Project Objectives
1)The creation of 6 OSTE
Stations designed to assess teaching skills focused on in-patient
geriatric medicine content.
2)The design of procedures for training standardized learners
using a cadre of 4th year
medical students, senior residents and geriatric fellows as standardized
learners
3)The creation of assessment forms for the standardized learners
to use for assessment
4)The creation of self-assessment procedures for Faculty-Learners
5)The creation of Pre and Post OSTE-Module measures for use in
the initial phase of Geriatrics OSTE-Module evaluation
OSTE Station
Logistics
-
•Setting—Clinical
Performance Center (CPC) University of Chicago
-
•All OSTE’s video-taped for Faculty-Learner Self-Assessment
-
•OSTE’s will allow Faculty-Learner to practice encounter 2
times per station
Bedside OSTE 1st Time
Through (5 min.)
Video Self Assessment & SL-Feedback (10 min.)
Bedside OSTE 2nd Time
Through (5 min.)
Video Self-Assessment & SL-Feedback (10 min.)
-
•Standardized Students Trained by PI and CPC Coordinator
and SP-Trainer
•
OSTE Station Content
-
1)Geriatric
Medicine Content
- Incident Delirium in the
Hospitalized Older Adult
-
•Inappropriate Use of Foley Catheters
- Assessing Decision Making
Capacity
-
•Polypharmacy & Drug-Drug Interactions
-
•Discussing Advance Directives
-
•Assessment & Treatment of Pressure Ulcers
2.
Teaching Skills Content
a) Bed-side or Door-side Teaching
One-Minute Preceptor Micro-Skills
Probe for Supporting Evidence
Reinforce What Was Done Right
Correct Mistakes
b)
Conference Room Teaching
Case Audit Method
Census Audit Method
OSTE
Scripts (Example)
Case:
Work Rounds--Delirium in a Hospitalized Older Adult
Learning
Objectives:
1) The
faculty-learner will articulate one or more options for a
Teachable Moment.
2) The
faculty-learner will demonstrate the 5 Micro-Skills of the
One-Minute Preceptor Model during the door-side encounter.
3) The
faculty-learner will identify one skill step for improvement
after Video Self-Assessment and Feedback 1.
4) The
faculty-learner will practice the encounter again, trying a
different approach to the skill-step identified above.
Setting: Work
Rounds--Outside Patient’s Room
Cast: Attending
(Learner), Senior Resident , 2 Interns, 3rd Year Medical
Student
[The
Intern is
opening chart and looking at vital signs, with student and
resident looking on]
Attdg: OK
Holly, so what’s going on with Mr. Jones this morning?
The Intern
[Turning to Attending]: Right, so this is our
86 year old man with Parkinson’s, admitted with an
aspiration pneumonia and change in mental status.
He also has a
history of CAD, dementia and diabetes.
We’ve been broadly covering him and using a sliding
scale for his diabetes.
X-cover was called again last night about another
confusion episode…he was trying to pull out his Foley, so
they gave him a milligram of Ativan and ordered a posey,
mitts and prn soft restraints.
They didn’t get called again, so he apparently did
fine the rest of the night.
This morning he’s a bit lethargic, but really doesn’t
seem to far off his base-line, I guess.
He’s been doing generally well.
He’s been afebrile for 24-hours and seems to be back
to his baseline.
Today he’s 36.7
140/65 84
20 and 96% on RA.
He seems to be sundowning.
Perhaps we should put him on some standing Haldol or
resperidone.
Resident:
[To Intern] I’m not sure that Ativan was really the
right choice last night by the cross-cover; I agree Haldol
is better. The
benzo’s are associated with delirium and delirious patients
always do worse and end up staying longer.
The last thing we want to do to him or us is to turn
this poor old guy into a rock—the sooner we get him back
home the better.
Student: You
said he was sundowning? [To Attending] I’m sorry but
I’m not real clear about what exactly that means?
Assessment Instruments* to be Used by Standardized
Learner: Example
Bedside Teaching--Skill 5: Correct Mistakes
* Adapted with permission
from Morrison EH, et al. Reliability and Validity of an
Objective Structured Teaching Examination for Generalist
Teachers. Acad. Med.2002;77(10):S29-S32
This work was partially
funded by the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation