April 2009 - Addendum .
Discussed on
'The Rachel Maddow Show'for Thursday, April 17, 2009
was something called the
Bybee memo from
Jay S. Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel who is now a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
This attorney interpreted the
United Nations Convention Against Torture to mean that America could torture prisoners - guess this could be called the American Inquisition.
I was curious about the educational background of
Jay Scott Bybee, using Wikipedia I found that he graduated magna cum laude from the
Brigham Young University
and earned his Juris Doctor cum laude from BYU's
J. Reuben Clark Law School a private, coeducational research university owned by
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints located in Provo, Utah.
Now here is a
bio of the attorney that wanted to destroy us....
How can anyone be expected to have a fair interpretation of the law when individuals of these backgrounds are doing the interpreting. Torture made legal, using the allegedly "secular" courts to destroy a woman trying to escape an abusive husband....
How many others have been destroyed by this Puritan/Evangelical infection ?
- Were these Christians seeded to interpret the laws with their special bias ? is interpretation the only skill they have, Bible or Law books ?
- These Christians do not follow the teaching of either Christ or Man...
- In Virginia the legal population has no oversight, they self regulate themselves based on their interpretation of both the Bible and secular Law.....
- Then there is this, in 2000 an Agency of the Supreme Court of Virginia, called the Virginia State Bar changed its policy. From addressing "strategy" with Code of Professional Responsibility to avoiding "strategy" with Professional Guidelines and Rules of Professional Conduct
There seems to be a pattern in the law enforcement process. They unleash the "bad apples" to "stress" the community, the cops that beat up on people, overlook crimes against citizens and just execute their mission ineptly. Then when a citizen or population makes a mistake the "good apples" sweep down and persecute them. At this time the victim is told that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" and that they must be punished for their crimes. If one brings up the crimes against them, the issue is irrelevant, history is irrelevant. But apparently history, even fabricated history is relevant when one is being processed. Those implementing the "law enforcement" process are willing pawns, eager to beat up a perpetrator regardless as to the "crime" or even if a "crime" was committed. This behavior is highlighted by ethnic discrimination, a "presumption of guilt" is applied to the citizen.
This paradigm feeds the Puritan fires, gives them relevance, it gives them someone to punish. Evangelicals educated and trained in the interpretation of law with a Biblical foundation then infiltrate secular processes and thrive. Consider that if science and prevailing theories are considered incorrect in theocratic schools, what branch of studies would service a society? The ability to convince others to give up their money based on religious documents or legal documents either works. Right or wrong does not matter it is all about punishment.
The Puritan's and "law enforcement" are perfect bedfellows,
willing soldiers that will not ask questions and if any questions are asked the law will be
interpreted in a manner that would marginalize those asking the questions. The soldier will say "I understand" salute and march off, an example being
Police Raid Berwyn Heights Mayor's Home, Kill His 2 Dogs - pick poor judgment in the field, questionable training or intent?
Another case would be our
crusading attorney who stated in the courthouse that he would destroy us, had the court dismiss years of State Social Services mental health and marriage counseling and possibly compromised their victims legal counsel who ignored the years of Social Services Counseling, dates and other records. Was this the actions of a secular "officer of the court" or the product of a theocratic infection. An individual that chose a role of "interpreting" documents and preaching ideology. The "sin"/"crime" was that my girlfriend had an abortion, she was a murderer and trying to escape her master. It did not matter that the husband that they were defending was an abusive, cross dresser, that allegedly had an illegitimate child in another state. Consider the works of the
attorney that persecuted us.
Consider the irony that the scientists are giving weapons of mass destruction to those that do not "believe" in empirical evidence and want Armageddon.
In the case of the crusading attorney, if there was a concern about family or the children then we would not have heard about suicide attempts, incest and neglect by the "born again" father after the "win", the "punishment" of the mother.
In the case of our police assault in the CVS incident as "law enforcement" and "courts" allegedly interested in maintaining a reputation of integrity and professionalism. When I stated that material was not reviewed, was missing and that the evidence would refute the police report the correct response should have been to get the store video and review it. The choice was to "punish" us and ignore the evidence, identifies that it was not about "law" or "due process" it was about "punishment". The judge even stressed this when my attorney pled me guilty, by their tirade about the leniency of the prosecutors deal, they had not heard any evidence or any part of the case, they just wanted "punishment".
I am hearing concern about a substance and those being "punished" for having it in their possession, this is not about right or wrong, it is about a vehicle for Puritan "punishment". Much like my girlfriends abortion was the motivation for a crusading attorney, ignoring evidence a vehicle of punishment for Virginia Kangaroo Courts and creating an evil substance a vehicle of punishment for whole populations. Consider the potential of these speed cameras to punish, what would they do if everyone drove the speed limit as it stands there should be enough people to punish without too much "rigging".
Listen to the Conservative rhetoric, it is all about profiting themselves and punishing those that do not agree with their beliefs. One is not "forgiven" after their "punishment" after a conviction one has a record, one is "tagged", we may have been "tagged" by the Crusading attorney. My concern is the scenario presented by a WTOP reader, that I will be pulled over in a traffic stop and punished again, shot was the word I believe.
The punishment/Puritan behavior factor is relevant because of the niche that contains a significant population of these individuals. Even if laws are made, they will be interpreted by these "Christian conservatives".
The politicians make laws and try to bow to the whims of their constituents. Consider personalities of the Judges and Attorneys, interpreting and arguing the interpretation of law. Consider the personalities of the clergy interpreting and arguing the interpretation of the Bible - another document. What profile fits both patterns, people gravitate to professions of proficiency, like our
crusading attorney. The legal profession is filled with those brainwashed into the punishment paradigm.
The personalities that argue both law and religion have the same proclivity. Naturally those with talent gravitate to their niche professions.
I am curious as to the percentage of
law colleges that have a theocratic foundation and teach a biased implementation/interpretation of the Law.
Now if the bias of those practicing the interpretation of law is a theocratic punishment model, then punishment would be prevalent in the society.
What country has one of the highest prison population's ?
What this means is that regardless of what law is made, these personalities with their bias, will interpret the law as they perceive it.
What country
interpreted United Nations Convention Against Torture to mean that we could torture ?
If there is no control over this population, there is no functional judicial process. I use our
experiences to highlight the marginalization of a client which protects a niche.
Here is another anomaly, I am around fifty years old, I have never been called for jury duty. Up until 2005 I had no criminal record, so was I lucky or was it because I am on a no jury list? Is there a filter to ensure the correct population of "peers"? Over the last decade we have heard of voter fraud and other means of controlling the theater. What is the litmus test of the jury selection...
Of course this runs into statistical modeling of the populations and events. But with enough demographic and identity data collected the theater could be manipulated.
