1. General. All the lane-use signals discussed in TFGAP-U are intended for long stretches, perhaps kilometers, of roadway. A left-turn arrow, for instance, regulates drivers turning left at any cross street or driveway in the controlled region. On urban surface streets there can be multiple intersections in the span between successive signals over a lane.
Altogether different are the widely-used lane-control (as opposed to lane-use) signs near intersections; one familiar example reads RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT while other examples use arrow symbols. The MUTCD describes the signs starting at section 2B.20 and the related pavement markings in section 3B.19. Important to remember is that these signs and markings pertain to motorists approaching one particular intersection, and their regulatory effect on a driver expires as soon as she clears that intersection.
Lane-control management is simpler than lane-use management because with lane control there is no concern with reversible lanes or the two-way left-turn lane.
2. Signals. In congested areas, lane control is sometimes handled not by signs but by special lights, roughly similar to lane-use signals, mounted over the center of each lane to be controlled. Signals are installed in order that lane control can be changed throughout the day. For example, a three-lane approach to some busy intersection might be configured as follows.
Because lane-control and lane-use signaling are different, they should use different symbols. Signals similar to the following are already in use in some areas. They mimic many of the standard signs used for this purpose, except that the signs most frequently have a black arrow on a white background.
These lane-control signals are black and white to provide ample contrast with the standard red-yellow-green signals that are likely installed to govern right of way at the intersection proper. Any intersection carrying enough traffic to justify changeable lane control in its approaches probably has enough volume to warrant a right-of-way signal, so it is important that motorists be able to tell the difference.
Additionally, lane-control management arrows differ from lane-use management arrows in color and shape, as discussed in TFGAP-U. Still, it may not be wise to use both categories of signal in the same section of highway (lane-use for general regulation and lane-control for special cases near intersections) because the combination could well have an interpretation too complicated for drivers in heavy traffic to sort out.
3. First Version of Display Sequence. A primitive attempt at signaling the schedule in the bulleted list above might show these lights over the three lanes:
| Table One. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step Number | Nature | Left Lane | Center Lane | Right Lane |
| 1 | Morning |
|
|
|
| 2 | Mid-day |
|
|
|
| 3 | Evening |
|
|
|
| 4 | Overnight |
|
|
|
| Return to step one. | ||||
It turns out that this simple plan has weaknesses. Some motorists will react more quickly than others to a change in signal; but when a light changes, even the most alert and prudent driver may have passed the point where she can redirect her vehicle in accordance with the limitations imposed by the new signal. That is why clearance intervals must be included in the sequencing of lane-control signals.
4. Implicit Clearance. Sometimes two lane-control movements cannot be used at the same time because of conflicts in vehicle paths: for instance, cars turning left from the center lane would collide with vehicles in the left lane going straight. While no planner would ever schedule these two movements simultaneously, there is still a danger if they occur in immediate succession. Because no clearance interval is included in the conversion from morning to mid-day in the table one, the following scenario could unfold, all within the space of a minute:
5. Second Version of Display Sequence. To remedy this issue is needed a more highly articulated schedule, with implicit clearance intervals, as displayed in table two. (Another kind of clearance, explicit, will be introduced later.)
| Table Two. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step Number | Nature | Left Lane | Center Lane | Right Lane | Comments |
| 1 | Morning |
|
|
| Add left turn to center lane (from last step). |
| Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| Remove left turn from center lane. | |
| 2 | Mid-day |
|
|
| Add straight movement to left lane. |
| Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| Remove straight movement from right lane. | |
| 3 | Evening |
|
|
| Change center lane from straight to right. |
| Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| Change center lane from right to straight. | |
| 4 | Overnight |
|
|
| Add straight movement to right lane. |
| Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| Remove straight movement from left lane. | |
| Return to step one. | |||||
An estimate is that the clearance interval should last through about three cycles of the red-yellow-green signals of the intersection proper, or approximately five minutes.
Implicit clearance is not necessary when some capacity of a lane is to be ended, and no conflicting movement from another lane is to begin.
While implicit clearance solves a safety problem, another matter remains as detailed in the next section.
6. Explicit Clearance. Suppose that step C of the five-step scenario above is changed, and motorist "X" does notice the changing of the lane-control signal, but only after she is stopped at the edge of the intersection. Through no fault of her own she is now in the wrong lane to complete her left turn, and her realization of what has happened may foster contempt for "unfair" traffic signals.
This problem can be addressed by adding explicit lane-control clearance signals, in the form of a flashing arrow, for a movement that will be prohibited in a few minutes. This tells a motorist already in the lane to continue, and it warns drivers who are still early in their approach that they should seek some other lane.
7. Third Version of Display Sequence. The fully developed schedule appears in the table below. Flashing signals can be implemented with two alternating images, although animations of greater sophistication are possible.
| Table Three. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step Number | Nature | Left Lane | Center Lane | Right Lane | Comments |
| 1 | Morning |
|
|
| Add left turn to center lane (from step 4b). |
| 1a | Explicit Clearance |
| ![]() Alternating |
| Remove left turn from center lane. |
| 1b | Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| |
| 2 | Mid-day |
|
|
| Add straight movement to left lane. |
| 2a | Explicit Clearance |
|
| ![]() Alternating | Remove straight movement from right lane. |
| 2b | Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| |
| 2c | Conversion |
|
|
| Add right turn to center lane. |
| 2d | Explicit Clearance |
| ![]() Alternating |
| Remove straight movement from center lane. |
| 3 | Evening |
|
|
| If the right turn were also being added to the left lane, this step would be preceded by an implicit phase for clearance of the straight movement in the center lane. |
| 3a | Conversion |
|
|
| Add straight movement to center lane. |
| 3b | Explicit Clearance |
| ![]() Alternating |
| Remove right turn from center lane. |
| 3c | Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| |
| 4 | Overnight |
|
|
| Add straight movement to right lane. |
| 4a | Explicit Clearance | ![]() Alternating |
|
| Remove straight movement from left lane. |
| 4b | Implicit Clearance |
|
|
| |
| Return to step one. | |||||
While this plan may seem complicated, the reader should bear in mind that at any moment motorists will see only those signals that they need to see -- in other words exactly one row of the table. Hence only the engineers need worry about the volume of detail.
Here is a brief summary of the difference between the two types of clearance phases.
8. A Subtle Safety Problem. Consider, from table three, these two steps:
| Table Three extract. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2b |
|
|
|
| 2c |
|
|
|
Even with a comprehensive schedule of clearance phases, things can still go wrong. In the following scenario, two motorists on Ash Street plan to turn right onto Beech Street, which has multiple lanes.
What happens instead if in step B of the scenario Motorist "X" does notice the signal change? She can make her right turn into the right lane and avoid the crash, but once on Beech Street she may be unable to change lanes in time for her left turn onto Cherry Street. Although she can drive around the block and try again, she will no doubt become perturbed at being "stuck" in the wrong lane despite having observed the signals.
Not apparent is any practical way to prevent this problem, which is inherent to changes of lane control. Mitigative is that these crashes would involve low-speed vehicles moving in nearly parallel paths, thus the probability of injury or major damage would be slight, and the overall risk would be low. On the other hand, changeable lane control is implemented only where traffic is very heavy to begin with, so any collision that does occur is likely to result in backups throughout the area, which can generate further "fender benders".
In any case, two actions can reduce this hazard:
As always, no use of motor vehicles is perfectly safe, and drivers accept this as a part of the price of automotive convenience.