• Coordinate all
components of the curriculum around a weekly scientific
theme.
• Increase integration of physicians into focus topic
sessions.
To date, we have no
data on the redesigned curriculum; we anticipate generating
data about the students’ competencies at mid-course and the
end of the course in the summer of 2005.
Key lessons learned so far and next
steps
•Set clear
objectives for the students.
•
•Coordinate
assignments for FMM, journal club and lab experiences.
•
•Place emphasis on
scientific content.
•
•Integrate the focus
topic sessions, problem solving sessions and journal club
with the scientific theme of the week.
•
•Continued faculty
development is necessary to help faculty teach in a
student-centered interactive manner versus lectures.
•
•Evaluate student
competencies of professionalism, communication, medical
knowledge in basic sciences, and personal development.
•
•Make the clinical
presentations patient-centered instead of
physician-centered.
•
•Have full-time
scientific facilitators in each student group.
•
•Eliminate the
student presentations; use the time allotted for the
presentations for additional problem solving time.
•
•When breaking up
the students into smaller groups, make sure that the faculty
are equally competent.
•
•Change the focus of
the focus topic session previously entitled “gene search”
from being specifically identified as genomics to
more broadly encompassing bioinformatics.
Questions
Is the assessment
method sufficient to determine if the various
competencies are being met?
Is the level of
faculty development sufficient to ensure the correct
method of presentation?
If not, how do we get faculty to comply?
How do we ensure
faculty participation when there is no additional
compensation or no repercussions if faculty do not
participate?