TFGAP Lane-Control Signals.
Version of 15 October 2005.
Dave Barber.
TFGAP-A

1. General. All the lane-use signals discussed in TFGAP-U are intended for long stretches, perhaps kilometers, of roadway. A left-turn arrow, for instance, regulates drivers turning left at any cross street or driveway in the controlled region. On urban surface streets there can be multiple intersections in the span between successive signals over a lane.

Altogether different are the widely-used lane-control (as opposed to lane-use) signs near intersections; one familiar example reads RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT while other examples use arrow symbols. The MUTCD describes the signs starting at section 2B.20 and the related pavement markings in section 3B.19. Important to remember is that these signs and markings pertain to motorists approaching one particular intersection, and their regulatory effect on a driver expires as soon as she clears that intersection.

Lane-control management is simpler than lane-use management because with lane control there is no concern with reversible lanes or the two-way left-turn lane.

2. Signals. In congested areas, lane control is sometimes handled not by signs but by special lights, roughly similar to lane-use signals, mounted over the center of each lane to be controlled. Signals are installed in order that lane control can be changed throughout the day. For example, a three-lane approach to some busy intersection might be configured as follows.

If a fixed schedule is satisfactory, this arrangement can be achieved with signs, albeit complicated ones. On the other hand, signals can react dynamically to varying traffic counts, and they simplify driver decisions by showing only the regulations currently in effect, and not those for other times of day.

Because lane-control and lane-use signaling are different, they should use different symbols. Signals similar to the following are already in use in some areas. They mimic many of the standard signs used for this purpose, except that the signs most frequently have a black arrow on a white background.

These lane-control signals are black and white to provide ample contrast with the standard red-yellow-green signals that are likely installed to govern right of way at the intersection proper. Any intersection carrying enough traffic to justify changeable lane control in its approaches probably has enough volume to warrant a right-of-way signal, so it is important that motorists be able to tell the difference.

Additionally, lane-control management arrows differ from lane-use management arrows in color and shape, as discussed in TFGAP-U. Still, it may not be wise to use both categories of signal in the same section of highway (lane-use for general regulation and lane-control for special cases near intersections) because the combination could well have an interpretation too complicated for drivers in heavy traffic to sort out.

3. First Version of Display Sequence. A primitive attempt at signaling the schedule in the bulleted list above might show these lights over the three lanes:

Table One.
Step
Number
Nature Left
Lane
Center
Lane
Right
Lane
1Morning
2Mid-day
3Evening
4Overnight
Return to step one.

It turns out that this simple plan has weaknesses. Some motorists will react more quickly than others to a change in signal; but when a light changes, even the most alert and prudent driver may have passed the point where she can redirect her vehicle in accordance with the limitations imposed by the new signal. That is why clearance intervals must be included in the sequencing of lane-control signals.

4. Implicit Clearance. Sometimes two lane-control movements cannot be used at the same time because of conflicts in vehicle paths: for instance, cars turning left from the center lane would collide with vehicles in the left lane going straight. While no planner would ever schedule these two movements simultaneously, there is still a danger if they occur in immediate succession. Because no clearance interval is included in the conversion from morning to mid-day in the table one, the following scenario could unfold, all within the space of a minute:

  1. The traffic light at this intersection turns red.
  2. Motorist "X", who plans to turn left, approaches the intersection a moment before the morning phase ends. Seeing that the left turn will be permitted from the center lane, she moves into that lane and waits at the stop bar for a green light.
  3. The lane-control signal changes directly from the morning settings to the mid-day settings, without a clearance period. However, motorist "X", who is looking around the intersection, does not notice the change.
  4. Motorist "Y", who plans to go straight, now approaches the intersection and moves into the left lane because she sees the mid-day signal permitting left-lane drivers to go straight. She, too, stops at the red light.
  5. The light turns green and both drivers proceed. Motorist "X", who is turning left from the center lane, collides with motorist "Y", who is going straight in the left lane.

5. Second Version of Display Sequence. To remedy this issue is needed a more highly articulated schedule, with implicit clearance intervals, as displayed in table two. (Another kind of clearance, explicit, will be introduced later.)

Table Two.
Step
Number
Nature Left
Lane
Center
Lane
Right
Lane
Comments
1Morning Add left turn to center lane (from last step).
Implicit
Clearance
Remove left turn from center lane.
2Mid-day Add straight movement to left lane.
Implicit
Clearance
Remove straight movement from right lane.
3Evening Change center lane from straight to right.
Implicit
Clearance
Change center lane from right to straight.
4Overnight Add straight movement to right lane.
Implicit
Clearance
Remove straight movement from left lane.
Return to step one.

An estimate is that the clearance interval should last through about three cycles of the red-yellow-green signals of the intersection proper, or approximately five minutes.

Implicit clearance is not necessary when some capacity of a lane is to be ended, and no conflicting movement from another lane is to begin.

While implicit clearance solves a safety problem, another matter remains as detailed in the next section.

6. Explicit Clearance. Suppose that step C of the five-step scenario above is changed, and motorist "X" does notice the changing of the lane-control signal, but only after she is stopped at the edge of the intersection. Through no fault of her own she is now in the wrong lane to complete her left turn, and her realization of what has happened may foster contempt for "unfair" traffic signals.

This problem can be addressed by adding explicit lane-control clearance signals, in the form of a flashing arrow, for a movement that will be prohibited in a few minutes. This tells a motorist already in the lane to continue, and it warns drivers who are still early in their approach that they should seek some other lane.

7. Third Version of Display Sequence. The fully developed schedule appears in the table below. Flashing signals can be implemented with two alternating images, although animations of greater sophistication are possible.

Table Three.
Step
Number
Nature Left
Lane
Center
Lane
Right
Lane
Comments
1Morning Add left turn to center lane (from step 4b).
1aExplicit
Clearance
 
Alternating
Remove left turn from center lane.
1bImplicit
Clearance
2Mid-day Add straight movement to left lane.
2aExplicit
Clearance
 
Alternating
Remove straight movement from right lane.
2bImplicit
Clearance
2cConversion Add right turn to center lane.
2dExplicit
Clearance
 
Alternating
Remove straight movement from center lane.
3Evening If the right turn were also being added to the left lane, this step would be preceded by an implicit phase for clearance of the straight movement in the center lane.
3aConversion Add straight movement to center lane.
3bExplicit
Clearance
 
Alternating
Remove right turn from center lane.
3cImplicit
Clearance
4Overnight Add straight movement to right lane.
4aExplicit
Clearance
 
Alternating
Remove straight movement from left lane.
4bImplicit
Clearance
Return to step one.

While this plan may seem complicated, the reader should bear in mind that at any moment motorists will see only those signals that they need to see -- in other words exactly one row of the table. Hence only the engineers need worry about the volume of detail.

Here is a brief summary of the difference between the two types of clearance phases.

  • Explicit:
  • Implicit:

    8. A Subtle Safety Problem. Consider, from table three, these two steps:

    Table Three extract.
    2b
    2c

    Even with a comprehensive schedule of clearance phases, things can still go wrong. In the following scenario, two motorists on Ash Street plan to turn right onto Beech Street, which has multiple lanes.

    1. Motorist "X", who is approaching on Ash, sees the lane-control signals of step 2b at the intersection of Beech. She plans to make a right turn, so she moves into the right lane. However, she intends to make that right turn into the left lane of Beech Street because she wants to turn left from Beech onto Cherry Street only a few dozen meters beyond this intersection.
    2. The lane-control signal changes from 2b to 2c, but motorist "X" does not notice this.
    3. Motorist "Y" now approaches on Ash and opts to use the center lane for her right turn onto Beech. She, too, wants to turn into the left lane.
    4. The right-of-way light changes to green.
    5. Simultaneously, motorists "X" and "Y" attempt to make right turns into the left lane of Beech Street. They collide.

    What happens instead if in step B of the scenario Motorist "X" does notice the signal change? She can make her right turn into the right lane and avoid the crash, but once on Beech Street she may be unable to change lanes in time for her left turn onto Cherry Street. Although she can drive around the block and try again, she will no doubt become perturbed at being "stuck" in the wrong lane despite having observed the signals.

    Not apparent is any practical way to prevent this problem, which is inherent to changes of lane control. Mitigative is that these crashes would involve low-speed vehicles moving in nearly parallel paths, thus the probability of injury or major damage would be slight, and the overall risk would be low. On the other hand, changeable lane control is implemented only where traffic is very heavy to begin with, so any collision that does occur is likely to result in backups throughout the area, which can generate further "fender benders".

    In any case, two actions can reduce this hazard:

    As always, no use of motor vehicles is perfectly safe, and drivers accept this as a part of the price of automotive convenience.