Girlfriend fell again June 02, 2009

Consequences of Virginia's courts system

It does not make sense for the government to be negligent, but it does make sense for populations in the government to profit. I highlight explicitly those like the crusading attorney who stated that it was their intent to destroy us. Is this the activity of an "officer of the court" for a divorce case ?

A volume business "strategy" is more profitable than quality "strategy", especially for mediocre performers. The Virginia State Bar ignores such strategies as running for political office, has members that are confused about Church and State and those that are just preying on the weak.
All good strategies...

Like other sociopaths the members Virginia State Bar and Law Enforcement use time and cover up to get away with their crimes. For example we could not get another attorney to address the abuse of process issue. As a result of the dog bite injury we brought "abuse of process" up to Mr. Burks and were instructed to wait till after the injury case was settled, covered up.....

Circumstances and consequences cascade, this is with intent - Girlfriends situation, From the seventeen years of spousal abuse and then five more years of being vilified in the Virginia courts by the Virginia State Bar's crusading member, the dog bite and another members desertion and then when she has a breakdown she is persecuted again by CVS and the Manassas Police and .....

Today my girlfriend fell again....

The dog bite injury causes her leg to give out occasionally. Today she did it again, falling into a tree trying to get her dog she hit her head and has bruises all over.

I worry about her, we moved to a remotish area to get away from a stalker. We found out that there are more nuts in the woods, from crooked cops, safe houses and secret drug fields - oh well.

After finding out she was okay, I laughed, told her we should not go out, the cops might chase us again, blame me for abusing her - which is funny in itself because while she was being abused by her husband the cops were not around. When they were called for help, on the stalking and assaults they would chuckle and make comments like "another domestic call". What a contrast, when there was a need "law enforcement" dismissed the event but when there is no need they are predatory, making up a situation, using questionable judgments.

Just how do they select these individuals ? I hear that potential "law enforcement" officers are subject to a battery of psychological tests and evaluations, who is doing the evaluating ? Torture advocates and those whose interpretation of the law reflecting the judgments and interpretations of Jay Scott Bybee and  John Yoo. That would explain why there is such a high percentage of bullies and thugs in "law enforcement".

If I was not "law" abiding our problems would have been solved a long time ago. On the third stalking event I considered dealing with the situation. If I had taken care of business, years of listening to a crusading attorney, corrupt representation, the cascade of events would not have happened.