The CE4 Corner

The Cosmic Bridge, Close Encounters and Human Destiny

by Craig R. Lang, Certified Hypnotherapist

 


Hypnotic Growth, Exploration and Healing for Mind, Body, Spirit and Beyond

Brooklyn Center, MN  763-257-7334  e-mail: craig@craigrlang.com

Cosmic Bridge Home About the Bridge Read a Chapter Contact Craig Order 'Bridge' Books, CDs and More Links The CE4 Corner Hypnosis Homepage Upcoming Events

 

November/December, 2007: Evidence and Agendas, Notes from the Area 61 Conference in Duluth, MN

©2007 by Craig R Lang, MS CHt

 

This was the second year I have presented at the Duluth, MN conference, the Area 61 UFO Convention (on Hwy 61 north of Duluth - no, it's not a typo for Area 51) on Saturday Oct 20th. The conference is put on by Jim and Allen Richardson, each year in October. This year, just like last year, it was a pleasant gathering, about 50 people (my estimate). I had a book table set up at the back of the room (thank you Jim and Allen for inviting me to do this), and as a result, I got to talk to quite a few people in the UFO community - experiencers, investigators and simply interested parties. What a fascinating day! And I even sold a few books... J

 

The Richardson brothers are both advocates of the Earthlights theory, and tend to be more skeptical of the E.T. Hypothesis. This made for an interesting series of discussions and a fascinating afternoon. The first two talks were by the Richardsons themselves. One was on Earthlights (and to some extent, arguing against the E.T. school of thought). The next was on cryptocritters, including legends of a lake monster in Lake Superior. Then it was time for yours truly to talk.

 

My talk was on UFO sightings in Minnesota and Wisconsin - a combination of several previous talks at MarsCon, the Winona conference, etc., with a bunch of new material on local cases. I also updated my discussion of the abduction signs and indicators. As always, this resulted in a number of raised eyebrows - mostly from people who recognized such signs in their own lives.

 

After my talk, several people whom I suspected might be experiencers came over to my book table. I got to talking with several of them, hearing a number of stories about UFO sightings, abductions, and other anomalies. Also, several other people approached me about doing work on various healing topics, such as weight loss, fear management, etc. Most of them live in the Duluth area, however, which is a bit of a drive to Minneapolis. Thus, when the work time arrives, I suspect that Saturdays will become a wee-bit busier.

 

Usually, the discussion came back, once again, to the topic of the alien nature and agenda. What is the phenomenon doing? Who/What are the Visitors and why are they here? I have always had to make it clear that I certainly do not know the answer. I do not believe that anyone else does either. In The Cosmic Bridge, I talk about a few possible ideas - namely the Nature Preserve metaphor, the Indigo Hypothesis, the Deardorff model, and a few others. Yet in my view, there are far too many unknowns to draw any firm conclusions. We simply know too little about the phenomenon.

 

The final speaker was a ghost hunter from Northern Minnesota (his name escapes me at the moment) talking about various exploits in cemeteries, haunted houses, etc. He described some fascinating paranormal mysteries in the region. While I have never been actively interested in ghost research, the topic does intrigue me, so this lecture really tickled my curiosity.

He had some interesting comments to make about orbs, specifically that some of them have been detected with film cameras. The key here, however, is that the cameras were film-based, rather than digital. His comments were that from an evidential point of view, digital cameras are nearly worthless, since the evidence cannot be scrutinized. However, film photography leaves negatives which are available (presumably) to investigators. Ultimately, he stated that what counts is the evidence.

 

How, I wondered, does this apply to close encounter research? In truth, I believe that it applies in a big way(!!!). In anomaly investigation, evidence is the Holy Grail, and yet in my research, it is almost unattainable. I deal with anecdotal accounts of events that occurred many years previously. They are those flickers of memory, meaningful and informative, so tantalizing in their suggestion that there is so much more we do not yet understand - and so much that we cannot (yet) prove.

 

The biggest issue in close encounters, as in any other scientific research, is how we can characterize, quantify and measure a phenomenon. How can we develop ways of capturing verifiable evidence for CE4 events? Is there any way to do this? How does one quantify an alien agenda? And how does one measure a superposition of realities? Again, I don't know, but I believe that there are things we CAN do to gather evidence of the phenomenon.

 

Some possible avenues of research come to mind:

1.    Continue to collect and catalog ground traces left from UFO touch-downs.

2.    Set evidence traps - ways in which the Visitors may betray their presence, such as through the use of hidden cameras, placing aluminum foil under throw rugs in the bedroom, the abductee carrying a personal GPS device, etc.

3.    Measurement of physical phenomena associated with encounters, such as paranormal fallout. Are there electromagnetic anomalies associated with an abduction experience? Does the abductee have unusual EM characteristics, especially in the short time after she/he returns from an encounter?

4.    (Continue to) Develop means of measuring PSI ability, and construct a baseline of data about the experiencer and the non-experiencer. Does PSI ability vary between the two groups, and/or vary either before or after an encounter?

5.    Examine the family lines of experiencers for genetic or other medical anomalies. Are Indigo children more common in the family lines of abductees? And what does this imply about their genetics, etc.?

 

It would be easy to brainstorm a myriad more such experiments, and I invite anyone to send more ideas, either to myself or to other researchers. As a hypnotherapist, I tend to focus on the mental, emotional, spiritual and metaphysical aspects of the phenomenon. I would hope to see more research out there, focusing on physical evidence of the mystery.

 

I have lots of other notes from that afternoon, but for the moment, these cover the bases of the talks and discussions. To me, once again, the whole afternoon/evening simply drove home the diversity of opinion on the phenomenon, and how strange it really is.

As I have stated so many times before, I believe we really know very little about close encounters. The only thing I can truly conclude is that UFO and CE4 researchers have a whole lot of work to do.

 


 

Bio:   Craig R. Lang is a field investigator with Mutual UFO Network, and is a certified clinical hypnotherapist with the National Guild of Hypnotists.  He lives in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, and conducts UFO and close encounter research in the Twin Cities metro area of Minneapolis and Saint Paul and in surrounding areas within Minnesota and Wisconsin.  He can be reached by e-mail at craig@craigrlang.com.  The Minnesota MUFON website can be reached at www.mnmufon.org.

 

 

Join My Mailing List:

I invite you to sign up for my new Mailing List News from the Bridge.

Receive  the latest info on hypnosis and hypnotherapy, UFO research , and the close encounter experience.

 

Enter your name and email address below:

Name:
Email:

Subscribe  Unsubscribe
 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Back

 

Cosmic Bridge Home About the Bridge Read a Chapter Contact Craig Order 'Bridge' Books, CDs and More Links The CE4 Corner Hypnosis Homepage Upcoming Events