Organizations and Crusades

I am a threat to society ?  This is ironic in that I haven't been in a fight since grade school, I have broken up a few and restrained a drunk once. Not even when I was in the Corps did I get in any fights. But I have been assaulted by the police twice, each time I caught them abusing their authority. So now there is probably flag set in my records that indicates that I am a "threat to society" worthy of being assaulted or shot on whim, everything can be made right by a notation on a report that will never be questioned. My girlfriend has a slight disorder, she will say the opposite of what she means, especially under stress, when she was assaulted by her husband in Reston and the police came she said that I had assaulted her, once she said that all the police would do was to confront me as to why I assaulted her. This disorder was why her mental health counselors were mandatory in defending her position, I also have this disorder too to a lesser extent but it ruins me in any "debate". Now I have a flag set that says that I "beat up cops", even though it was them beating on me on both occasions.

I see a cop I see a problem to be dealt with, not a solution to a problem. From our experiences if one calls the police the individual that called them becomes the cops problem, the solution for the officer is to neutralize their problem. Of course if you have been vandalized or robbed, they will tell you that it was just kids. If one's girlfriend or wife has been assaulted, is wounded or upset and a man is around these cops will accost the man, claiming that the woman is in denial. I have seen cops selling "controlled substances" to children, using their position to gain power, the current initiatives facilitate this behavior - if they were undercover why did everyone know who and what they were ? Of course my proof and witnesses are lost.

Then there was the concern that I had when this cop demanded my id without an explanation as I have known cops who profited from their position. When one gives up their Id they expose themselves to a possible hostile force, that now has knowledge of who they are, where they live and access to a social machine - no street criminal has that type of access. Without effective oversight as demonstrated by the manner in which they framed me they can get away with anything - I now have a record of being a "threat to society", "assaulting a cop" will I be shot in the "next event" ?

Integrity of the Profession   I question the ability of the Virginia State Bar to ensure the integrity of the profession. I cannot help but wonder at the diligence of their research into a complaint made by a client. Do these investigators just ask the offending member whether they "made note" of an action, like the bankruptcy trustee claimed when he looked into the "statute of limitations" malpractice issue ? In the report the trustee stated that the attorney whose performance was in question had made no note of our questioning a date and therefore no malpractice - shredder or in our case avoidance resulted in our questions not being noted. Does this type of dismissal ensure the integrity of the profession ?

I find this very upsetting as an American because this implementation does not ensure the integrity of the judicial process and as a result provides an environment for those with questionable motives. An infection where the host organism is no longer functional. Through obfuscation, "speaking in tongues" and avoidance the institution does not address the infection, instead it expects the damaged part to fight the raging infection, by suing. Because the part is damaged it cannot bring the resources necessary to effectively fight an already established infection.

Therefore those of us that are not rocket scientists are exposed to a predatory racket that harvests those that are in need. Either ours is a personal problem and we are being discriminated against or no one can be expect to have competent representation, even if one does get a "partner" in noted law firm, their goals may not be their clients, the client gets sacrificed and when complaint is made it is disregarded because the member is reputable - the client is the liar.

This is the information age, it seems like everyone is being held accountable for each and every event in their lives - ignorance of the law is no excuse. Here we have a population that process their clients without concern for "quality" of service, I am curious as to the practice collecting money from a client and then sacrificing them based on convenience, theft is a profitable "strategy". Obfuscation is easy with this profession, providing that the right papers are filled out, the illusion is maintained after all one cannot control the whimsy of a judge or a jury so try proving the omission of material is not "strategy" when a complaint is filed. To "prove" anything the context of the case has to be reviewed. Would doctors treating a patient for anxiety have supported a client in a "medical impairment" defense of "prescription fraud" charge ? Presuming that the attorney was correct and Virginia courts are "Kangaroo Courts", as a professional I would be curious as an "officer of the court", to whether the client was right and was framed. Accepting that the Virginia courts are corrupt, the prosecutors deal mitigated the damage of a biased judge - this is what I thought after hearing the attorneys comments. But the video would have remained and "assault", "framing" citizens and intentionally misleading the courts are crimes - so where was this attorney/officer of the court.

The Bar expects that the damaged parties regulate their membership, since the damaged party may be bankrupt because of this members "indiscretion" another's crusade and when attempts are made to obtain counsel an argument ensues, the "strategy" excuse is presented - to which I respond "yes dear, it was good strategy to sacrifice a client for political or personal gain, just not good for the client".

Without a documented foundation to "sue" a member of the Bar, such as a standing complaint by the institution that "certifies" their membership, a damaged client is laughed at by other members when they try to sue as dictated by this "Bar". The offending member goes on to do it again and again. Part of this laughter has a foundation that the member is approached by a "bankrupt" client who is requesting that they address a complicated case that is outside their financial scope. Such was the laughter we got when we tried to address the CVS representation and mention was made of our previous concerns abuse of process and deserting attorney issues, all good "strategy".   ha ha ha ha silly client cried wolf again..

How many clients were screwed in this manner by these attorneys ? How deep is this "political" infection ? If the "Bar" does not address "strategy" then how many clients have been screwed just because their attorney did not bother to engage and were so damaged, bankrupt that they could not "address" ? How many clients were laughed at because they believed in the lie "innocent till proven guilty" ? Is this how these members treat those that are not "clients of choice" ?

Attorney Malpractice   Lets look at suing an attorney for malpractice, if one is lucky enough to obtain an attorney that would not laugh at the individual for actually suggesting such a thing against another member. Lets look at one of the most heinous betrayals that we experienced, it does not matter whether this attorney was distracted by politics, lacked skill or was not motivated by the clients case - their client was not one of choice. Mr. A. Strode Brent was hired September 6, 1990, fired June 25, 1992 because of failed service, Ms. Judy A. Dugger was busy trying to "fix" the damage caused by Mr. A. Strode Brent to the case. Damage control took Ms. Judy A. Dugger till 1995, well past a "malpractice" charge. Now when a damaged client is expected to address "strategy malpractice" issues I remember this case, we too can laugh, the Virginia State Bar membership is protected and the client harvested, a good strategy, a good racket.