The Crusade against Chattel (1989-1995)



Christian Soldier
The Christian Soldier - a master of a successful courtroom strategy - This is the "Christian Soldier" that I would want on my side, he did not let his clients character stop his crusade against the wife who was trying to escape from an abusive relationship. "Church of God" members showed up at the escaping wifes residence, they showed up in court. When they were not around the husband would lurk in the woods surrounding the wife's residence, employment and pounce assaulting or accosting her. This attorney brought the power of Church against an abused housewife with a grade school education, raised in foster homes + incidents, raped by her good Christian husband's friends as he watched and then these people forgot about the children.

If these "Christian Groups" and members of the "Church of God" are willing to defend a "cross dresser", "abuser", with a feloney record and a husband that declared that he was intending on turning into a woman then based on our experiences they must support:
We have here deception, obfuscation, denial and procrastination with this "Christian Soldier", which was which was impressive "strategy" - as an attorney he was awesome. This attorney epitomizes everything that identifies a successful modern attorney. Deceit is a great "strategy" it overcomes all barriers, it is like playing a chess game, making ones opponent look the other way and taking the queen. Damn the rules or laws the only thing that matters is the illusion, the image, the theater, why bother with facts like guilt and innocence, right or wrong, why bother with "morals" - good "strategy".
A Christian's Character - Why don't we look into this upstanding Christian's character, that was worthy of this attorney's crusade against a housewife. I stress again that since this individuals stalking stopped, we hope that he/she, whatever their choice finally was has gone on with their lives. The children are grown up and have survived with scars, but they are free now.

Here are some items that I observed and heard about over time:
  • I was told that this Christian, handcuffed his wife to the bed and gave her to his three friends as he watched. This was a topic in the period the husband's attorney excluded in his access of the wife's mental health records. The wife had asked her attorney to get a blood test of the child also, he did not try.
  • Terrorism of the family that provided sanctuary for the wife and child, the family was entertained by numerous phone calls from the husband, he would threaten to kill the wife and child, threaten the family, they were so concerned that they bought a .357 magnum revolver and filed an ineffectual restraining order. They too had children...
  • In one occasion the woman providing sanctuary tried to get the child out of the argument and this good father threw the child at the woman knocking her down.
  • I was told that on several occasions when the wife had gone to the woman's shelter the husband had found her and threatened them.
  • The wife was informed by her husband in a phone call while she was at a church camp, that he was intending on turning into a woman. The wife also found the doctors bill and asked that her attorney look into it, he did not.
  • The daughter informed me in an emotional conversation that her father molested her. The daughter could have been "playing" us, she was confused.
  • After his suicide attempt the mother finally got to talk to her son again. He stated that the good father barely noticed him after the divorce was final, the child also rebelled. The child claims to have gotten involved with gangs, allegedly one of them robbed my place when we trusted the son to watch it as we were on an attempt at a vacation.
  • This Christian attorney explained the pictures in the album away as being a "fetish". This was when the Judge hearing the case excluded the custody issue of the child because "they would not overrule the rulings of another judge". Making the current state of mind of the wife irrelevant to the divorce proceedings, as the only relevant information after the separation would be whether the mother was fit to care for the child. Guess this was another deception / lie for God as the exclusion was a direct omission of material, this is okay for an "officer of the court", but as a "Christian" claiming the high ground ?
  • We moved thirty miles away to a rather isolated area, with the mistaken belief that the husband could no longer use the coincidence excuse, for stalking - we were wrong.
  • When the wife tried to escape from this good husband, she got this crusader. She did not even have her clothes as her husband had stretched them out with his fetish.
  • This "Crusader" stated that he would destroy this mother/housewife if she did not return to her master, the claims of not being paid, implies that it was a "Crusade" not a professional "officer of the court", yet I cannot get over the images that I have of this attorneys client.
  • Adultry The wife told me that the husband had a child in Ohio by a woman that he had been having an affair with. I guess that "adultery" punishment only applies to women ?
Members of the "Church of God"  provided us with this little tidbit. Was this at the prompting of husbands attorney ?
One of the church members gave the wife this note along with another and a bunch of preaching. How was providing this note a "Christian" thing, by implication they were saying that the wife and mother should be "put to death (law)". What about the husband ?

Rather than judging these people should have supported both sides, tried to make it as painless for the family, especially the children as possible. Maybe they could have deterred the stalking, the assaults and stopped the alleged abuse of the daughter by the father - I seriously do not believe that they would have convinced the wife, to go back as she had already tried the "counseling" avenues.
I thought that "Christians" did not agree with individuals with gender issues, yet these works, demonstrates that I have been wrong. I see that this attorney is writing articles about the moral dilemmas of modern society and I remember his "strategy", the persecution of the housewife who was only trying to extract herself from an abusive relationship, who had sought counseling years prior to the separation. The lies and deceit that this Christian used to defend his client. This was a "Crusade" and how far was this individual willing to go on this crusade. Is this how "Christians" are supposed to keep a family together ? Through this individuals actions he destroyed the wife, who he considered chattel in favor of the husband. From "Good Christians" I would expect "support" for both individuals in such a predicament, even I tried to get the marriage back together till I observed this husband's character, the throwing of the child, knocking the woman down upset me, I wanted to go get the jerk right then, that was when sanctuary provider's boyfriend showed me their .357 magnum revolver they had purchased "just in case".

Since they like quotes from the Bible.... This attorney's strategy was effective, the courts believed him, "Church of God" members supported the Christian father. It was a shame that there was no compassion for the wife, the chattel.

One can only see these groups affiliated with the attorney as a great resource for those "men" that choose an alternate lifestyle after making a commitment to a marriage with children. This attorney will destroy the female "chattel", zealously defending the "rights" of the "Christian Brotherhood". The children do not matter as they too become casualties of this individuals "Crusade", discarded with the win. The mantra of these "Christians" is "obey, chattel or be destroyed, thou art slaves", in other words "on your knees bitch". I am still confused by these gender issues as depicted by the husband, just who would be the chattel if the husband succeeded in becoming a woman ? I will leave such questions to our crusader here since I can see from the articles he has written that he knows what he is talking about.

Given the depth of this individuals hatred for women we cannot wonder if we stepped into some "Christian Cult" with secret "Orders" where once one is on their lists one is screwed for life. Much like the current system where once you are on the "records" you cannot prove your innocence, one is presumed guilty.

After this "war" was over, the mother denied contact by the courts, with her minor son - where were these "zealots" for these children ?

This crusader, the Church of God and affiliated Christian organizations choose through the works that are being done an image of tolerance for those that choose complicated lifestyles.

Commonwealth Commentary Newsletter - the politics connection
Stop The ACLU Blogburst: Two ACLU Leaders Causing Harm in Virginia
Governor Gilmore Announces Appointments to Virginia Boards and Commissions
Latest victims are right here

Ironically the wife was the one going to church, but the betrayal of the church members demonstrated their true nature - "by their works". I have tried to get her interested in church for moral support, some sort of community, but going these "congregations" makes us both feel uncomfortable as we remember the depth of their betrayal. Now my girlfriend does her Bible through correspondence. I tried to get her to go to the church that sponsors her Bible Studies but distrust runs deep and I too am reluctant to participate in such activities.
Issues   Contact   BLOG Entries