production system as business people and have machines (robots, automata, and knowledge machines) produce goods and services at the lower levels of the hierarchy. This launches an upward spiral of national economic deliverance.

 

 

 

Patterns of population density at each level of the Maslow’s Need Ladder

Maslow’s need ladder pertains to individual needs. But, since our goal is global development, we have to extrapolate the need ladder to the level of the society. Human beings are highly social and they react in a social way. For example, a mother sacrifices her food and physical comforts for her children’s benefit and a father mortgages his farm to give a good start to his children. A soldier sacrifices his life to defend his country. Of course, such sacrifices can take a good or an evil form. Individuals can be turned into law-breaking and immoral tools of gangs and extremist zealots. These social tendencies lead us to examine the needs at the societal level more so than at an individual level.

The progress of a society can be gauged by examining the fraction of a population involved in activities at a particular level or whose needs are satisfied according to Maslow’s hierarchy. In a democracy, since people elect their leaders, a majority of people cannot be left at the bottom of the ladder. They will vote the leaders out continually leading to unstable societies. Democratic leaders have to work towards satisfying most human needs to gain stability and peace.

Let us examine the possible, potential, or ideal scenarios for distributions of people at each level. [5] Traditionally, a triangular distribution (Figure 3) is envisaged, where most people are involved in activities intended to satisfy their physiological needs. The triangle is very acute, i.e. a large base and a narrow peak. An acute triangular distribution is not conducive to peace and harmony in a society. Since democracies give power to a majority of people, political power and economic power are always at odds in a society with an acute triangular distribution. In the developed countries, these proportions are somewhat better as there are slightly larger proportions of people involved at the higher levels. This distribution correlates well with the relative political stability in the developed countries.

            A better distribution looks rectangular (Figure 4) where we have the same proportion of people involved in activities at each of the five levels. In this scenario, more people have moved to the top from the bottom of the ladder. This movement should not be done by fiat or by class (or caste) but by hard work and capability. All people are allowed the opportunity to move up or settle at a comfortable or chosen level. From the point of view of a democracy, this already adds to political stability, peace, and harmony. But this scenario is not ideal as there are still some people toiling at the bottom level.

            An inverse triangular distribution (Figure 5) is even better than the rectangular distribution discussed above. Many more people moved to the top. Only a few people are at the bottom. But it may not be the goal yet? Because, who (or which few) wants to be at the bottom?

            Ultimately, an inverted-peak distribution (Figure 6), where all the people, or the whole society, are involved in activities at the highest level is ideal. Having satisfied their lower level needs, people obtained the necessary skills, knowledge, and education, and moved up the ladder. Leaders should have this scenario as their ultimate goal. It is up to the individual people or groups to choose and reach the level at which they are satisfied and comfortable. People should have the opportunity and options to settle at a level of their choosing. [6]

In reality therefore, as a society develops, an actual scenario or distribution will be somewhere in between the traditional triangular and this inverted-peak distribution. As all the people are at the top, or where ever they are comfortable, this results in a very stable democracy. One would expect that there will be intellectual debates and not physical conflicts as candidates vie for political leadership. The shape of an actual scenario can be used as a metric for the level of development accomplished by a society or a nation.

 

Maslow’s Hierarchical Revolutions

            So a society’s goal should be to move from a traditional triangular distribution to an inverted-peak distribution, i. e., from a current reality towards an ideal system (Figure 7). While it takes time to go from one distribution to the other people will not tolerate a slow rate of progress. I introduce the concept of a revolution as people want a fast paced fulfillment of their needs. People and societies are more likely to trust the leadership, if positive results are evident. Hence, I call for Maslow’s Hierarchical Revolutions. These revolutions are the means to get to the goals.

From the discussion in the previous sections, it should be clear that there is need for revolutions at each level on Maslow’s Need Ladder. [7] The call for revolutions rather than evolutions is justified because the world population is increasing at an alarming rate and because small scale, or slow-paced, or evolutionary improvements will not satisfy a significant fraction of people. Without satisfying most people, there will only be conflicts and confrontations. In democratic societies where the majority holds the ultimate power, people will not accept slow progress at any level of the hierarchy. The result will be anarchy or brutal dictatorship but not peace.

I propose five levels of revolutions (Figure 8), namely,

·         Green revolution

·         Security revolution

·         Affiliation Revolution

·         Esteem Revolution, and

·         Mind Revolution.

 

Let us consider the Physiological needs first. Modern agriculture, food processing, storage, transportation, and distribution satisfied this need in developed countries. Thanks to Green revolution of the last several decades and the help from of developed countries, many developing countries have satisfied most of these needs. Food has been given a primary focus in international development. Housing is a dire need. For the majority of people in developing countries, rewards for work are barely sufficient to buy and satisfy basic necessities of life. They have no savings left to improve their lot or that of their children. Generations get caught in depressive poverty. Large scale mechanization and automation will increase productivity on the farms and allow people to gain additional funds for housing. Manufacturing automation will make more affordable housing available to satisfy people’s need for shelter. Green revolution and manufactured housing are necessary to address physiological needs.

            The prevailing wisdom was that safety and security were mostly satisfied in the developed countries. This was so until the terrorist attacks in the US in 2001. Developing countries are a long way from providing safety and security to people. Security problems are partly the vestiges of colonialism and social inequities of several centuries, even millennia. Regrettably, there is also a mistaken view held by some groups that they can move up the ladder by fighting their way up. The effect of violent confrontations is merely the transfer of control of wealth from one group to another, but it jeopardizes the security of all people. In some instances, a few warlords want to control the riches and force people to work for them, which is a throw back to feudal systems. Such people are misleading their followers. Lack of education among the followers allows the few to dominate and cause mischief.

A security revolution allows security technologies to be deployed. Security and safety should protect humans from man-made and natural forces of destruction; protect the environment from misuse of technology; and free people from diseases. The most important protections are equal opportunities for all people and their freedoms to pursue individual expression, movement, and enjoyment. These securities then extend to values, ethics, and culture. The reader may notice that I have defined security in a broader sense.

            Affiliation revolution can contribute significantly to world peace and harmony. Unfortunately, planners do not give any consideration to affiliation needs. Most peace-loving people join some group or the other and enjoy the company of one another. People support one another or derive pleasure from such companies and invest their free time in mutually supportive and societal activities. Sports clubs, athletic clubs, music groups, drama and debating societies, literary conventions, and cultural groups fulfill the affiliation needs of most people. With Internet and electronic media, there are many opportunities for on-line and virtual affiliations.

When their affiliation needs are not satisfied, some people are attracted to evil groups, such as gangs, drug rings, mafia, and terrorist organizations. These nefarious groups market themselves to the credulous folks and convert them to their vile and vicious ways. Some extremist religious groups also succeed in luring unsuspecting people by taking advantage of their affiliation needs. In the guise of affiliation, they train and turn the gullible people into terrorists and criminals.

Healthy societies and smart governments encourage and promote positive affiliations. Advanced technologies, such as television, radio, Internet, World wide web (the Web), Instant Messaging, and Weblogs can play a vital role in satisfying the affiliation needs. Education, training, and extension of physical and virtual clubs can satisfy this need.

            Esteem revolution comes up next. The modern world provides people with infinite opportunities to excel in their chosen fields. As more activities are created and developed, people will get a wide array of opportunities to choose a field of pursuit and thrive in it. People can succeed in a chosen vocation and be recognized by groups. Family and friends play an important role in mutual recognition and in according esteem. Next, workplace and communities bestow recognition and a person’s esteem is enhanced. As people choose their own enterprises, work diligently, and attain business success, their esteem grows. As people move away from working for giant monolithic corporations, and work on their own businesses, or partnerships, or collaborative ventures, job satisfaction and goal accomplishment lead to a high degree of self-esteem. Encouragement of small businesses and franchising will lead to a great number of people satisfying this need. With the availability of Internet and e-business facilities, people can engage themselves in areas they like to work in and leave other aspects of a business to collaborators. Progressive application of electronic business systems will make work more interesting.

            Mind revolution is concerned with self-actualization. There are times when one wishes to be as great as Einstein, or Gandhi, or Emerson, or some other great personality. Self-actualization is traditionally the province of a few ¾ one in a million or a billion. In an ideal state of the world, as people’s drudge work is offloaded to machines and a variety of networks are available to communicate with knowledge sources, the top level needs are grasped by a greater number of people. Unlike other needs discussed so far, this need is something that is satisfied by one for oneself. Society can create environments to satisfy the other four types of needs and leave individuals to work on this need by themselves. A small number of people push themselves to reach the heights of their professions or other pursuits. They may be geniuses, super stars, statesmen, or leaders. It starts in the minds of people and a revolution here is a great success for humankind.

 

Characteristics of the Revolutions

            How do we recognize that we are in a state of revolution and how can we measure the success in our efforts? We have to identify certain unique characteristics of each revolution. [8] When the world produces abundant supplies of food and shelter outpacing demand, we know we accomplished this revolution. Food production surpasses total needs of global population. Every person is well clothed and receives needed shelter. Physiological needs, by and large, do not obey the laws of elasticity of demand. People cannot consume more food just because it is available and cheap. The demand saturates and the curve flattens. Likewise, when food becomes scarce, people cannot avoid consumption. The minimum and maximum demands for basic needs are within a narrow band relative to higher level needs. Large scale mechanization on the farm and in the industry will improve productivity per unit of labor and per unit of land and other inputs. We will see a small number of producer-entrepreneurs on the farm. These farmers are well educated in technologies, knowledge of farming methods, and business. They actually enjoy farming (just like hobby gardeners do). Additionally, they will be collaborating with other self employed entrepreneurs. They receive high economic rewards without increasing unit costs of food. Similar characteristics will be noticed in the housing sector also.

            The hallmarks of Security revolution are that safety and security of all freedom loving people is assured. Safety extends to people’s health, well being, and fundamental rights. Such a safety is possible through strong emphasis on health care sciences and technologies. Liberties and fundamental rights are guaranteed by focusing on the legal and justice systems. National, state, and local law enforcement systems and authorities provide internal security. Military and global police forces provide national and international security from criminal elements. Security technologies, such as, robots, electronic monitoring, autonomous weapons systems, and knowledge intensive analytical systems, will be largely deployed. Again, a small number of entrepreneurial security specialists will be operating to provide these services. Accounting, auditing, financial, and legal information and enforcement systems are built so that security from white collar crimes is addressed. Education and training in law abiding, value systems, and ethical living will prevail.

            Affiliation revolution will be marked by a wide presence of clubs at local, state, national, and international levels. Virtual clubs, groups, societies, and networks will become ubiquitous. Such clubs emphasize positive and healthy friendships, relationships, and comradeship. Societies will be marked by their high level of education, skills, and broader international understanding in a wide range of subjects. As stated earlier, people will have more time and resources available to invest in these higher level pursuits. As people become sophisticated, they value intellectual and friendly pursuits. Activities are seen as win-for-all, rather than as winners and losers.

The affiliation revolution can also show a marked decrease in international terrorist groups. It is stated that as young people look for affiliation, they are sometimes attracted by religious extremists and are converted to these causes. [9] Lacking education and skills of analytical reasoning, these affiliation-starved people join terrorist organizations. If a wide choice of affiliations, such as clubs, societies, and networks are available, people will be so busy that they are less likely to be attracted to terrorism. Being knowledgeable of the robustness of the security systems, these potential miscreants may desist from joining terrorist groups. The world will consist of a vast array of friendly and affiliated real and virtual networks.

            Success of esteem revolution will be marked by highly successful entrepreneurships, partnerships, and collaborations. People take responsibility and pride in ownership. Such a social system leads to esteem ¾ both esteem from peers and self-esteem. People choose enjoyable vocations and avocations. This in turn, should result in harmonious relationships and high productivity. One will find a highly educated and knowledge intensive society. Production systems are highly efficient and productive. People will have free time available to invest in progressively higher pursuits.

            Self-actualization starts with winning the minds of people by the society or enlightened minds. This revolution starts within one’s mind and accomplishments solidify there. Need satisfaction is viewed in the context of philosophical and spiritual light.

Great artists and performers will get audiences in person, as well as on the Internet, TV, Video, and other virtual networks. Since communication technology can connect global networks, audiences can form internationally in small or large groups instantly. Technology can also allow for many different and dispersed networks. People and groups have no need to fight for network resources. Both people and performers get choices. Good performers and interested people make connections and performances thrive. Time and resources will cease to be constraints.

People will have plenty of time on their hands to pursue these pastimes as they have machines doing chores to satisfy their lower level needs. Availability of economic resources will enable people to pursue a mind revolution. Self-actualization appears to be very personal and may have to come from within people. Leadership’s role ends with making resources available.

 

A Strategic plan to launch the revolutions

After defining the ends and means, now it is time for leadership to develop a strategic plan to realize the vision of an enlightened society that exhibits an inverted-peak distribution. Key tasks deal with automation to relieve the drudgery from the masses, continual application of science and technology, creation of virtual spaces to allow activities that would otherwise be restrained by  the constraints of physical spaces, harmonious allocation of resources with a view to increasing productivity and efficiency, investment of people’s time in high level pursuits, entrepreneurial environment for work and management, and assurance to people of opportunities to move up the ladder based on talents and effort. I recognize eight key tasks as follows.

  1. Large scale mechanization and automation in producing goods and services
  2. Continual advancements in and application of science and technology
  3. Creation of virtual spaces and environments on a large scale
  4. Separation of spaces to avoid conflicts
  5. Harmonious allocation of resources
  6. Allocation (freeing up) of time to high level pursuits
  7. Make societal resources available for people to borrow, repay, and replenish
  8. Assurance of equal opportunities to move high up on the Maslow’s Need Hierarchy.

So long as there are drudge and rout chores at the lower levels, clever people in the society will connive to enslave others from within the society or from another society and impede the vertical ascent of all humans. Hence, the first task is large scale mechanization of all chores to improve the production systems and satisfy the physiological needs. Technology should pervade all human activities, freeing humans to do mental activities only. When mechanization displaces people from manual labor, there can be massive unemployment. Displaced people should be offered opportunities to seek knowledge through education, and skills enhancement through training. Such educational and training activities will also consume their free time. This then avoids the dangers of undirected free time of people. Societies should be willing to invest in these activities as they are investments in a positive revolution.

            Presently, large scale utilization of technology is highly non-uniform. Many parts of the globe are still emerging out of the middle-ages. There is need for large scale development of new sciences. Translating sciences into technologies and transferring technical products to serve people is a key part of this task. A thorough understanding of science and nature’s workings will give us greater technical potential to develop new material formulations and products. We can overcome resource constraints of the current techno-economic environment. One lesson we can learn from nature is that it recycles everything and unleashes tremendous changes. Understanding human mind and the factors that drive people to extremely evil acts is an essential research undertaking.

            Leaders have to launch science and technology development programs to develop virtual spaces. For example, electronic spaces and networks can connect people around the globe into chosen activities (virtual clubs) and allow members to satisfy their affiliation needs and pursue higher goals. Electronic (or information) spaces can also provide teaching, learning, and discussion forums. By connecting physical and virtual activities, a few performers can entertain a large audience and a few science experiments can satisfy several researchers in their individual inquiries. Societies have been fighting for space for the last few millennia. We may not be able to create physical space even if we colonize the moon for man’s desire to own physical space is endless. The solution lies in creating endless virtual spaces and in creating minds that know that space is a means to life and not an end in itself.

            Separation of spaces will lead to the avoidance or resolution of conflicts. Perhaps, we can create virtual spaces and spend as much time as we want there and also learn to time-share physical spaces. Humans have been fighting for land to raise crops and to graze their animals. Mechanization of farming will likely eliminate such conflicts for physical space. We have been fighting for energy and other resources; science and technology may give us an abundance of creative knowledge that such resource fights will be history. We need to understand the root causes of conflicts and address them with knowledge solutions.

            Following on the defining of goals, leaders should allocate resources towards the revolutions. Preferred projects are in mechanization, and automation, development of science and technology, education and training, construction of virtual spaces, affiliation vocations, and mutual understanding of cultures. Directing people’s time to high level pursuits as opposed to low level chores and evil designs is key to accomplishing ultimate objectives. Leadership has a special responsibility to create activities so that people channel their time into creative and positive pursuits.

            The success of a plan hinges on allocation of adequate resources. Traditionally, development expenditures are treated as costs rather than as investments. As people move up the ladder and engage in higher level activities, the economic worth of society’s resources actually increases. Leaders should develop financial mechanisms so that people may borrow, repay, and replenish society’s resources cyclically. For example, people can borrow money for acquiring any skills and education and repay as they gain earnings. People should have opportunities to invest in pursuits consistent with their aptitude. An important task for leaders of developing countries is to invest in education and training. Correspondingly, the leaders in the developed world should assist the developing world in the pursuit of knowledge and skills. Since only a small fraction of the world falls into the developed category, leaders can be assured that there are more developmental opportunities in the world. There appears to be a fierce competition for energy resources and job opportunities. But a look at the end state or goal state shows that we have enormous research and development opportunities in developing energy technologies and high productivity manufacturing technologies.

            Leaders and societies should assure all people of opportunities to move higher on the Maslow’s Need Hierarchy regardless of their current or recent social status. This assurance can be seen by designing legal, justice, and financial systems for the protection of people’s right to opportunities. With such an assurance, people will make sacrifices in the near term for long term benefits.

 

Measurable goals in the march towards the vision

            From an implementation perspective, national vision has to be translated into short-term goals that can be measured periodically. A period of forty or fifty years appears to be a good time frame for the long-term vision as it is the productive lifetime of a citizen in a developing country. [10] For instance, in a fifty year time horizon, people can visualize what their children will achieve and the environment in which their grandchildren will begin to grow. If we follow this time horizon, we should set a goal, which reads, "Nearly one-hundred percent of people will move up from the two lowest levels of the hierarchy into the third echelon in fifty years." It means that most citizens will have their physiological needs satisfied and are busily working on satisfying their esteem and affiliation needs by the end of the fifty-year period. Granted, some will move higher and a small fraction of people may be left behind. Yet, once such a national commitment is made, we can expect present sacrifices (investments) in order to attain the vision. In the absence of such a clear vision, we are left with the current situation in which everyone and every group joins a scuffle to grab resources and opportunities. Without a defined vision, goals, and a plan, there are no tasks, no assignment of people to perform the right tasks, no optimal allocation of resources, and no monitoring of metrics. Hence there is no forward march towards a developed nation status. Chaotic motion only leads to intense heat!

When national commitment is specified in terms of a framework of Maslow's hierarchical needs, a janitor will know that his or her grandchild need not be cleaning up after someone else. However, the janitor will also realize that his grandchild can be among those at the finish line only through literacy, education, effort, and commitment. People will know what the means are to attain those goals and not fight for quotas for a lucky few among the currently dispossessed. Simultaneously, a professor will realize that she has two important tasks. One task is the creation of more positions at the higher levels of Maslow's need hierarchy and the other task is to prepare her own grandchildren to enter a competitive and merit-based society.

A lesson from the experience of US is worthy of note. The US has placed emphasis on the development of capital, technology, skilled labor, and management methods to satisfy these needs for a majority of people. An optimal balance between free-markets and individual initiatives on the one hand and government subsidies, assistance, initiatives, and policies, on the other, has been struck with a results-oriented approach. Democratic principles[11] and participatory institutions of governance have motivated individuals and small groups to participate, contribute, and accomplish economic and social gains. Cooperation and healthy competition have replaced mutual confrontation as laws and regulations have assured people of social and economic opportunities to move up the ladder. Mr. Jerry L. Jordan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland stated that economic infrastructure plays a major role in determining economic prosperity.[12]

 

Science and Technology are the key enablers of the Revolutions

            The key to move people up the ladder is science and technology. Stated in plain language, no people should be expected to do the chores at the lower levels. Industrialization and mechanization of agriculture had already lifted the burden of production of foods from peasants (and industrial goods from mechanics) to machinery in the developed world. The fact that computerization, flexible manufacturing systems, and robots have improved productivity in every sector of the economy proves that technology can work harmoniously with human need system.

            Agriculture, food, and housing sectors will receive a tremendous boost from a large scale application of science and technology and complete the green revolution. Life sciences, medical and health technologies, sanitation and public health, electronics, communications, sensor, and robotic technologies will help with security and safety revolutions.

            Information, computer, communications, media, and material sciences and technologies will launch the affiliation revolution. They will provide unlimited access to information and knowledge for people in their pursuit of virtual networks and virtual clubs.

            Modern management methods and business processes will be the pillars for esteem revolution.  Ready availability of knowledge and easier learning methods owing to modern media technologies such as simulation, gaming, and virtual experience will foster a highly learned society. This learning and accomplishment will extend to and embrace all forms of fine arts, crafts, and literature. Based on the foundation of the strongly emerging sciences and technologies, people are at the threshold of a mind revolution.

Unfortunately, the implication of technology is often misunderstood. In the first instance, productivity owing to the application of technology can result in unemployment and therefore misery for those displaced from their erstwhile productive occupations. But, appropriate application of technology when combined with opportunities for education can move people out of the lower level occupations and into higher level pursuits. The objective of mechanization should be the movement of people into so called, leisure activities and intellectual and cultural pursuits and not into unemployment.

Computer, communications, and television technologies have allowed more people to receive training in technical skills, and education in higher arts. Pursuit of knowledge and the arts, and research into new frontiers of knowledge can provide large populations with opportunities to move up the ladder. Technology decreases costs by producing more goods at any level of the hierarchy and thus increases rewards for those who apply it. Producers get better rewards and will be able to afford goods and services to move in an upward spiral of development.

 

Conclusions

I have suggested Maslow’s hierarchical revolutions, which are strongly based on human needs and a rapid pace of development. The current triangular distribution of people along the Maslow’s need ladder is the primary cause for conflicts among peoples and nations. These revolutions lead to an inverted-peak distribution where most people are highly satisfied and enlightened. This is a highly desirable and stable distribution conducive to global peace and harmony.

My prescription of a revolutionary pace of well defined development strategy is based on the realization that people have little patience to wait to get to an undefined goal state at the current snail’s pace. The slower pace will not work. Planners have to take risks with a rapid pace. Being afraid of riding a bike fast, if one tries to go slow one only becomes unstable and falls to the ground. Fearing to fly an airplane fast, if one eases on the throttle slowly, one never takes off. To succeed in interplanetary travel, one has to leave the earth with escape velocity or one will for ever be grounded. In this context, speed pays.

            Leaders have to develop an international plan and several national plans with timelines. In a forty or fifty year plan period, a twenty some year old person’s children would have graduated from college and the person’s grandchildren will be commencing schooling. When the plan horizon is seen by people and specific results are marketed by leaders, people will support the plan and work for its success. More importantly, people will be willing to sacrifice and wait in the hope or assurance that their grand children will reach the top. I believe that this time period is within the span of peoples’ patience and revolutionary.

            During the transition, when technology displaces people from their current professions, they should not be relegated to the ranks of unemployment. That should be grasped as an opportunity to move the unemployed from the lower levels to upper levels through education and skill enhancement. With will and leadership, we can begin the revolutionary voyage to establish peace in the world!

 

 

 

Figure 1. Maslow’s Need Hierarchy.

 

 

 

 

Figure 2. Model Connecting Needs, Demands, Satisfiers, Rewards, Technology, and Development.

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Hypothetical Patterns of Populations Involved in Activities (Satisfiers) at Each Hierarchical Level; A Conventional Triangular Distribution.

 

 

Figure 4. Hypothetical Patterns of Populations Involved in Activities (Satisfiers) at Each Hierarchical Level; A Rectangular Distribution.

 

 

Figure 5. Hypothetical Patterns of Populations Involved in Activities (Satisfiers) at Each Hierarchical Level; An Inverse Triangular Distribution.

Figure 6. Hypothetical Patterns of Populations Involved in Activities (Satisfiers) at Each Hierarchical Level; An Inverted-Peak Distribution.

 

 

Figure 7. From a Triangular to a Peak Distribution.

 

 

Figure 8. Maslow’s Hierarchical Revolutions.

 



[1] Som Karamchetty, Sole Member, SomeTechnologies LLC, Columbia, MD, USA, somk@comcast.net

[2] Frank G. Goble, The Third Force: The Psychology of Abraham Maslow, 1970, Jefferson Center for Character Education, Published by Maurice Bassett Publishing (2004).

 

[3] Maslow had not suggested the need ladder for a country; it is my extrapolation by summation.

[4] Source: http://www.bigpedia.com/encyclopedia/Popemobile

[5] A word of explanation is in order here. These charts do not show the fraction of people whose needs are satisfied at each level. It shows the fraction of people working at a specific level to produce goods and services typical of that level. People working at a higher level will have already satisfied their needs at the lower levels as they have the resources to obtain the goods and services at lower levels.

 

[6] As people vacate the activities at the lower levels, robotic machines and knowledge based systems will replace them.

[7] Maslow did not call for the Revolutions. It is the current author/presenter that introduced the concept of revolutions utilizing Maslow’s Need Hierarchy as a framework for the discussion.

 

[8] A revolution cannot be an end in itself. It is a means to an end.

[9] Example in source: http://www.e-prism.org/images/Suicide%20Terrorism%20Paper%20for%20Eprism.doc

[10]  Life expectancy in India is 61. Source: http://www.indiatogether.org/health/infofiles/life.htm

[11] This is not to state that democracy in developed countries is perfect and that there is universal participation. The degree and quality of democracy is sufficient to make the system work for most people. This aspect may be contrasted with authoritarian and state controlled countries where progress is less remarkable notwithstanding the abundance and availability of natural resources.